{"id":14793,"date":"2009-01-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-09-05T17:14:08","modified_gmt":"2016-09-05T11:44:08","slug":"chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
 \n\n \n\nIN ME HIGH czoum OF' KARNATAKA AT BA}'\u00bb3C~\u00a7A: '\n\nBA'TEi\") THIS THE 9111 1:)AY.0;*=_iAN1'3\u00e9;:\u00e9'Y;+J?:?:Q\u00e99V'_'_;_  \n\n13E:mRi'\u00ab:   V   i Q\nTHE-H()N'BLI3 n4R;\u00a7.j:t1:\u00a7;frx(:;E'-;{_ RAMI:$N'\u00a7'{E:v  \nREGULAR sgcogvp A153-EAL'. 30. E  ) @f2Q\u00a7:2 .\nBETWEEN: V  \u00e9  \nC-handra$hekaIVHanama;$.p\u00bb\u00a7:1   _' '\nMajor, occ: se1\"vi\u00a2\u00a7:.& :;grijc1:;Etu;xx3\"*v  V' V:\nR\/:3 Somgaon?  :_    App\ufb02nant\n \"\"\"    Adv.)\nBhimap\ufb01a\u00e9   '\n\nMagar. <x::<:: agriculture\nR,'Ii--.:) Yadahalii,"  _\n\n"  A Evi1a,gi..*\u00a7'aluN1; " """   Responaent\n\n(By Sxi Rajcndra C Dcsai, Adv)\n\n Aiapem is \ufb01lcd under Section 100 cm against the\njmiglricnt  and decree dated 6-10~2001 passed in\nR.A.~~N'.;_40\/1994 on the \ufb01le of the PrI.Civi1 Ju\u00e9gc (S1293),\n\n=  .. damkhandi dismissing the appeal and mociiiying the\n V judgment and decrm: dated 26-27199'! passed in\n V (}.--'3.No.195\/ 1991 on the file of Pri.M1m.siff, Mudhol.\n\nThis appeal having been heard and msmvcd for onrlcrs,\n\n\" coming on far prams-uncemant this ciay, the Court \u00e9clivercd\n\nthe following:\n\n \n\n\n\nJUDGMEHT\n\nThe app\ufb01ilantf plain\u00e9\ufb01'  \n\n \n\nappeal cha\ufb02enging the lagal\ufb01ty  conr;\u00e9:i::;\u00a7:$s; 'thc * L.\n\njucigmcm and decree  Why the\nprincipal Munsi\ufb01; Mu\u00ab\u00a7fheL \/1'\u00a7 9\u00a71V, which has\nbeen C(I)!1\ufb01I'!}3.\u20acd by   {Sr D131 at\n\nJamakhandi;1~:::\ufb01\u00a7L;i3x.N\u00a7._.4{;f-i\u00a79\u00e9'\u00a7i;\u00a3u:d.__\u00e95\u00e9V1ew2001.\n2. V.  the parties will be\nrcfc1'{i:\"d\"Vt0A..:i}\u00a7'2    to than; before the trial\nV _ 2 3.:I' 3:z\u00a7t the (2.336 in a nutshell am that; the\n\n  1=:i;;ed._t.:m suit against the defendant betbm the:\n\nV   for the relief of speci\ufb01c perfarmmlcc: of the\n\n\" \u00e9g:\u00e9e1:\u00a71c:4ii:_ \u00e9f $a!e\/ Ex. P11 and that other aiiicd relief. 11: is the\n\nc\ufb01sa \u00e9if piainti\ufb01\" that, defendant is the owner of the suit\n\n\" .. \" pm \u00a35.43 mcasming 50* x 68', out ofnon agricultural iand\n\n NOJSS4 :31' Mudhol and that has had agreed to $611 the\n\n same to the plaixztj\ufb01 for Rs.18,400\/-- and aemrciingty he\n\ncntsmd into agrccment of sale] EXP. 1, dated (}9~04--199() by\n\n\\ K\n\n\n\nreceiving earnest money of Rs.i2,0{)0\/--; further \n\nalso paid defendant Rs.3,00(}{- on :6-Q4\u00a7V_i'~:29G.A_T.:'o\u00a7;:  \n\nbalance saie con\u00e9xidcra\ufb01on amou\ufb01it  \n\nrc<:<:ipt.\/ Ex. 13.2; that piam\ufb01ff _ask\u00e9&--. A \u00a7cfcnda:z3'::A  " e\u00a7:'::~'cii;t'\u00e9'*. \n\nrcgistcretd salt deed in his fa\u00e9o\ufb01if aft:::rV t;i:g:'VViV$a1ancc V'\n\namount of Rs.13,400}\u00a7 a;1d \u00ab<'3f"'ti3'\u00e9  suit plat\nto him; that the dcfend.