{"id":15105,"date":"2011-03-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-17T03:03:07","modified_gmt":"2016-01-16T21:33:07","slug":"sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011<\/div>\n
                                     S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994\n\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN\n                        AT JODHPUR\n\n                                 ORDER\n                              Sujan Singh\n                                Versus\n                         The State of Rajasthan\n\n          S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 388\/1994\n\n\n                       Date of Order : 15.03.2011\n\n                           PRESENT\n          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI\n\nMr. Prithvi Raj Singh for the petitioner\nMs. Chandralekha - Public Prosecutor\n\n\nBY THE COURT<\/pre>\n
               This revision petition is directed against the judgment<\/p>\n
dated 19.11.1994 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions<\/p>\n
Judge, Barmer in Criminal Appeal No. 10\/1994, whereby the<\/p>\n
learned appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the<\/p>\n
petitioner and upheld the judgment of conviction and order of<\/p>\n
sentence dated 13.07.1994 passed by the learned Chief Judicial<\/p>\n
Magistrate, Barmer against the petitioner in Criminal Case No.<\/p>\n
220\/1986. By the said judgment the learned trial court convicted<\/p>\n
the accused-petitioner under Section 279, 304-A IPC and sentenced<\/p>\n
him for the offence under Section 279 IPC to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs.500\/- and in<\/p>\n
default   of    payment    of    fine,   further     to    undergo      simple<\/p>\n
                                Page 1 of 6<\/span>
\n                                      S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994<\/p>\n
imprisonment for 15 days and for the offence under Section 304-A<\/p>\n
IPC, the accused-petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous<\/p>\n
imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5000\/- and in<\/p>\n
default   of    payment    of   fine,   further    to    undergo      rigorous<\/p>\n
imprisonment for six months.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
               The brief facts giving rise to the present revision<\/p>\n
petition are that complainant Bhura Ram (P.W.5) lodged a written<\/p>\n
report in the Police Station Barmer alleging therein that on<\/p>\n
04.05.1986 in the evening at about 5.00 p.m. petitioner Sujan<\/p>\n
Singh came driving a mini bus at fast speed and met with an<\/p>\n
accident in which deceased Antari aged 5 years, who was crossing<\/p>\n
the road, died. It was further alleged that the bus was stopped by<\/p>\n
the driver a little further and the complainant and one Kishna Ram<\/p>\n
ran after the bus from which driver Sujan Singh came out. It was<\/p>\n
further alleged that the accident was caused due to rash and<\/p>\n
negligent driving of the petitioner.          On the aforesaid report, a<\/p>\n
First Information Report bearing No. 124\/1986 under Section 304-A<\/p>\n
IPC was registered at the Police Station Barmer and the<\/p>\n
investigation commenced.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
               After usual investigation police filed challan against<\/p>\n
the petitioner for the offence under Section 279, 304-A IPC in the<\/p>\n
                                Page 2 of 6<\/span>
\n                                   S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994<\/p>\n
Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barmer. The learned trial court<\/p>\n
after trial convicted the petitioner under Section 279, 304-A IPC<\/p>\n
and sentenced him as narrated above vide judgment and order<\/p>\n
dated 13.07.1994.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            The petitioner filed an appeal against the aforesaid<\/p>\n
judgment and order of the trial court before the learned Additional<\/p>\n
District and Sessions Judge, Barmer, who dismissed the said appeal<\/p>\n
vide judgment dated 19.11.1994.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of<\/p>\n
sentence passed by the learned trial court which was upheld by the<\/p>\n
learned appellate court while dismissing the appeal, the petitioner<\/p>\n
has preferred this revision petition.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that<\/p>\n
the learned trial court convicted the petitioner for the offence<\/p>\n
under Section 279, 304-A IPC on the basis of the statements of<\/p>\n
P.W.1 Kishna, PW.2 Jhoomri, P.W.5 Bhura Ram and P.W.8 Meera<\/p>\n
and the learned trial court has erred in appreciating the evidence<\/p>\n
of all these four witnesses because P.W.2 Jhoomri in her cross-<\/p>\n
examination admitted the fact that after the accident when she<\/p>\n
heard about death of Antari, then she reached the place of the<\/p>\n
