{"id":14866,"date":"2009-02-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-29T22:56:31","modified_gmt":"2014-05-29T17:26:31","slug":"m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
 \n\n '(BYSRI:PMAHESI~IA,ADV. FOR R1\n\nin: THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BAN(}A1;01~2\u00a7i \n\nDATED THIS THE mu DAY OF FEBRUARy52o(\u00a79%F    \n\nBEFORE   \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. \n\n \n\nR.S.A. NO.  2o<i2A% % A    \n\nBEIWEEN\n1 MSHIVARUDRAPPA 5   \n\nPRESIDENT,<SRI.VEER&BI'I\u00a3LDRAVSWAMY\n\nSEVA  H\u00a3)RAYAI.A, 'BEGUIk:" HOBLI\n\nGUNDLl.II?E'I'5{CHAMARAJA..\\IAGAR"DIST.\n   '   ' ...APPELLANT\n\n   (Ema; isik  AISVQCATE )\n\n1 H__BBASAPPA -.  \n,,I\u20ac1AJ{)R, sf 9_.LA'rE PUTFANANJAPPA\n % .RyQ.;1<3RAYAI.;a%--v1LLAGE\nV ' \u00bb I' BEGIIRHOBLX, GUNDLUPET\n V _ cmwikwmaew DIST.\n\n2 X .__THE _SEC.RETARY\n'HORAYIXLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT\n PANCLHAYAT HEAD QUARTER\n~ : ,Ho1eAYALA, BEGUR HOBLI\n c;urmLU1=E'r TALUK,\n" CHAMARAJAHAGAR mam.\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
12.2 W SERVED) \u00e9g<\/p>\n
THIS RSA FILED U\/S.10O CPC AGAINES1″ _
\nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE DATED 16.3.2002 PA_SSED’EN’-  A
\nR.A.NO.96\/2000 ON THE FILE OFAATHE c1’vIL\ufb01j=JUD(3E
\n(SR.DN.), NANJANGUD, ALLOWING TH.E_ ;a.PPEAL_ AND
\nSE’I’TiNG ASIDE THE JUDGMENT  “DATE-_D=
\n31.7.2000 PASSED IN o.s.No.294\/9.2 ON THE, $11.3  <<\/p>\n
THECIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND  -GUND1;UP.ET..  <\/p>\n
THIS RSA comm} ON FdR.ir:EA1\u00e9INt.\u00a7THIe DAY,
\nTHE comm' DELwEREDjmE\u00bbemL:,owINe:;~ <\/p>\n
a…………………..v
\nThe    in 0.8.\n<\/p>\n
No.294 of  Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.)
\nand   respondent was the
\nplaintiff  the  was the 1″ defendant in<\/p>\n
the sa:i:1.,s:uit4. \u00b0 ‘rhe..:stA:es\u00a7\u00a7ondent\/plajnu\ufb01 filed the suit<\/p>\n
 egaiiasj; mezaii respondent only for the relief of<\/p>\n
 restI’aming’ the defendant therein<\/p>\n
   with the plaintj\ufb01”s peaceful possession<\/p>\n
 CI?.L.j0_”y;IIlCnt of the property mentioned in the<\/p>\n
 to the plaint, namely, the Backyard ( Hittalu)<\/p>\n
‘ fee “s;ite.ated in Horayala Village, Begur Hobli, Gundlupet<\/p>\n
  “Taluk, Chamarajanagara District, measuring East-West:<\/p>\n
-%\u00bb\/<\/p>\n
24% feet and North-South: 60 feet lying to the .<\/p>\n
p1a.int;i\ufb02”s house. It is the speci\ufb01c case of  pg 3* htk3%C,Et;ti1*z*ht&eee&<oo <\/p>\n
that he is the owner in possession of u  <\/p>\n
property and that the   = <\/p>\n
Authorities of the Village
\nmanner of right, title o1f_  e\ufb01ithchodule
\nproperty, are trying V   his lawful
\npossession and ehjoymeht '   " \u00e9ubsequemly,
\nthe appellaxgt'    as the 2'14
\ndefendant'  –  \u00a31 :3:-53*-'t   Panchayat
\nrepresented by  in the Trial Court<\/p>\n
on service brtthsuitkeosinzxraztans and \ufb01led the Written<\/p>\n
"stgteI:1:ent;}_  'ease of the plainti\ufb01's. It was<\/p>\n
