{"id":148169,"date":"2008-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008"},"modified":"2015-07-22T20:25:52","modified_gmt":"2015-07-22T14:55:52","slug":"v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm or KARNATAKA AT 3ANGAI,\u00e9R\u00a7'%:\u00abT   \n\nDATEG THIS me 27*\" DAY OF A_L!GU_ST, 250\ufb01s-- fT;     4 \n\nswans % A M _ %\nTHE HOMBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQK js\";A%::\u00a7Ii*\u00abar;r:1:;f\u00e9H::   A<\/pre>\n
WRIT PETITION No.18S?8 \u00e9\ufb01\u00e9eog {GM-R;Esj:
\nBETWEEN   _    <\/p>\n
V s susau – V
\n5\/0 LATE SEETHARAMAI. es  %
\nAGED as YEARS
\nwe \ufb01ASAVAVALLY v:L.LAr:~;;:-:  . %
\nI-(ANATHI pros?    A
\nCHIKMAGALUR TALUK  <\/p>\n
REP. av HIS 9A~Hes,pE.a * \u00ab
\nSRI.RANGANA:_TH   <\/p>\n
 PETITIONER<\/p>\n
“(5_y”Sri  Sa:{d\u00e9,-ep ‘Eaii\u00a5, Advocate for
\n‘M15. Ashek\u00bb Haranahalli Associates, Advaczatar.)<\/p>\n
AhI3~   a  %%%%%
\n1  DE\u00a7UTY%<:6iv\u00e9MiSsIomER<\/p>\n
'i1".HIKMAGAi;,1}R SISTRICT
\nCHIKHAGALLE2 <\/p>\n
V'._2 3 DEPUEY' CQMQSERVATOR or FGRESTS<\/p>\n
H M' " '  \u00bbcH1T;<.re_:AGAmR<\/p>\n
"CHIKMA\u20ac5A'LLlR DIVISION
\nW .. RESPGNQENTS<\/p>\n
(By Smt Sargj\ufb01ni Muthanna, GA)<\/p>\n
   ' THIS WP FILED PRAYING T0 QUASH THE GOVERNMENT ORDER
\n "DT."?.9.20C6 GPRGDUCED VIBE ANNA); DIRECT THE RESPGNDENTS
\n Ti) PERMIT THE PETITIOHER TO CUT 8: REMOVE ALL THE TREES<\/p>\n
STANDING ON THE SCHEDULE LAHD WITHOUT PAYING ANY
\nADGIYIONAL MALKI VALUE; AND ETC.\n<\/p>\n
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made-.the
\nfollowing: ‘  <\/p>\n
Q..B.D.E.B<\/p>\n
The petitioner has questioneddghe   <\/p>\n
Government Order dated yth septem\ufb01\ufb01lr <\/p>\n
He has also seught a writ of mand_an3.us lie. the rei$tilejl2ideVhtls to <\/p>\n
permit him to cut the treee stanVdi:i*lg:__e.l;_ the ~– land
\nwithout paying any additlenel”rhar,ket l;if\u00bb3?l’\\i.i”e\u00a7l’,”  <\/p>\n
2. The brief facts pf theceeeVe{e,__t’h\u00e9ltv\u00ab:t’ij.e’. schedule land<\/p>\n
was grantedihy ‘the’5E2\u00a7ate4.Ge-Sfelttjment to the petiticsner on 19″‘
\nNevember, 19845.” .He’V..hae”;\u00a7_\u00e9id:V”‘l’%;\u00e9.29,397\/– towards the mall-cl
\nvalue of the *trees4ust-ah_’d’ihg ‘en the schedule lands. on receiving<\/p>\n
th:eV.arl’lal4l:’reement\/erder was challenged by the petitiener by filing<\/p>\n
lvrit petition l\\lo.,1\u20ac1056 of 2001. This Court by its erder, dated<\/p>\n
\u00a3334.\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
jzxstified in holding that the existence ef 93 trees is<\/p>\n
ascertained after the refixation ef the beundaries. <\/p>\n
(e) He has aiso relied upon the judgment of  the _ <\/p>\n
case of N.K.BASl-IEER AHA\u00a7eE’n’i%’~ :.,,_ <\/p>\n
KARNATAKA & ANOTHER,bireporter.t’in 19s:e;_2) i<ai\u00a7;L.j'tett%<\/p>\n
260 for contending that the"'"cfai*:tee ef~.Va"'n\u00a7ehd.'1'ipeeemes
\nnwner of trees standingxgn the"'gVrent:ec3..i.and.'Hthiex has atso
\nreiied upon an unreportedtciet\ufb01ivsinn,.\u00ab~~dt'\u00a7i:9\u00a7;_Q.?.1996 passed<\/p>\n
in Writ pe::::\u00a2tii   other connected<\/p>\n
petitinns. Paregtaph ~'<:rde;' reads as foiiews:<\/p>\n
_ "gigs; when the..;\u00a7et\u00a7\u00a3i\u00a7:ner seek permission to<\/p>\n
