{"id":146758,"date":"2008-04-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008"},"modified":"2016-06-10T14:59:34","modified_gmt":"2016-06-10T09:29:34","slug":"nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
1\n\n{:3\n\nI1--\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT SF KHRNETAKH AT BANGALORE\n\nnnwnn THIS THE o4\"'nmx or APRIL 2908\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HDN'ELE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMRR<\/pre>\n
nzsunan smcoun APPEAL no.2455x2oc5Tj {; ‘ <\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
MREEERBHMED<\/p>\n
3:0 AEDULKAREEM uALguA;\ufb01 v_
\n53 VEARS, occ AGRICULTURE,’<\/p>\n
REG \u00a5I\u00a5EK%HAHEA CQLDMY \u00bb~
\nUERBER GHLLI, ‘<\/p>\n
-n.\n<\/p>\n
‘ISHFER<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
MEHncoBaaB_=–, 1- V’;\n<\/p>\n
are nMEEMAsnafNAn\u00a3wALE’<\/p>\n
an YEHR${LOC$ AGRICUhTUE\ufb01fq
\nwowwmmmawmm @<\/p>\n
nhnann mantra
\n\u00a71JAPUR.f3 “*”\n<\/p>\n
u”T\u00a3.L’s!n s\u00a73u1v:s.\ufb01EsA1
\n54 $5335, o c AERJCULTURE
\nax’ v:#3K%mA\ufb02uA;:ogGsv<\/p>\n
nnannn aRLLI,* =<\/p>\n
 _mUKU\ufb01n aHv
\n‘j,3Nnjn3mnca\ufb013nnA xunxmnnx<\/p>\n
~. 45 ?EHB\ufb01;,DCC AGRICULTURE
\n‘_H\u00a3o vivaxaunmnn CDLDNY<\/p>\n
\ufb02AR\ufb01AR*\ufb02hbLI,
\ngxansua<\/p>\n
$BH\u00a5%$\ufb02GEPPA<\/p>\n
“\u00ab$io BASAFPA’HEEEALLI<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01 ?R\ufb01, GEC HERICULTURE<\/p>\n
Rf\ufb02 VIVEEANANDA
\nDERBRR GFLLI, EI \ufb01rb\ufb01<\/p>\n
ERIKEHT<\/p>\n
i3Y<\/p>\n
AND .\n<\/p>\n
3J0 GHNGHYAY HDTIMATH
\n45 YEARS, om: AGRICULTURE<\/p>\n
HID VIVEEHNANDA COLONY<\/p>\n
nnnunn (:3. 1′
\nJau1n.u.r1..n. -941 .1.\n<\/p>\n
BIJAPUR<\/p>\n
|’.f.\n<\/p>\n
HH }<\/p>\n
K R E\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02h MEDEG\ufb02R<\/p>\n
55 VERRS, OCC \ufb01G\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01LTU\ufb01E
\nRIO VIVEKENKHDA CDLONY
\nDARERR GRLLI,<\/p>\n
EIJHPUR<\/p>\n
HHT LEKMI<\/p>\n
K30 EHmNTB5OUDh DE3BI.7-_
\n95 YERRS; DEC SER\u00a51CE ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
R50 vivnxnnanna conomv V<\/p>\n
HARE\ufb01R.$ALLI, BIJ%PUR<\/p>\n
.~;-mi -.5 E HEEBALL1 .5 3- If!  <\/p>\n
u<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
‘ K?\n<\/p>\n
. f-.-5;: _?f’1:115RS;”~ O\u20ac3t2 PE!-IISIONER 1’2\u00bb:-:17: “*
\n” V ,.w.;~”Te:’-V  GALLI ,<\/p>\n
nR’nn\ufb02AF\u00a7\ufb01u\ufb02  ‘_   ,  S
\n  “Mr: n V
\n55 *\u00a7mARs,’n::r; “SUF’J3E?’C*,!\u00a7 . _’
\nEJO’MhhhI\ufb01AEJUN’\ufb02E%%E.\n<\/p>\n
an-U -r1Lv\\r!P.\n<\/p>\n
lIo.l’Jf’\\l”zJI’\\;’, ‘,<\/p>\n
U%..’cI:iHH.ABA3A?P?. PATIL<\/p>\n
 – ‘%smmR% * <\/p>\n
 V1.3-mv~.*1’~”1.=; or mnmcram
\nH? EEFUTY EQHISSIONER<\/p>\n
, $31 Jmun<\/p>\n
 Jmua nzvnnomnw-r AUTHORITY<\/p>\n
E? 1T5 C\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01l\ufb01\ufb01l\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n
E\ufb02\ufb02 EIJAPUR<\/p>\n
Y!