 the suit property belongs to the<\/p>\n
 and that the plam' tiff is not in<\/p>\n
possessio;:.1 had enjoyment of the same, as such, the<\/p>\n
  not entitled for the relief of injunction. It was<\/p>\n
   contended that the Court has no jurisdiction to<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
my the suit and the suit is not maintainable in the <\/p>\n
of Section 304(2) and Section 133 (1) of . <\/p>\n
Parishads, Taluk Panchayat, Samithis anti:  <\/p>\n
Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayat\u00e9   Ga <\/p>\n
impleadment of the 2114 defendanI;,'V._}i"e.V_  <\/p>\n
the written statcammat filed
\nthe Mandal Panchayat,    V  _   V'\n<\/p>\n
2) In t;ne_1igm   parties,<\/p>\n
the trial Court  t1 xe <\/p>\n
i)  ‘$ihc.\u00a7ti;r\u00a7r.. proves that he is<\/p>\n
”  }a\u00a3vfu l and enjoyment of<\/p>\n
5 .. LA tfi\u00e9    on the date of \ufb01ling of
\n  wit ?  _____ <\/p>\n
   the plainti\ufb01 proves that the
\n V.  at Point ‘O’ was put-up by his
\n..  g_g’andfather Devappa ?\n<\/p>\n
 *  Whether the defendants proves that
\nthis Court has no jurisdiction to try<\/p>\n
\/1′<\/p>\n
iv) Whether the plainti\ufb01 is entitled for’_t{1ie”;-‘..: if  <\/p>\n
relief sought for in the plaint ?    ‘ V<\/p>\n
V) To what order or  T .. 3 <\/p>\n
3) During the   <\/p>\n
himself as PW.l and  ‘mere xi\u00e9imcsees as
\nPWS. 2 and 3 . The J?”ar__1chayat was
\nexamined as     examined<\/p>\n
himself as  \u00e9.?\u00a71d~ Ex.D1 to D5 were<\/p>\n
4)  sides, the Trial Court on<\/p>\n
_-  Qf  as documentary evidence, by<\/p>\n
  31.07.2000 dismissed the suit of the<\/p>\n
    h\u00a7iemg% the plainti\ufb01’ has failed to prove ms<\/p>\n
    and enjoyment of the schwule<\/p>\n
   L Being amazed by the said judgment and<\/p>\n
 passed by the trial Court, the p1a’mti\ufb01’ em<\/p>\n
\u00a7.\/<\/p>\n
appeal before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), e<\/p>\n
RA. 1%()).96 of 2000.\n<\/p>\n
The Lower Appeilate Court  V’   \u00bb <\/p>\n
sides and on :re~assessmcnt of oizjal  :1, f<\/p>\n
evidence, by judgment ciaterfi    .<\/p>\n
appeal with conditions.  ::eu1’ee
\nthe Lower Appellate  points for<\/p>\n
consideration.    .  V<\/p>\n
1)   Court erred in<\/p>\n
‘ h(_)ldi_I1\u00a7’    p}amtm” is not entitled<\/p>\n
_ ‘ ‘V  fol’;  injunction as sought<\/p>\n
A V’  for?  V
\n‘  VA   the judgment and decree of
\n ‘ A  Court is erroneous and mat;
\n on facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n
H  “the case ?\n<\/p>\n
(1<\/p>\n
 iii) What order?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6) The Lower Appellate Court held’     _  <\/p>\n
Eight: of the contents of the  J <\/p>\n
Panchayat, which are markedjas E:{s–.J? .’19   <\/p>\n
from the oral evidence of WVS.  itis   the
\nplaintiff has proved
\npossession of i\ufb01\ufb01ixce the suit<\/p>\n
was only for   of title was<\/p>\n
not    in that View of the
\nmatter anew: the principles of law laid<\/p>\n
down    by the Supreme Court that,<\/p>\n
   of 1mm’ oval:-le property<\/p>\n
