{"id":149067,"date":"1982-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1982-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982"},"modified":"2016-08-26T20:41:37","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T15:11:37","slug":"paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","title":{"rendered":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 363, 1983 (1) BomCR 552<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Deshpande<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>  1. Petitioners Paikamma and Sitamma filed regular civil suit No. 121\/1974 against respondent Maroti, his brother and his mother for possession of the two disputed fields and for other reliefs.  On 31-11-1978 the learned Joint Judge, Jr. Dn. Chanrapur passed a decree in favour of the petitioners for possession of the suit lands and he directed an enquiry under Court. 20, R. 12, Civil Procedure Code regarding future mesne profits.  Regular Civil Appeal No. 23\/1979 preferred by respondent Maroti was dismissed on 7-1-1981 by the learned Assistant Judge, Chandrapur.  Similarly appeal No. 3\/1979 filed by the mother and brother of Maroti regarding mesne profits was also dismissed by the same judge by a common judgment.  Thereafter the petitioners filed execution petition for obtaining of the two suit lands.  They obtained the orders for the service of the special process server on 27-1-1981 and they obtained actual possession of the land on 28-1-1981 at about 10A. M.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.  It appears that on this very day respondent Maroti came to know that the bailiff had come for handing over possession and he approached the civil court at Chandrapur and requested for stay of the execution and it appears further that the learned Judge passed an order of ad interim stay of execution under Order 41.  Rule  5 (ii) of the Civil  Procedure Code.  But it  appears further that before the stay order  was actually  received.  the petitioners had already got  actual possession of the land from Maroti.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.  It is on account of these facts that on 29-1-1981 respondent Maroti gave an application in the trial court at Ex. 13 in regular Darkhast No. 6\/1981 for restoration  of possession and this application was made  under S. 144 of the Civil Procedure Code read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code.  The present petitioners  objected to the petitioner filed by respondent Maroti.  After considering the material before him the learned Judge gave a clear finding that the provisions of Section 144 of the Civil Procedure Code were  not applicable to the facts of the present case.  However, he held that  he can restore the possession of the  land to Maroti under inherent powers under S. 151 of the Civil Procedure Code and so he passed an order on 3-2-1981 that the decree holders shall  put  the judgment debtor in possession of the suit fields with the standing crops.   According to the learned Judge no act of the Court should harm the litigants.  Feeling who are decree holders have filed this revision application.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.  It is quite  clear that the learned Judge has given a finding that Section 144 of the Civil Procedure Code is  not applicable  to the facts of the instant case.  But the learned Judge has passed the order by invoking aid of Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code.  The order of the Court is clearly contrary to the law.  When the possession of the land was already delivered to the decree holders before the stay order  reached the bailiff who was entrusted with the work of handing over of possession to the decree holder petitioner, the stay order became inoperative and ineffective  and the possession could not be restored even under inherent powers.  Shri G. J. Ghate, advocate, appearing on behalf of the  petitioner urged before me that even the stay order was passed  after this was actually delivered to the petitioner and part from this even if it is assumed fro a moment that the  stay order was actually passed before possession was actually delivered it is undisputed fact that it could not be communicated to the  bailiff before  the possession was actually delivered to the decree holders petitioners.  It is a fact of common  knowledge that even where a superior court issues a stay order if the decree is executed before the stay  order of the superior court reaches the original court.  the stay order becomes  inoperative. The same principle  will apply in respect of the order passed by the same court regarding stay as the decree for  delivery of possession is clearly executed. I do not think that  any jurisdiction is vested in the trial court even under inherent jurisdiction to restore possession of the land to respondent Maroti.  The learned Judge had  clearly exercise jurisdiction  which was not vested in him by law and  the  order is clearly illegal and it cannot be supported.  The result  is that this revision application is allowed.  The impugned order of the trial  court dated 3-2-1981  directing  the decree holders to put the judgment debtor  Maroti in possession of the suit fields with standing  crops quashed and the application of Maroti dated 29-1-1981 is dismissed.  Rule is  made absolute.  But. as there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order of costs of this revision application.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Rule made absolute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 363, 1983 (1) BomCR 552 Bench: Deshpande ORDER 1. Petitioners Paikamma and Sitamma filed regular civil suit No. 121\/1974 against respondent Maroti, his brother and his mother for possession of the two disputed fields and for other reliefs. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982\",\"datePublished\":\"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\"},\"wordCount\":820,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\",\"name\":\"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982","datePublished":"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982"},"wordCount":820,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982","name":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1982-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T15:11:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paikamma-and-anr-vs-maroti-on-3-november-1982#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Paikamma And Anr. vs Maroti on 3 November, 1982"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}