\u00a7;:j:."gfay$d:' one ytarg that\nduring the Mglfy"   \u00a7R: i\u00a7:ndant to execute\nmgistemd    hence hr: issued the\n1awye;'$"r;3\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7;%;] ;.\u00e9s;.;r3.3; f;'tg\u00a7:ctd'a-(\u00a31991 calling upon the\ndcibnziant  to'  deed by rttcciving balance\n\nconskier\u00e9itiqix .  but dctlttndant gave false\n\n V. \u00ab_ rt:_\u00a7:}is;f\/ EX.\u00a5?.4;  is reacly and willing ta perform his part\n\n~ l\ufb01f\ufb02lc under Ex. P. 1. Benet: he \ufb02ied the suit.\n\n'   befarc the trial court dtibiidant \ufb01lgd\n\n \u00e9taiement and contcsttd the suit admitting \u00a313.:\n\n zzccu\ufb01\ufb01n {:35 the agcemtzntj Elx.P.1 ami the receipt of\n\n aalc consideration of Rs.5,(}(}0\/~, but contended\n\n' " -' t11at time was the csscnce of contract and that as per the\n\n\n\nag~e::me11t;'Ex.P. I the piainti\ufb01' ought to  \n\ndeed on er beibre 31\u00abo5--199o; teat the-~p}a\u00a7\u00a71\ufb01f\u00a7'fvvas  \u00bb \n\nready and Wiiing to perform his 1*-ii'\u00a7\u00ab.3.*:_e1'ie '\n\nferfeited the advance amount-and the 'agree.men$.\u00bbcamc5_;- td be ;\n\ncancelled and he is not  to 2e1'x:%i';;   the said'\n\nag:neeme11t{Ex.P. 1.  iigeisv. 'dismiss the suit of\n\ufb02}ep]a1_n\ufb01\ufb01_ ' _ '  \u00bb .'  _ '\\\n\n5. Q.a\u00a7~.\u00a2pe'::_\u00a7g_s:s p1\u00a7z\u00e9;;i\u00a33;\u00a7}\u00a71' the parties the trial\ncourf;   plaintiff in support of his\n__P;W. 1 and got examined two mare\nWimese  marked documents Ex. P. 1 tr:\n\n4', :01'; e.\u00a5::eh\u00e9lf  elefendant, vdefendant himself examined\n\n   1 and also examined one more Witness as\n\nI     court after considering the material evidence\n\nApiacegfl'  it though rejected the prayer of the plaintiff for\n\n AA speeiiie per\ufb01smnance ofagreenaex1t\/Ex.P.'1, deemed the suit\n\n  "Q1\ufb02%he plaintj\ufb01" directing the defendant to repay the ativaznee\n\nsaie czonsiderati\u00e9m amount of Rs.5,Q0O[\u00ab with intexest at\n\n12%: 13.3. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree,\n\nN\n\n\n\nessence of contract the suit of the plain\ufb01\ufb01 ought \n\nbccn decreed, instead dismissal of the prayer Qi"  \n\nfor speci\ufb01c pcrfoxmance, which __is,    " "\n\nillsgal. Hence it is praycci to allow \ufb01le -!\u00bb;\u00a7sisi_\u00e9\n\nthe judgment and decree  by th<\u00e9'   1\n\n111111 the rciicf of spmi\ufb01c Vgf  1.\n\n'2'. Hcazrd the  H  for both the\npar\ufb01cs and pcrustd   question of\n3311:? that azis\u00e9is\u00e9   isfi\n\n1    committed crmr in\n  performance of the\n\n'r;0nt'1'act <s3ii:' that the piaintri\ufb01 was not rcady\n\naxiii w\ufb02ling   part of tzonuact md the time\n\n. "WES hit:-agile' essscizc\u00e9bf the contract 'E'\n\n .1\u00a7\u00a7Ei*z1;ittz=:dl\u00a7',"Asuit property belongs to defendant and\n\nI  :V};;f:_ \ufb01\ufb01tcregi  agmcmcnf: of sale with the plainti\ufb01" for a\n\nfatal \u00a7={)\u00a73$\u00a7{1\u00e91'afiGn of Rs.18,4()0\/-- and agreement Ex.P.i.