{"id":14928,"date":"2009-02-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-10-22T19:38:39","modified_gmt":"2015-10-22T14:08:39","slug":"rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAREVIATAKA AT BANGALORE.\nDATED THIS THE 2157' DRY' OF FEBRUARY 2009. \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONTSLE MRJUSTICE    .\n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL N'O,9fV7\u00bb16 0:5' 2ei);=3,(\"(:?c) 4\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSRI.RUI)RAPPA,\ns\/0 HIRIYANNA.\n\nAGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,\n\nR\/0 THINDLU VILLAGE.\n\nVIDYARANYAPURA POST,\n\nYUELA1-KLANKA HOBLI,       ~ _\nBANGALORE NORTH TALUK. '- _ 5 '    APPELLANT\n\n{BY MR. G.A. SRIKATTTT: ..e'ow1:\u00a5A\u00a7 A15.vo'<:ATE-.1 V'\n\nAND:\n\nsMT.sARoJAMMA,.V T; .. \n\nw\/o P.NARAYANASW:1M[Y}' A V ' '\n\nAGED ABOUT. 39 4Y\u00a3;A;Rs;j \n\nTHINDLU VILIAGE, _ .. --\n\nVIDYARANYAPURA }'.OST.. '\n\nYELAHANKA I-IOB\u00a3I,_ ' -\n\nBANGALORE N.oRTH*:aALUK.v  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
my SR1,<\/p>\n
$1′-a*I\u00e9’EiWA”n::URTHY, A.3V0cATE}<\/p>\n
 2% i:\n<\/p>\n
THIS i\\(\ufb013CE1QL.ANEOUS FIRST APEPEAL IS FILED UNDER
\nORDER 43 R*1,(r} apt: AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15-1042005<\/p>\n
–. .’_j~\u00a3-Ass,ED ori_11;A.Ns.1 FRED 3*; THE RESPONDENT HEREIN
\n4 UNDTER .<(__)RDER 39 RULE 11 A333 2 R\/W' sE<:.151 CPC IN
\n*.__'"o_,s~.\u00abN0,6oe1\/2004 GN Tm: Fzm 6'}? THE XVII ADDLCITY CIVIL<\/p>\n
'& .s1::ssINs JUDGE? BANGALGRI3, GRANTING TEMPORARY<\/p>\n
A’ ‘  _f ~\u00bbI_N’.IUNC4JTION.\n<\/p>\n
:5,\/”\n<\/p>\n
THIS M.F.A., CGMIING OR FOR FINAL HEARING THIS BAY,
\nTHE COURT DELIVERED THE FGLLOWENG:\n<\/p>\n
QUDGMENT<\/p>\n
This Miscellaneoue First Appeal”\n<\/p>\n
under Order 43 R 1 {r} CFC <\/p>\n
dated 15~–10~2o05 passaa an 1..%’a.Nie’;jr.A~:zeV f\u00a7’1.a’d_:4′,bY; <\/p>\n
respondent herein under <*319dia1j 397R: 1 <\/p>\n
Sec.151 opt: in o.s.NQ.8oe_:"\/"2Voe.a ea'-\u00abt1;'a_\u00a7f3i1e of
\nthe XVII .add1.c\u00a7t3,'<…{:i.;v:1_L;;;,,V""sejaa'si.oas Judge.
