{"id":150852,"date":"2009-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-14T03:07:53","modified_gmt":"2015-12-13T21:37:53","slug":"ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KAR'NA'i'AKA AT B.\u00a7;}i%\u00a7;\u00a7L;iiR--E _\n\nBATED THIS THE 13'\": DAY QF..Q{ECE_3x&amp;BEi\u00a7'_\"i2\ufb01\u20ac3\u00a7._ AV  \"\n\n1;s.e:;\u00ab'r.):~:\u00a7;:.*::_~::r,51  \u00bb 4\n\nRep.   -.    \n\nMr.Rc,{s.han'Rohm  _'  . ...Pe\u00a5.itioner\n\n(By sr\u00e9y\ufb01tzasy c3.;{;=;%;Vr:;i:n-r\u00a7:y\"\u00a7a P.E.Um::sh, Afhrecates)\n\n1. V'  'i'}m $5\u00a7i3'\u00a7n\u00a3 Cum1::izs:.~;is:11c1* of\n f{?on:VmcmiaI \"i':\u00bb;tszCS\n_, (L'1!(I\u00a5}-?G._20, Viswcswaraiah Tawers\n _  Road\n. l'3a12ga}\u00a3\"\u00a7:*::'\u00a3\u00a5~56{I \u00a3331,\n\n'7\u00a3_'_hle ~,!5\u00a7.'SS\u00a3S'.'8\ufb02f C\ufb02\ufb01imi\ufb01\ufb02if\ufb01ilffl' at'\n.. !}1.lZ'i1\ufb01I'Ci3\u00a7 Taxeg\n{r\ufb02r\u00e9ht Marazagemen.-1:} ~--~ 1 1\n $.13-*e'\u00a7.\"e'\u00a3%?%lI'3'g, 9V{3'\u00bb~1, VI Fiver\n* WK Bzniixiing, Iialidasa Road\nRama No.61i3, Ga1.,ui}.:.1'nagar\nPsangalom\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 (X39.  Rasspondem\ufb01s\n\n\" \"(Lay an: \u00a7i.N.Shivay0gisw*am3r, ;.::;,:&lt;3:=3\n\ng;;;&#039;~&#039;\\.w~\u00ab\n\n\n\nThtif\ufb01ft writ petitions are fil::-Tc} under amrtizz-.Ir.&quot;~..- \u00a33~2tC3 \u00e9f3i\u20ac &#039;ti&quot;:=c\u00a7&#039; &#039;\nConstitution of India, praying to quash th\u00a2__Cifsfxer-._T &#039;dated&quot;\u00ab\n\u20ac3&#039;?.11.2009, passcci by 131:: 1&quot; I&#039;\ufb01$pwIil}\ufb01I}f\u00bb,.Yi{\u00a7f.\ufb01 z\ufb01rzxizipgalxtt-_&#039;;&#039;F.&#039; 8$*sVLt;, \n\nTh\u00a2&#039;:8\ufb01 p\u00e9titiozls coaxing an fatar ;:g1&quot;c*Ii:&quot;21\u00a3r;\u00e93L:*3r&#039;TT,i&quot;:e3af\u00a3ng&quot;ii&#039;::.__ \n\ngroup this day, the court made the followhjgf\n\nIn fhes\ufb01 writ petitigms, t1:tVf:?--fvV&lt;\u00ab\u00e9ti17tiif&amp;13L;=:r-s.\u00a71&#039;at.rv::AA pgtgzycd far\na writ in the nature   &#039;the order dated\n{)?.1 1.2809, pasg-;~t!V_h}3y   Agmcxmt-F,\ncIi.rect&#039;u1g    SECHGI} ?2(3} of\nthe   E2093 {ibr short, &#039;the\nAct&#039;) an:};uam:{g &#039;\u00a3.5,g..\u00a72s.:3,9t1ct: ti: the\n\n pet1t;s3\u00a7\u00a7i.:\u00a3;~s., Rui\u00e9 ..:\u00a7\u00e9 of ma Karnataka Vahm Added Tax\n\n   shaft, 'th\ufb01 Rules') speci\ufb01es that it is\n\ngs.an~ag\u00a7o';3% mace beibm Itvying penalty. Adnzittcdiy,\n\nV V' _ in tI:\u00a3%::. i:1:%,s\u00a7'*; ai\":s{;\"\u00a3;*-351:3, rmtice under R1115: 39 at' the Rules was\n\n\u00ab. h  :i3;;\u00a7t  ;iss;1.1t::s--:'i\" to the pe\ufb01tiontm. 