{"id":146335,"date":"2009-11-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009"},"modified":"2014-12-01T16:23:37","modified_gmt":"2014-12-01T10:53:37","slug":"shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
RSA N0.1507 of 2007\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER' \nBEFORE C C C\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUs*T1c\ufb01{3;,S'.1=ATij:'   'V  T: \nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL N'oA.CI5O7\/2.Ci,O'7C {:NJ)\u00b0w \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nShri M0hammadrafiq1;;\u00e9';..\n\nS\/0 Allauddin Mujawar;  C'   .  \nAge: 33 years, Qcc: Agri.cjL_11--ture,.Vb \"\nR\/0: Hukkeri_,._'   V   ' \nT31: Hukke:fii;.59j!A3_]T.3,    \" \nDist: Beig\u20aciuIT1':----.      ...APPELLANT\n(By SrAiV.\"  Anc\ufb02f\ufb01b\u00e9zate)\n\nAN DVVET \" V'  C  \n\n1. The state of K;mA:eT_\u00a3aT;a,\n the Deputy C01T1missior1er,\n .  ..... .. \u00ab\n\n  \n\nH 2 .xTheVV  Psinchayat Hukkeri,\n\nA  itS  Officer,\nHuK1;eriw591313,\n\n A DiSt.:V__Be1gaum. ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
 ‘–,(By  Ravi.S.Ba1ikai, Advocate for caveator–R2)<\/p>\n
RSA N0.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
This regular second appeal is \ufb01led under Section
\n100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgnient
\nand decree dated 28.03.2007 passed in R.A.No.3ji’,\/20.04
\non the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.);*’*’–Hnk}{eri”,
\ndismissing the appeal and con\ufb01rming the
\ndecree 17.04.2004 passed in O.S.No.479\/–.1.98V9*–on, the”
\nfile of the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) l~iu-kkeri.   ‘ V .  <\/p>\n
This regular second apipeali 0′ ,
\nadmission this day, the CoU.r’t-._delivered thee.fol’1povving: J V<\/p>\n
Junemaggl
\nLearned Governrnent lPlelader_is_’.:’directed to take<\/p>\n
notice for respoiident No.1 <\/p>\n
 in short compas, the same is
\ntaken tip’ for  with the consent of the<\/p>\n
parties.\n<\/p>\n
‘   a regular second appeal filed invoking<\/p>\n
Siection  the Code of Civil Procedure challenging<\/p>\n
lquthe  and decree passed by the learned Civil<\/p>\n
iuTJgag\u00a2(sn Dnq Hukken,ini1Aim131\/2004c\ufb01snnsmng<\/p>\n
RSA No.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
the appeal and confirming the dismissal of the suit filed<\/p>\n
in O.S.No.479\/1989.\n<\/p>\n
4. The appellant was the plaintiff  _
\nCourt. The suit was filed by
\ntitle over the suit schedule\u00bbpropert;tV_lla_*id
\ninjunction and, in the for”po:s’ses.sfion. The
\nsuit schedule propertiit\ufb01pi  denoted by
\nletters ‘A, B,  R,  situated at
\nGajabalwadli    if itoizvn. The plaintiff
\nbased   properties on the
\nregistered by the previous owner<\/p>\n
during the-piiand on the gift deed dated<\/p>\n
  24_:\u20aci6.:1_i97 ei<e'cut_ed.vby the plaintiffs grandfather in his<\/p>\n
5;'  2nd defendant\u00a7Town Panchayat, Hukkeri,<\/p>\n
it   res_iste'd.the suit contending inter alia that the suit was<\/p>\n
\u00b0not'"lrnaintainab1e as no legal notice as contemplated<\/p>\n
 "under Section 284 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act<\/p>\n
RSA No.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
was issued and for non–compliance of requirernent
\nstipulated under Section 80 of the Code
\nProcedure. The description of the suit  '
\nby the plaintiff was also denied,:.ap'art
\ngift deed dated 24.06.1976
\nclaims title to the propertyi  Egjritendecg .