\nBangalore. granting tevrrzit.-%:::fv:ar'j,rA<\/p>\n
2. I have .:t3’r.e..jl”e.a”r_n”ebd..–Counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellantwa’s..e:.'<\u00bb;*e\ufb01\u00a7:,;=as'–. t–\u00a7ie'"iea'rned Counse} for<\/p>\n
responderrt. " '<\/p>\n
3. _-..Tjhe V’!5b;x*fiee Twiii be referred with<\/p>\n
1r.efe–rer’r>::\u00abe Etc the st\u00e9zV’\u00a5\u20ac’\ufb01As in the Court below.<\/p>\n
~4′;’.-._’r\ufb01aTy~_p’1T;a’%ntifr has filed an application<\/p>\n
 \ufb01nder em-a.=;.\u00e9eaa Ruiaa 1 arm 2 r\/w Sec.151 CPC.<\/p>\n
 : 9I’A’41’1″{.=,,’V:ctrn\u00e9terition of the \ufb01aintiff in the Court below<\/p>\n
 ras”.u n’der: ,2\/’<\/p>\n
She is the absolute owner and in possession<\/p>\n
of the land measuring 51\/-1;, guntas of 1and”–.._\u00bbin<\/p>\n
Sy.No.80\/4, situated at Thindlu .y’sii1”aLg’g”’,’V..<\/p>\n
-.\n<\/p>\n
Yeiahanka Hobli, Bangaiore North ‘1’alu’.’1:{:’Lh’<\/p>\n
land was purchase\u00e9 wide reg.is”ier\u00abed’_’  tied-,d\\t’~.,<\/p>\n
dtd.16–1~2002. M: the revezhu\u00e9t”\u00a3e\u00a2’cfa.gv <\/p>\n
mutated in the name
\nM.R.28\/OL02. She is in p_a\u00e9{c.e:tut1 possessiion of<\/p>\n
the suit schedule \u00a7rop?\u00e9–r=tj\u00a7\u00a5.”–<\/p>\n
The p1air;.vt’it\ufb02f:V:’~   that the
\ndefendants  Rhhiav-ing a support of
\nanti socVi*aiI”‘o’ are trYing to
\ninterfere\u00bb’v..Wit”h’  possession of the
\nplaintiff.  have filed this
\nvaa–p.1;v1ic;tt\u00a7.i.oE1}?V’ \u00a7..\u00a7”..\u20ac_\u00a51′{if of exparte temporary<\/p>\n
o<\/p>\n
1\ufb01j_u*n_o’tion.V_”resirainixsg the defendants or their<\/p>\n
 age1’1.t–s.’*fro.irku7.”\u00a7:I\u00e9A’:i*i’9i\u00e9sizing the she\u00e9 put up in the<\/p>\n
 plaint s.a”111ft””v.seh.e\u00e91;ie \u00a7i'{‘s\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7’fj7.<\/p>\n
\u00e9hffhe defen\u00e9an\u00e9s E. and 3 have filed the<\/p>\n
no-hjtection statement as under:’<\/p>\n
61\/<\/p>\n
The defendants ever that the portions of the<\/p>\n
property described in eieeizs A,B,C,D,E,F, G are<\/p>\n
the portions of the preperties sold jointly <\/p>\n
joint family members te several <\/p>\n
property described in mocks 1 and’V”~5:.:~..ar*e giIn_r<\/p>\n
exclusive posseesien we enje_yrn,e.nftIof,”t-heV”V-..,1$\u00a5;.A<\/p>\n
defendant. The eeepert3rV.a’:i4_escribe”d <\/p>\n
and 8 is in exeiusive gees?-_;essui’od1h2′ andbendjohyrnvent of
\nthe defendant Ne.:\u00a7. v’__i\u20ac’V~\u00a7:e.’:p=r’opertt’y.. described in
\nblock No.2 and 2? eye in e\u00a7;c.1’Vnsiv–‘e.Vpossession and<\/p>\n
enjoyment of g\ufb01effelncieigetg  property in<\/p>\n
blocks 4 82: 5.6 _.i;rVe”V””i.r;4″‘e.’::\u20aci’i’ia.Siv~.e*’possession and<\/p>\n
enjoyment  yournger brother of
\ndefendants.  Portion which is
\ndescribegdvippn wrz2ee.surir2g 0.30 guntas is
\n \u00e9.”s:p\u00a7’g,$.\ufb01eg\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a5;h en\ufb01 enjoyment of the<\/p>\n
det;e.rivd_a’ntts:V”‘a2nrifether jeint family members. The<\/p>\n
