{"id":146886,"date":"2008-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-05T07:00:17","modified_gmt":"2017-11-05T01:30:17","slug":"b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm' me' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 261\"\" DAY OF AUGUSI' 200:3 \nBEFORE \"  M\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUSI'ICE N. ANAl\u00a7l__I)P...:   H\n\nCRIMINAL REVISION Perrrxo\ufb01 N'<\u00bbsg%%g. Lg  _   \n\nEEEEHA\n\nB.S.Manjunatha Swamy\n\nS\/o. Muddaiah\n\nAged about 45 years  _\n\nAttendcr, Canara Bank '  ~\n\nThyamagondlu Branch ' 'M\n\nNciamanga}.a.Talu1( A vvvv _   .V '  jv .. \n\nBangalore Rural \u00a3rfis%:rict.;'  _  ~  ' ...Petitio33cr\n\n(By  Kumar, Advocates)\n\nAND: _-- .,\n\n  A. H  ..... \n\n. ' 2 ., ' S[Vo.V.1_.a;e'~.,Borcgowda\n V _  LRS.\n\n11%)  %  mi\n'=w\/-9. E3;'Ganga11na\n about 46 years\n\nA "  1{1A;)V);  ' "\u00a33.G.Vi}'ay Kumarm\n\n -Aged about 30 years\n\n  VA .1(:\u00a3) Chandrakal\n\nAged about 26 years\n\n\n\n1(d) Bhagyalakshmi\nAged about 24 years\n\n1(6) Bynesh\nAged about 21 years\n\nRespondent lfb) to 1(6) am children <\/pre>\n
0fB.Ganga13na andallarcr\/o.
\nByarcswara Nilaya, 8′” Cross,
\nLakshmaiah Kalyana Mantapa’ _  .
\nVaralakshmi Garden, Mohan Nagafr
\nYcshwanthapur  V ._
\nBangalore–E’>6O 022. .    ”     Respondents<\/p>\n
(By Sn’ Ramcsh Babs  <\/p>\n
This  ‘V  section 397<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C.,:    and onzicr dated
\n25.01.2305; Fasi Track (Sessions) Judge-V,
\n  2505, thereby dismissing the
\nappeal. \ufb01led   thereby challenging the order<\/p>\n
  by XVIII ACMM Court at
\n B3″9\u00a7’i\u00b0*t’&”\u00a7f’3″v.\n<\/p>\n
 _ dayfthe  made the following:<\/p>\n
H 2  ‘-.,’)]’i1uis  petition comm’ g on for final beans’ g this<\/p>\n
am) \u00a3\\psM,\u00a35\\)_ ”\n<\/p>\n
Hthis  mf\u00e9f i1.;o};a decision reported in AIR 1999 SC 981
\n cos:-2_ ‘:of State of Kerafa Vs. Puttumana {Hath
\n Namboodin), wherein the Supreme Court has<\/p>\n
The petitioner (hereinafter refcrncd ho   \u00a7_va$    b
\ntried, convicts:-d and sentenced
\nunder section 138 of the Ncgq\u00e9rigtblc    ‘V
\n[for short. ‘thc Act’). in C.C.Ndi;\u00a7S10]  of
\nXVIII ACMM8aXXASCJ   M’  <\/p>\n
Accused \ufb01lcd    on the<\/p>\n
\ufb01le of Fast    at Bangalore. The<\/p>\n
learned Sessions an  of evidence has
\ncon\ufb01rmed th c:.  Thcmforc, accused is<\/p>\n
‘before this court by   397 and 401 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
  of c\u00e9gi\u00e9z   1   xx” nt \ufb01ndm gs recorded by the<\/p>\n
    appellate Judge, it is necessary for<\/p>\n
‘5.  Ordinaxily, thcmfom, it would not
\nbe appmpriatc for the High Court
\naPPIDPI1’atc the evidence and come to
\nconclusion on the same when   * _
\naircasdy been appreciated by  _ A
\nwell as the Sessions Judge in   any. n
\nglaring feature is bmugiit”‘to
\nHigh Court which would
\nto gross of jn\ufb01\ufb01cnj\u00e9 ._
\nthe impugned jud\ufb01xent   from
\nthe aforesaid stamz-p\u00a7im,, var; 1ha\u00a7}e$  [izt\u00e9sitation
\nto come to   Court<\/p>\n
czitrecttod’ its    with the
\nconyziotion oi’=t\u00a5:i\u00a7 ‘tI1=_\u00a7p9ndcnt by It-appreciating
\nthe  V ciaid\u00e9ncc, The High Court also<\/p>\n
 fn’1’t’i1erV’-1\u00b0-.n’or in not examining scvcrai
\n“items of evidence “relied upon by the Additional
\nV’ ” -.S6sj$ions\u00ab’Ju_tige, while con\ufb01rming the conviction<\/p>\n
_ 9t’VVt1iii_~v_1:os\u00a7ond\u00a2nt in this vmw’ of the matter. the
\nA  judgment of the High Court is wholly<\/p>\n
  ” aasivcie the same.”\n<\/p>\n
unsizstainablac in law and we, accordingly set<\/p>\n
3. In the case ofJohar as Others Vs.  <\/p>\n
another. n-;-ported in 2008 CrI.L.J.V 1527,o \ufb01lo  .1 V ” ‘V <\/p>\n
has hcldh _  _ ‘
\n*9. Revisional   thcoV\u00bbv’VHVigV1’;VV M
\nCourt in terms of section    VV
\n401 ofthc Code
\nThe High Court did not  on-t,  error of
\nlaw on the part of tho   It was
\nnot opin\u00a2;1..:1gat any  been
\nleft out o-iV’i4t’s    below or
\nimlevagt ; bozo taken into
\nconsidega\ufb01gni;   gnaw into the
\nmerit   it upon the
\ncrodcntialify,__of   It sought
\nto ref-‘-apprcciato V “\ufb021eVVV’ whole evidence. One
\nVV VV    to be substituted by<\/p>\n
