{"id":148455,"date":"2009-01-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-21T22:46:36","modified_gmt":"2017-08-21T17:16:36","slug":"hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
i<\/p>\n
25: “ms azea aaijm GF KARNATAKA AT 3AN\u00a7ALsa\u00a7<\/p>\n
mama “E”!-{IS THE 15″”? 5:255: 0:: JANUARY 2a__\u00ab:’\u00a7_:59′” ‘ ”    .<\/p>\n
BE?9RE<\/p>\n
‘:*;–s\u00a7 i-\u00a7G\u00a3’s\u00a5’8LE MR, ,3i.3S’?ECE3%?s%Vf$D.?:AA?\u00a7i.?*?1′  <\/p>\n
;’\ufb01;.R,P’;  , \u00a7:\u00bb’\u00ab’Sg”;:f.4.%A\u00bb*;f_\u00a7\u00a7*’?–A_& ‘L
\naamaes\u00e9:    L     ” <\/p>\n
%’%I?\u00a7\u00a75JS”\u00a7”Ai’\u00a7.. \u00a7.sis;11;..*.:’v:\ufb01-‘:3 1.3s%’s:1*EB
\nFQ?;f’v’:\u00a7RL'{ As
\nE-\u00e9Ih\u00a7U\u00a7’EA:*’\u00a7\u00bb_i;E:’ii’E:’~7; L\u00a7%ss<:&::':E\u00a7%.
\n?\u00ab:%;sea*sa::us\u00a3,1a:,%%
\n\ufb01\ufb01-.i*\u00abi"\u00a7'Hf;3"\u00a7%'Ii,?\u00a7"Et\u00a7It3!\u00a5\u00a7: 'F.O.\ufb01:,\u00a35'-<\/p>\n
\netags\ufb01aiaz-5\u00a7$ke2sV%     \n  A      ?E'?E'\u00a3'\u00a7(}?\u00a7E':i\n<\/pre>\n
:32′  a RA:’3′:1*;3.*JA?\u00a7;~.S?z;i\u00a7D\u00a7f– ma SR; 5 aassrnsgamj<\/p>\n
Am:\n<\/p>\n
  3;)” \u00ab .S’\u00a7’,s’\u00a5i’\u00a7 ‘\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7$5 zszgaa\ufb01gvam<\/p>\n
 A  BT’:’.i,5i;.}$;{Z3\u00a2\u00a7:r’R’\u00a33.s\u20acrsTE mace
\n _ E\u00a7!_5z?\u00a7i3.5\u00a7i;’?\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7x’vV””\n<\/p>\n
  2:; Sti\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i-‘\u00a7 .\n<\/p>\n
 \u00a7;$..\u00a7.z;s::~\u00a7,a.s C:-:A.rx;\u00a7
\n V ” .. \u00a7sGE\u00a7=–33 ‘z’EAR.$
\n \u00e9v\u00a7;\u00aba.:Irx\u00a7E, MAvAa?HAa?ET
\n mzs\u00e9z\ufb01gr cams
\n;B\ufb01aa”>\u00e9$\ufb01zL\u00bb;”}RE
\nT  RES?G\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7E\u00a7’\u00a7T$<\/p>\n
M’ A   \u00a35? a\u00e9is arwaseam Assecxgms, \u00a3x;,’IrE:’s. FER R~\u00bb2)<\/p>\n
  C\u00a7”\u00a7i…,R\u00a7’a\u00a3’ES\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7*\u00a7 ?E”\u00a5’I”‘\u00a7”\u00a7\u20ac.”;:’~\u00e9 ES FREQ W5 39? Rfw r\u00e9\ufb01i,<\/p>\n
CR.?,C. ?\u00a7.A”:’E\u00a7’*\u00a7G TQ SET A\ufb01fil\ufb01\ufb01 THE GRBER QATEQ<\/p>\n
 ;rf}:\u00a7I?$;:–;.\u00e9:rm*a:*::;’a:g”:ssa;f~,i ha\u00e9 i\u00e9f\ufb01f\ufb01iii\u00e9\ufb01 a grime 3: act, be<\/p>\n
u<\/p>\n
3*
\n9} ;’l?-Star seizasre ef the artic\u00e9eg, 2*’ rasgcsncient maved
\nair: aggiicaiiss: ungi\u00e9f \ufb01eztiarzs 453 anti 45?\u00a7\u20ac;r,?,\u00a7r.. se; \u00e9\u00a7g_5n\u00a7<\/p>\n
grant 9:’ ifzterim zzusia\u00e9v \u00ab:1? ihe miz\u00e9\u00e9 \u00a7\u00a5’\u00a7rc:3:3:’:sg.:’_ ”’ ‘<\/p>\n
