{"id":14626,"date":"2009-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-28T09:34:10","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T04:04:10","slug":"chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 2591 of 2009(H)\n\n\n1. CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BHARGAVI AMMA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. VIJAYA KUMAR,\n\n3. PADMAKUMAR,\n\n4. GOPALAN NAIR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :28\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n               K.P. Balachandran, J.\n            --------------------------\n             W.P.(C)No.2591 of 2009 H\n            --------------------------\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.29\/04 on<\/p>\n<p>the file of the Munsiff&#8217;s Court, Haripad.        He<\/p>\n<p>instituted the said suit against the respondents<\/p>\n<p>for fixation of boundary, for permanent prohibitory<\/p>\n<p>injunction  as  also   for  mandatory   injunction.<\/p>\n<p>Another suit O.S.No.46\/04 was filed by defendants 1<\/p>\n<p>and  3  in  O.S.No.29\/04  against  the  petitioner\/<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff for declaration of prescriptive easement<\/p>\n<p>right of way. A counter claim was also advanced in<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.29\/04 aforesaid.  The two cases were being<\/p>\n<p>jointly tried treating O.S.No.29\/04 as the leading<\/p>\n<p>case.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.   In the course of trial, the petitioner\/<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff  filed  a   commission  application   for<\/p>\n<p>measurement of the properties with the assistance<\/p>\n<p>of a surveyor.  The prayer was to measure out the<\/p>\n<p>properties on the basis of partition Deed No.655\/<\/p>\n<p>1104 M.E. of Sub Registry Office, Karthikappally.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 2591\/09              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Respondents also requested the court to ascertain<\/p>\n<p>matters, which they set out in their objections<\/p>\n<p>filed to the commission application. The trial<\/p>\n<p>court allowed that prayer.  The Commissioner filed<\/p>\n<p>a report wherein, he has stated that even though<\/p>\n<p>the old survey plan regarding plaint A, B and C<\/p>\n<p>schedule properties was produced before him, that<\/p>\n<p>was not a sub division plan and therefore, he could<\/p>\n<p>not measure out the properties on the basis of old<\/p>\n<p>survey plan and that therefore, he measured out the<\/p>\n<p>properties on the basis of re-survey plan. He also<\/p>\n<p>expressed his inability to measure out the property<\/p>\n<p>on the basis of the old survey plan.  However, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner filed an application (I.A. No.486\/08) to<\/p>\n<p>set aside the commission report. It was alleged<\/p>\n<p>therein that the Commissioner refused to measure<\/p>\n<p>out the properties on the basis of old survey plan<\/p>\n<p>even though such a plan was produced before the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 2591\/09                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     3.    The court below observed that there is no<\/p>\n<p>serious allegation regarding measurement of the<\/p>\n<p>properties based on re-survey plan and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>without setting aside the commission report, he<\/p>\n<p>directed    the  Commissioner  to  measure  out  the<\/p>\n<p>properties on the basis of old survey plan and<\/p>\n<p>partition deed and ascertain items 1 to 4 mentioned<\/p>\n<p>in I.A.No.1113\/06. Accordingly, the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>filed another supplementary report wherein also, he<\/p>\n<p>expressed his inability to locate the properties on<\/p>\n<p>the basis of old survey plan.    The court below was<\/p>\n<p>of   the    view  that   the  stand  taken   by  the<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner is true. The trial court, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>disallowed the request to set aside that report as<\/p>\n<p>well and observed that he is not prepared to direct<\/p>\n<p>the   Commissioner  to  do  an  impossible  act  and<\/p>\n<p>dismissed    the   application  for   remitting  the<\/p>\n<p>commission report again. It was also observed that<\/p>\n<p>both the cases are ripe for trial and are included<\/p>\n<p>for trial in the special list to 4.2.2009 and that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 2591\/09                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>at the time of trial, if the petitioner\/plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>succeeds in producing more evidence to show that it<\/p>\n<p>is possible to locate the properties on the basis<\/p>\n<p>of old survey plan, his prayer for measuring out<\/p>\n<p>the properties on the basis of old survey plan will<\/p>\n<p>be   considered    at   that   stage.  It   is   being<\/p>\n<p>dissatisfied with the said order, dismissing I.A.<\/p>\n<p>No.1688\/08,     that  the   petitioner\/plaintiff   has<\/p>\n<p>approached this Court seeking to have Exhibit P15<\/p>\n<p>order set aside and to direct the court below to<\/p>\n<p>appoint a new Commissioner for ascertaining the<\/p>\n<p>matters requested for in Exhibit P3 application and<\/p>\n<p>also to prepare a report and plan in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with old survey plan with the assistance of a Taluk<\/p>\n<p>surveyor.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    It is vehemently contended before me by the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner that Exhibits<\/p>\n<p>P11 and P12 are sub division plans as per old<\/p>\n<p>survey numbers and that the Commissioner could have<\/p>\n<p>relied on on those sub division plans for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 2591\/09               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>purpose of measuring out the properties as per old<\/p>\n<p>survey plan.   It is seen that both, in Exhibits P11<\/p>\n<p>and P12, the Assistant Director of Survey and Land<\/p>\n<p>Records, Central Survey office, Thiruvananthapuram<\/p>\n<p>has endorsed that those are copies prepared during<\/p>\n<p>the year 1959 by the concerned officials of Survey<\/p>\n<p>Department, but not authenticated to be correct and<\/p>\n<p>that    for  verifying  with   the  originals,   the<\/p>\n<p>originals are not available now. Such being the<\/p>\n<p>endorsement on Exhibits P11 and P12, it is futile<\/p>\n<p>to contend that measurement as per old survey plan<\/p>\n<p>and sub division sketch should have been made on<\/p>\n<p>the basis of Exhibits P11 and P12 survey plans.<\/p>\n<p>There is, thus, no merit in advancing a contention<\/p>\n<p>that the commission report has to be set aside and<\/p>\n<p>that a fresh commission has to be issued when the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are not able to furnish or cause to be<\/p>\n<p>produced any plan in relation to the properties as<\/p>\n<p>per old survey plan.   However, the court below has<\/p>\n<p>observed    that at  the  time  of  trial,  if   the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 2591\/09               6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>plaintiff succeeds in producing more evidence to<\/p>\n<p>show that it is possible to locate the property on<\/p>\n<p>the basis of old survey plan, his prayer for<\/p>\n<p>measuring out the properties on the basis of old<\/p>\n<p>survey plan will be considered at that stage.    For<\/p>\n<p>the said relief, proper application can be moved<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court if at all circumstances<\/p>\n<p>enable the petitioners to move such a petition<\/p>\n<p>producing more evidence.\n<\/p>\n<p>     This writ petition, as matters stand, is devoid<\/p>\n<p>of merit and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>28th January, 2009        (K.P.Balachandran, Judge)<br \/>\ntkv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 2591 of 2009(H) 1. CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. BHARGAVI AMMA, &#8230; Respondent 2. VIJAYA KUMAR, 3. PADMAKUMAR, 4. GOPALAN NAIR, For Petitioner :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":898,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009"},"wordCount":898,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009","name":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T04:04:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrasekharan-pillai-vs-bhargavi-amma-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrasekharan Pillai vs Bhargavi Amma on 28 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14626\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}