{"id":14808,"date":"2011-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011"},"modified":"2015-12-26T10:49:46","modified_gmt":"2015-12-26T05:19:46","slug":"global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a04034\u00a0of\u00a02011\n\nGlobal\u00a0Trade\u00a0Link                                                  ...... Petitioner\n                                \u00a0Versus\u00a0\nUnion\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0&amp;\u00a0others\u00a0                                           ...... Respondents\n                             \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\nCORAM:\u00a0 HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.\u00a0PATEL\u00a0\u00a0\n                             \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0Sumeet\u00a0Gadodia,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00adState\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 J.C.\u00a0to\u00a0A.G.\u00a0\nFor\u00a0Respondent\u00a0No.\u00a04\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0Advocate\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0UOI                  \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Md.\u00a0Mokhtar\u00a0Khan,\u00a0ASGI\n              \u00a0    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n              th\n\u00a002\/Dated:\u00a020\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0July,\u00a02011\n                \u00a0          \u00a0\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Having\u00a0heard\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0sides,\u00a0Rule.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0So\u00a0far\u00a0as\u00a0question\u00a0of\u00a0interim\u00a0relief\u00a0is\u00a0concerned,\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\ncircumstances\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case,\u00a0especially\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Union\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0in\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a045\u00a0of\u00a02011,\u00a0<br \/>\nas\u00a0quoted\u00a0herein\u00a0below,\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is,\u00a0prima\u00a0facie,\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;9.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Environment\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Forests\u00a0has\u00a0issued \u00a0<br \/>\n       a \u00a0 moratorium \u00a0 on \u00a0 13.1.2010 \u00a0 restricting \u00a0 environmental \u00a0 clearances \u00a0 for \u00a0<br \/>\n       new \u00a0 polluting \u00a0 industries\/projects \u00a0 in \u00a0 43 \u00a0 critically \u00a0 polluted \u00a0 industrial \u00a0<br \/>\n       clusters \u00a0 which \u00a0 include \u00a0 only \u00a0 one \u00a0 cluster \u00a0 i.e. \u00a0 Dhanbad \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 State \u00a0 of \u00a0<br \/>\n       Jharkhand\u00a0and\u00a0not\u00a0the\u00a0Barajamada\u00a0industrial\u00a0cluster\u00a0where\u00a0the\u00a0iron\u00a0ore \u00a0<br \/>\n       crusher\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0is\u00a0located.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       10.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0notification\u00a0dated\u00a027.7.2010\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0Forest \u00a0<br \/>\n       and \u00a0 Environment \u00a0 Department, \u00a0 Govt. \u00a0 of \u00a0 Jharkhand, \u00a0 Ranchi \u00a0 is \u00a0 not \u00a0 in \u00a0<br \/>\n       consonance \u00a0 with \u00a0 O.M. \u00a0 dated \u00a0 13.1.2010 \u00a0 issued \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Ministry \u00a0 of \u00a0<br \/>\n       Environment\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Forest.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                                                                   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(Emphasis\u00a0supplied)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>3.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0has\u00a0issued\u00a0a\u00a0direction\u00a0dated\u00a027th\u00a0 July,\u00a02010,\u00a0<br \/>\nwhich\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0referred\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0aforesaid\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncounter\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0mainly\u00a0relying\u00a0upon\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0memorandum,\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0Central\u00a0Government\u00a0dated\u00a013th\u00a0January,\u00a02010.\u00a0Thus,\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ndirection \u00a0 issued\u00a0by \u00a0the \u00a0State \u00a0Government\u00a0dated\u00a0 27th\u00a0 July,\u00a02010\u00a0is \u00a0based\u00a0<br \/>\nupon \u00a0 some \u00a0 misinterpretation \u00a0 or \u00a0 misreading \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 office \u00a0 memorandum,\u00a0<br \/>\nissued\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Government\u00a0dated\u00a013th\u00a0January,\u00a02010.\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nsubsequent\u00a0order,\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0State\u00a0Pollution\u00a0Control\u00a0Board\u00a0at\u00a0<br \/>\nAnnexure\u00ad3\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0memo\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0petition\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0sailing\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0boat,\u00a0<br \/>\nbecause \u00a0 the \u00a0 impugned \u00a0 order \u00a0 passed \u00a0 in \u00a0 August, \u00a0 2010, \u00a0 based \u00a0 upon \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\ndirection,\u00a0\u00a0issued\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0State\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0\u00a0dated\u00a027th\u00a0July,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0Thus,<br \/>\n                                 \u00a0       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad2\u00ad<br \/>\nthere\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0prima\u00a0facie\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0 \u00a0Moreover,\u00a0<br \/>\nlooking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0requirement\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a021(4),\u00a0if\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0any\u00a0breach\u00a0of\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0conditions\u00a0upon\u00a0which,\u00a0the\u00a0consent\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Pollution\u00a0Control\u00a0<br \/>\nBoard,\u00a0then\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0Pollution\u00a0Control\u00a0Board\u00a0can\u00a0refuse\u00a0further\u00a0consent\u00a0<br \/>\nafter \u00a0 expiry \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 earlier \u00a0 consent. \u00a0 In \u00a0 the \u00a0 facts \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 case, \u00a0 in\u00a0<br \/>\nadvance,\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0has\u00a0declared\u00a0its\u00a0intention\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0grant\u00a0consent\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\nrenew \u00a0 the \u00a0 consent, \u00a0 without \u00a0 pointing \u00a0 out, \u00a0 any \u00a0 breach \u00a0 of \u00a0 any \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nconditions.