\n5r<\/p>\n
CITY HUHICIPRL COUNCIL
\nBY ITS COMMISSIONER,<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
 .’- Q _2\u00a7r1~.zLuA:\u00a7’TAs <\/p>\n
UHC BIJBPUR<\/p>\n
5 \ufb02RDAPEER ABDUL AJIJ MUSRIFF
\n?\u00a7 YR5, DES KETD KSRTC DFFICER
\nRID NEAR PDJ HTGH SCHOOL PLAY GROUND<\/p>\n
$391 K\ufb01l\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01 \ufb02AE%R<\/p>\n
ERRERR GALLI,<\/p>\n
EIJAFUR<\/p>\n
‘-4|<\/p>\n
nmwAn.MKHmaao3 nznannxnn
\n35 YRS, occ PHOTHGRAPHER I “., ,
\nRED ALI RDZA, NEAR KHEDIGRHMUHY G 1.
\nBIJAPUR ‘\u00ab I<\/p>\n
3 manna Hnnnnn xHmnAnsAH $\ufb013An1\u00a7F,_v.:
\n42 %, (ICC BUSINESS ‘ ‘-\n<\/p>\n
Rio HAVELI QALLI ,
\nEIJAPEIR A<\/p>\n
9 ansnvnmwan MALLAPPA’MB\ufb02KR: .
\nan Y\ufb01\ufb01, \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01*R AK \ufb01U3\ufb01IFF*gy
\nRio E\ufb02WVEL:’S\ufb02lLLI 3 ‘ v “v*
\nBIJA?UR_ ; ;*V . ‘ “W<\/p>\n
in smug usuauxagu Ph$H\ufb01\ufb02\u00ab. ”<\/p>\n
33 YRS; mac Busx\ufb02zss ”\n<\/p>\n
niu_nAnaAR.mauL1,,*q
\nHEAR nawnz Ma$gu3 *.\u00b0
\naIaA?uR’% ‘ ‘ *.’r<\/p>\n
11 IPAPPA BFERPPE ICKTTIHANI I3 KUMBAR
\n\u00e9? vns, act ausziass
\n. ‘\ufb01f0:BEE&T EALU1″\n<\/p>\n
.’nJn Eu3:,v,<\/p>\n
12 fALL\ufb01r\u00e9\u00a7_$1MANuA GOLLAR<\/p>\n
$7 Y%3;”\ufb02CC BUSINESS
\nRIO HQRRANKERI, BAGALKDT ROAD<\/p>\n
‘nTa1JA9un
\n“~ .. naspeunzuws\n<\/p>\n
-\u00ab:53 EET VIJETHE R HAIR, %nv FOR CIR1:<\/p>\n
THIS R3)’; 13 FILED U\/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST<\/p>\n
uTHE JUDGEMENT 5 DEGREE ETD \u00a75.\ufb01\u00a7.?5\ufb015 RRSSED<\/p>\n
LL,\/%<\/p>\n
E”.\u00a7\u00a7:\ufb01anant injunction.\n<\/p>\n
IE3 R..Pu.. NU -\u00a7\ufb01.\u00a2”‘2005 ON THE F1 DE OF THE PRESIDING
\nBFFI CEIFL. FAST TRACE IQQLIRT-1 I , El JAEUE, D1 53-11 551%!!!-
\nTH”E~ ..|3|sPPFu5t.L AND COEIFI RMI N13 THE JUDGHEENT AND<\/p>\n
BEQREE DTQ 22.02.2003 PASSED IR 53 NO.393f2Q$G<\/p>\n
QM THE FILE OF THE II }-‘L’D\ufb02L.CIIVIL JUDGE (SR.DEJ_.’}..<\/p>\n
13:1″? 1591
\nD.i.U I’M} :-\n<\/p>\n
zrms APPEAL comnrs on FOR AnM1ssI”e\u00a7:.vijf:ii:i% ‘  ‘<\/p>\n
DRY, THEE CCIURT DELIVERED THE FOLI.aQH:’ING:.”‘””<\/p>\n
This is a plaintiffs’ 1’\u00e9;-\u00e9\u00e9angs au’;;:;:’.o a.’..– -I
\nthe concurrent :Einc.*.i.:1:\u00abg’~5A_   \u00e9\ufb01urts
\nbelow that the c:cnnstrur.\u00b0’tV:i.\u00a7:\u00a7r1″ put up
\nby than r3aasfandagnt~$$ \u00bb:.4y.a uygontrary to
\nlaw and mat :23.’ land as shown<\/p>\n