\n\n AA(iatc\u20ac1-{\u00a7\u00abV9--{}4--199O came to ht: executed by him by receiving\n\n  anr\u00e9xdvanca amount of Rs.2,000\/--, furt.l1t:z" he also mccivcd\n\n" jfmm the plaintiff Rs.3,000[--- out of balance sale\n\n \n\n\n\nu:\n\ncons\ufb02ezation and executed zeceiptf Ex.P.2 da11:d; "2.6-()4-\n\n1990. According to defend:-;:nt time was 'pf\n\ncontact and that sale shoulci be campleted   \n\n05-4.990<\/pre>\n
, but the plain\ufb01\ufb01 failed r5″g’eu;h;:  <\/p>\n
that period inspite of repeated   <\/p>\n
the ciefeneiant as such”‘i.ge* was in urgent need
\nof money for  son, forfei-‘fed
\nthe a\u20aciva1_3e\u00a7–..   agreement} Ex.P.1.
\nOn t\ufb01e   immediately after a
\nmonij;  of agreement\/Ex.P.1 he
\nalong    defendant anci requested him to<\/p>\n
exectlie saie  his favour, after receiving the balance<\/p>\n
 ‘A \u00ab  c:EeLi3a.*;:f{\u00a3ie:;2ation”e’1z1ount,’i’3ut the defendant himseif prayed<\/p>\n
1   accaztiingly he Waited for one year and<\/p>\n
flieregfteeiseued legal notice dated 3195-1991 calling upon<\/p>\n
 n the  to execute the 531:: deed in his favour. In support<\/p>\n
 ‘(If  case apart from his oral evidence he piaccd on record<\/p>\n
H\u00e9the orai evidence of P.W’s.2 an\u00e9 3, but their evidence izs :31″ net<\/p>\n
much consequence in the absence of any documentary<\/p>\n
evidence: to this e\ufb01hct, there was no endorsement “rm<\/p>\n
EXP. 1 for cxtcntiing the time by defendant by    V” 2<\/p>\n
Moreover, P.W.2 is said to he the vreiative of   _mV:\u00a3ci V’ ‘<\/p>\n
32:5 said to be the friend of FEW. Jvcvi\ufb01-:’.\u00a7 \u00a71e:r’; <\/p>\n
approaching the dcfcndant’\u00bbTa_f’his  to’ V L’<\/p>\n
each other, accoz\ufb01ing \ufb01g P.Wf2..\ufb01}fi1\u00a2:n”‘\u00ab.thcy. \ufb01iiet._t.h;:i\u00a7\u00a2ia:tfc11dant
\nat his house ht: was  :s\u00a7hc;’cas accoxtiing to
\nP.W.3 thcrc wage  .SCVtSf?\u00a373:E’.’fi).{i’ house at that
\ntime.  zaaigi  c2\u00a7\u00a7\u00a22\u00a7sQ\u00a2$[ii.5\u00a2 come: identity of
\nthe  Q  they have showed
\n4’+7.g11v:3\u00bb1*\u00e9%z:1:c:\u00ab:_\u00a2_:  and willingness of the plainti\ufb02’
\nto get Afhajsalc’ ‘ii\u00e9tvour, aiso they have not stated<\/p>\n
any:3_e   0f’- <\/p>\n
plainii\ufb01”, a bare statcmggat by\u00e9\u00a711{Ti:VI;i\u00a7V;\u00a7vit11c:5scs
\nthat defandant rcfa1sv2.\u00e9’c%\ufb02’   ‘:$”\u00e9s_I;:’ deed, Without
\nas-ssi\ufb01ing any   If really the
\n wags.   part of contract
\nand if    for  to exttcutc
\nthe sa?.:\u00a7 :p  the piainti\ufb01” caught to haw:
\ngot  c\ufb01hct an the said agmxtmcnt<\/p>\n
Exf; 2 pr he\u00a7\u00a3ve :E;ss:1\u00a2d legal notice to the defendant<\/p>\n
 ”  forward to execute Ittgistttrcd sale<\/p>\n