\u00a0Moreover,\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a02nd\u00a0Proviso\u00a0to\u00a0Sub\u00adsection\u00a04\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a021\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Air\u00a0(Prevention\u00a0and\u00a0Control\u00a0of\u00a0Pollution)\u00a0Act,\u00a01981,\u00a0before\u00a0refusing\u00a0<br \/>\nfurther \u00a0 consent \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0 1st\u00a0 Proviso \u00a0 of \u00a0 Sub\u00adsection \u00a0 4 \u00a0 of \u00a0 Section \u00a0 21, \u00a0 a\u00a0<br \/>\nreasonable \u00a0 opportunity \u00a0 of \u00a0 being \u00a0 heard \u00a0 ought \u00a0 to \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner.\u00a0Prima\u00a0facie,\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case,\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nState\u00a0Government\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0alleging\u00a0any\u00a0breach\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0condition\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0consent,\u00a0<br \/>\npreviously \u00a0 given \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent\u00adBoard, \u00a0 nor \u00a0 any \u00a0 opportunity \u00a0 of \u00a0 being\u00a0<br \/>\nheard \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 given \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent\u00adBoard \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 before\u00a0<br \/>\nissuing \u00a0 the \u00a0 direction, \u00a0 as \u00a0 stated \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 impugned \u00a0 order \u00a0 in \u00a0 August, \u00a0 2010.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Balance\u00a0of\u00a0convenience\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0<br \/>\nwhich\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0working\u00a0unit,\u00a0has\u00a0never\u00a0received\u00a0any\u00a0notice\u00a0for\u00a0breach\u00a0of\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 conditions, \u00a0 upon \u00a0 which \u00a0 the \u00a0 consent \u00a0 was \u00a0 previously \u00a0 given \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondent\u00adBoard\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0has\u00a0invested\u00a0sizable\u00a0amount\u00a0towards\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0establishment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0crushing\u00a0unit.\u00a0In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0facts,\u00a0an\u00a0irreparable\u00a0<br \/>\nloss\u00a0will\u00a0also\u00a0be\u00a0caused\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0stay,\u00a0as\u00a0prayed\u00a0for,\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\ngranted.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4. \u00a0 \u00a0 I \u00a0 therefore \u00a0 stay \u00a0 the \u00a0 operation, \u00a0 implementation \u00a0 and \u00a0 execution \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nimpugned \u00a0 order, \u00a0 passed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents\u00adJharkhand \u00a0 State \u00a0 Pollution\u00a0<br \/>\nControl \u00a0 Board, \u00a0 dated \u00a0 21st\u00a0 August, \u00a0 2010, \u00a0 which \u00a0 is \u00a0 at \u00a0 Annexure\u00ad3 \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nmemo\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0writ\u00a0petition,\u00a0till\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0respondent\u00adUnion\u00a0of\u00a0India,\u00a0respondent\u00adState\u00a0and\u00a0other\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondents\u00a0are\u00a0seeking\u00a0time\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0their\u00a0respective\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavits.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Time,\u00a0as\u00a0prayed\u00a0for,\u00a0is\u00a0granted.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Rule\u00a0is\u00a0made\u00a0returnable\u00a0on\u00a025th\u00a0July,\u00a02011.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0I\u00a0hereby,\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0to\u00a0continue\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0iron\u00a0ore\u00a0crushing\u00a0<br \/>\nactivities\u00a0till\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0expected\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0State\u00a0Pollution\u00a0Control\u00a0Board\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a0<br \/>\nor\u00a0before\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing,\u00a0it\u00a0will\u00a0file\u00a0the\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavit\u00a0and\u00a0if\u00a0the<br \/>\n                                         \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad3\u00ad<br \/>\n       Board\u00a0is\u00a0relying\u00a0upon\u00a0any\u00a0document,\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0will\u00a0also\u00a0be\u00a0filed\u00a0on\u00a0<br \/>\n       or\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing,\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0considered\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\n       this\u00a0Court,\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>       10.\u00a0\u00a0This\u00a0matter\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0heard\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0W.P.(C)\u00a0No.\u00a03277\u00a0of\u00a02011.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(D.N.\u00a0Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\nAjay\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a04034\u00a0of\u00a02011 Global\u00a0Trade\u00a0Link &#8230;&#8230; Petitioner \u00a0Versus\u00a0 Union\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0&amp;\u00a0others\u00a0 &#8230;&#8230; Respondents \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad CORAM:\u00a0 HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.\u00a0PATEL\u00a0\u00a0 \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0Sumeet\u00a0Gadodia,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0 For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00adState\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 J.C.\u00a0to\u00a0A.G.\u00a0 For\u00a0Respondent\u00a0No.\u00a04\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Mr.\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0Advocate For\u00a0the\u00a0UOI \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Md.\u00a0Mokhtar\u00a0Khan,\u00a0ASGI \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad th \u00a002\/Dated:\u00a020\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0July,\u00a02011 \u00a0 \u00a0 1. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Having\u00a0heard\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0sides,\u00a0Rule. 2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0So\u00a0far\u00a0as\u00a0question\u00a0of\u00a0interim\u00a0relief\u00a0is\u00a0concerned,\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0and\u00a0 circumstances\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case,\u00a0especially\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a0 the\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Union\u00a0of\u00a0India\u00a0in\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a045\u00a0of\u00a02011,\u00a0 as\u00a0quoted\u00a0herein\u00a0below,\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is,\u00a0prima\u00a0facie,\u00a0a\u00a0case\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0 &#8220;9.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Environment\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Forests\u00a0has\u00a0issued \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":757,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011"},"wordCount":757,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011","name":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-26T05:19:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-trade-link-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Global Trade Link vs Union Of India &amp; Ors on 20 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}