V V V –  anothcrpossibie<\/p>\n
 ‘   what has been hckl in the above<\/p>\n
 thio Court can interfere with impugned judgment<\/p>\n
  VVio’~found Courts below have committed any error of<\/p>\n
V”  Courts below have left out relevant evidence or<\/p>\n
 L’ ‘  into consideration irrczlcvant evidence.<\/p>\n
  alsc  ‘copy of letter as per Ex.D.2.<\/p>\n
8′ the outset. it is necessary to state
\n between accused and Canara Bank cannot
\n  as per so end’ ence. The accused has not examm ed<\/p>\n
 of the bank. However, hatter (Ex.D.1) addressed by<\/p>\n
5. 1 have heaxd learned Counsel for pc\ufb01tic–;:1cr.v  =
\nbeen taken through evidence and     ‘<\/p>\n
below.\n<\/p>\n
6. The accused Whilst not son<\/p>\n
cheque in question  ccntei1\u00a7ie(:i’Ve–:  2001,<\/p>\n
when he was travelling   he<\/p>\n
lost cheque   accused had
\ninformed the   branch. not to<\/p>\n
honour cheque “Tax2d :   account<\/p>\n
7. It is necc\ufb01sazyetc  ‘the relevant time, accused
\nwas workir;g.,ag Aituem.\u00a7er cf  Bank, Thyamagondlu
\n ‘I’he  in te substantiate the same. has<\/p>\n
($1’.1_e.1″.V1q1t’2 by Canaxa Bank, Gckula Branch,<\/p>\n
Manager of Canara Bank is dated  .<\/p>\n
this document has come into cxistgnc;   ” ”<\/p>\n
were  before that: Court   . :3 A<\/p>\n
9. The learned trial Judgfi
\nhas held that plea of     Vai signed
\nblank cheque, without   Nclamangala
\nto Bangalore,   trial Judge
\nhas    he Lost signed
\nblank   the Managcr of the<\/p>\n
_!_O.  \u20ac’\u00a7cS\u00a7ibns Judge on 1c–appnx-iation of<\/p>\n
   has a\ufb01xcd his signature on the<\/p>\n
  The learned Sessions Judge has held<\/p>\n
  employee of the bank was aware of<\/p>\n
 *\u00ab.,..44_”.g:onscq11;j:a1’1!:es of carrying siped blank chcqucs and also<\/p>\n
% %%f’a\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7n.L.to be taken after loss of the cheque. The accused has<\/p>\n
  that he has not surrendered remaining cheque<\/p>\n
‘V V  V H1″c \u00a7avcs, when he dosed his account.<\/p>\n
11. From the contents of cheque marked as Ex.P.1, we<\/p>\n
\ufb01nd cheque was drawn on the account beating No.5$O19<\/p>\n
held by the accused. The contents of letter as ” <\/p>\n
relate to ().D. account held by the     <\/p>\n
Ex.I3.2 would meal on 23.o1.2oo1V,e’ <\/p>\n
letter to the Manager of    <\/p>\n
Bangalore, regarding his  smiengier <\/p>\n
and treat cheque book as  anti’  \ufb02<\/p>\n
Theee  \u00ab’seE–.se\u00a7z’ving documents. The
\n  contents of this letter by<\/p>\n
examm1n’ ‘ g  It is also ‘mteresting to<\/p>\n
 _ no\ufb01ceiletler   has come into existence after<\/p>\n
  xeejsondent was mcoztied. The learned trial Judge<\/p>\n
  Judge on proper appreciation of<\/p>\n
V Vv . rejected the plea of accused that he had inst<\/p>\n
W ” ”   :s.ien\u00e9:d” undated blank cheques during Januaxy 2001.<\/p>\n
 -_”I’h_Vet*efeIe, presumption available to respondent under<\/p>\n
  eeetion 139 of the Act was not mbutted by<\/p>\n
iv- a\u00a3WW4:_<\/p>\n
petitioner] accused. in these circumstances, I do  ” <\/p>\n
grounds to interfere: with judgments of Courts 1   ‘ ‘M<\/p>\n
12. Accordingly, I pass the fo\ufb01\u00a73jwir\u00a7g:-: 3
\nORDER. V M<\/p>\n
The nzvision petition is  o\ufb01”:ece{  dxmctx-,d’  to
\nsend back records along   <\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH comm’ me’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 261″” DAY OF AUGUSI’ 200:3 BEFORE ” M THE HONBLE MR.JUSI’ICE N. ANAl\u00a7l__I)P…: H CRIMINAL REVISION Perrrxo\ufb01 N'<\u00bbsg%%g. Lg _ EEEEHA B.S.Manjunatha Swamy […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":931,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\",\"name\":\"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008"},"wordCount":931,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008","name":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-05T01:30:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-s-manjunatha-swamy-so-muddaiah-vs-b-ganganna-so-late-boregowda-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B S Manjunatha Swamy S\/O Muddaiah vs B Ganganna S\/O Late Boregowda on 26 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}