in than Cc=nLg2.:a{h’e;r\u00a7s:\u00a7Ii*\u00a7re. I3\u00a2\u00a31rai<ipme.r:t'\u00a7 Plan.<\/p>\n
:2. .F\u00e9jr__ " 1.-.n\u00e9_ "g~nr;}&._2se ms<\/p>\n
 Tvhe-.LA\u00ab:3:iaintif\u00a3s have film the suit in an<\/p>\n
"' :?'. '~fg\u00a7p;ae=ai$t.\u00e95:iva capacity in than public interest.<\/p>\n
"'–\u00a7r'ig%i:r..:$11y it was filed far that ralief or<\/p>\n
suhaquantly, it was<\/p>\n
 \u00bb.._ \u00a2-anv-arrt:'as\ufb02 for the relied? of mandatory injunctiorg<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
=\u00ab';itigation<\/p>\n
'the<\/p>\n
.5.\n<\/p>\n
and fbr the other reliars. The case at the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs is they are all residents of<\/p>\n
vivakananda calony’ in Bijapur situated in \ufb02uid<\/p>\n
Na.5. The defendants 1 and 2, who are the g\ufb01\ufb01t\ufb01\ufb01; f <\/p>\n
nf GT3<\/p>\n
r-:a.e41xaxmxm\/wwmwwa. ‘VThejj’~.:i”;’;  L<\/p>\n
defendant is a Surgaon and tw\ufb013*tg5tGq#\u00a7Enmtnt;xt<\/p>\n
amplayaa. Tha 2″ defendant vat a t\u00e9tit\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb02hli\ufb01fft<\/p>\n
grasacutar and now an A\ufb02v\ufb01cata “kg vgtaf\u00e9s\ufb01iani<\/p>\n
The vittkananda cgtgny _mi\u00a7-_Hga;mQrt;gHf<\/p>\n
Hula-3 :4-a.1\\+-4 :31 s-Inna-Irina.  ” 4 n.’- 3′
\na..1’a-on-.1.-a’auuava..-E-1.4. y\\4.a.\u00a7vviI’\ufb01 ‘ ‘ J’…~|.l -K  5-.u’i7 <\/p>\n
Fla\ufb012  ,\ufb01ftaf
\ncanstructianrHiQh\u00a7t\ufb01_f\u00a73$\u20act\u00a7n_:tt\u00a7’ \u00a7f\u00e9resaid site,
\ndafan\ufb01antw i.a\ufb01\ufb01 Q i\u00a7vtxSt\u00e9:ta@ to put up a naw
\ncanstructia\ufb01t\u00a7idVtttyt\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9_co\ufb01ttructing a Hbspital
\nor a \ufb01linit,’.[\u00a5\u00a7i\u00a7hmE”i\u00e9 injurious to the<\/p>\n
inhabitants \ufb01r th\u00e9 \ufb01ii\u00e9kananda Colony where the<\/p>\n
;t\u00e9uit-\ufb01Eo\u00a7arwg is sitauteu and they have sat out
\nit \ufb01\ufb01tatl the tonsaquancas which wuuld fluw in
\ntt= , fut\ufb01r\u00a2’if Q Hp\u00e9pital is run in the said prnparty.<\/p>\n
Vt,__Ip ftut}: vthey had filed public interest<\/p>\n
present suit is<\/p>\n
\/1′<\/p>\n
apprmral… which the defendants have obtained, is
\ncentrary te Lew and the result at’ collusion and
\ntherefunre, they filed the suit for injunetiieh.
\ninitially. as during the pendency
\nproceedings the defendants eompietecii.