2′): Tim magistrate; 3fier:”ir3e’a’r%.r;g..A ti\u00e9\u00e9JV”v?;r;:f3:V.:’::*\u00a7:\u00a7:r”2f\u00e9i1V:<\/p>\n
%:’ej&:::i&:::::f E332 apg\u00e9igaiicrz Xfi\ufb01\u00e9 ‘ej_r”\u00e95e;.:f. \u00a7aif\u00a7;;\u00e9”\u00bb.a=,&\u00a7:fa:’:\u00a7?:.VV<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said er\u00e9ar, 2\u00bb’.”‘%”‘rasp\u00e9n:ie!nta\u00e9;a?\u00e9’*:v\u00a7’%\u00a7”%e\u00a5is\u00a7c:\u20ac’<\/p>\n
i\u00e9efisre the segsic\ufb01s :r;2;:\u00a7i w;%”z’\u00a7’,=::fr’;* E;r.::*ar \u00e9:ai\u00e9a:i= z,’;”‘,2Q:t28,.<\/p>\n
aiiaweci Liza a\ufb01aiitatica ‘a r:_\u00e9 $ai: ‘E:’s\u00e9:_i;;e””-\u00ab?:f’::.::”:::\u00a2_r\u00a7ar cf the triai
\naswi ra\u00a7e::t\u00a72f:.s\u00a7~ jEfr’_;r\u00ab-vi,’ s; a2″”:”a;\u00e9;’V.= -.’T\u00a7’?:\u00a7s:=;j.._;\u00a77et’;\u00e9:i:\u00a7\u00e9r:e*r c\u00e9mgany is<\/p>\n
ifsaregfcxre iii ‘t\u00a7:\u00a7_:3–.r\u00e9’ii\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:’:..j;~~.. _ <\/p>\n
5:: :t,\u00a7*.$3i\u00a5”f\u00a5\u00e9\u00a7 .’:\u00a71.;\u00a7\u00a7f2S+E\u00a5’..f\u00a7\u00a75__i\u00a71\u00a7[Q\u00e9iiii\u00e9iiaf wmjid submit that<\/p>\n
\u00a3313 c\u00e9r\ufb01\u00e9ir’u\u00a7\u00e9sse\u00a7=.by :f%:\u00a7’Egg:-\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01 $\ufb01S$\u00a7G’Z\u00a5’3S judge is agairzst aiis’
\n;faci:ga;’:L;\u00a7 QSQ:-aV%i\u00a7\u00a7%i\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7 Q? :59 age, \u00a73affi\u00a3:’!,\u00a7\u00a7af\u00a7?y” as %t ig in<\/p>\n
9″\n<\/p>\n
Ear: Q’? \ufb01actiarz E5 3? iha \u00a35′; 2-; thig<\/p>\n
mt’
\nR.\n<\/p>\n
we
\nfj’
\nU
\ngm:\n<\/p>\n
m
\nW
\n“N
\n{:2
\nEm
\nV?’<\/p>\n
\ufb01g as :3 whet\ufb01a: iize<\/p>\n
Mllllue<\/p>\n
$3′; :3′:\n<\/p>\n
 *-\u00bbv.::;s1\u00a7?\u00a7\u00abm\u00a7i$ it was mi ii\u00e9a giaga far ifaa S\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01i\u00e9fs\ufb01 judge is<\/p>\n
$97\/,<\/p>\n
9-1′
\nI<\/p>\n
Q?’ waniarfaiiig\u00e9g \u00a33′? am\u00e9ucts Qf the camgarzig, R46-.–:.*=:\u00a7?t;:%”\u00a7f’r’;\u00abc\u00a7;&:r=;i:\u00bb–<\/p>\n
2 S3 3 \ufb01rms fi\u00e9a \u00a7\u00a33TI’C\u00a7’!\u00a7$$\u00a5’ {sf the maducts rxieaf\ufb01z <\/p>\n
ihg articies are mi re\u00e9ease\ufb01, his i:wesfrr:aii=’ft \u00a5\u00a7\u00a7?;;\u00a7\u00a7C5’4 5% .i\u00a7st;’.., a<\/p>\n
Sr’, He figzriher g\ufb01bmits the pi\u00a7’0v\u00a7$\u00a5*:’;_:?ss $1? $\u00a7a:i:%e:vi:’1 ‘ifs?-}’5;% @”?’= <\/p>\n
the f\ufb01aient Act aermitg a ;:e:’\u00e9V\u00a7*:i:._”pE$_Vi2*ar:\ufb01e;:s\u00a7%:”_”::;;;:}ic\u00e9$\u00a7  the