  k\u00e9lx\ufb01end his possession even against the<\/p>\n
   who tries to dispossess him except in<\/p>\n
 of law, held that the pla:’nt1\ufb02” is<\/p>\n
 .   for a decree of permanent injunction aminst the<\/p>\n
g<\/p>\n
defendants from forcible disposscssion from the ~_4<\/p>\n
schedule property. In that View of the matter, tli\u00e9 st  <\/p>\n
Appellate Court allowed the appeaisnd ‘_    K V’<\/p>\n
defendants not to interfef’?   <\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of
\ntill he is evicted from the ‘suit  of<\/p>\n
7) Being ‘   th\u20ac%%%Saidsi3adgnaent and
\ndecree  Court, the 2*”!<\/p>\n
defendant is     Second Appeal.<\/p>\n
8)  appeal was admitted for<\/p>\n
of th’e.,.faL}uwix1g substantial questions of<\/p>\n
‘t A   the Lower Appellate Court is
\n2 ..   in decreeing the suit despite
\n a\ufb01ndingthatthe plainti\ufb02is not<\/p>\n
the owner ?\n<\/p>\n
t ii) Whether the plaintiff who fails to pmve
\nlawful possession cf the suit property<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
could be granted a decrm for <\/p>\n
injunction ?\n<\/p>\n
iii) Whether the Civil  %
\njurisdiction to try aj”i’n”att\u00a21′.,   ”
\ninvolves claim by or  V   _ ”\n<\/p>\n
Panchayat in  of” a
\nproperty in View of  2:2   <\/p>\n
9) Upon’ ‘  .  V  ” \ufb01ppeal, the
\nP1aiB\ufb01\ufb01’\/R3$PU\u00a7ii1\u00a2i:i\u20ac\u00ab’;’–_V Nog%I%.%:%hars% appeared %  ttmough his<\/p>\n
learned ‘noiice on respmxdcnt No.2-<\/p>\n
Gram   as su\ufb02icient and it has<\/p>\n
_ V mmaixged <\/p>\n
 .V V” hgve heard” “””  the learmod counsel appear]. Hg<\/p>\n
‘(Sn   perused the records 9f the Courts<\/p>\n
x I ’11)  [as noticed above, the 2″‘ dcfendmlt, who<\/p>\n
  sabsequently implcaded before the max’ Court; did<\/p>\n
(M<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
not \ufb01le any independent written statement. He A4<\/p>\n
to have adopted the written statement  <\/p>\n
Defendant No.1. Defendant No. 1–Mam1a1   & kk<\/p>\n
its written statement had  the <\/p>\n
not the owner of the suit    ‘setit
\nproperty belong to the    the
\nplaintiff is not in    Though the
\ntrial Court   of the Lower
\nAppellate  said judgment, has
\ndecreed    directing the
\ndefendarvizte’ riot’  with the pla’mt:i\ufb01”s<\/p>\n
possession    in due process of law.<\/p>\n
 _  suit was for the Belief of<\/p>\n
 only. The piainee” did not seek<\/p>\n
  _decIe\u00a3;ati(;\u00a721′  his title to the property. Therefore, in<\/p>\n
‘ W H ‘T _a  the Courts below were not required to go<\/p>\n
  “\ufb02ee question of title of the parties. The only<\/p>\n
 .:: q-uestion which was required to be considered by the<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
Courts below was, whether the plaintiff was <\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of the suit  <\/p>\n
and whether the defendants    K V’<\/p>\n
possession and enjoyment of the   7f.<\/p>\n
dismissed the suit mainly the
\nplaintiff has not prove’-:d . i.s’*1;he  the
\nproperty and he is in   the same.
