{"id":148032,"date":"2010-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-17T08:08:09","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T02:38:09","slug":"mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010<\/div>\n
                                        Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000499\n                                                                                                                          CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000476\n                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Dated\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02010\n\n\n\n     Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Mahender\u00a0\n\n     Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0AIIMS\n\n\n     Background<\/pre>\n
1.           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a008.12.2009\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0All\u00a0India\u00a0Institute\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Medical\u00a0Sciences\u00a0Hospital\u00a0[AIIMS]\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0whether\u00a0any\u00a0child\u00a0was\u00a0born\u00a0from\u00a0Smt.\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Santosh.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0responded\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a011.12.2009\u00a0denying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     Applicant\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0information\u00a0pertained\u00a0to\u00a0patient\u00a0care\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0related\u00a0issues\u00a0<\/p>\n
     regarding\u00a0Third\u00a0party\u00a0patient\u00a0which\u00a0are\u00a0privileged\u00a0communication\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0hospital\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0patient\u00a0<\/p>\n
     in\u00a0a\u00a0confidential\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0relationship.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0rejected\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0seeking\u00a0exemption\u00a0<\/p>\n
     under\u00a0provisions\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0and\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(j)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005,\u00a0and\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n
     sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0third\u00a0party\u00a0patient,\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0could\u00a0only\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\/her\u00a0or\u00a0<\/p>\n
     to\u00a0Court\u00a0of\u00a0law.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     2.      Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0such\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0constrained\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0First\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Appeal\u00a0dated\u00a019.12.2009.\u00a0Apart\u00a0from\u00a0reiteration\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0<\/p>\n
             and\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0provided\u00a0some\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0case.\u00a0As\u00a0per\u00a0<\/p>\n
             the\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0pairokar\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0criminal\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
             nephew\u00a0was\u00a0murdered\u00a0and\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0criminal\u00a0proceedings\u00a0claims\u00a0himself\u00a0<\/p>\n
             to\u00a0be\u00a0a\u00a0juvenile.\u00a0The\u00a0question\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0determined\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00adII,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
             is\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0delinquent\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0juvenile\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0and\u00a0whether\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0son\u00a0of\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0and\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
             date\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0on\u00a017.11.1984,\u00a0as\u00a0claimed\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00adII\u00a0is\u00a0correct\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Hence\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
             Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00a0are\u00a0essential\u00a0to\u00a0prove\u00a0the\u00a0exact\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\u00a0However\u00a0<\/p>\n
             not\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0any\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n
             constrained\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0Second\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0on\u00a027.01.2010\u00a0narrating\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0<\/p>\n
             sequence\u00a0of\u00a0facts\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Criminal\u00a0case\u00a0pending\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0
\n       Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board.\u00a0The\u00a0hearing\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0fixed\u00a0for\u00a011.05.2010\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
      issued\u00a0notice\u00a0dated\u00a027.04.2010\u00a0to\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0parties.\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.    The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0heard\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0on\u00a011\u00a0May,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      2010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.    Dr.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0HS\u00a0and\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Kundan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Admn.\u00a0Officer\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0<\/p>\n
6.    The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0alongwith\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Hardeep\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0and\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Yashvir\u00a0Singh,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Advocate\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.    On \u00a0 11.05.2010,during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 it \u00a0 transpired \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Third \u00a0 Party\u00a0 in \u00a0 this\u00a0 case \u00a0 being \u00a0 Smt.\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Santosh,\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0ought\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0heard.\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0was\u00a0adjourned\u00a0to\u00a028.06.2010\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
