{"id":148131,"date":"2010-01-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-07-24T13:00:20","modified_gmt":"2017-07-24T07:30:20","slug":"t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 1540 of 1998(A)\n\n\n\n1. T.K.BALAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. TLB, MANNARKKAD\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN\n\n Dated :14\/01\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                             P. BHAVADASAN, J.\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                          C.R.P. No. 1540 of 1998\n                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                Dated this the 14th day of January, 2010.\n\n                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>           The order of the Taluk Land Board in I.A.33 of<\/p>\n<p>1998 in C.C. 131 of 1973 is assailed in this proceedings. By<\/p>\n<p>the said order a petition under Section 85(8) of the Kerala Land<\/p>\n<p>Reforms Act by the petitioner was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>           2. Ceiling proceedings were initiated against one<\/p>\n<p>T.K. Kunjumalu Ammal and it was found that she was liable to<\/p>\n<p>surrender an extent of 44.51 acres of land. That order of the<\/p>\n<p>Taluk Land Board was assailed by several persons including<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners before this Court.                       This Court allowed the<\/p>\n<p>petition and remanded the matter to the Taluk Land Board for<\/p>\n<p>fresh consideration. After remand, it is seen that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>laid a claim in respect of properties comprised in Sy. Nos.<\/p>\n<p>55\/1, 55\/6, 55\/0, 55\/2, 55\/9, 55\/8 A and 55\/8 B having an<\/p>\n<p>extent of 7.81 acres, which he obtained as per Document<\/p>\n<p>No.1275\/1953. In the proceedings dated 19.11.1982 the Taluk<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP.1540\/1998.                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Land Board upheld the contentions of the petitioner and held that<\/p>\n<p>those items of properties did not belong to the declarant and were<\/p>\n<p>liable to be excluded. According to learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, it was found that the landlord         had clandestinely<\/p>\n<p>included the above items of properties in his option statement to<\/p>\n<p>the Taluk Land Board and the Taluk Land Board had initiated<\/p>\n<p>proceedings to take possession of those lands. It was then that the<\/p>\n<p>petition was filed by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>            3.   The Taluk Land Board dismissed the petition<\/p>\n<p>holding that it was belated and there was no petition to condone the<\/p>\n<p>delay. The said order is assailed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            4. The order of the Taluk Land Board on the very face<\/p>\n<p>of it is untenable both on facts and in law. It can be seen from the<\/p>\n<p>facts of the case that the properties, over which the petitioner laid<\/p>\n<p>claim was found to be not belonging to the original declarant and<\/p>\n<p>that was directed to be excluded as per proceedings dated<\/p>\n<p>19.11.1982. It is interesting to notice that the declarant had carried<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP.1540\/1998.                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the matter in revision before this Court as C.R.P. 3662 of 1982.<\/p>\n<p>There was no challenge to the finding of the Taluk Land Board as<\/p>\n<p>regards the property over which the petitioner had laid claim.<\/p>\n<p>Before this Court, the prayer of the revision petitioner, land owner,<\/p>\n<p>was confined to seeking a re-option to surrender the land. It could<\/p>\n<p>thus be seen that the order of the Land Tribunal, which exempted<\/p>\n<p>the properties, which the petitioner claimed to be those belonging<\/p>\n<p>to him has attained finality. Thereafter there was no question of<\/p>\n<p>the declarant opting those lands for surrender. When the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>came to know that the landlord had fraudulently included those<\/p>\n<p>lands in his re-option, he approached the Land Board. One fails to<\/p>\n<p>understand how the Land Board could have rejected his claim at<\/p>\n<p>all. Strictly speaking, the question of application under Section 85<\/p>\n<p>(8) does not arise for the simple reason that such a petition had<\/p>\n<p>already been filed and that had been allowed in the earlier<\/p>\n<p>proceedings dated 18.11.1982. That order was passed with the<\/p>\n<p>declarant on the party array and after hearing him. After that, the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP.1540\/1998.                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>inclusion of the land in the re-option statement by the landlord<\/p>\n<p>subsequent to the order from this Court can only be treated as<\/p>\n<p>fraudulent. Viewed from that angle, the finding of the Land Board<\/p>\n<p>that the petition is not maintainable as barred by limitation since<\/p>\n<p>there was no petition to condone the delay cannot be sustained.<\/p>\n<p>           5. It is also brought to the notice of this court that there<\/p>\n<p>was a suit O.S.55 of 1989, instituted by the petitioner herein<\/p>\n<p>against the declarant and others for declaration of title and<\/p>\n<p>possession of the very same property involved in this proceedings,<\/p>\n<p>since the declarant and others claimed independent right over the<\/p>\n<p>same. In fact the defence in the suit by the declarant and others<\/p>\n<p>was that they had perfected title over the suit property by adverse<\/p>\n<p>possession and limitation. The suit was decreed in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff-petitioner herein. It is said that an appeal is pending and<\/p>\n<p>the order has not become final. Any how, it is not necessary that<\/p>\n<p>this court should wait for a finding in that appeal, that has nothing<\/p>\n<p>to do with the present proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP.1540\/1998.                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           Therefore, this revision is allowed, the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>is set aside and it is held that the land which was exempted as<\/p>\n<p>belonging to the petitioner in the order dated 18.11.1982 shall not<\/p>\n<p>be taken possession of in pursuance of the re-option exercised by<\/p>\n<p>the declarant. It is also made clear that the above findings are only<\/p>\n<p>for the purpose of this proceeding and it may not affect the other<\/p>\n<p>proceedings between the parties in the civil court.<\/p>\n<p>                                               P. BHAVADASAN,<br \/>\n                                                    JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sb.\n<\/p>\n<p>CRP.1540\/1998.    6<\/p>\n<p>                               P. BHAVADASAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                     &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                               C.R.P. No. 1540 of 1998\n<\/p>\n<p>                     &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                         ORDER<\/p>\n<p>                                     14.01.2010<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 1540 of 1998(A) 1. T.K.BALAN &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. TLB, MANNARKKAD &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.) For Respondent :SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.) The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN Dated :14\/01\/2010 O R D E R P. BHAVADASAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":859,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\",\"name\":\"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010"},"wordCount":859,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010","name":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-24T07:30:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-tlb-on-14-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.K.Balan vs Tlb on 14 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148131\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}