{"id":14629,"date":"2010-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-10T09:51:27","modified_gmt":"2016-07-10T04:21:27","slug":"preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1560 of 2004()\n\n\n1. PREETHI SHAJI, 29 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. AKASH SHAJI, AGED 7 YEARS, MINOR,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC.,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.K.BABA, S\/O.KURIAN,\n\n3. LEELA, AGED 62 YEARS,\n\n4. VASU, AGED 64 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.RAJEEV\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :24\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n                 M.A.C.A.No. 1560 of 2004\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n            Dated this the 24th day of June, 2010\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      In this appeal under section 173 of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>Vehicles Act claimants in O.P.(MV) No.1014 of 1998 of the<\/p>\n<p>Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda challenge<\/p>\n<p>the judgment and award of the Tribunal dated January 30,<\/p>\n<p>2004 awarding a compensation of Rs.2,32,000\/- for the<\/p>\n<p>loss caused to them, on account of death of Shaji in a motor<\/p>\n<p>accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The facts leading to this appeal, in brief, are these:-<\/p>\n<p>Deceased Shaji was aged 30 at the time of the accident and<\/p>\n<p>as a Company Worker, he was earning Rs.5,500\/- per<\/p>\n<p>month, according to the claimants. Claimants are his<\/p>\n<p>widow, minor son and parents. On May 25, 1998 at about 3<\/p>\n<p>p.m. deceased Shaji was riding his motor cycle bearing<\/p>\n<p>registration   No.KL-8L\/1491       along    Thrissur-Amballur<\/p>\n<p>National Highway 47. When he reached near Christian<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 1560\/2004               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Church, Thalore, a K.S.R.T.C. bus bearing registration No.<\/p>\n<p>KL-15\/2300, driven by the second respondent, came at a<\/p>\n<p>high speed from the opposite side and dashed against the<\/p>\n<p>motor cycle of the deceased. Deceased Shaji sustained very<\/p>\n<p>serious injuries and he succumbed to the injuries sustained<\/p>\n<p>while undergoing treatment in the Medical College<\/p>\n<p>Hospital, Thrissur. According to the claimants, the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to the negligence on the part of the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent, driver of the offending bus. The first<\/p>\n<p>respondent as the owner and second respondent as the<\/p>\n<p>driver are jointly and severally liable to pay the<\/p>\n<p>compensation to the claimants who are the legal heirs and<\/p>\n<p>dependents of the deceased.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Respondents 1 and 2 filed a written statement,<\/p>\n<p>admitting the accident and further contended that the<\/p>\n<p>incident occurred due to the negligence of the claimant.<\/p>\n<p>      4. PW1 was examined and Exts. A1 to A8 were<\/p>\n<p>marked on the side of the claimants. No evidence was<\/p>\n<p>adduced by the respondents. The Tribunal, on an<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 1560\/2004                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appreciation of the evidence, found that the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to the negligence of second respondent and<\/p>\n<p>awarded a compensation of Rs.2,32,000\/- with interest at<\/p>\n<p>the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization<\/p>\n<p>and costs. The claimants have come up in appeal,<\/p>\n<p>challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel for respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. The accident is not disputed. The finding of the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal that the accident occurred due to the negligence<\/p>\n<p>on the part of the second respondent, driver of the<\/p>\n<p>offending bus, is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the only question, which arises for consideration, is whether<\/p>\n<p>the claimants are entitled to any enhanced compensation ?<\/p>\n<p>      7. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,32,000\/-. Break up of the compensation awarded is as<\/p>\n<p>under:-\n<\/p>\n<pre>      Loss of dependency                :   Rs.2,04,000\/-\n\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 1560\/2004                4<\/span>\n\n      Pain and suffering               :    Rs.      5,000\/-\n      Loss of consortium               :    Rs. 10,000\/-\n      Loss of love and affection       :    Rs. 10,000\/-\n      Funeral expenses                 :    Rs.     3,000\/-\n                                            ------------------\n           Total                       :    Rs.2,32,000\/-\n                                            ========\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      8. The learned counsel for the appellants mainly<\/p>\n<p>sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal for the loss of dependency, loss of consortium and<\/p>\n<p>loss of love and affection.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9. The Tribunal took the monthly income of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased as Rs.1,500\/- and after deducting 1\/3 for his<\/p>\n<p>personal    expenses,   took  Rs.1,000\/-  as   his     monthly<\/p>\n<p>contribution to his family and adopted a multiplier of 17<\/p>\n<p>and awarded a compensation of Rs.2,04,000\/- for loss of<\/p>\n<p>dependency.     The     deceased  was    working        as    an<\/p>\n<p>Administrative Officer in Kerala Shipping and Inland<\/p>\n<p>Navigation Corporation Ltd. on daily wages of Rs.77.50.<\/p>\n<p>Taking into consideration the above aspect, we feel that his<\/p>\n<p>monthly income can reasonably be fixed at Rs.2,500\/-,<\/p>\n<p>which works out to Rs.30,000\/- per annum. After deducting<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 1560\/2004                5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1\/3rd for his personal expenses, the balance amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/- can be taken as his annual contribution to his<\/p>\n<p>family. The multiplier adopted by the Tribunal as 17 is not<\/p>\n<p>seriously challenged. Thus, the compensation for the loss<\/p>\n<p>of dependency would come to Rs.3,40,000\/- (Rs.20,000\/- x<\/p>\n<p>17). Thus, the claimants        are entitled an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.1,36,000\/- on this count.<\/p>\n<p>      10. The Tribunal awarded a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/- for loss of consortium, which appears to be very<\/p>\n<p>low. Taking into consideration the tender age of the second<\/p>\n<p>claimant, the son of the deceased, we feel that a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.20,000\/- would be reasonable on this<\/p>\n<p>count. As regards the compensation awarded under other<\/p>\n<p>heads, we find the same to be reasonable and therefore,we<\/p>\n<p>are not disturbing the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>      11. There is another aspect in this case. The Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>awarded interest @ 6% per annum, which appears to be<\/p>\n<p>very low. The claimants are entitled to interest at 7.5% per<\/p>\n<p>annum for the compensation already awarded and for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 1560\/2004                  6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation from the date of petition till<\/p>\n<p>realization.\n<\/p>\n<p>      12. In the result, the claimants are found entitled to<\/p>\n<p>an additional compensation of Rs.1,46,000\/-.         They are<\/p>\n<p>entitled to interest at 7.5% per annum for the compensation<\/p>\n<p>already awarded and for the enhanced compensation from<\/p>\n<p>the date of petition till realization. They are also entitled to<\/p>\n<p>proportionate cost. The first respondent being the owner of<\/p>\n<p>the offending bus shall deposit the amount within two<\/p>\n<p>months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.<\/p>\n<p>      In the result, the appeal is disposed of as above.<\/p>\n<p>                                A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nmn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1560 of 2004() 1. PREETHI SHAJI, 29 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner 2. AKASH SHAJI, AGED 7 YEARS, MINOR, Vs 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC., &#8230; Respondent 2. P.K.BABA, S\/O.KURIAN, 3. LEELA, AGED 62 YEARS, 4. VASU, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":855,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010"},"wordCount":855,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010","name":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-10T04:21:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/preethi-shaji-vs-managing-director-on-24-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Preethi Shaji vs Managing Director on 24 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}