      notice\/s\u00a0were\u00a0accordingly\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Third\u00a0Party.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.    Dr.\u00a0D\u00a0K\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Medical\u00a0Superintendent\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n
9.    The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Yashvir\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
10.   During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0parties\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0placed\u00a0on\u00a0record,\u00a0it\u00a0<\/p>\n
      transpired\u00a0that\u00a0two\u00a0certificates\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board,\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      basis\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0was\u00a0treated\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0and\u00a0granted\u00a0bail.\u00a0Out\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0two\u00a0<\/p>\n
      certificates,\u00a0one\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0birth\u00a0certificate\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0NDMC\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0male\u00a0child\u00a0of\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Udham\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Singh\u00a0and\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0on\u00a017.11.1984.\u00a0However\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0certificate\u00a0of\u00a0NDMC\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0carry\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      date\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0child\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0accepted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Court.\u00a0The\u00a0second\u00a0document\u00a0<\/p>\n
      produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0school\u00a0certificate\u00a0of\u00a0Sarvodaya\u00a0Vidhyalaya,\u00a0D\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Block, \u00a0 Janakpuri \u00a0 and \u00a0 a \u00a0 school \u00a0 leaving \u00a0 certificate \u00a0 of \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 Secondary \u00a0 School, \u00a0 Veer \u00a0 Khera,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Bulandshahar,\u00a0UP.\u00a0This\u00a0school\u00a0leaving\u00a0certificate\u00a0was\u00a0found\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0fake\u00a0and\u00a0forged\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0<\/p>\n
      clerk, \u00a0 Sh. \u00a0 Teeka \u00a0 Ram \u00a0 Sharma \u00a0 of \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 Secondary \u00a0 School, \u00a0 Veer \u00a0 Khera, \u00a0 Bulandshahar, \u00a0 UP\u00a0<\/p>\n
      produced\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0school\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Board\u00a0[Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board]\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      accused\u00a0never\u00a0studied\u00a0in\u00a0their\u00a0school\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0year\/s\u00a01996\u00ad97,\u00a01997\u00ad98.\u00a0Pursuant\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      vigilance\u00a0officials\u00a0conducted\u00a0an\u00a0enquiry\u00a0and\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0found\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0school\u00a0certificate\u00a0was\u00a0indeed\u00a0<\/p>\n
      fake\u00a0and\u00a0forged.\u00a0On\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0report\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0officials,\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0registered\u00a0<\/p>\n
      vide \u00a0 FIR \u00a0 No. \u00a0 385\/2006 \u00a0 u\/s \u00a0 420\/468\/471 \u00a0 IPC \u00a0 at \u00a0 Police \u00a0 Station \u00a0 Mayapuri, \u00a0 New \u00a0 Delhi \u00a0 on\u00a0<\/p>\n
      03.10.2006.\n<\/p>\n
 9.          The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0while\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0information\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0narrated\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
            cause\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0doubt\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0veracity\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Birth\u00a0Certificate\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0NDMC.\u00a0The\u00a0application\u00a0<\/p>\n
            filed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Juvenile \u00a0 Justice \u00a0 Board \u00a0 has \u00a0 also \u00a0 been \u00a0 placed \u00a0 on \u00a0 record\u00a0<\/p>\n
            providing\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0background\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0for\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0<\/p>\n
10.         Based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0parties,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0could\u00a0find\u00a0<\/p>\n
            no\u00a0reason\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0whether\u00a0a\u00a0male\u00a0child\u00a0was\u00a0indeed\u00a0born\u00a0on\u00a017.11.1984\u00a0<\/p>\n
            to\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0furnished.\u00a0No\u00a0confidentiality\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0infringed\u00a0in\u00a0responding\u00a0atleast\u00a0<\/p>\n
            in\u00a0either\u00a0affirmative\u00a0or\u00a0negative.\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0nature\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0plain\u00a0‘YES’\u00a0or\u00a0‘NO’\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
            lead\u00a0to\u00a0breach\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0relation\u00a0nor\u00a0can\u00a0it\u00a0termed\u00a0as\u00a0personal\u00a0information,\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0exists\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
            public\u00a0domain\u00a0already.\u00a0Moreover\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0justice\u00a0and\u00a0larger\u00a0public\u00a0<\/p>\n
            interest\u00a0demand\u00a0that\u00a0such\u00a0an\u00a0accused\u00a0who\u00a0has\u00a0allegedly\u00a0submitted\u00a0forged\u00a0documents\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n
            not\u00a0be\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0go\u00a0scott\u00a0free,\u00a0on\u00a0bail\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0protection\u00a0of\u00a0being\u00a0a\u00a0juvenile.\u00a0The\u00a0CIC\u00a0in\u00a0its\u00a0<\/p>\n
            considered\u00a0opinion,\u00a0directs\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0furnished\u00a0<\/p>\n
            by\u00a0or\u00a0before\u00a030th\u00a0July\u00a02010.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
