{"id":14934,"date":"2009-09-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-25T14:45:58","modified_gmt":"2014-05-25T09:15:58","slug":"sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE um DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 200914.e,V'O\u00bb._:'.__\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.vENu;;QPAL.A~'GQ'w1jrS.ii  V\u00a5:\"  \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.9379 OF    7\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri. K.N.Manjunatha, '  ~_ \n1570. Late Nanjappa @ Nanjegowda,  \nAged 43 years,   _  \nR\/0. Kirangur viltage,    V    ' \nK.ShettyhaHi Hobth. , _   f   \nMandva District.        v\n\n     '.   ...PETITIONER\n(By Sri. Kempeg'o*N\u00a7i'\u00a7 fo'i*\u00a7:.;SrE.$\u20ac,V.=Nara's\u00e9m'han Adv.,)\nAND:   A\n1. The Pres_EdenxtO,\"\"..M \" _ \n_ Zilla P\"a\u00a7Tc'hayath,''' ._ V\n 'M._.23nd=y_\u00a7i':~EDf:s_tric:t,  ----- \n'V.'Mar\":d.ya. '_ \n\n2. Tlie E-5&lt;_e&lt;1:ut4i:v&#039;e&#039;V_ O~ffie&#039;er\n\n  Taluweanchayarh,\n\n_Sriran&quot;gapai:ha Taiuk,\n\nv%OA&quot;\u00ab.,..4 M__;andya mstrict.\n\n  Grama Panchayath,\n\nKira rig air,\n\n ..._&#039;&quot;K.Shettyha||E hobli,\n-._4:S-rirangapatna taluk,\n\n\n\nMandya District.\nRepresented by Its Secretary.\n\n4. Sra. Krishnappa 4\n8\/0. late Channappa,\nAged about 50 years,\nR\/o. Kirnagur viilage,\n\nK.Shettyha|ia hobll,   \nSrirangapatna taiuk, \n\nMandya District.\n\n  \n\n(By Sri.B.J.Somayaji for R1;-.T*~Sri.SL&#039;iti,_Bhat  &#039;R4, = &#039;\n\nSmt.M.C.Nagashr_ee E-ICGP for R2 8:3)  &#039; _  _\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITION EILIEO.&#039;_iiuNoEiR_IA&#039;RTIcLEAS 226 AND\n227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF1i\\EDIAE=i?RA\u00a5I_i\\E,G\u00bb\u00bbTO QUASH THE\nORDER AT A!\\EX--D, OATEO.25_.5c.2oO7 SPA~SSE--I);I=w THE R1 IN\nAPPEAL BEARING NQ.2\u00a7;&#039;.1_99f3-ZOGQ. _  I \u00ab \n\nTHIS PETITION ..C{;;ii*4;IN&#039;(f\u00a7_:Q.N-...FO.R HEARING THIS DAY, THE\nCOURT MADE THEfO:yLtIOwINc3&#039;:~HsjVvr. I   \n\nAccorciing tO:thVe&#039;p\u00e9titioner, property bearing Janjar No.45\n(nevi?3\\iOV..&#039;1AIS9Tania.I_146)VyWa\u00abssesSment No.18SA\/1B with house\n\nconsitruictecii&#039; t:He.reOn,.:&#039;.1situated at Kirangur Village, \u00a7&lt;.Shettyhai1i\n\n Of &quot;Sriran&#039;g.a\u00a7patna Taiuk, Mandya District, situated within\n\nVwyadyministsfaitive jurisdiction of the third respondent Grama\n\nii&quot;.:&quot;Pa&#039;n.ciI-awyatyi belongs to one Smt. Sannamma, W\/o Ningegowda.\n\n ..._petitiOner claims that, he is the grandson Of Said\n\nI\n\n,\u00bb\n\n\n\nSannamma. The assessment extract of the said property\n\nproduced as Annexure--A ie, for the assessment year \n\nshows that, Smt. Sannamma is the owner and \n\nproperty. Petitioner contends that, the fou,rt_h responjd:ent&quot;Vi:s&#039;riot:it &#039;*~ \n\na relative of said Smt. Sannamma and ti,i&#039;at,.:&#039; heia &quot;st&#039;ransg_e&#039;i=:;,a_A\u00ab\n\nThough the 4&quot;&#039; respondent is neith_er_a family,mieni?be.r_,_no3r a \n\nrelative of Smt. Sannamma and   possession\nof the property, it is contended. t&#039;iq&#039;gL,4t%f_respondent in\ncollusion with the third&#039;~respondent, c_j&#039;ot;:_hi&#039;s.&#039;Vnarii,ie&#039;Lentered in the\nassessment extract: Annexure--B\nshows that, in we Ningegowda, the\n\nname of the fourth respfo_.n&#039;den&#039;t_yVhas been entered.\n\n2. _ Smt. \ufb02&quot;Sa_nnarnm&#039;a challenged the said entry as at\nA&#039;nnexurei..Qaghefore the&quot;&quot;s&#039;e&#039;cond respondent, by filing an appeal\n\nunder   Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (Act\n\n short\u00bb); Thellsiecond respondent, after consideration, allowed\n\n_..l,l&#039;_j&#039;:\u00bbl*ie_&#039;s\u00bbaid appeal and cancelied the katha made in the name of the\n\n1&quot;-info-iiyrthvrespondent, which is evident from the order dated\n\n as at Annexure--C. \\)\n\n\n\n3. Aggrieved by the said order of the secoynd\n\nrespondent, the fourth respondent filed an appeal before__&#039;the&#039;f.irst&#039;i.V\n\nrespondent under S.237(3) of the Act. First  if\n\nallowed the said appeai on 25.05.07. Thefiiordeif  a;t.Adnfn_e\u00a7.the\"order\"'~at\"'.\n\nAn nexu re-\u00abD.\n\n4. The fourth respondrenyt 5Ai3\/H99 f0!' 6\ndecree of declaration of Titie,a'nd--  against\nSmt. Sannammapirfiir.jj{\u00a7rinci'pa1 Civii Judge (Jr.\nDn.) &amp; 3Mi=c  hpgfakkweiiafiimed therein that, the\nproperty canie to grant made by a competent\nauthority andf\u00e9thait  and enjoyment of the\nsame. Aftefrfythe dea\"thV_VVoVf Srnt...'Sannamma, the petitioner herein\n\nwas im:p1.e;adedA.past-he 15' legai representative of defendant Smt.