{"id":150713,"date":"2010-02-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-05-18T04:35:05","modified_gmt":"2014-05-17T23:05:05","slug":"moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 36769 of 2009(M)\n\n\n1. MOOSA, AGED 49 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SUB INSPECOTR OF POLICE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. KUTTAPPAN, AGED 59 YEARS,\n\n3. M\/S. INDIA TELECOM INFRA LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.FAZIL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :03\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          K.M.JOSEPH &amp; M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n        ------------------------------------------------------\n                 W.P.(C) No.36769 of 2009-M\n            ----------------------------------------------\n          Dated, this the 3rd day of February, 2010\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>K.M.Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the<\/p>\n<p>following relief:&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;to issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ,<\/p>\n<p>       order or direction commanding the Ist respondent<\/p>\n<p>       not to grant any protection to the respondents 2<\/p>\n<p>       and 3 to make any construction in the property<\/p>\n<p>       covered by the interim order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>       Munsiff         Court,         Muvattupuzha           in<\/p>\n<p>       O.S.No.473\/2009&#8221;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            2.    Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as<\/p>\n<p>follows:&#8211;Petitioner is a poor cooli.    The 2nd respondent is the<\/p>\n<p>adjoining owner residing on the northern side. It is stated that<\/p>\n<p>there is civil dispute and the boundary has to be fixed. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that when the disputes were going on, the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent permitted the 3rd respondent to erect a mobile<\/p>\n<p>phone tower in the disputed property. It is the further case of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner that        the 3rd respondent filed          W.P.(C)<\/p>\n<p>No.27618\/2009 before this Court seeking police protection for<\/p>\n<p>construction of the tower.           The petitioner was the 2nd<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 36769\/2009                        -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent in the said writ petition.     Ext.P1 is the judgment<\/p>\n<p>pronounced by this Court in the said writ petition along with<\/p>\n<p>other writ petitions. It is the further case of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>that protection was given only if there is no interdiction for<\/p>\n<p>the construction from any competent forum. Petitioner filed a<\/p>\n<p>civil suit against the 2nd respondent seeking declaration of his<\/p>\n<p>right over plaint B-schedule property, that is, the property<\/p>\n<p>now possessed by the 2nd respondent and permitted the 3rd<\/p>\n<p>respondent for construction of tower. Recovery of possession<\/p>\n<p>is prayed.     The learned Munsiff has granted interim order<\/p>\n<p>(Ext.P2).    Ext.P3 is   the sketch prepared by the Advocate<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>             3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd respondent.     Therein, inter alia it is stated that the<\/p>\n<p>suit is filed only after Ext.P1 judgment. It is also contended<\/p>\n<p>that there is no merit in the case of the petitioner. In this<\/p>\n<p>context, the respondent has produced          the    report of the<\/p>\n<p>Advocate Commissioner as Ext.R2(b) and the report of the<\/p>\n<p>Village Officer, Muvattupuzha as Ext. R2(c).           The Village<\/p>\n<p>Officer, according to the      2nd respondent has categorically<\/p>\n<p>stated that the construction of the mobile tower is in 15 cents<\/p>\n<p>of property belonging to the 2nd respondent.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 36769\/2009                       -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            4.    We heard the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 besides<\/p>\n<p>learned Government Pleader.      The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner essentially relies on Ext.P2 order.    The learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the 3rd respondent would point out that the 3rd<\/p>\n<p>respondent is not even made a party in that proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>The 2nd respondent would point out the fact that Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>judgment is not even mentioned in the plaint (Ext.R2(a).<\/p>\n<p>            5. A perusal of Ext.P1 judgment would show that,<\/p>\n<p>this Court, while granting protection had made it clear that<\/p>\n<p>parties can approach civil Court and other forum.      In this<\/p>\n<p>context, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits<\/p>\n<p>that having regard to the prayers in the suit, construction of<\/p>\n<p>the tower by the 3rd respondent cannot be interdicted even in<\/p>\n<p>terms of Ext.P1 judgment.     The fact remains that the Civil<\/p>\n<p>Court has passed an order inter alia directing the parties to<\/p>\n<p>maintain status quo regarding B-schedule property as noted<\/p>\n<p>by the Advocate Commissioner.       Ext.P2 is an order passed<\/p>\n<p>exparte. In the nature of the order passed we would think<\/p>\n<p>that while Ext.P2 order is pending it may not be appropriate at<\/p>\n<p>the same time to permit construction to go on in violation of<\/p>\n<p>the order.    As to whether the order will be violated by<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 36769\/2009                       -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>permitting construction on the basis of police protection<\/p>\n<p>ordered as per Ext.P1 it is a matter which should be decided<\/p>\n<p>by the Civil Court. No doubt, apparently Ext.P1 judgment was<\/p>\n<p>not brought to the notice of the Civil Court by the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>the plaint.\n<\/p>\n<p>            6. The writ petition is disposed of directing the Ist<\/p>\n<p>respondent not to grant protection to respondents 2 and 3 to<\/p>\n<p>make any construction without getting Ext.P2 order clarified or<\/p>\n<p>modified.   This order will be conditional upon fulfilling the<\/p>\n<p>following conditions.   The petitioner will implead the 3rd<\/p>\n<p>respondent     in   the     civil   suit    O.S.473\/2009       &amp;<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.2836\/2009) within one week from today. If steps are<\/p>\n<p>not taken to implead the 3rd respondent       by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>within one week from today, the direction given by us will<\/p>\n<p>automatically stand recalled.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         (K.M.JOSEPH)<br \/>\n                                              JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS)<br \/>\n                                              JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>MS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 36769 of 2009(M) 1. MOOSA, AGED 49 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE SUB INSPECOTR OF POLICE &#8230; Respondent 2. KUTTAPPAN, AGED 59 YEARS, 3. M\/S. INDIA TELECOM INFRA LTD., For Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":771,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010"},"wordCount":771,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010","name":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-17T23:05:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-the-sub-inspecotr-of-police-on-3-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Moosa vs The Sub Inspecotr Of Police on 3 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150713"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150713\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}