x*’defenda4nts.~~s_t%:rte that in erder to maintain the<\/p>\n
” \u00ab..1’1:u’r_opertiesv.V__hi’ in t\u00e9ze\u00e9r names as per the<\/p>\n
:*~.:n1z’n&i–ers_ta’;1dings in the \u00a7e;g”\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7E}r. the father executed<\/p>\n
. its-ebpbarate power ef eeteerzegr in the names of all the<\/p>\n
 brothers in resgeee: ta the blocks — 5,6,7 and<\/p>\n
<2\/,<\/p>\n
8. The learned i;’\u20ac\u00a7’\u00e9.33’%\u00a7$\u20acl for the appellant<\/p>\n
submits that the \u00a3.ea’\u00a3:*\u00a7’i2\u20ac;=.\u20aci E\u00e9istrict Judge havepvnot<\/p>\n
passed a speaking? assay and therefore, the”.o’1’d*ear..<\/p>\n
passed by the \u00a7..s~.r.=:.::*m:-:.::\u00e9 \ufb01istriet Judg–e::”u<\/p>\n
sustainable in \u00e9:.\u00a7*~:s.:. \u00a7:ven.:””‘thpotfghwl'”s’e1.?eraix7..<\/p>\n
contentions were sstsezi and ev.?\u00aben7__tl1ou’gh..se.ve_fa_l\u00b0=<\/p>\n
documents were \u00a73z’a::du;\u00a3;:e\u00a7.:”\u00a7,’ :11-.ese dQcu_Irieri’ts””‘Were<\/p>\n
not looked into.\n<\/p>\n
9. The learned iinzg-:\u00e9_a;\u00e9Vi’V\u00bbi;o:~–\u00ab._lthfe\ufb01respondent<\/p>\n
\u00a7’:’2e\u20ac3 {;z::’\u20ac\u00a7?.<.'53z"';\u00ab.  '<\/p>\n
supports the irnpzx<\/p>\n
10. I hassfeii’—  ‘-ggelrused the impugned
\norder. The_ 1e’a’rv;..ss4.p:”,:sg;;;”m:5\u00a7a\u00bb:’ Judge has observed
\nthat the pialintifs ‘E’3sa5;”””–::f\u00a7:5nished 11 documents.<\/p>\n
One of \ufb01iiv\ufb01p doe\u00a7;:::\u00e9%\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7:\u20ac\u00a7’ \u20ac\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a7~}%;’\ufb01iGS\u20acS that plaintiff has<\/p>\n
:’i$.11.i’VC1.1p5?’3<l'-l\u20acf"'R't\u00a7lll'*\u00ab._g\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9lllll\u00e9s\ufb01issri? by defendant No.1.<\/p>\n
The-.VfJ.hodtoVgrspV"\u00a7:Vs:~~ a:"ii\u00e9se\u00a7<:ssa: the existence of the<\/p>\n
lsvshed.'\u00bb..44_Therelf\u00e9sAfe. iii\u00e9s E""z"\u00e9a\u00a7 Ceurt has held that<\/p>\n
" \u00ab..fjVt'h_e'-\u00bb.pIaintiVfAf has gsi.  :;%'\u00ab'\u00a7.'1\u00a7\u00a7E\u00a382~\u00a73Ci\u20ac case. The Trial<\/p>\n
7–,lC-o"tujt._h%.s aise   srder to preserve the<\/p>\n
'v.'Vts—tateeiof affairs as is esgiszs\ufb01.<\/p>\n
Q\/'<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
11. The piaintiff seeking relief for the grant<\/p>\n
of temporary injunction. has to satisfy the Court<\/p>\n
about the existence of a prirna facie case <\/p>\n
favour. Once the civii Court <\/p>\n
conclusion that the plaintiff ha~s.__’a <\/p>\n
case in his favour, it is called “‘up\u00e9:$_”I1’~’Vto*,s’ee’ aisf”:Aoi’?1.’_A<\/p>\n
whose favour the ‘nalance’of~~._conivenienice\ufb02fevxeisits<\/p>\n
and whether the interfersnV_c_ie:A’\u00bbv:ef,_Vth\u00e9’ was
\njustified at that stagve…i:i’:;*;::–_pr{,o:te’c’Lt~twhis rights or
\nnot. Mere existszitn ‘case could
\nnot be suffic.i’e\u00a7n’t    injunction.\n<\/p>\n
It was nec%’\u00a2_s\u00a7;;_;\u00abg{;\u00bb;:;;at  the existence
\nof a prirriga  of convenience is