\nconstruction, the plaintiffs cf\u00a7eEi\u00a5tertat2_
\nand glaint was annendee te
\nmandates}: iI’:juI:t;’12.;\u00a2;II!= D I A T AV<\/p>\n
 Cf euuimona
\nentereci a5Jg:e.m.*e::>-:9  written
\nete’tement. _They  putting up
\neenstructieh  the sanctioned
\nplan ants}:  the cenetructian
\nElf nu;u~sih’gVVV_heme 1 and 2 is legal<\/p>\n
and tha-… same” hes’.v”been\u00e9T.epproved, the running of<\/p>\n
I-f’xt}:eA n”:.–;1.:’5.”s;?i..’i:sg1″e–hemeHid’d'”i:ot emit obnaxious small of<\/p>\n
 in the pleint and the suit is<\/p>\n
  file:’lj’1eit_h’te:.eiefide intenti-ens. The plaintiff<\/p>\n
w . _ . _ . . ._ —-.—–rv-\n<\/p>\n
Viit~-.___f\u00bb.%<;_I..5 w'i*:cu"'g_ 13 a neighbour has crnnstrlmft\ufb01d his<\/p>\n
 A   4.1-. e-\n<\/p>\n
\u00abtiteitrge-se en the amen wmpeund wall end in we.–..<\/p>\n
I’<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
 ‘~teq\u00a3:rai dietute erase and tuu.t-efere, he has<\/p>\n
3 ii-seerecii the suit ii’: “an name of others. They<\/p>\n
have else set: taut: the various provisions of law<\/p>\n
\\”|L\/\/<\/p>\n
D?’<\/p>\n
under which their construction is legal and<\/p>\n
valid .\n<\/p>\n
.5. The Trial Court framed as
\nirsue.-3. The 1″‘ plaintiff was examined   M
\n2′? do-rzumemtzz were marked as Exv\u00a7.mP’1’\u00ab1;c?–,_2TF”:A\u00a7:2\u00a7dVV:vh’\u00e9\u00ab’
\nalao axaminad 3 witnnas. the <\/p>\n
Mmmirmd ag LIL1 and 9.r.*edI.i-:.\u00b0~a\ufb01”~~..%1\u00a3 <\/p>\n
In. The “fr:i4._a1V_.  of the
\nHfarwai\ufb01 \u00a2\u00a7.a.l\u00a7’–.:.\u00a7iriri\u00e9’hca on record
\nheld the ” Suing put up by
\nth-ii  1a\u00a7,:.q:f:”-..V___’i.lj,a.gal, there in no
\nc<:1J.u:s:i.<.:n '.;;et:ww\u00a7"A:-Li::e\u00a7tfe&\u00a7'\u00a7;iaiits 1 and 2 and the<\/p>\n
other ,':–.~\u00a3':E'L:i.~::J'. \u00e9l.#,'~~.*'.:h\u00abe"'- g\ufb01iaintiffs have failed to<\/p>\n
I-': {ir'\u00bbave"':r\u00ab..3t;r1:evir"~–_casr: ""aiid therefore, they are not<\/p>\n
 \u00bb.41'5::-\u00a7";.;siacrna of mandatary er parmanent<\/p>\n
  \u00a7..Ih':[l..'lIE5f.\u00a3if:iC\u00a3J3.'#2:\u00a7if5'\u00a7;":;t13U5 it dismissed the suit: of the<\/p>\n
g5la;nt.'.iJ_3.f3 AggL';-\\!t!IIt.i tr,-r the sI…J..c:!. jI.:dgr1n_-nt anrl<\/p>\n
"'4r:jc$iJ'rt on reappraciatian of the entire avitianca cm<\/p>\n
wracarci and after formulating the points for<\/p>\n
\\u\/
\nV<\/p>\n
consideratian has agreed with the findings<\/p>\n
mccmssiad try the Trial court \ufb01nd cliamizssad the<\/p>\n
appaa.1. Aggriavad by than two concurraj\ufb01ti<\/p>\n
findings the plaintiffa are in an-sand appea;l_.,._'44'_\u00bbi:"*Q"? <\/p>\n
7. sri.s.3.Habba11i, 1earnea”ceupgaL f\u00e9r \ufb01nds’<\/p>\n
agapallanta: aaaailing the i:n,;:au<;j'n_ae::i._ii'_jiucli<;_:'t::\u00bb,<%Aa'rxtV <\/p>\n
– dacraa of the caurta: baloi\u00e9-ifogjterihciag\ufb01,’ <\/p>\n
1\u00a5&i.r.;A pm; 9<\/p>\n
the _ma 3119:; tn; dniendantn i\u00bb._a’n._.d. 2 9
\ncmsstrmticn is: a re\u00a7–:?;danti\u20ac%-1:. \u00a3~=\u00a7:-as.”–..as per the
