{"id":150072,"date":"2011-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011"},"modified":"2017-03-13T09:43:10","modified_gmt":"2017-03-13T04:13:10","slug":"mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                        at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001808\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a010,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a010,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Pijush\u00a0Kanti\u00a0Nath\n           D\u00ad8\/4,\u00a0Gharkul,\u00a0Sect\u00ad15,\n           Kharghar,\n           Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0410\u00a0210\n\n\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Mumbai.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Central\u00a0Railway\n           Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager\n           Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)\n           Chhatrapati\u00a0Shivaji\n           Mumbai\n\nRepresented \u00a0 by:\u00a0 Shri\u00a0 Vipin\u00a0 Kumar,\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 and\u00a0 Shri\u00a0 Siddhartha\u00a0 Sahay,\u00a0 O.S.--present\u00a0 at\u00a0 NIC\u00a0 VC\u00a0 facility\u00a0 at\u00a0\n\nMumbai\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner              :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                               at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                            File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001808\n                                                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant&#8217;s\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a006.05.2010\u00a0to\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        against\u00a04\u00a0items\u00a0(a\u00add)\u00a0regarding\u00a0his\u00a0being\u00a0treated\u00a0ineligible\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Asst.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Personnel\u00a0Officer\u00a0(Gr.\u00a0B).\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      Through\u00a0his\u00a0communication\u00a0dated\u00a007.06.2010,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0forwarded\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a007.06.2010\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        APO(Admn) \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 through \u00a0 which \u00a0 point\u00adwise \u00a0 reply \u00a0 was \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Thereafter,\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant&#8217;s\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0dated\u00a007.07.2010,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        16.08.2010,\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a003.10.2006\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        in\u00a0connection\u00a0with\u00a0&#8216;promotion\u00a0from\u00a0Group\u00a0&#8216;C&#8217;\u00a0to\u00a0Group\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\u00ad\u00a0conditions\u00a0of\u00a0eligibility\u00a0which\u00a0clarified\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        subject\u00a0case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0however,\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0information\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0approached\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0dated\u00a001.10.2010\u00a0requesting\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        copy\u00a0of\u00a0Rules\u00a0and\/or\u00a0Codes\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railway\u00a0which\u00a0shows\u00a0the\u00a0ineligible\u00a0conditions\u00a0as\u00a0shown\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        HQs\u00a0office\u00a0CSTM&#8217;s\u00a0L.No.\u00a0HPB\/785\/R\/BD\/APO\/Gr.\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\/LGS\u00a0dated\u00a027.01.2010\u00a0and\u00a003.03.2010.<\/p>\n<p>Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0correct\u00a0position\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a0 Rule\u00a0 through\u00a0 AA&#8217;\u00a0 decision\u00a0 dated\u00a016.08.2010.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0however,\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0agree\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Respondents\u00a0and\u00a0insisted\u00a0on\u00a0receiving\u00a0the\u00a0&#8216;correct&#8217;\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<p>5.      It \u00a0 was \u00a0 noted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 is \u00a0 having\u00a0 certain\u00a0 grievances\u00a0 against\u00a0 the\u00a0 public\u00a0 authority\u00a0 for \u00a0 not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        allowing \u00a0 him \u00a0 to \u00a0 appear \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 departmental \u00a0 exam \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 now \u00a0 he \u00a0 is \u00a0 trying \u00a0 to \u00a0 elicit \u00a0 from \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Respondents \u00a0 the \u00a0 Rule\u00a0 which\u00a0 could\u00a0 contradict\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0taken\u00a0by\u00a0 them.\u00a0 \u00a0However\u00a0 this\u00a0is\u00a0 not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        possible\u00a0since\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0rule\u00a0exists\u00a0on\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0provided.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0might\u00a0<br \/>\n         have\u00a0a\u00a0 \u00a0genuine\u00a0reason\u00a0for\u00a0seeking\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0 \u00a0but\u00a0the\u00a0forum\u00a0to\u00a0address\u00a0this\u00a0grievance\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        surely\u00a0not\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.\u00a0Nonetheless,\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0help\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0suggested\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0personal\u00a0hearing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0sort\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        hand.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0held\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0adequately\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.<\/p>\n<p>7.      The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0closed.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                           \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                  Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      Shri\u00a0Pijush\u00a0Kanti\u00a0Nath<br \/>\n        D\u00ad8\/4,\u00a0Gharkul,\u00a0Sect\u00ad15,<br \/>\n        Kharghar,<br \/>\n        Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0410\u00a0210<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n        Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)<br \/>\n        Chhatrapati\u00a0Shivaji<br \/>\n        Mumbai<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n        Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n        Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)<br \/>\n        Chhatrapati\u00a0Shivaji<br \/>\n        Mumbai\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.   Officer\u00a0In\u00adcharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001808 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a010,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a010,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant Shri\u00a0Pijush\u00a0Kanti\u00a0Nath D\u00ad8\/4,\u00a0Gharkul,\u00a0Sect\u00ad15, Kharghar, Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00ad\u00a0410\u00a0210 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Mumbai. Respondents Central\u00a0Railway Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ) Chhatrapati\u00a0Shivaji Mumbai Represented \u00a0 by:\u00a0 Shri\u00a0 Vipin\u00a0 Kumar,\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 and\u00a0 Shri\u00a0 Siddhartha\u00a0 Sahay,\u00a0 O.S.&#8211;present\u00a0 at\u00a0 NIC\u00a0 VC\u00a0 facility\u00a0 at\u00a0 Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":430,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011"},"wordCount":430,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011","name":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-13T04:13:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-pijush-kanti-nath-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Pijush Kanti Nath vs Ministry Of Railways on 10 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}