. \u00b0c':u\u00a3f V'and*7f"en\u00e9aye tree\u00e9, the faflowing courses<\/p>\n
\u00a7!'ItT: : 'ep{e=n;'i tb ijbe Deputy Conservator cf
\nFarests:—i ' 1  it<\/p>\n
 tea) to grant permission to cut and remove the<\/p>\n
it "   ., " trees; H<\/p>\n
__"~t3'\u00a5;a)AVgto refuse permission if he comes to the<\/p>\n
'  "tccmclusinn that the applicant has 119 rfght to
\nthe tree gmwth of that the trees be-Ieng to
\nthe government;\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01ii.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
c) to permit the holders of the Land    <\/p>\n
the right to such trees (except saedameeef}
\nupon a valuation of their iprfeseet’ .. vaIue’  f
\nbased on prevaiiiege _market”‘-rates, the  <\/p>\n
trees are reserved ‘trees, belcegin\ufb01
\nGovernment.  V  \u00bb_ _V\n<\/p>\n
4. Per centre, Sm2;’_A..4_’_:\u20ac?a_rei\u00a7n:V:_\u00bbV:MutLt$Aer:eja, the teamed
\nAdditiona! Gevemmente Advegate.   \ufb01e responeents
\nsubmits that the  __:;\u00a7a;\u00a7.\u00a73\u00a7”V.\u00a7i1:”respect cf 93 trees
\nstanding on the  number of trees is
\nascertained aenly ‘  fesurvey and refixing the
\nbeundariesw Sheeelee eb\u00a5’_I’!a’!2\u00a7\ufb01’f5Ei notice one ef the conditions
\nsebject te4.3\u00a79\u00a7ji:eh the  made vide Government Order,<\/p>\n
dt}’1Q&’1i=\u00e9.eVve;\u00a71h.e:e: \u00ab4934 (Annexure-R3). The said condition<\/p>\n
 statee7’cIr;e!:Vthe:’A’f\u00a2reet”‘\u00a7epartment cfficiels wculd disease of the<\/p>\n
Vjreee stef{d\u00a5\u00a71gv:AVeh”.V’the schedule lane. She also brings to my<\/p>\n
 t%1Ve..\u00a2_;sndertak\u00a7ng given en beheif of the eeti\ufb01crner that at<\/p>\n
 ‘efjdieposei, the differentiai maiki value, \u00a7f any, shall be<\/p>\n
 to the Ferest Department (A:mexure~R5 te the<\/p>\n
 “”e\\.4″”et’a.”t:ement ef objections). She submits that the petitioner is not<\/p>\n
83%<\/p>\n
justified in cieiming the right over the tress <\/p>\n
consideration is paid by the eetiticner.   <\/p>\n
‘5. The submissions of the ieerned totmsel heis<e.v"rfeceiv.etiV"g<\/p>\n
my enxiees censideratien.\n<\/p>\n
6. The decisieris on  eaeeai by the
\npetitiener’ side, can beat’ no  imzeived in
\nthis case is resurveyiirrgiii” re\ufb01xation ef the
\nbeurieeries, In  eught to have
\nwaited till  fLi\u00a3i–Ab\u00bbci~i:-iirirrerceitien ef the boundaries and
\nthereafter <:onsicie:red_'th~e  request for the grant of the
\nschedule  In the ease, the grant is first made and<\/p>\n
thereeAftervi"theF're::iirvey and the refixatioh ef the boundaries have<\/p>\n
 tei<eri"';.n_!Ta\u20ac':e.JA  vivzfetixation ef the beundaries it is found that<\/p>\n
vV'.:-Jithere ere"i~35v–.trees, the petitioner grantee becomes iiebie to pay<\/p>\n
 for all the 135 trees. If he has said the maiki<\/p>\n
wry fer 42 trees, he is iiabie to pay the meiki value fer the<\/p>\n
 A I s   ree:iaini*ng 93 trees.\n<\/p>\n
V U ?,’But the aiiied question which cerinet be ignored :5,<\/p>\n
whether these 93 trees are grown after the grant of the iand in<\/p>\n
1989!.\n<\/p>\n
1984? Neither the eetitione\ufb02s side nor the respeeden\u00a7ef’:.e:’Sid’e’_”A”<\/p>\n
have predated any expert’s certi\ufb01cate shew\u00e9ng  ‘A V’<\/p>\n