\nthat the suit properties were gran1"a*thana of
\nGajabarawadi ownedll  the Town
\nPanchayat,  that the
\ndocuments  did not pertain to
\nthe    p A  V  <\/p>\n
  framed necessaiy issues<\/p>\n
regardintg V't'itle.l'ofT the plaintiff and his actual<\/p>\n
"and, in the alternative, of entitlement for<\/p>\n
"'po~ls,_session_. Ajn""issue regarding maintainability for want<\/p>\n
of ri'otie'e.u:ider Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/p>\n
3    Section 284 of the Karnataka Municipality Act also<\/p>\n
 to be framed. An additional issue with regard to<\/p>\n
'4':\n<\/p>\n
RSA N0.15{)7 of 2007<\/p>\n
pecuniary jurisdiction of the Trial Court was also<\/p>\n
framed.\n<\/p>\n
‘7. Parties having let in oral and
\nevidence, the Trial Court, on consideratioyziioify
\ndocumentary evidence, dismissed
\nwhile defendant No.2 had
\nto Show that the property in   of the
\ngrama thana, the plaintiff to  any
\nsatisfactory evidence title over the
\nproperty. As  since
\nthe  deposed in the chief<\/p>\n
exalninationiithat  “property ~ subject matter of the<\/p>\n
  “va1u_evmore than Rs.1,00,000\/– and as<\/p>\n
 the” said_Vas’sert–i_on made in the evidence had not been<\/p>\n
cha.1iengedi*Vi.b’y.h:’the plaintiff in the cross–exarnination, the<\/p>\n
i’._CiviiiJ1V.idge (Jr. Dn.) had no pecuniary jurisdiction to<\/p>\n
  ”:.entertain the suit. Though the Trial Court found that it<\/p>\n
  had no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit, in<\/p>\n
s<\/p>\n
RSA N0.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
respect of other issues which were framed, the_fl’ria1
\nCourt returned findings on merits holding
\nplaintiff failed to establish his title or
\nthe property. Accordingly, suit  it
\ndismissed. V I 2 2 V l  in it  <\/p>\n
8. The lower Appellate,Cp.urt   ” it
\nthe question regarding   llthe ‘findings
\nrecorded by the Trial ‘A the lack of
\npecuniary    conclusion
\nthat the  inholding that it had
\nno  in the matter. It has also<\/p>\n
found that.._4.sincle.th:e’  Court had gone into the<\/p>\n
 ‘_ merits of” the easeand had appreciated the evidence on<\/p>\n
 record ar1d:r.et’urned findings on all other issues, in the<\/p>\n
light” of A ‘l-ltije?’ decision rendered in the case of<\/p>\n
lV..ppT.H.ll\/asvlluztizanta and others vs. ‘I’.J.Jagadeesh & Others<\/p>\n
  s\u00ab1ijr\u00e9:pio’r\u00ab:ed in ILR 1999 KAR 2924, it had to be held that<\/p>\n
 there was no failure of justice. The lower Appellate<\/p>\n
RSA N0.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
Court found that the plaintiff had acquiesced in and, at
\nany rate, the lack of pecuniary jurisdiction did
\nthe root of the matter as the parties had  ‘
\non merits. Having recorded such”  its
\nAppellate Court ought to have
\nof the findings on other   ilTriali’i
\nCourt. . is u V 2 1<\/p>\n
9. In the background of the substantial<\/p>\n
question of iaviz that    is,
\n”    _b’elow erred in<\/p>\n
i(.liSI_1’1iSiSiiI1g.__’tl1e  the ground of lack of<\/p>\n
pecu’niaIj,\u00a7 in the trial Court?”<\/p>\n
10. Both_:itheF learned counsel have addressed their<\/p>\n
  on the ‘substantial question of law framed.
\n ‘   .,11.,_’i~t:h,as.__to be stated here that the defendants also<\/p>\n
led. e’videnc-eofiimerits and the Trial Court did not choose<\/p>\n
igto con.sid_er the question of lack of jurisdiction as a<\/p>\n
\u00a7r;re1ii12_.inary issue and, in such circumstances, it has to be<\/p>\n
.4<\/p>\n
RSA No.1507 of 2007<\/p>\n
held that both the parties had acquiesced  the
\njurisdiction of the Trial Court. At any rate, since’~.th’e_g’Trial
\nCourt had addressed the matter on merits
\nno justification for the lower   .\n<\/p>\n
suit by recording a finding on
\nSince the question of pecuniaryjurisdititioni  rhatter
\nthat goes to the root’ of  iniiithsgffacts and
\ncircumstances of the  ftpp–el1ate Court was
\nwell advised t.o-ideal  before it. It
\nought to ,a.li the issues on which
\nthe  Trial Court by re-\n<\/p>\n
appreciating  record. Having failed to make<\/p>\n
such an exer”ci.se; the Cl-ovifer Appellate Court erred in law in<\/p>\n
  and decree under challenge<\/p>\n
thfe-(suit on the ground of lack of pecuniary<\/p>\n
 jurisdictioiiin the Trial Court. At any rate mere assertion<\/p>\n
  the defendant in his evidence stating that the property<\/p>\n
 lt’w.asv;1ued more than Rs.l,O0,000\/– cannot be made the<\/p>\n
 basis to hoid that, the Court had no pecuniary jurisdiction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil RSA N0.1507 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER’ BEFORE C C C THE HON’BLE MR.JUs*T1c\ufb01{3;,S’.1=ATij:’ ‘V T: REGULAR SECOND APPEAL N’oA.CI5O7\/2.Ci,O’7C {:NJ)\u00b0w BETWEEN: Shri M0hammadrafiq1;;\u00e9’;.. S\/0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1010,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009"},"wordCount":1010,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009","name":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-01T10:53:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mohammadrafique-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Mohammadrafique vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}