    after receipt of baiaxioe sale czoxlsidcratien<\/p>\n
azzzgouni… ”  ‘<\/p>\n
”  In vicw of the aforesaid discugsions and reasoning,<\/p>\n
  who has not did any act in \ufb01zrthcrancc of the<\/p>\n
   agreement] Ex.P.1, is not at ail cn\ufb01\ufb02cd to relief of<\/p>\n
speci\ufb01c performance of agreement\/’ Ex. P. 1 and he will not be<\/p>\n
put to any hardship or inconvcniencrc if  <\/p>\n
speci\ufb01c pc:rf1ma11ce is rajcctcd. As such  th\u00a7:-  <\/p>\n
below haw: rightly Injected the  9f: the  fee’<\/p>\n
speci\ufb01c: pcrfozmazzce of thc agztcm\u00e9utf P. 1   <\/p>\n
\ufb01nd any good grounds to hmi\u00e9rferc xwith’ <\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings mcoxdcd by the <\/p>\n
12. As ibr as    is concamcd,
\nadmittedly   “;.i\ufb01:;..5,000[- to the
\nd\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb02da\ufb02tg    dispute tbs”: same.\n<\/p>\n
    the ag:n’:ccmt:n[Ex.P.1
\nthat  ‘-c4asnV*:v -\u00bb~–o.f ” agreement by the piaillti\ufb01l
\ndefen:ie1\u00ab3ii._’i’s ::v13.1V*;itIt;i:iV.’.’1:o’: of earnest mancy, as such<\/p>\n
def:\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01ia.f:t is  to forfeit the same. Accordingly both<\/p>\n
   rightly ordered for refund of camcst money<\/p>\n
  trial court Wmngly imposed interest at<\/p>\n
1’2%p.va..’  iowctr appellate court considering the fact that<\/p>\n
 nthg: tfaiisac\ufb01on is not 3. commercia}. transacum xiigbtly<\/p>\n
‘  the rate of interest to 6% pa. which also (ices net<\/p>\n
 ‘V  for any imclttfcrcnce. Hence viewed from any angle 1 do<\/p>\n
not \ufb01nd any good grounds to intczrfcrzt with   <\/p>\n
aiecrse passw by the courts below;\n<\/p>\n
13. Hence this appeal   <\/p>\n
dismissed as devoid of   V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 Author: K.Ramanna IN ME HIGH czoum OF’ KARNATAKA AT BA}’\u00bb3C~\u00a7A: ‘ BA’TEi”) THIS THE 9111 1:)AY.0;*=_iAN1’3\u00e9;:\u00e9’Y;+J?:?:Q\u00e99V’_’_;_ 13E:mRi’\u00ab: V i Q THE-H()N’BLI3 n4R;\u00a7.j:t1:\u00a7;frx(:;E’-;{_ RAMI:$N’\u00a7'{E:v REGULAR sgcogvp A153-EAL’. 30. E ) @f2Q\u00a7:2 . BETWEEN: V \u00e9 C-handra$hekaIVHanama;$.p\u00bb\u00a7:1 _’ ‘ Major, occ: se1″vi\u00a2\u00a7:.& :;grijc1:;Etu;xx3″*v […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":586,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009"},"wordCount":586,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009","name":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T11:44:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-hanamappa-kulali-vs-bhimappa-giriyappa-magi-on-9-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrashekar Hanamappa Kulali vs Bhimappa Giriyappa Magi on 9 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14793"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14793\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}