{"id":146491,"date":"2010-02-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-30T00:44:56","modified_gmt":"2018-09-29T19:14:56","slug":"sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n
EN THE HEGH CQURT Q13' KARNATAKA, BAN\n\n.DA'I'E'\u00a3> THIS THE 23% DAY OF E?E1BR{\u00a7AR)?\"12{\u00a7--\u00ab'1s';3'..j:  L' %\n\nBEFGRE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H'eB\u00a7IL\u00a3rr:~-- seas      _   ...Appe11ant\n\n(By M]  85    Adv. ,}\n\nAHD:\n\n_............................\n\n1. Ti?1e\"New uiIx<viia"i\u00a3s\u20ac}\u00a7.;\u00a5$\u00a7$1s\u20ac\n\n f\ufb01\u00e9smpany Limitagi, .\n\n" \u00ab V\u00abN'0,4"'\u00a7f "ZR, Ni._i:k1yanaI;.da Nagar,\n. '  \u00a7\u00bb$V9:.;:a;1d\u00a7;1ai1a13i,\n\n . *-'PgfiysQfe._'x\u20ac@\u00e9xzi\u00bb;\n\n" A B'ax1ga1'<;::"'j_\u20act.5'\nRaprgsented by its Branch Manager'\n\nH  A. ,'I'l:1\u00e9"\u00a33'\u00a71ite\u00e9 India insurance Sempany,\n\nV Shanna},\n -33%' im Managar.\n\nF SEE. P,E{a1iya.,ppa\u00a71,\nS\/' :3. Petunia],\n\nLg"\n\n\n\nPet\ufb01yragowdana Pudur,\nPeriyapalli,\nNamakkal District --- 637 801. . . .Respor:v:i\u00a3::11ts\n\n(By Sri.R.Rajagopalan, Adv, for R4\nBy Sri..M.Arm:1 Ponnappa, Adv., for R~'2)\n\nThis M.F.A. is \ufb01led under 1:23 'T{(1)%5f \nagainst the judgement and deczfzm dated K 1.1122003 passed \nin MVC 190.852\/96 on the \ufb01le of 1.;-';x;=5'XI)( Addl.'  of\n\nSmaii Causes, Member, MAST, Meimpolitan' Bangaiere,\n(SCCH No.17), diSII1iS$\u00a7\u00a71g _.t1'1a  Claim "petition for\ncompensation. V  " * .-- Vv "  \n\nThis M.F.A Corning   this day, the\nCourt delivered 1:11;: \u00ab\ufb01QIit_:3Wi1i;g:~\u00a7    ' \n\nThi$'awppe:\u00a5i\u00a7 udir%:Cf\u00a34:c\u00a7\u00a7.,ga3:1st the judgment and award,\n "1   by the MACT, Bangalore\n\n(s<i<:*\u00b0{\u00a7k:;\u00ab:~:f\u00a7.5,'  .1\u00a7f\u20acC.NQ.852\/ 1995.\n\n 2. " ~. the impugnsd juziment and aware}, the\n\n \u00e9ismissed. the petition filed: by tbs appel\u00e9ant\n\nV.  damages is this vehicle.\n\nL\/\/..\n\n\n\n3. Aggr\u00e9eved by that, 1:116 appellant has \ufb01led this\n\nappeal.\n\n4. In brief, tha facts are; The appeHant"\u20ac\u00a7%}21s  \n\nof the Canter bearing registration N'c3fKA.JG:_3\u00a7.65.;5f\u00a7V:'aI;\u00a71 6:1  \u00bb j  AV\n\n3~1995, the Canter was moving \n\nNear Mott: Benxmr Village, the 161\u20acj?.bea\u00a5ii1g_ \ncame from 13116 Opp\ufb02sit\ufb01Vf\ufb01I?\u00a73Ctj{3\ufb01V_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7'\u00a7ili'g1'} Sp\u20ac(:':d\u00a7  dashed\nagairlst the \u00e9anterf As   gamer was\ncomplete}? 5:: cornpensation 0f\nRs.1,5O,0\u00a7O '  has dismissed the claim\npe'\u00a3;itioa.  _v Au\ufb01grticzefgza\ufb01w  'ffhti appellaziit has flied this;\n\n ~.    