\narig\u00e9\ufb01ai \u00b0\u00a5”\ufb01\u00a7E”iLif\u00a7\u00a3:iLi\u00a5”&i”   23\u00a7i\u00e9%:\u00a7i%:”:\u00a7sr:=: amj
\ni\u00e9ei\u00e9cga the at: 9? the__V:f\u00e9$_g\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7s\u00a7:2i”~.:\u00a7v\u00a7:’AA~’.Ig\u00a7;:235ring prgdzgcts
\ndira-ciify fmmf it’i*:;e 7′;*r?\u00a71%1′:;f\u00a7\u00a7ii;2?a\u00a7{ “\ufb01r. it\u00a7 agarsts \ufb01aeg rub:
\namausi in  52′ tm Agt, Segi\u00e9es,
\ntha \u00a7:}\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7: ts :f%;3\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7.:\u00a75\u00a7%f i\u00a7fgA if they ara a\u00e9icx\u00e9ie\u00e9 is
\n:’arnai2\u00a7 ;23_’i~h\u00e9 :\u00a7g_\u00a53\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7;5\u00a7”~\u00a7”‘\u00ab;\u00a3$<3\u00a7\u00a7\u20ac:e er c\u00e9zsri, than their very<\/p>\n
utiiiiy. fgaa\u00e9i\ufb01ia\u00e9 %::$i: faf'e.*:\ufb01 "*t"i="2& resisita\u00e9rzt affezi vsmzsi\u00e9 be igst,<\/p>\n
–,.%_c\u00a7:;:$.\u00a7%*s\u00a7..,.-;=,;,;%gg i\u00e9xs\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9giia him, The sess\u00e9\u00e9rzs jmtiraa hag<\/p>\n
 .__:’\u00a7::,\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7:i\u00a7_f~?.,:;\u00a7i  fa\u00e9i that rst: \ufb01rrima fade case was ma\ufb01a ms:<\/p>\n
fa:?”.._\u00a7\u00a7’:ev.:\u00a7\u00a7a \u00a7::;Tfe ragar\ufb01\u00e9ng Vi\ufb01i\u00e9ii\u00e9\ufb01 if i:G\u00a7Y\u00a5’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7i. Act am<\/p>\n
“-\u00bb.ti*:a:s*&f:a;j\u00e9.\u00a7; Qfa\ufb01i af irzterim cizstaafig is \ufb01giiai jgasiifie\ufb01,<\/p>\n
‘E,  iie\u00e9\ufb01ifi\ufb01 ifs: mira\ufb01 iiig \u00a7\u00a5'{3Li\u00a7’2\u00a7$ tazrge\ufb01, E hay? axamia\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n
  ii\ufb01\ufb01a \u00a7\u00a7”f”}\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7\ufb01$\u00a7 af\u00e9arg, amb<\/p>\n
faunrvl
\nLA-.3<\/p>\n
gaig’ that \u00a7’i\u00a7ii\u00a7n’r \ufb02ag yiaiaie\u00e9 GE’ infring\ufb01gg
\nEr: \u00a7fG”si\u00a7SE\u20ac:?:”zS if ih\u00e9 C<::9"\u00a5'r\u00a7\u00a7ht Act –"\u00e9\u00a7i3\u00e9:hVVV'<\/p>\n
\u00e9i\ufb01erziiiia i1\u00a7m is the er:":E\u00e9ri:frf;A,Vr;_:2$t\u00a3:r\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7r"'\u20ac.:ffi;?'2\u00e9'= %<\/p>\n
@333 seized \u00a7r:.ti*:e Case,' <\/p>\n
Each cx\ufb01servatiarz was ;:r::a?i c;eT\ufb01_Vf9r \u00a7sV'\u00a7i\ufb01 a:'~:%:;\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7s;:Aj;r:t–r'?e;.VV:f::~3 \u00a7?E:*. '<\/p>\n
jzsi\u00e9gmg ti\u00e9\u00e9 isaae reiati\ufb01g tr: _:_i}i'e.._a:.\u00a2;:;sa.t\u00e9s3n_ivrrsa\ufb01e against