\nThe\u00a0Judgment\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0reserved\u00a0and\u00a0pronounced\u00a0in\u00a0Chamber\u00a0on\u00a07th\u00a0July\u00a02010.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                   (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<\/p>\n
                                                                                                  Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
      Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n
      (G.\u00a0Subramanian)
\n      Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
      Cc:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
1.          Mr.\u00a0Mahender
\n            RZ\u00adL\u00ad24,\u00a0Shanker\u00a0Park,
\n            West\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Pur,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
2.          Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n            AIIMS,\u00a0Ansari\u00a0Nagar
\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.      Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n        AIIMS,\u00a0Ansari\u00a0Nagar
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.      Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge\u00a0\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n
     5.\u00a0\u00a0Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC
\n\u00a0\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000499 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000476 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Dated\u00a0July\u00a07,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Mahender\u00a0 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0AIIMS Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a008.12.2009\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0All\u00a0India\u00a0Institute\u00a0of\u00a0 Medical\u00a0Sciences\u00a0Hospital\u00a0[AIIMS]\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0whether\u00a0any\u00a0child\u00a0was\u00a0born\u00a0from\u00a0Smt.\u00a0 Santosh.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0responded\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a011.12.2009\u00a0denying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0information\u00a0pertained\u00a0to\u00a0patient\u00a0care\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0related\u00a0issues\u00a0 regarding\u00a0Third\u00a0party\u00a0patient\u00a0which\u00a0are\u00a0privileged\u00a0communication\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0hospital\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0patient\u00a0 in\u00a0a\u00a0confidential\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0relationship.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0rejected\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0seeking\u00a0exemption\u00a0 under\u00a0provisions\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0and\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(j)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005,\u00a0and\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0 sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0third\u00a0party\u00a0patient,\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0could\u00a0only\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\/her\u00a0or\u00a0 to\u00a0Court\u00a0of\u00a0law.\u00a0 2. Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0such\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0constrained\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0First\u00a0 Appeal\u00a0dated\u00a019.12.2009.\u00a0Apart\u00a0from\u00a0reiteration\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0 and\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0provided\u00a0some\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0case.\u00a0As\u00a0per\u00a0 the\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0pairokar\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0criminal\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0his\u00a0 nephew\u00a0was\u00a0murdered\u00a0and\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0criminal\u00a0proceedings\u00a0claims\u00a0himself\u00a0 to\u00a0be\u00a0a\u00a0juvenile.\u00a0The\u00a0question\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0determined\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00adII,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 is\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0delinquent\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0juvenile\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0and\u00a0whether\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0son\u00a0of\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0and\u00a0his\u00a0 date\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0on\u00a017.11.1984,\u00a0as\u00a0claimed\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00adII\u00a0is\u00a0correct\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0 Hence\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Santosh\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0 Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board\u00a0are\u00a0essential\u00a0to\u00a0prove\u00a0the\u00a0exact\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0birth\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused.\u00a0However\u00a0 not\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0any\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0 constrained\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0Second\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0on\u00a027.01.2010\u00a0narrating\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0 sequence\u00a0of\u00a0facts\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0additional\u00a0facts\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Criminal\u00a0case\u00a0pending\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0 Juvenile\u00a0Justice\u00a0Board.\u00a0The\u00a0hearing\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0fixed\u00a0for\u00a011.05.2010\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0 issued\u00a0notice\u00a0dated\u00a027.04.2010\u00a0to\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0parties.\u00a0 4. The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0heard\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0on\u00a011\u00a0May,\u00a0 2010. 5. Dr.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0HS\u00a0and\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Kundan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Admn.\u00a0Officer\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0 6. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":986,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010"},"wordCount":986,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010","name":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T02:38:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahender-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Mahender vs Ministry Of Health And Family … on 7 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}