\nalso in faifojir  claiming it. It has<\/p>\n
also be;’s._liown tpersozi claiming injunction<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.v’Vi”i1.’1’E’5i’:il1’3R1’*.3i_%\u00a7\u20ac Vviiiiiiinjnty which cannot be<\/p>\n
con1pe_cn.si’a.te.d”iiaaetnis sf money would be caused<\/p>\n
 an injun.c~t_i\u00a7\u00a7n is rafuse\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n
   the instant case, the Triai Court has<\/p>\n
n\u00e9.–tiA”–ei:aAInined these aspects and simply passed<\/p>\n
uiiueiviiiorder to presetve the state of affairs as it<\/p>\n
1\/<\/p>\n
exists. It is the contentien of the learned
\nCounsel for the appeilant that the order<\/p>\n
impugned is not a speaking erder. Therefore, Vt”h_ge<\/p>\n
Trial Court is \ufb01iireeted is examine the <\/p>\n
mentioned abeve and pass the reasoned” M<\/p>\n
Since the order passed by the ::;<i'a1-.co:;r;'ei's'I.'n6t.'.1a <\/p>\n
speaking order, in my '\u00e9\u00bb"\u00a7\u00e9V\u00a5 ti.1is'._ orde'r_'–is..<\/p>\n
sustainable in iaar and the  is "liablevto'*..l5'e-~s'et<\/p>\n
aside.\n<\/p>\n
13. The learned Co–1i7n_se_l fovx.'””t.l1ie:”‘r.espondent ~<\/p>\n
plaintiff submitsstizatv,ti:.efexpartev. ‘interim order<\/p>\n
was  But, on perusal
\nof the ortieij:  order has been
\ngranted in  Therefore, the
\noenvtenv_t’i:.:o’n__f’ ei”  ____ __.\u00a3ee:’-reed Counsel for the<\/p>\n
re’sVpo;n’den.t*.t’h_a”?:__ \u00e9ajunetzies may be granted till<\/p>\n
 the .c’eiis’posVal.”_”–eiii.’\ufb01e has he merit and cannot be<\/p>\n
 aC–cepte”c\u00a5. af’-‘Z this stage.\n<\/p>\n
 The ehservatien made herein shall not<\/p>\n
4″v~.eginf.*11i’enee the Teiai {Joure while disposing of the<\/p>\n
2\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAREVIATAKA AT BANGALORE. DATED THIS THE 2157′ DRY’ OF FEBRUARY 2009. BEFORE THE HONTSLE MRJUSTICE . MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL N’O,9fV7\u00bb16 0:5′ 2ei);=3,(“(:?c) 4 BETWEEN: SRI.RUI)RAPPA, s\/0 HIRIYANNA. AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R\/0 THINDLU […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rudrappa S\\\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\\\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1240,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Rudrappa S\\\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\\\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rudrappa S\\\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\\\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009"},"wordCount":1240,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009","name":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-22T14:08:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rudrappa-so-hiriyanna-vs-sarojamma-wo-p-narayanaswamy-on-21-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rudrappa S\/O Hiriyanna vs Sarojamma W\/O P Narayanaswamy on 21 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}