{"id":148069,"date":"2008-08-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008"},"modified":"2015-10-25T18:46:55","modified_gmt":"2015-10-25T13:16:55","slug":"cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.K.Rathod,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nFA\/3562\/2008\t 4\/ 4\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nFIRST\nAPPEAL No. 3562 of 2008\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 9294 of 2008\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nCHOLAMANDALAM\nMS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nDHANKIBEN\nKATLALBHAI RATHWA &amp; 2 - Defendant(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMS\nLILU K BHAYA for\nAppellant(s) : 1, \nNone\nfor Defendant(s) : 1 -\n3. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 07\/08\/2008 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned advocate Ms.Lilu K. Bhaya for the appellant ?  CHOLAMANDALAM<br \/>\nMS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tIn<br \/>\nthe present appeal, the appellant ?   Insurance Co. has challenged<br \/>\nthe award passed by MAC Tribunal,Baroda in MAC Petition No.200 of<br \/>\n2007 below Exh.6 dated 27.11.2007 whereby the claims Tribunal has<br \/>\ndirected the appellant ?  Insurance Co. to pay Rs.25,000\/- with<br \/>\nrunning interest @ 7.5% from date of filing of the application till<br \/>\nthe payment to the claimant.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tThe<br \/>\nclaims Tribunal has rejected the objection raised by the Insurance<br \/>\nCo. at the stage of 140 application of M.V.Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Ms.L.K.Bhaya has raised contention that specific reply has<br \/>\nbeen filed by the appellant to the application u\/s. 140 of the<br \/>\nM.V.Act and defence has been raised that insured vehicle<br \/>\nNo.GH-6-Y-8277 is a goods vehicle and at the time of accident and at<br \/>\nthe time of accident, there were other passengers travelling in the<br \/>\nsaid vehicle and therefore, they were gratuitous passengers and the<br \/>\nrisk of such passengers was not covered under the policy. According<br \/>\nto her submission, respondent No.1 was never a labourer nor she was<br \/>\ntravelling in the vehicle as owner of the goods. According to her,<br \/>\neven RTO Rules  do not allow to travel in a goods vehicles by paying<br \/>\nfare or gratuitously. According to her, as per the RC Book and policy<br \/>\nof the vehicle, the carrying capacity of the vehicle is only one<br \/>\nperson i.e. Driver of the vehicle and no other person is allowed to<br \/>\ntravel and therefore, it amounts to breach of condition of insurance<br \/>\npolicy and thus, the Insurance Co. cannot be held liable to satisfy<br \/>\nthe award. She also submitted that driver of the vehicle was not<br \/>\nholding the valid and effective licence to drive the vehicle at the<br \/>\ntime of accident. The insured vehicle is an auto-rickshaw which was<br \/>\nexclusively meant for carrying the goods and respondent No.2 who was<br \/>\ndriving the insured vehicle at the time of accident was holding<br \/>\nlicence to drive light motor vehicle which was valid from 21.6.2003<br \/>\nto 31.5.2022 but, no specific endorsement on the driving licence to<br \/>\ndrive a transport vehicle as well as a goods vehicle. Therefore, she<br \/>\nsubmitted that these are the contentions and objections raised by the<br \/>\nInsurance Co., which have not been examined by the claims Tribunal<br \/>\nand rejected the contentions raised by Insurance Co. Therefore,<br \/>\npresent appeal is filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tI<br \/>\nhave considered the contentions raised by learned advocate Ms.Lilu K.<br \/>\nBhaya and also perused the award passed by the claims Tribunal under<br \/>\nSection 140 of the M.V.Act. The claims Tribunal has considered<br \/>\ncertain decisions of Apex Court including the recent decision in case<br \/>\nof  <a href=\"\/doc\/1496598\/\">Yallwwa v. National Insurance Co. Ltd and others<\/a>, reported in<br \/>\n2007 ACJ  1934. However, in Para.14 of the award, the claims Tribunal<br \/>\nhas only considered that ingredients of Section 140 of the M.V.Act,<br \/>\n&#8216;no fault liability&#8217; is satisfied by the claimants and objection<br \/>\nraised by the Insurance Co. is subject to evidence and should take<br \/>\nthe disputes and it is their liability to prove the said disputes and<br \/>\nit can be decided, when full fledge trial begins at this juncture<br \/>\nunder the no fault liability scheme, the Insurance Co. is held<br \/>\nliable.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tAn<br \/>\napplication under Section 166 of the M.V.Act is filed by the<br \/>\nclaimants which is pending. Therefore, in light of this background,<br \/>\nif this Court admits the matter, then this matter will remain pending<br \/>\ntill the main application u\/s.166  is decided by the claims Tribunal.<br \/>\nWhatever amount is awarded under this award, is subject to final<br \/>\noutcome of application u\/s. 166 of the M.V.Act. Therefore, according<br \/>\nto my opinion, if this appeal is disposed of at this stage, without<br \/>\nexamining the merits of the matter and direction is given to<br \/>\nInsurance Co. to pay 30% amount to the respondents claimants by<br \/>\naccount payee cheque and rest of 70% amount is directed to invest in<br \/>\nany nationalized bank with cumulative interest and remain as it is<br \/>\ntill the main application is decided by the Tribunal, that will meet<br \/>\nthe ends of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tTherefore,<br \/>\nin light of this, present appeal is disposed of without expressing<br \/>\nany opinion on merits and the Insurance Co. is directed to deposit<br \/>\nthe entire awarded amount together with cost and interest with the<br \/>\nclaims Tribunal within a period one month from the date of receiving<br \/>\nthe copy of this order.  After realizing the amount, the claims<br \/>\nTribunal is directed to pay 30% amount to the respondents claimants<br \/>\nby account payee cheque and rest of 70% amount be invested in any<br \/>\nnationalized bank in the name of respondents claimants initially for<br \/>\na period of 5 years with cumulative interest and with periodical<br \/>\nrenewal till the application under Section 166 of the M.V.Act is<br \/>\ndecided by the claims Tribunal. The respondents claimants are not<br \/>\nentitled the amount of interest upon said FDRs and FDRs shall remain<br \/>\nwith the Nazar of the claims Tribunal. The claims Tribunal shall have<br \/>\nto decide the application u\/s 166 of the M.V.Act independently<br \/>\nwithout being influenced by this order. The claims Tribunal shall<br \/>\nnot permit the claimants to withdraw the application under Section<br \/>\n166 of the M.V.Act. The claims Tribunal shall have to decide the<br \/>\napplication u\/s 166 of the M.V.Act independently without being<br \/>\ninfluenced by this order. Accordingly, present appeal is dismissed<br \/>\nwithout expressing any opinion on merits.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tThe<br \/>\namount deposited with this Court for the purpose of appeal shall be<br \/>\ntransmitted to the Tribunal concerned.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tAs the First Appeal No.3562 of 2008 is dismissed, no order is necessitated in Civil Application No.9294 of 2008. Accordingly, Civil Application No.9294 of 2008 is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>(H.K.RATHOD,J.) <\/p>\n<p>(vipul)<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 Author: H.K.Rathod,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print FA\/3562\/2008 4\/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 3562 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9294 of 2008 ========================================================= CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD &#8211; Appellant(s) Versus DHANKIBEN KATLALBHAI [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":965,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008"},"wordCount":965,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008","name":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-25T13:16:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cholamandalam-vs-dhankiben-on-7-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cholamandalam vs Dhankiben on 7 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148069\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}