{"id":149387,"date":"2009-09-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-28T16:03:31","modified_gmt":"2016-08-28T10:33:31","slug":"sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009_W,O*._V_\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. PD. DINAKARAN, CH1EE_JOsjTOE  O\n\nAND\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUST1CE . 2 \" \n\nWRIT PETITION Nbs.,_i44o1-6212eo9;.:  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1\n\n{By s;--i:,{sma;--\nASS'1S.) '\n\nSRIBRAHMAIAH   2\nS\/O LATETHSRUMALAIAH g ~   \nR\/AT HOSAKOPPA Vii;x.AGE {KOPPA} A \" \"\nHOLEHONNU_R- HOBLI AESED P,O~. fj  'V \nBHADRA=;jAT;'\u00e9i;' TALUK,'  '\ns1-IIMOGA' \n\n PETITiONER\\ -A\n{COMMON IN BOTH\n\nTHE PETETEONS)\n\n ADV. FOR M\/s. T SESHAGERI\n\nAND:\n\ng ' STATE\" OF.._KARE\\%ATAKA\n DEPARTMENT OF' COMMERCE AND\n\n INDUSTREES.\nV _ ' 'REEBY  'SECRETARY\n._ \"  CVEDHANASOUDHA,\nA 'BANGA\"L_O'RE 1.\n\nO  DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY\n\nIN*THE STATE OF KARANTAKA.\n\n'*-._KI~\u00abIAN1JA BHAVAN,\n__.RACE COURSE ROAD,\nBANGALORE 1.\n\nTHE JOINT DIRECTOR OF %\nMINES AND GEOLOGY\nSARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE.\n\n\n\n4 THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST\nDEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY\nSHIMOGA.\n\n5 THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR\n\nOF FORESTS, BHADRAVATHI.\n\nSHIMOGA.\n\n6 I-IE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER\nSHIMOGA SUB DIVISION,     * _ ~ \nSHIMOGA. I  RE._SPONI)ENT:tS.'  \"\n {COMNEONIN E013 \n THP;v1_\u00b0E2'I'ifi'I(3f;NSj;\n\n(By Sri\/Smt : BASAVARAJ KAREi)\u00a3DYi\"v--G\u00a3&..SD. I \u00ab\n\"','N!=a:1\u00ab_\"'=l==E\u00a23\/:. \/ a V \n\nTHESE w.Ps. F.i,LEI)V {To QUASH THE\nIMPUGNED ORIDIS-RS---_(a] ;oiI*._, I'V;2.2I,20.09_uONE PASSED BY THE\nRESPONDENT 1'-iJO.\u00ab=i;\u00a7FOUi\\I'I) AT ANNEXP. 413;\" DT. 20.4.2009 ONE<\/pre>\n
PASSED BY:.’I”}\u00a3EI..__R.”3S–POND.ENT NO;.3, IN REVISION PETITION
\nNO. 171\/2OO9_VF(;:)_U;E_VD Ar  ‘<\/p>\n
TPIESEWRIT  COMING ON FOR HEARING ON
\nTHIS DAY, sA.BHzrJ1::1\u00a7 ‘.3,  THE FOLLOWING.’-<\/p>\n
  E R<\/p>\n
_f’l”he.se pe\ufb01titoyns lare \ufb01led under Articies 226 and<\/p>\n
   ~,COnStitution of India, seeking for quashing<\/p>\n
oforder dated 12 \/ 2\/ 2009 passed by the<\/p>\n
–V reSp’on.tier1t.’i\\:io.4 ~ Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines and<\/p>\n
‘:jGeoioIgy,vV” Shimoga, as per Annexure ‘F’ to the writ<\/p>\n
 and aiso to quash the order dated 20\/4\/2009<\/p>\n
t\u00e9jiavtzissed by the 8″‘ respondent — Joint Director of Mines<\/p>\n
and Geology, in Revision Petition No.I71\/2009 and to<\/p>\n
V’<\/p>\n
grant such other order or orders as this Court deems<\/p>\n
just and necessary to meet the ends ofjustice. -f  ~<\/p>\n
2. It is averred in the petition   <\/p>\n
belongs to Bovi community andlpuhisi.iavvocation.is~Vst_oneid<\/p>\n
cutting and petitioner is eking odtitdhis   <\/p>\n
stone cutting and in the    rriade an<\/p>\n
application for grant  ” before the 4″‘-
\nrespondent over. \ufb01n _ar<\u00a7aIf  Gkintas in
\nSy.No. 97 of  d it Bhdadravathi Taluk.
