{"id":149334,"date":"2010-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010"},"modified":"2015-06-11T08:34:00","modified_gmt":"2015-06-11T03:04:00","slug":"mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                               Club Building, Old JNU Campus,\n                             Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067\n                                    Tel: + 91 11 26161796\n\n                                              Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/000106\/3889Adjunct\n                                                            Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/000106\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\nAppellant                            :      Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay,\n                                            B10\/7052, Vasant Kunj,\n                                            New Delhi.\n\nRespondent                           :      Ms. P.D. Yadav\n                                            PIO,\n                                            Govt. of NCT of Delhi,\n                                            Office of the Deputy Director of Education\n                                            C-4, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-1100057.\n\nRTI application filed on             :      12\/04\/2008\nPIO's Reply                          :      04\/12\/2008\nFirst Appeal filed on                :      11\/12\/2008\nFirst Appellate Authority order      :      22\/12\/2008\nSecond Appeal filed on               :      22\/01\/2009\n\nParticular of required information:\n        The appellant had asked in RTI application for duly verified, year wise list of employees of\nDeep Public School D2, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and how have been paid transport allowance and\nbonus from 1996. Action taken report by department of education for violation of section of 10\nDelhi School Education Act, 1973 for non payment of transport allowance and bonus to employees\nalso give information of delayed payment of salary by Deep Public School to me. And provide\naction taken report by department for unauthorized recovery of my salary &amp; deduction of salary;\nleave both for any leave taken by me.\n\nThe PIO replied:\n       The information asked for was called from Deep Public School, New Delhi as the same was\nnot available in this office. The Chairman of School has refused to provide the same on following\ngrounds:-\n    1. The information desired from some under RTI Act, Section-11 deals with third party\n       information and has no relation with public interest or activity. The information is exempted\n       from disclosure u\/s 8 (j) of RTI Act, 2005.\n    2. Dr. O.P.Kajariwal, Information Commissioner has also stated in his order dated 25.04.2008\n       that unaided school can retain its privacy regarding its Management, Administration,\n       Finance etc.\n    3. Even otherwise the issue regarding applicability of RTI Act to unaided private school is\n       pending in judiciary in Hon'ble High Court of Delhi (Writ No. 8363\/2008 and writ no.\n       8035\/2008).\n\nFirst Appellate Authority Ordered:\n       \"PIO (SW-A) is directed to provide the information as detailed above within 15 days. PIO\n(SW-A) is further advised to revised to review the information received by her from the IIIrd party\nto ensure that the proper information is provided to the appellant.\"\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                         Page 1 of 3\n Relevant facts emerging during hearing 13 April 2009:\nThe following were present.\nAppellant: Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay\nRespondent: Ms. Satinder Kaur PIO and Mr. J.R.Meena APIO\nMr. Prakash Verma Manager of the Deep Public school states that the school has supplied the\ninformation to the Education department. A perusal of the First appellate authority's order also\nindicates that the information for only 2008-2009 was not available with the PIO. Mr.N.C. Kaushik\nEducation officer who is present admits that the details of 2008-2009 are with him. The PIO has\nbrought a letter of 6\/4\/2009 in which a noting has been made by ADE (ACT) Mrs. Abha Joshi\nstating that the record is not traceable. The PIO also states that the information with Mr.N.C.\nKaushik Education officer is not the one which the appellant has sought.\n\nThe actions of the PIO appear to be denying the information by any means. She claims she does not\nknow where the information may be, the ADE (ACT) has also stated that the records are not\ntraceable. It is significant that the plea of not having records was not made before the First appellate\nauthority. The PIO appears to contend that nobody knows if the records which should be with the\ndepartment exist anywhere or not.\n\nThe Director of Education is asked to investigate this matter and give a report to the Commission\nabout where the information is located. This report will be submitted to the Commission before 5\nMay 2009.\n\nThe decision was reserved on 13 April 2009.\n\nDecision announced on 27 June 2009:\nThe Director of Education Mr. Chandra Bhushan Kumar has sent a report on 04\/05\/2009 stating\nthat:\n\"From the explanations furnished by the DDE(SW-A), it seems that,\n    1-     the record management pertaining to private unaided school has not been up to the\n           mark;\n    2-     the concerned school did not assist in making the information available;\n    3-     the concerned school also requested, by using third party clause, not to made available\n           the data (requisite) to the applicant.