\nHowever, the    VVon”V\u00a7.te’–apprecia\ufb02on
\nof the  \ufb01nding of fact
\nthat the V’  was in possession
\nand    as on the date of the<\/p>\n
suit and    possession of the property.<\/p>\n
” ‘E*.he of  notices issued by: the Manda}<\/p>\n
 Exs.P19 and 20 indicate that the<\/p>\n
       in possession of the suit property.<\/p>\n
 ”  VV”The oral evidence of PW.1 to PW.3 clwrly<\/p>\n
 i.i.est3ia:\u00a7Vjlisi1es that the plaintiff’ has been in settled<\/p>\n
 ‘  ‘fiossession of the schedule property for couple of ywrs<\/p>\n
‘M<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
prior to the \ufb01ling of the suit. It is new well-settled’<\/p>\n
by catena of decisions of this Court and the   <\/p>\n
that, a person in settled possessio_n…of_   2<\/p>\n
protect and defend his possession   7-]<\/p>\n
owner and the true owner take’<\/p>\n
property in accordance  by  due
\nprocess of law.  ‘plaint\ufb01f is ill
\npossession of  es V’  of the suit,
\nand that    the plainti\ufb01’ is
\ntermed    Lower Appellate
\nCourt,  is justi\ufb01ed in granting<\/p>\n
the relief of Lpe1inane1ot_\u00bb’i:\ufb01:i1nc\ufb01on to the limited extent<\/p>\n
‘V    enjoyment of the property shall<\/p>\n
  the defendants until the plaino\ufb01 is<\/p>\n
  ‘n1..(1\ufb01e’::pmcess of law. Defendant No.1, who<\/p>\n
1 _  to-be the owner of the property, is at liberty to<\/p>\n
   action in accordance with law for getting<\/p>\n
  :’ vgooeeession of the property. The order of injunctzion<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
granted by the Lower Appellate Court is not an absolute<\/p>\n
order against the defendants and the Defendant No;l[ieV<\/p>\n
at liberty to initiate action in accordance   _<\/p>\n
eviction of the plamti\ufb02 from the  l  ll  <\/p>\n
Appellant] defendant No.2 has not:’eet+_u;\u00a7<\/p>\n
in respect\u00e9g\ufb02schedule pmpe\ufb01y,’\u00ab.g3pr has” oonteiideciee <\/p>\n
he is in possession ofthe  as lie”
\nadopted the written   No.1, it is<\/p>\n
clear that acoordtx1g__to   lie the owner<\/p>\n
of pro  ” ‘  has no manner of
\nright, eee,’ ox?  the schedule property.<\/p>\n
Therefore, he”   any grievance against the<\/p>\n
  the mwer Appellate Court. The<\/p>\n
 appellant has \ufb01led this appeal<\/p>\n
  _i11dieates..__~’tt3.a;t~”lie is trying to interfere with the plainmrs<\/p>\n
l H H ‘T ‘possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule<\/p>\n
 though the appellant has no manner of right<\/p>\n
ll  ‘eve? the property. Therefore, the Lower Appellate Court<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
is right in decreeing the suit against boihw <\/p>\n
defendants and granting relief to a Iimited  4′    H<\/p>\n
14) No doubt, the plainti1f’edntex}&.ed    x<\/p>\n
in possession of schedule _  <\/p>\n
However, as noticed earlier,  the S101′
\npermanent injunction   title
\nwas not required’ to i’  because,
\nDefendant No.51′ ‘iilcgiie .  \ufb01le schedule
\npmperty V.   Panchayat, . it
\ncannot   Court has no jurisdiction
\nto exlmrm\ufb01  of permanent injunction<\/p>\n
_ . end    A<\/p>\n
    1’s)%ef’e\u00abeeese\u00a2een 2 11 of the Karnataka Panehayat Raj<\/p>\n
 _ Aet:,A  as under:\n<\/p>\n
 n I  “‘2.?..iv!:.:. Decision of claims to property by or<\/p>\n
  mm Panchayat – (1) In any<\/p>\n
 village to which a survey of lands other than
\nlands ofdixlaxily used fer the purpose of<\/p>\n
w<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
agriculture only has been or shall
\nextended under any law for the time   A’
\nforce, where any property or any   03?:-.  i<\/p>\n
over any property is  0:931     <\/p>\n
of the Gram Panchayat, or byyaiiy
\nagainst the Gram PanCl1eyat”,A._it    i
\nlawful for the Assistanti’C:ii1:missie\u00a73e1″  <\/p>\n
enquiry of wklichdzie <\/p>\n
to pass an order    _<\/p>\n
(2) y A\ufb01y bf?  OM61′
\nmade uritieriiigji\u00e9etibeee\ufb01on \u00ab{ 1) .  appeal to<\/p>\n
the  the decision
\nof the –.i3e3j1i:,5(‘- Coxximiseioner shall be \ufb01nal.