\nThe   the application<\/p>\n
has granted  favour of the petitioner for<\/p>\n
a perioddof\ufb02d \ufb01ve V'3*ears\u00bb– andthe said lease has expired<\/p>\n
_ 1itt1e4_;jearI.ier t'o~2006. The petitioner has \ufb01led<\/p>\n
 vreiievszaliappgiication before the respondent No.4 with a<\/p>\n
 the {ease for a further period of 5<\/p>\n
V V . years'.  respondent No.4 after considering the<\/p>\n
  gipplication for renewal, renewed the lease for a further<\/p>\n
–‘ of 5 years with effect from 7\/8\/2006 and ‘<\/p>\n
ekecuted a fresh lease deed in favour of the petitioner<\/p>\n
having quarry lease No.QL.528 and petitioner is<\/p>\n
\\.\/”\n<\/p>\n
operating quarry and paying royalty levied by the Dept.<\/p>\n
of Mines and Geology Without committing any _<\/p>\n
It is necessary to obtain No Objection Certi-Eic:iatec:lV: V’<\/p>\n
the Asst. Commissioner, Shims-ga  S;,ib\u00a5D_ivision;’*~\u00ab<\/p>\n
Shimoga, before renewing the  ancigthei. <\/p>\n
Commissioner, Shimoga,
\nCerti\ufb01cate on 3\/2\/2005, w’ne\ufb01’l.iia\u00e9l’r:hingsi’steed thus,
\nrespondent No.4 issnedla  to_.th:enfpe_ti.tioner stating
\nthat respondent: to the effect
\nthat  in Sy.No. 103 of
\n lands coming within
\nthe reserved forest.\u00bb him to cancel the quark’?<\/p>\n
lease Agranted to various persons including the petitioner<\/p>\n
“hereiin and  the basis of the same, show cause notice<\/p>\n
 petitioner as to why the quarry lease<\/p>\n
it  L granted him on 7\/8\/2006 should not be cancelled. y<\/p>\n
 Vlpkespondent No.5 did not intimate the 411′} respondent to<\/p>\n
  lannalll the lease granted to various persons in respect of<\/p>\n
it  ~Sy:.No.97 of Jainbarghatta Village. What he had referred<\/p>\n
it to was in respect of Sy.Nos.129, 103 and 137 of<\/p>\n
e \\)<\/p>\n
Jambarghatta village and not in respect of Sy.No.97.<\/p>\n
Pursuant to receiving the notice dated 15\/ 12\/<\/p>\n
9\/ 1\/2009 the petitioner sent his reply  .<\/p>\n
Sy.No.97 of Jambarghatta village; isnot  H”<\/p>\n
the reserved forest and lease was <\/p>\n
necessary N.O.C. from the*..’Revenu’e.__Departrrient “and ” 2′<\/p>\n
question of renewing the lease never. arise and
\nrequested to drop all  the matter.\n<\/p>\n
The respondg211ir;l. Visio.4{g by’ area 12\/2\/2009<\/p>\n
ordered to granted to the<\/p>\n
petitioiierl’ _ 7″\/?\u00a7st\/\u00e9oote holding that Sy.No.97 of-<\/p>\n
Jambarghatta  the limits of reserved<\/p>\n
forest .. and\u00e9dthat-the”‘quarrying operation would cause<\/p>\n
 the crops’ raised in the neighbouring lands<\/p>\n
  has cancelled the quarry lease granted<\/p>\n
lav’-\u00ab4theV___v’petitioner. Being aggrieved by the said order<\/p>\n
passeddhby the respondent No.4 dated 12\/2\/2009,<\/p>\n
0 revision had been \ufb01led before the respondent No.3 by<\/p>\n
 -~-‘the petitioner and the said revision was dismissed on<\/p>\n
20 \/ 4 \/ 2009 and being aggrieved by the same, these writ<\/p>\n
\\}’<\/p>\n
petitions are filed contending that the order impugned
\nis erroneous and illegal and the same is liabie to be set
\naside and therefore, the order passed by respondents 3<\/p>\n
and 4 are unsustainabie and liable to be quashpedi.’ “..<\/p>\n
3. We have heard the learned counselljapplearingpli <\/p>\n
for the petitioner and the leariied. pp<\/p>\n
appearing for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
4. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner
\nreiterated the grounds’-\ufb01iirgepd   petition and
\nsubmitted that .Sy.No,9″?-   village is a<\/p>\n
revenue land forest land and the respondents 3<\/p>\n
and 4 are’-snot  cancelling the quarry lease<\/p>\n
 granted to thelnipetiittionier holding that Sy.No.97 is in the<\/p>\n
 reserye_,forest”‘area and the writ petitions are liable to be<\/p>\n
setting aside the orders passed by the<\/p>\n
it respondents and 4.\n<\/p>\n
  Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for<\/p>\n
  respondents submitted that Sy.No.97 of Jambarghatta<\/p>\n