\nNot with the guidance, the DDE(SW-A) has been able to retrieve the requisite information from the\nconcerned private school (original custodian of information). However, in view of the third party\ninformation and consideration of the matter at the level of CIC, a view has to be taken at the level\nof CIC.\"\n\nThe Commission has perused the information and does not see any merit in the exemption claimed\nunder Section 8(1)(j) by the Chairman of the School-the third party. In view of this the information\nwill have to be provided.\n\nBefore parting the matter the Commission would like to record that there was absolutely no reason\nfor the PIO not to have given details of \"Action taken report by department of education for\nviolation of section of 10 Delhi School Education Act, 1973 for non payment of transport\nallowance and bonus to employees\" within 30 days.\n\nDecision dated 27 June 2009:\nThe Appeal was allowed.\nThe complete information will be give to the appellant before 10 July 2009.\n\nBrief facts leading to the show cause hearing on 24\/02\/2010:\n     On receipt of a letter from the Appellant dated 28\/07\/2009 alleging non-compliance of the\nCommission's order, the Commission issued a show cause notice to you and further directed you to\nprovide the complete information to the Appellant. The Commission was in receipt of a letter dated\n                                                                                      Page 2 of 3\n 26\/08\/2009 from the Appellant alleging that information provided vide the Respodent's letter dated\n21\/08\/2009 is not in compliance with the Commission's order. It has been alleged that on Query\nNo.1 information was sought for the period from the inception of the school (which is claimed to be\n1989) however, information provided vide PIO's aforesaid letter is only for the period of 1996-\n2009.Secondly, with regard to Query No.2 it has been alleged that information in terms of the copy\nof the acquaintance roll for the period from 2004-2009 was not enclosed as against the PIO's claim\nmade therein. Furthermore, information provided on Query No.3, 4 &amp; 5 is not appropriate.\n\n     The Respondent was directed to provide the point-wise complete and correct information to\nthe Appellant before 11\/02\/2010. She was directed to appear before the Commission at the above-\nmentioned address on 24\/02\/2010 at 10.30AM along with written submissions to show cause why\npenalty should not be imposed on her under Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Showcause Hearing on 24 February 2010:<br \/>\nThe following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Ms. P.D.Yadav, PIO;\n<\/p>\n<p>         The PIO states that they do not have the records of the said school for the period 1994. The<br \/>\nPIO is directed to give this in writing to the Appellant and also give a copy of the reorganization<br \/>\nletter to the Appellant. The Appellant states that this should be available in the file which holds the<br \/>\npapers relating to the reorganization of the school. The PIO is directed to check the availability of<br \/>\nthis file and give the information. In case the file is not available the PIO will state this to the<br \/>\nappellant in writing.\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO is also directed to give the photocopies of the budgets of the school from 1996 onwards.<br \/>\nThe PIO has stated that no action has been taken in the matter of non-payment of dues to Miss.<br \/>\nShobha Upadhyay since no complaints have been received. The appellant states that she has filed a<br \/>\nnumber of complaints with the Regional Director and she is giving a copy of the same to the<br \/>\nRespondent. The PIO is directed to obtain information on whether any action has been taken in<br \/>\nresponse to these complaints. If any action has been taken photocopies of notings and<br \/>\ncorrespondence will have to be provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO is directed to give al the information as directed in these instructions to the Appellant<br \/>\nbefore 10 April 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                     Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                           Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                    24 February 2010<br \/>\n(In any case correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(BK)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                          Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Old JNU Campus, Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067 Tel: + 91 11 26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/000106\/3889Adjunct Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/000106 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay, B10\/7052, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":306,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010"},"wordCount":306,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010","name":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of ... on 24 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-11T03:04:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-shobha-upadhyay-vs-office-of-the-deputy-director-of-on-24-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs. Shobha Upadhyay vs Office Of The Deputy Director Of &#8230; on 24 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149334\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}