\nC\ufb01w\ufb01l\ufb01-.h1*:\ufb01\ufb011″\u00e9 B”if\ufb01l\ufb01”\u00a7I’l.ieu’f ‘Pl.-ii’). Ewan “‘ the<\/p>\n
Gmrarnmant    par EILD2
\npermitting  ziuxsing harm and
\nhmspital:  zaiixa, the. same being
\ncontrgW ~._{‘\u00a7gv”””af the Karnataka Town<\/p>\n
and countn\u00a7*;P1ahnin\u00a2” Amt. 1955, still the<\/p>\n
;j”VVt:\u00bb:1ns’t;’:C1ct;ivnni. \ufb02an “::’Li’i:”‘Vup Imuld be illegal. The<\/p>\n
‘ajmly provide: for r.-hangs or land<\/p>\n
  ua\u00e9iaf-‘ti r;\u00a7:.\ufb01’ViL?’;j:-\u00e9;’rmission to put up a hospital or an<\/p>\n
iii~.._._’nL5:g:’sin\u00ab;_;.. xtgome in a residential zone. when
\nH , thug I;l_:c_mt_i\u00absIni:.s have gut up the<\/p>\n
.9.\n<\/p>\n
pl-aintiffes are entitled to decree Ior permanent<\/p>\n
injunatian restraining tha defendants from<\/p>\n
running a hospital or a nursing hams in the!<\/p>\n
building, which they have cunstructed.<\/p>\n
ii. Per contra, the laarna:L1″i”co!;ns’_\u00a71_:.fi:t._ <\/p>\n
respondent smtnrijetha R.Nai}:_ 7..A_A_5i..ipp6rts.._ <\/p>\n
imgugmd jucigm-ant and dacr\u00e9\u00e9Lca\ufb01_ that” r:_\u00a2m;t5;_ <\/p>\n
in ::iispui:a. _V  it\ufb02iiiti””\u00a5-::anatruction.
\nAfter dem:ali:s.h:i\u00a7f$V~;.,t:’:.\u00bb\u00bb i.f:”ahsif;,rL’1ctian they have
\nPM ‘4’?    have’ obtained a
\nsanction\u00a2=V\u00a7’t\ufb01VVV_p’1ain’  authority. A<\/p>\n
perusaaai ., of   Vigiian shows what they are<\/p>\n
=’:”VV’\u00a7’\u00ab”‘?-‘.I’13’f\u00e9’;”A’;-5″‘~’=*<?i\ufb01\ufb01'i-A. i\ufb01a" "" "residential premises with an<\/p>\n
;_:'e.z;fc:r*'ar;:i,'_:e.*J:2.t;n'i:xv4t_&;1:':.$i~..t_rpgnning a clinic. Thorofara, the<\/p>\n
  plat by the defendants is not far<\/p>\n
'gI.gttin'g..  a nursing home or a hosgital. Both<\/p>\n
" " . f_fIi."!"I.'.'I';;'i.:'ug 'UP it nLu.':i ng mi<\/p>\n
G1.-\n<\/p>\n
nmre nbteinenl a sanctioned plan for putting up
\nenly a residential premises and a clinic in the<\/p>\n
residnntial premises, it does net v;i.e1.a1:eH<\/p>\n
building regulations no: the provisions <\/p>\n
aha,<\/p>\n
Knrnateka ,Town and Country Planning  <\/p>\n
The Guurte below were ju:sti\u00a3ied\u00bbii\u00bbVi’n”heidztne’ <\/p>\n
the nrunnetrnt;-tien sen 5.11.11: 1.19 is J.eg,?al en:-.1 *’=.re3~.i5:a
\n’91’.-er.’e.!;’are, q.-.e.e..in.-. d granm\ufb01ng en?’ decree  e
\n…….\u00ab.u.h..-|-.n…..\u00bb.. -: ….-in… mt.-I AS. A… ……1|..;L…’-13.: …I. ”j.-&.,. _…I .1
\nu.Leu.Iua\u00a7I…uJ.y 4. LJ Lul.I…I….l.U I. Lu 5.!!! ‘SJJ..\u00a2-D13 Lh 58.1.8<\/p>\n
nut arise.\n<\/p>\n
10. __;nsn\u00a7e:1″.:_;:ee”  of using the
\ngremises\ufb02 en.1Aeii-“Vn;,1_it”‘ni1:g_””-_ne.me or a hospital is<\/p>\n
cencerne::i;’…_i:he  \ufb01iienrlfiled even herons the<\/p>\n
cnnstrncztioni\u00e9hwnnyciiit in “during the course of the<\/p>\n
5 gnnnennyg gr _tne “nbnceedings the building is<\/p>\n
 -nniiess the gleintitfn actually plead<\/p>\n
‘   what’ th.e’e”3miieance or inccmvenience caused am:<\/p>\n
he new-n of use tn 1.-.*..ie.. t…-3 building is
\ne’*cueL.’..” put ta use and given e”ida’i-ca in au\ufb01pazt