” village is in reserve forest area and petitioner cannot<\/p>\n
\\)<\/p>\n
and therefore, petitioner cannot carry on quarry work in
\nthe said forest area. According to the petitioner, the
\nland comprising Sy.No.97 of Jambarghatta village” is a<\/p>\n
revenue land and the Asst. Commissioner <\/p>\n
N.O.C. and however, the material on record  *<\/p>\n
that as per the report submittepd  ll<\/p>\n
Commissioner of Forest, Bhadrlavatlhif <\/p>\n
103 of Jarnbarghatta village\u00ab_,are inf.reserve’~.:fore’s’t”area ”<\/p>\n
and even the Deputy Qorrimissionerl,”V-has also<\/p>\n
recommended for cancellation\u00bb.o’f;the  lease in- favour<\/p>\n
of the  onith.e’\u00a7rouI1.dVVlthat lands in respect of<\/p>\n
which lelaseis granted ‘is.__r’es’erve forest land.<\/p>\n
 revisio_n_,,the Joint Director of Mines and<\/p>\n
Geo’l9gy._{‘thej3F\u00a2 respondent has considered the entire<\/p>\n
rnateriall  record after affording opportunity to the<\/p>\n
‘.,petitio,:1er\u00ab:_ to substantiate his ground and has come to<\/p>\n
A ..,lt’h:ell’conclusion that land comprising in Sy.No.97 of<\/p>\n
 …_l'”‘lJa;11barghatta village is in reserve forest area and<\/p>\n
“shaving regard to the letter of the competent authority<\/p>\n
dated 20 \/ 4 \/ 2009 and notification dated 14\/ 12\/ 1981,<\/p>\n
\\.5’*’<\/p>\n
accordingly, the 3″‘ respondent revisional authority<\/p>\n
upheld the order of the competent authority..and’ <\/p>\n
directed to collect the arrears of  C’  <\/p>\n
petitioner along with interest up””to ‘the-\u00ab,date,_as_ it<\/p>\n
under Rule 36 and 39 of Karnataka gi\\\/Iinor” Iv\\\/Ijil\ufb01eraic<\/p>\n
Concession Rules, 1994  of the
\nrevision petition on20__[ is clear
\nthat there is a the competent
\nauthority —  “‘ar:id.”‘~3.?\u00e9:V.flrespondent — the
\nrevisional=i’    of Jambarghatta
\nvii1ag\u00a7:i”‘irii   lease has been
\ngranted.   ‘th_e”j’petitioner is in reserve forest<\/p>\n
area andC4″‘th_\u00a73rCfore,”- petitioner cannot carry on the<\/p>\n
 “a,ctivityl,Wvvhich is not forest activity without<\/p>\n
 ,__.obtaini:I\u00a7tg:lgpermgission of the Central Govt. under Section<\/p>\n
 tgheliviiorest Conservation Act, 1980 and the<\/p>\n
V’44._Xe’:QnteIitigh of the petitioner that the land in Sy.No.97 of<\/p>\n
  gv.”.vcIa;a’31ll3farghatta village is a revenue land has been<\/p>\n
   _rejected by respondents 3 and 4 and having regard to<\/p>\n
“the above said material on record, it is ciear that the<\/p>\n
‘\\\/Q’<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
concurrent \ufb01nding on the question of fact, to the effect
\nthat the land in Sy.No.9’7 of Jambarghatta village is in
\nreserve forest area, the order cancelling quarrymg lease<\/p>\n
granted in favour of the petitioner is justified :”_’does<\/p>\n
not suffer from any error or illegality as.,”‘t–o  ‘<\/p>\n
interference in these writ petitions.’ A\u00a7ccorC’1irrgly,._j’w\u00e9v..<\/p>\n
hold that there is no merit in <\/p>\n
pass the following order:–\n<\/p>\n
These writ petitions; are di:-s1i1’i~sse’d;s _<\/p>\n
sci\/–\n<\/p>\n
Chiel lustice<\/p>\n
     Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
  …..  JUDGE<\/p>\n
Index: Yes’,’.I;\\?oll’,\u00bb~””” Sd;\/,<\/p>\n
..   ‘l ‘ Web  Yes\/\/No <\/p>\n
  *’Fi’11vs <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009_W,O*._V_ PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. PD. DINAKARAN, CH1EE_JOsjTOE O AND THE HONBLE MR.JUST1CE . 2 ” WRIT PETITION Nbs.,_i44o1-6212eo9;.: BETWEEN: 1 {By […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1163,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009"},"wordCount":1163,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009","name":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-28T10:33:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-brahmaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-3-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Brahmaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}