caunsel far the appeliant contended\n\n mat :3-is  was met juszi\ufb01ed in dismissing the claim\n\n ' j\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9;~\ufb01ti<;:"z,.' \ufb01e also submitted that tha 'if\u00e9hiiil\ufb01 was extensivaiy\n\n  and the insurer 91" the appailant has not\n\nV.  '  'c\u00e9ig\ufb01i\ufb01snsata\u00e9 the appe\ufb02arx: aciequateiy arz\ufb01 thsrafere, the\n\n Tribunal was :10: justi\ufb01ad in \u00e9ismissing {ha ciaizn pefi\ufb01ann\n\nL\/J\/.\n\n\n\nHe also submitted that the Value of the vehicle showgx \n\npolicy is Rs.3,77,{)GO\/ -7 and the appellant  *\n\nRs.2,7'3,.:'i00\/~ and therefore, the "I'rib1:11al--.was1; in \n\ndismissing the claim petition He, tfierefere,  _\n\nimpugned judment anti award  \n\n5. As against fl1i'e;,_;...A_  for the\nrespondents 1 and 2 V  was insured<\/pre>\n
with the first respeficieeiiiiz    has paid a
\nsum sf Rs.2,78,:”;ifJ\u20aci_:}’ ‘fi:r;eI:\u00bb\u00a7s\u00e9it1ement of the eiaim
\nef the appeiian-i   report and therefore, the
\nTebuna;   the claim petition. They
\ng_3.3g  fgkiai  has surrendered the vehicle<\/p>\n
  sum of %?%s.2,’}’3,;:”i00\/– in full and fmal<\/p>\n
  Vsettiemeizt  They aiee submitted that the<\/p>\n
eeppe\ufb02enif .1’1:”aeh\u00a710t produced anything be Shaw that the<\/p>\n
iiieceived by him is in..adeq1_:ate. Therefore, they<\/p>\n
 i’.’i”s_3_[\ufb013mit\u00a3ed the: the impugned judgeme\ufb01t am award does net<\/p>\n
L\/\/..\n<\/p>\n
cal} for interferenm. They also placed reijarzce an
\ndecisions;\n<\/p>\n
(1) 2005 ma page 1332
\n(2) (2009) 4 SCC page\n<\/p>\n
7. I have carefuily C011Si%i\u00e9%%?d  made<\/p>\n
by the iearnad counsel for  ” _<\/p>\n
8. The \u00a7)(),ii’\u00a3it;: ti\ufb01at  1’\u20aci1f”ii.t1_3i_ p\u00e9risideration is,<\/p>\n
Whether i?\u00e9aEi!\u00a3!i\u20aci\u00a3.j’:~Jii}%1.sv”:;f1iiafAt’\ufb01ed in dismissing the<\/p>\n
claim petition? A’\n<\/p>\n
9. Ii \u00e9_s rei\u00e9vaiit.i’t.;2 i’;i;’f\u00e9; the appeilant is the ewner 0f<\/p>\n
tbs: veiiicicii.  “‘Nai.KA-Q2~6552. The accident has<\/p>\n
   1995. The appeilarit has ciaimed<\/p>\n
 cor3i’13c5ii$atii)iifv_v..fr\u00e9i:ii’. his insurer i.e., the \ufb01rst respondent.<\/p>\n
 Si1:vey i’:as’—V conducted. Based on the survey report, 3<\/p>\n
 “<}f..$siV2,'?3,50Q\/~ has been paid to tha appenam. The<\/p>\n
  has accepte\u00e9 it in fail and \ufb01nal s\ufb01ttiemant of his<\/p>\n
V.  '   Thereafter, the appeliant has \ufb01ie\ufb01 ciaim patitiori. The<\/p>\n
L\/\/,<\/p>\n
appeilz-mt has not produced anything to Sh()W -'\ufb01\u00e9ie<\/p>\n
amount received by him is inadequate. It is clear  <\/p>\n
evidence, the appeiiant has surrer1\u00e9:e:'ed* \u00abf.3A1e'__vei'ii:bie_  bee'<\/p>\n
received a sum ef \u00a7?~2s.2,'73,50{}\/V-,   <\/p>\n
of his claim. The appellant has   the<\/p>\n