\n“‘ the name. the question of nuisance er using of<\/p>\n
 bnil-riing for e purpaee other than what is<\/p>\n
imnnt to -cann-at be gone in tea and decided by the<\/p>\n
\\|<\/p>\n
“L\/<\/p>\n
.11.\n<\/p>\n
court. Though mama evidence is adduced and the<\/p>\n
Ccaurtae hava czansidarad the said issue as I stated<\/p>\n
ear3.i.\u00bbar, the suit was filad even before <\/p>\n
canstmctinn of the building. The entire:.~~~~-i$f\u00a7L_.i_ie”.j’<\/p>\n
was t-5.3 find out whether the constructivq\ufb01’-..\u00a7ui.ifLi\u00e9piT<\/p>\n
is illegal or not and it i3;’Jt1dnt:a\u00ab:y-;’f\u00a7\u00a7i’._tvhi\u00e97 <\/p>\n
cow:-ahansive Qavalapmant lilgng   <\/p>\n
cannct: be \ufb01aund .t’ault.–_\u00a7.’it};,——–  hagsa ‘-W… a\u00e9tia\ufb01
\nfor an injunction  3;’-4t’,’:;:s\u00a7:i’3.ance’ is a
\nc-antireuing one._:” Memiigr’::’;b\u00a7:ca:;s.\u00a7’e..V’. this suit
\ninjumzticm sgr_aa\u00a7’~..  issue was
\na decree  that would not
\ncome in :tha__ \u00a7\u00e9y..–vg;_;”:’tha\u00ab4.:\ufb01i,;\u00a7i.nti.ffau filing cane more
\nsuit  and to adduce<\/p>\n
mridenatge. in u\ufb01ug\ufb01pafit itaf\u00e9vithe said pleas. At: any<\/p>\n
i’-‘W9;’~.t__’}ju3–.”vca3\ufb01 f\ufb01hi “” ‘interference on that aspect<\/p>\n
.a%:’;’.u_i_::-‘:’:_T:i.”‘st.  in this case. In that View of<\/p>\n
  tha.’m,\u00a7’tta\u00a3g”Vii:i.V_ ‘Be not find any error czommittacl by<\/p>\n
‘\u00a35-\u00e9ii\ufb01\u00e9nti appaal, wniah merit admission. I-innca, the<\/p>\n
appeal is diamissed reserving liberty as<\/p>\n
aforasnid.\n<\/p>\n
N6!”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 Author: N.Kumar 1 {:3 I1– IN THE HIGH COURT SF KHRNETAKH AT BANGALORE nnwnn THIS THE o4″‘nmx or APRIL 2908 BEFORE THE HDN’ELE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMRR nzsunan smcoun APPEAL no.2455x2oc5Tj {; ‘ BETWEEN: MREEERBHMED 3:0 AEDULKAREEM uALguA;\ufb01 v_ 53 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nazeerahmed S\\\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\\\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2005,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Nazeerahmed S\\\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\\\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nazeerahmed S\\\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\\\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008"},"wordCount":2005,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008","name":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem ... vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-10T09:29:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeerahmed-so-abdulkareem-vs-dr-danappa-so-chanabasappa-patil-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nazeerahmed S\/O Abdulkareem … vs Dr Danappa S\/O Chanabasappa Patil on 4 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146758\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}