trees in questien. It is eiso quite poeslbie’  net  <\/p>\n
of the 93 trees may heve been greim\u00a7”%.1y the petit\u00a7e’f’ge\u00a7\u00a7.,.:a7f’ter’:the ” V<\/p>\n
grant came te be made. In vthe lmpe-eeee ‘e-r\u00a7er’eEse..th\u00bb-ere is no
\nrnen\ufb01on of the particuiere ef  v%_ese.jthe age ef the
\ntrees. Leeai prox{!e\u00a7en_s  made by the
\npet:itiener’s side ya\/e:\u00e9;3_!.d  \ufb01e oniy if there
\nwere no reeur~;ey__ehe1 b*ev:s.e~:\u00a7er!es. what cennet be
\nhast sight of};  \ufb01\ufb01npesed In the Gevemment
\nOrder,” dt.19″‘A  ”  (Aenexure\u00abR3) and the
\nu;1\u00a2.c.*..e\ufb02rvtekiv;::\u00ab:_\u00a7;’:\u00a2v:::i_f\u00a7.r”e13v of} :of the petitioner’s side (Annexure<\/p>\n
RS ‘ ‘tr;  –\u00bbetetemeet”‘ef_ obj ections).<\/p>\n
 circumstances, the impugned order is<\/p>\n
—-4.J.:;;g,j;ee’i.:$ as fa”r.__e–s the reependersts’ competence te demand the<\/p>\n
 differentlai meik! value in princmie is concerned.<\/p>\n
. ‘FIe*eiege:* fer an esklne, they are net entitied to demand the<\/p>\n
‘ejev.:1A”g3e\u00a7,\u00a7r:1ent of meiki value fer 93 trees even without femlshing the<\/p>\n
 siarticeiars.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a383-L<\/p>\n
9. In the result, I anew this petition in part  <\/p>\n
resperzdents’ cempetence in principle tov-:J’emaAnd–‘_”th\u00e9. 0}?<\/p>\n
differential maiki value but quash the der11Var\u00a7.{i_Trr\u00a7a\ufb02ie i r\u00a7 <\/p>\n
93 trees. Further I direct the resp\u00e9n\u00e9ents rd holdjzhg \u00e9–\u00e9jtr’u’ir\u00a7r by ” V<\/p>\n
affording adequate opportunv\u00e9tsgg tc_thz.sV:..r:\u00a7etIt2e_r:er iziavvptztvv\ufb01forth his
\ncase regarding the ace cf th\u00e9’  if it is found
\nthat any cf 93 treevs_\u00a7rsa_  after
\n1934, the petitierg.ar\u00a7”is__ p_a%g:%tt;eg\u00abr\u00a7\u00a7a!;g: valrse. If :1; is
\nfound that  1934,. the petitioner is
\nab\ufb01ged to pa:??’th\u00aber’  same:\n<\/p>\n
:0, _:~;_g m\u00a7:e:r%as  <\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
  A  ‘ _ :rmgr;g~.r;r <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH comm or KARNATAKA AT 3ANGAI,\u00e9R\u00a7’%:\u00abT DATEG THIS me 27*” DAY OF A_L!GU_ST, 250\ufb01s– fT; 4 swans % A M _ % THE HOMBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQK js”;A%::\u00a7Ii*\u00abar;r:1:;f\u00e9H:: A WRIT PETITION No.18S?8 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nV S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V S Subbu S\\\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1186,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\",\"name\":\"V S Subbu S\\\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V S Subbu S\\\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008"},"wordCount":1186,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008","name":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur ... on 27 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T14:55:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-s-subbu-so-late-seetharamaiah-vs-deputy-commissioner-chikmagalur-on-27-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V S Subbu S\/O Late Seetharamaiah vs Deputy Commissioner Chikmagalur … on 27 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}