{"id":150112,"date":"2010-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-05T13:30:54","modified_gmt":"2016-12-05T08:00:54","slug":"m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 368 of 2010()\n\n\n1. M.RAMESH,S\/O.MANI AGED 43 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K.MUHAMMED, S\/O.ABDURAHIMAN AGE NOT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.T.C.SOWMIAVATHY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :27\/05\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   A.K. BASHEER &amp; P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n\n            ------------------------------------------------------\n\n                          M.A.C.A. 368 of 2010\n\n            ------------------------------------------------------\n\n                          Dated: MAY 27, 2010\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>         In this appeal under sec.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act         the<\/p>\n<p>claimant   in OP(MV) 1030\/2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode,      challenges the judgment and award of<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal dated August 26,         2009 awarding a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.56,550\/-    for the loss caused to the claimant        on account of the<\/p>\n<p>injuries sustained in a motor accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   The facts leading to this appeal in brief are these:        The<\/p>\n<p>claimant was aged 43 at the time of the accident and used to earn<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5000\/- per month, according to him, doing coolie work.               On<\/p>\n<p>December 9, 2005 at about 1.30 a.m. the claimant was walking from<\/p>\n<p>Perumanna to Pantheerankavu and when he reached at Parakandam<\/p>\n<p>junction, a mini bus bearing registration No.KL-11-N-5134 came at a<\/p>\n<p>high   speed and and knocked him down.              The claimant sustained<\/p>\n<p>serious injuries.  According to the claimant the accident occurred due<\/p>\n<p>to the rash and negligent driving of the offending mini lorry by its<\/p>\n<p>driver.    The 1st respondent as the owner and the 2nd respondent as<\/p>\n<p>the insurer of the offending mini lorry are jointly and severally liable<\/p>\n<p>to pay compensation to the claimant.              The claimant claimed a<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 368 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.2 lakhs.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Respondent No. 1,      the owner of the offending vehicle,<\/p>\n<p>remained absent before the Tribunal.     The 2nd respondent, insurer of<\/p>\n<p>the offending vehicle, filed a written statement admitting the policy.<\/p>\n<p>      4.     Exts.A1 to A6 series and Ext.C1 were marked on the side<\/p>\n<p>of the claimant before the Tribunal. No evidence was adduced by the<\/p>\n<p>contesting 2nd respondent.       On an appreciation of evidence the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.56,550\/- with interest at 7%<\/p>\n<p>per annum from the date of the petition till realisation.  The claimant<\/p>\n<p>has now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of compensation<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.     Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal that<\/p>\n<p>the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the driver of<\/p>\n<p>the offending vehicle      is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the only question which arises for consideration is whether the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to any enhanced compensation.<\/p>\n<p>      7. The claimant      sustained the following injuries as revealed<\/p>\n<p>from Ext.A2, copy of the wound certificate, issued from the Medical<\/p>\n<p>College Hospital, Kozhikode:\n<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 368 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            &#8220;supra condylar fracture left femur type 1 compound,<\/p>\n<p>            lacerated wound left cheek and multiple injuries all over<\/p>\n<p>            body.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A3 discharge summary issued from the Medical College Hospital,<\/p>\n<p>shows that he was admitted           on 9.12.2005 and discharged on<\/p>\n<p>14.12.2005.     Ext.A4 reference card shows that the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>again admitted in the hospital on 31.8.2007 and discharged on<\/p>\n<p>7.9.2007.    Ext.C1 certificate of disability issued by the Medical Board<\/p>\n<p>shows that he has a disability of 8%.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.56,550\/-.<\/p>\n<p>The break up of the compensation awarded is as under:-<\/p>\n<pre>loss of earnings              -      Rs.3000\/-\n\nbystander's expenses          -        1500\/-\n\ntransport to hospital         -          500\/-\n\ndamage to clothing            -          250\/-\n\ntreatment expenses            -         5000\/-\n\npain and suffering            -        17500\/-\n\ndisability                    -        28800\/-\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>        9. The Tribunal took the monthly income of the claimant as<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2000\/- and adopted a multiplier of 15 and assessed the disability at<\/p>\n<p>8% and awarded a compensation of Rs.28,800\/- for the disability<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 368 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>caused. As the claimant was aged only 43 and was doing coolie work,<\/p>\n<p>we feel that his monthly income can be reasonably estimated at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2500\/-.     The percentage of disability assessed as well as the<\/p>\n<p>multiplier 15 adopted are not seriously challenged. Therefore for the<\/p>\n<p>disability caused, the claimant is entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.36,000\/- (8% of 2500 x 12 x 15). Thus on this count the claimant<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.7200\/-.<\/p>\n<p>      10.     Towards loss of earnings, the Tribunal awarded a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.3000\/- i.e. for 1=          months at the rate of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2000\/- per month.        We have fixed the monthly income of the<\/p>\n<p>claimant as Rs.2500\/-. The nature of the injuries sustained by him<\/p>\n<p>shows that the claimant must have been disabled for three months.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore towards loss of earnings, he is entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.7500\/- (2500 x 3), i.e. an additional compensation of Rs.4500\/-.<\/p>\n<p>      11.    As regards the compensation awarded under other heads,<\/p>\n<p>we find the same to be reasonable and therefore we are not disturbing<\/p>\n<p>the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>      12. There is another aspect.     The Tribunal awarded interest at<\/p>\n<p>the rate of 7% per annum which appears to be very low. We feel that<\/p>\n<p>interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum would be reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>      13. Thus the claimant is entitled to an additional compensation<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 368 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Rs.11,700\/-. He is entitled to interest @ 7.5% per annum from the<\/p>\n<p>date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost.     The 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent being the insurer of the offending vehicle shall deposit the<\/p>\n<p>amount before the Tribunal within two months from the date of receipt<\/p>\n<p>of a copy of this judgment.   The award of the Tribunal is modified to<\/p>\n<p>the above extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                         P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>mt\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 368 of 2010() 1. M.RAMESH,S\/O.MANI AGED 43 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K.MUHAMMED, S\/O.ABDURAHIMAN AGE NOT &#8230; Respondent 2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN For Respondent :SMT.T.C.SOWMIAVATHY The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":842,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\",\"name\":\"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010"},"wordCount":842,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010","name":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-05T08:00:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-ramesh-vs-k-muhammed-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Ramesh vs K.Muhammed on 27 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150112\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}