\n\n Sannfai*ri'rn_a\u00ab. VV\"ii\u00a5.'fit.e_r'V~tri\"ai, the suit was dismissed by a Judgment\n\nV7?I_anr3V Decree  07.04.07. Aggrieved by the said Liudgment\n\n4_;andV...,ijecree,the fourth respondent has fiied R.A. 42\/07 in the\n\n Judge (Sr. Dn.) at Srirangapatna and the appeai is\n\n i9\n\n\n\n5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the\nlearned counsei for the respondents and perused thewohwrit\n\npapers.\n\n6. Learned counsei for the petitioner contendedA_:'th_at, \n\nthe appeal preferred before the \n\nrnaintainable and the first respondent by 4ass'uvming,,'}'i;ist'ificati,o'n'i V\n\nnot vested in him, has passed the\"\"i'rn'pLigned\"order. x\ufb01iltwwlwas\ncontended that, the impugned: being all nuliity,\nis also contrary to the decision of  O.S. 50\/99\n\nand hence, cannot be~'sipsta'ined. :; \n\n7. Onv'7th'e\u00ab  Bhat, learned counsel\nappearing forthe foJrth.resp'on'dent contended that, the appeal\nfile'dV\"by,  S,a,nnva.mma'b'ef'oVre the second respondent was not\n\nmaint'a,i__n'ab_le.,.  ought to have been preferred within\n\n:i.i3.G'\u00bb,days frond the\"d'1ate, the entry at Annexure-B was made and\n\n_.itfhe\u00ab.i3'i3peal hauling not been preferred within the prescribed time\n\n lirnit, respondent had no jurisdiction to entertain the\n\nhaxppepasl and pass the orders. Alternatively, learned counsel\n\n9\u00bb:\n\n\n\nsubmitted that, if Annexure--D is to be quashed, it may be made\n\nclear that, the rights of the parties shall get regulated as \n\nJudgment and Decree that may be passed in RA.  _\n\non the file of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. i?_&gt;_n..,)__at 8;\"-ErangTap'atna., if \n\n8. Any person aggrieved by anyoi5i_gi~nal1*or'der of:V'i_t.hfel1.i_:\n\nGrama Panchayat, passed under thel_pi'=:),yisior'a-si of th'e'Al_<u>&lt;ure----C byV&quot;1&quot;ilVVin&#039;gyth&#039;e_ap.lpea&#039;l*~\ufb01nder S.237(1) of the Act. Sub-\nsection (2) of..S.264l9 provides&#039;-th&quot;at the decision of the Appellate\n\nAuthority tinder&quot;Se&#039;c_269(i)&quot;&#039;of the Act, shall be final. Hence, no\n\n. appea&quot;ir.._cot.tlVdrc preferred by the fourth respondent\n\nVi,:a&quot;ga.Enst theyorder:i&#039;atfAnnexure-C before the first respondent.\n\n&#039;*l\ufb01rst._r-espond&#039;e.nt has entertained the appeal of the fourth\n\n  referring to provisions contained in sub-section\n\nl\n\n&#039;J&#039;.-&#039;\n\n\n\nthe matter was to attain finality,\n\nhe can approach the__ third\n\nrespondent for necessary reliefs.\n\nIn the result, I pass the following:\n\n \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Ci) Writ Petition is allowed.&#8217;sR\u00b0&#8221;:V.._i V&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>(ii) Order passed by   dated 25.05.07<br \/>\nas at AnnexVure&#8211;D,_shal.l_stantl <\/p>\n<p>(iii) Order    &#8220;&#8221;s\u00abeoond.&#8212;&#8212;.:V:tespondent dated<\/p>\n<p>Clitshall stand restored.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iv) TheFinal.ioutoE\u20acVn\ufb01ef:of.:&#8217;the_ shatter pending in RA. 42\/07<br \/>\nogwt\ufb01e &#8216;file;&#8221;of._the;_A&#8221;learned Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.),<\/p>\n<p>Srirangjapatna;- slivallddecide the rights of the parties to<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;  _   &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; &#8221; &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>A 10 fed&#8221;   i &#8216;ng ly.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nIUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE um DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 200914.e,V&#8217;O\u00bb._:&#8217;.__ BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.vENu;;QPAL.A~&#8217;GQ&#8217;w1jrS.ii V\u00a5:&#8221; WRIT PETITION NO.9379 OF 7 BETWEEN: Sri. K.N.Manjunatha, &#8216; ~_ 1570. Late Nanjappa @ Nanjegowda, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":97,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009"},"wordCount":97,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009","name":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-25T09:15:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-n-manjunatha-vs-the-president-on-11-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K N Manjunatha vs The President on 11 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14934"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14934\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}