\n7:3) –  “sham be deemed to
\nhave  “notice of any enquiry or order
\n this  if notice has been given in<\/p>\n
‘  V’ ” the  manner.\n<\/p>\n
‘A   does not create any bar on the Civil<\/p>\n
 ~   entertaining a suit in respect of immovable<\/p>\n
Vi     lying within tl1Cj1.1I’iSdiC’l’.i0I1 of Gram Panchayat<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
16) In my opinion, as the plainti\ufb01 has<\/p>\n
admitted that the schedule property is owned ~ <\/p>\n
Panchayat, Section 21 1 of Panchayat Reg    ‘V<\/p>\n
application to the suit \ufb01led for  of  <\/p>\n
injunction by the plainti\ufb02’, who   <\/p>\n
possession of the property.
\ninterfere with the  eituatcd
\nwithin its jurisdiction,    accordance
\nwith Law. If g’    of a property
\ncompxaigasa’ by the autlaoriufos of
\nGram  due prooess of law,<\/p>\n
the i11lA’\u00a3’1*’–‘e’qictL;’i’c’Jr1″1.:V of  cannot be said to be<\/p>\n
et1t,ertaiVi1V'”o vst1it for the relief of permanent.<\/p>\n
  his possession as long as he is not<\/p>\n
   adopting due  of law. Therefore,<\/p>\n
 7{I peeeh01F1  me Lower Appellate com; is just1\ufb01od’ in<\/p>\n
   the relief.\n<\/p>\n
, as to<\/p>\n
1’7<\/p>\n
17) In the light of the above diecussions, _<\/p>\n
not see any ermr in the judgment of the  <\/p>\n
Court decreeing the suit of the _p1a.i1_’i\ufb01\ufb02’f   ” V’ V<\/p>\n
extent. No prejudice is caused   77:.<\/p>\n
account of the decree
\nCourt. Therefom, in ifieriv 0f A1.’he.. cii\u00e9cussieii, the
\nsubstantial questions ef ietir,   \u00abLthe time of
\nadmission of mg’   mcordingly.
\nThere are :10′    such, the appeal<\/p>\n
is liable eiobe   A <\/p>\n
 dismissed with no order<\/p>\n
Sd\/’-~
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana ‘(BYSRI:PMAHESI~IA,ADV. FOR R1 in: THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA AT BAN(}A1;01~2\u00a7i DATED THIS THE mu DAY OF FEBRUARy52o(\u00a79%F BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. R.S.A. NO. 2o<i2A% % A BEIWEEN 1 MSHIVARUDRAPPA 5 PRESIDENT,<SRI.VEER&BI'I\u00a3LDRAVSWAMY SEVA H\u00a3)RAYAI.A, 'BEGUIk:" HOBLI GUNDLl.II?E'I'5{CHAMARAJA..\\IAGAR"DIST. ' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1874,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\",\"name\":\"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009"},"wordCount":1874,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009","name":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-29T17:26:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-shivarudrappa-vs-h-b-basappa-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Shivarudrappa vs H B Basappa on 11 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}