\n$323 mgyars\u00e9ani, S\u00a7z\u00e9eV:%”t_::a;t i%j_:s;i”i”*;fe;~ bz:’s\u00a7s at’: which the
\nimmggz\u00e9e\u00e9 ar\ufb01ebig p&:3:\u00a7&:v{‘\u00a7;:’w\u00a7V’eia.g’\u00a7*;_ i:\u00e9;1si’:?a\u00a7’:%\u00a7e\u00a7 ta interfere<\/p>\n
with the 3a:r1fi:\u00e9:, 57\u00b0
\n:5. in V:ir’;Ve’1i.3’\u00a7:{:i$V”a::::\u00a7T” ‘:;:ir\u00a7::i*:*rs*:a\ufb01:\u00e9$ cf ‘aha case; the<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7SCEf’&iv\u00a7\u00a7i17\u00ab;\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a73 iT:v2fQ\u00a7\u00a7’ \u00a73\u00a7$%\u20ac\u00a7_ izxy the magistrate $3 tveii-<\/p>\n
reasarse\ufb01 .;f::ti i’:’:\u00a3=:i’\u20ac:3?<$;'-~:\u00a7i\u00a3=""imm:\u00a7nec\u00a7 sr\ufb01er 93' the ieame\ufb01<\/p>\n
sgs\u00a7i;;::\u00a7=:s_j;:c:\u00a7 \u00a7e.V:35'\u00a7":\u00a7%\u00e9\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7 be su\u00e9iainea. in the resuiii tiz\u00e9<\/p>\n
""'\u00a7.e;i\u00a7t\u00a7\u00a7:r"\u00a3\u00a5'\u00a7's; \u00e9\u00a7A3.4j_g%e%;e\u00a7,"W'{%*:a impugrzad er\u00e9er is set asi\u00e9e, 'fhe<\/p>\n
 *—\u00a7Vi?5;a.\u00e9i' :i'.Vla;%.g"zi\u00a7VV".T\u00a7-;V=.':'\u00a7.2\u00a7m','z? Qa\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 gr: the awiicatiavrs Lm\ufb01er<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00e9giisngan\ufb01 45:\u00bb; :;::m::': by the z'-'xr:.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i'\u00a7\u00a7':a\u00a7 <:'\u00a7:\u00a7ef<\/p>\n
""\u00ab_ "'\u00bb%vf\u00a7e::"<3\u00a7\u00a3si.iA:as2 \ufb01iagisiraia, \ufb01aagaicr\u00e9g Es Li\ufb01ih\ufb01i\ufb01f,<\/p>\n
\u00a5\u00a7h*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim i 25: “ms azea aaijm GF KARNATAKA AT 3AN\u00a7ALsa\u00a7 mama “E”!-{IS THE 15″”? 5:255: 0:: JANUARY 2a__\u00ab:’\u00a7_:59′” ‘ ” . BE?9RE ‘:*;–s\u00a7 i-\u00a7G\u00a3’s\u00a5’8LE MR, ,3i.3S’?ECE3%?s%Vf$D.?:AA?\u00a7i.?*?1′ ;’\ufb01;.R,P’; , \u00a7:\u00bb’\u00ab’Sg”;:f.4.%A\u00bb*;f_\u00a7\u00a7*’?–A_& ‘L aamaes\u00e9: L ” %’%I?\u00a7\u00a75JS”\u00a7”Ai’\u00a7.. \u00a7.sis;11;..*.:’v:\ufb01-‘:3 1.3s%’s:1*EB FQ?;f’v’:\u00a7RL'{ As […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":996,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009"},"wordCount":996,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009","name":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-21T17:16:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hindustan-unilever-limited-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hindustan Unilever Limited vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}