repair ef the vehicle. Baseifix\ufb01an claim of
\nthe appellant has been seeflie-(ii has accepted it
\nand thereafter,   in the case :31'
\nHARKHU    3. Others reported in
\n2005   owner 01' the vehicle
\nhaving receivfe\u00e9l %  full and \ufb01nal settlement of<\/p>\n
his claim free} }1i.s' insure\ufb02eannet claim compensation from<\/p>\n
  the offendizig vehicle.\n<\/p>\n
 _  .vV,iti1e’v.\ufb01)resent ease, the appellant has received<\/p>\n
 Vc:\u00a33n1pef1eat:’aei1’vfi*em his insurer in fuii and \ufb01ne} settlement at”<\/p>\n
  thereafier, \ufb01led claim petitiezx, Pie deubt, in the<\/p>\n
  value ef the Vehicle is shown as es.3,77,eoe\/\u00bb.<\/p>\n
“B\u00a7it’,”\u00e9\ufb01er the eurvey repent, the damage has men aeseseed at<\/p>\n
Rs.2,’?3,5{){}\/ ~. ‘1’h<~:~ appelizmt has accepted if, <\/p>\n
the amounf: in fuli and 11113} settlement of   <\/p>\n
shows, the vehicle has been tr3I1SfC3?}rCd_:3:('}::.{)"I]C.:$131 '<\/p>\n
4~ll-~1995. _ V 2  _ _\n<\/p>\n
31. The appellant has r\u00e9cg\u00a7i?ed c<\u00a7x13p'e1\u00a7.-safigriw in full<\/p>\n
and {ma} settlement of '_c1a_i':i1H'V_  : t;h\u00a2rea\ufb01\u00e9f,' v\ufb01led ciaim
\npetition. N0'::hi11gVhas   show that the<\/p>\n
amount rsceived:_"b3%:;; \ufb01f1e \u00e9ippeifan t .:is:-Vhixmzi\u00e9quate. Therefore,<\/p>\n
the   claim peti\ufb01on. The
\nimpugmd  :30: cal} for interferenoez.<\/p>\n
There isgrigfc .tfxifs=_a;':\u00a5j$ea1 arr} 1261106, it is liable ta '03<\/p>\n
  %      <\/p>\n
–  Amaeramgy, it is dismjsseci.\n<\/p>\n
3&5<\/p>\n
 –‘Es3fJ\u00a7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010 Author: H.Billappa EN THE HEGH CQURT Q13′ KARNATAKA, BAN .DA’I’E’\u00a3> THIS THE 23% DAY OF E?E1BR{\u00a7AR)?”12{\u00a7–\u00ab’1s’;3′..j: L’ % BEFGRE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H’eB\u00a7IL\u00a3rr:~– seas _ …Appe11ant (By M] 85 Adv. ,} AHD: _………………………. 1. Ti?1e”New […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S K Kalaiah S\\\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":525,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri S K Kalaiah S\\\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S K Kalaiah S\\\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010"},"wordCount":525,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010","name":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company ... on 23 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-29T19:14:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-k-kalaiah-so-kalaiah-vs-the-new-india-assurance-company-on-23-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S K Kalaiah S\/O Kalaiah vs The New India Assurance Company … on 23 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146491\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}