{"id":147590,"date":"2009-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-07T13:10:24","modified_gmt":"2018-06-07T07:40:24","slug":"p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 494 of 2009()\n\n\n1. P.RUGMINI, W\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. REKHA, D\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K.,\n3. RESHMI, D\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K.,\n4. KUNHILAKSHMI AMMA,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K.V.HARI, S\/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, AROCHANA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :25\/02\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                 R. BASANT &amp; C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n              ---------------------------------------------------------\n                         M.A.C.A. NO.494 OF 2009\n              ---------------------------------------------------------\n                 Dated this the 25th day of February, 2009\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Basant, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      The claimants before the Tribunal are the appellants before us. They<\/p>\n<p>are the wife, two major children and mother of the deceased. The wife is<\/p>\n<p>aged 48 years, the female children are aged 25 years and 23 years and the<\/p>\n<p>mother is aged 77 years. They claimed an amount of Rs.20,00,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the death of the husband of the first appellant, father of<\/p>\n<p>appellants 2 and 3 and son of the fourth appellant. The deceased was<\/p>\n<p>employed as Cashier-cum-Clerk of Indian Bank, Calicut. He was drawing<\/p>\n<p>a monthly income of Rs.14,323.45 at the time of his death. He had<\/p>\n<p>suffered injuries and succumbed to the same four days after the accident.<\/p>\n<p>Before the Tribunal, Exts.A1 to A4 were marked. No other evidence was<\/p>\n<p>adduced.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The Tribunal, on an anxious consideration of all the relevant<\/p>\n<p>inputs, came to the conclusion that the appellants are entitled to an amount<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M..A.C.A. NO.494\/2009                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Rs.9,71,200\/- as compensation as per the details shown in paragraph 7<\/p>\n<p>of the award:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            i. Transport to the hospital         :Rs. 1,000\/-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<pre>            ii. Funeral expenses                  :Rs. 2,000\/-\n\n            iii. Pain and suffering               :Rs. 9,000\/-\n\n            iv. Loss to estate                    :Rs. 2,500\/-\n\n            v. Loss of consortium                 :Rs. 5,000\/-\n\n            vi. Loss of love and affection        :Rs. 5,000\/-\n\n            vii. Loss of dependency\n              Upto 58 years(14323x12x2x8\/3)       :Rs.9,16,672\/-\n\n            viii After 58 years(15000x2x3\/3)      :Rs. 30,000\/-\n                                                  ------------------\n                                     Total        :Rs.9,71,172\/-\n                                     Rounded to :Rs.9,71,200\/-\n                                                  ------------------\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      3. The appellants claim to be aggrieved by the impugned award.<\/p>\n<p>What is the grievance? Learned counsel for the appellants submits that<\/p>\n<p>the amount awarded under the heads pain and suffering, loss of<\/p>\n<p>consortium and loss of love and affection are not adequate.            It is<\/p>\n<p>strenuously contended that the Tribunal erred in reckoning the multiplier<\/p>\n<p>as 8 alone and in computing the compensation with the multiplicand at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.14,323 for eight years only. For the remaining three years, it is argued<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M..A.C.A. NO.494\/2009                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that only a lower amount of Rs.15,000\/- has been reckoned as the<\/p>\n<p>multiplicand. This is unjust, contends counsel.<\/p>\n<p>      4. The deceased was aged 51 years at the time of his death. The<\/p>\n<p>multiplier applicable, going by the Second Schedule to the Motor Vehicles<\/p>\n<p>Act, is 11. The Tribunal found that the deceased would have continued in<\/p>\n<p>the same employment for a period of eight years and would have retired<\/p>\n<p>on superannuation at the end of eight years. Therefore, the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>adopted his present salary of Rs.14,323\/- as the multiplicand for a period<\/p>\n<p>of eight years and thereafter taking into account the post retirement<\/p>\n<p>prospects in employment, the Tribunal awarded compensation for the<\/p>\n<p>remaining three years reckoning the multiplicand at Rs.15,000\/-. It is<\/p>\n<p>contended that the Tribunal ought to have quantified the compensation for<\/p>\n<p>the entire period of 11 years taking Rs.14,323\/- as the multiplicand and, at<\/p>\n<p>any rate the multiplicand reckoned at Rs.15,000\/- for the last three years is<\/p>\n<p>not justified. We are unable to agree. We note that the entire present<\/p>\n<p>salary has been reckoned as multiplicand for the period during which the<\/p>\n<p>deceased would have continued in employment. The approach made by<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal is fair, reasonable and just. We are persuaded to agree that<\/p>\n<p>no higher amount is liable to be awarded under the head loss of<\/p>\n<p>dependency. Under the other heads shown above also, the appellants have<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M..A.C.A. NO.494\/2009                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>been reasonably compensated and we are not persuaded to agree that any<\/p>\n<p>higher amount is liable to be paid under those heads.<\/p>\n<p>     5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        (R. BASANT)<br \/>\n                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                     (C.T. RAVIKUMAR)<br \/>\n                                            JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sp\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M..A.C.A. NO.494\/2009    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                            R. BASANT &amp;<br \/>\n                            C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>                            M.A.C.A. NO.494\/2009<\/p>\n<p>                            JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                            25th February, 2009<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M..A.C.A. NO.494\/2009    6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 494 of 2009() 1. P.RUGMINI, W\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K., &#8230; Petitioner 2. REKHA, D\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K., 3. RESHMI, D\/O.LATE RAVEENDRANATH K., 4. KUNHILAKSHMI AMMA, Vs 1. K.V.HARI, S\/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, AROCHANA &#8230; Respondent 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C, For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-147590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":573,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\",\"name\":\"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009"},"wordCount":573,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009","name":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-07T07:40:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-rugmini-vs-k-v-hari-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Rugmini vs K.V.Hari on 25 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=147590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=147590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=147590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=147590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}