811 this gmu\ufb01d 315336, ti:-.6':\n\n _ 'jg;-gtitisiiiers are entitled to succeed.\n\nxxx\"\n\n\n\n3. Sri K.N.Shivay0giswan1y, learned \" x\n\nthat the pe\ufb01\ufb01oners. may treat the impugned orcifr-i': \n\nunder Rube 39 ofthe RIHES aim $01116':  \u00ab.ti1s\u00a7.\u00a77 3:32': \n\n1:314: petitioners '\u00a30 \ufb01le obj\u20acctjz3x1i\u00a7\u00abV__   iv  \"\n\nrespcu1de11t-3 will pass a\u00a73piDpfia?\u00a3j;; {\u00a7.ttiEfST \u00a311 \nLaw.\n\n4. F232\" \ufb01rm masons \u00e9tated \u00e9:};;\u20ac.,w\u00a7~:,  '\u00a3\u00a5;i1iawiug:-\n\nThe W\u00a3i$'  '3.:t\ufb01:13.\"\u00a7i$;31}St:\u00e9if' of.  iinpugned. onder\n\ndated    iae read as \ufb02\ufb02fl\ufb01\ufb01 ilild\ufb01i'\nRum 39 '9: ti:&gt;\u00a2::  v2;\u00a7;i:=:.;:i:e\u00ab\u00a7.::iai;1 10 days from today, the\n\npetitioiiacs  V_:i1}.e.i'i;\u00a7ei:;~'iio11s if any. Thcita\ufb01tr, the\n\n V' \"fESp{is;iiiIi\ufb01.\u00a33f.S \ufb01g.\u00bb pai\u00a7S\"appmpriat\ufb02 erders by c::o\u00a31sid\u00a3~:ri::1g the\n\n ..i:i3%_.the petitioners. Tile respondents shaii net<\/pre>\n<p>taii\u00e9 _\u00a7t\u00a3ps_ iigeii\u00e9ovcr the penalty 311321: the pc\ufb01tionem, until<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;they ;3a\u00a3-\u00a7\u00a7*;_o1*ders on the: objections to be iiiecl by the<\/p>\n<p>A ~ <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;VVSNN<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 Author: H N Das IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KAR&#8217;NA&#8217;i&#8217;AKA AT B.\u00a7;}i%\u00a7;\u00a7L;iiR&#8211;E _ BATED THIS THE 13&#8242;&#8221;: DAY QF..Q{ECE_3x&amp;BEi\u00a7&#8217;_&#8221;i2\ufb01\u20ac3\u00a7._ AV &#8221; 1;s.e:;\u00ab&#8217;r.):~:\u00a7;:.*::_~::r,51 \u00bb 4 Rep. -. Mr.Rc,{s.han&#8217;Rohm _&#8217; . &#8230;Pe\u00a5.itioner (By sr\u00e9y\ufb01tzasy c3.;{;=;%;Vr:;i:n-r\u00a7:y&#8221;\u00a7a P.E.Um::sh, Afhrecates) 1. V&#8217; &#8216;i&#8217;}m $5\u00a7i3&#8217;\u00a7n\u00a3 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":57,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009"},"wordCount":57,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009","name":"M\/S Enterprises Software ... vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-13T21:37:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-enterprises-software-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Enterprises Software &#8230; vs The Assistant Commissioner Of on 18 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}