incident.   Further P.W.5 Bhura ram has been declared hostile<\/p>\n
                             Page 3 of 6<\/span>
\n                                   S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994<\/p>\n
witness by the prosecution and he did not support the prosecution<\/p>\n
story and P.W.8 Meera also admitted in her cross-examination that<\/p>\n
after the accident she came out of her house, therefore, the<\/p>\n
evidence of these three witnesses was not properly appreciated by<\/p>\n
the learned trial court as well as by the learned appellate court<\/p>\n
and regarding the evidence of P.W.1 Kishna, the learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the petitioner contended that he also admitted in his cross-<\/p>\n
examination that after hearing the sound of the accident, he<\/p>\n
immediately rushed to the place of the incident and further he<\/p>\n
admitted in his cross-examination that the deceased girl herself<\/p>\n
came under the mini bus and thereby the accident took place.<\/p>\n
Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the<\/p>\n
evidence of P.W.1 Kishna also does not support the prosecution<\/p>\n
story that he saw the accident with his own eyes while the mini<\/p>\n
bus was being driven by the petitioner in a rash and negligent<\/p>\n
manner. The learned counsel for the petitioner further contended<\/p>\n
that as per the site inspection memo (Ex.P.5) and site map<\/p>\n
(Ex.P.6), the incident took place on the left side of the road where<\/p>\n
the dead body of the girl was found 3 feet away from the left side<\/p>\n
of the road, therefore, it cannot be said that at the time of the<\/p>\n
accident the driver was driving the mini bus in such a manner so as<\/p>\n
to drive it in wrong side.\n<\/p>\n
                             Page 4 of 6<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
                                    S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994<\/p>\n
            The learned Public Prosecutor contended that by<\/p>\n
seeing the child girl, the driver of the mini bus, i.e. the petitioner,<\/p>\n
could have stopped the vehicle or could have minimized its speed.<\/p>\n
Thus, she defended the judgment of the learned trial court.<\/p>\n
            I have considered the rival contentions of both the<\/p>\n
parties and perused the evidence available on the record. For the<\/p>\n
offence under Section 279, 304-A IPC, the prosecution has to prove<\/p>\n
the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle on the part of the<\/p>\n
driver to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In the present<\/p>\n
case, P.W.2 Jhoomri and P.W.8 Meera clearly admitted in their<\/p>\n
evidence that they came out of their houses after coming into<\/p>\n
knowledge of the fact of death of the deceased girl Antari and the<\/p>\n
complainant P.W.5 Bhura Ram did not support the prosecution<\/p>\n
story and has been declared hostile. Now if come to the evidence<\/p>\n
of P.W.1 Kishna, it is clear that he also admitted that he came to<\/p>\n
the place of the incident after hearing the sound of the accident<\/p>\n
and further he admitted in his cross-examination that the deceased<\/p>\n
girl herself came under the bus, therefore, the accident took<\/p>\n
place. In my view, the appreciation of the evidence made by the<\/p>\n
learned trial court as well as the learned appellate court is not<\/p>\n
proper.   Both the learned courts below have relied upon the<\/p>\n
evidence of P.W.1 Kishna, P.W.2 Jhoomri and P.W.8 Meera,<\/p>\n
                              Page 5 of 6<\/span>
\n                                       S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994<\/p>\n
    whereas in my view none of the witnesses have deposed anything<\/p>\n
    about the speed of the mini bus at the time of the incident and<\/p>\n
    further the site inspection memo (Ex.P.5) and site map (Ex.P.6)<\/p>\n
    does not show any rashness and negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n
    petitioner because at the relevant time the vehicle was being<\/p>\n
    driven by the petitioner on the left side of the road, therefore, the<\/p>\n
    testimony of P.W.1 Kishna, P.W.2 Jhoomri and P.W.8 Meera cannot<\/p>\n
    be relied upon about the rash and negligent act of the petitioner so<\/p>\n
    as to endanger the public life and to cause death of Antari by<\/p>\n
    driving the vehicle in rash and negligent manner. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n
    appreciation of the evidence as made by the learned trial court<\/p>\n
    and the learned appellate court being erroneous, the offence<\/p>\n
    under Section 279, 304-A IPC against the petitioner cannot be said<\/p>\n
    to be proved.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                Resultantly, this revision petition is allowed and the<\/p>\n
    judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.07.1994<\/p>\n
    passed by the learned trial court as well as the judgment of the<\/p>\n
    learned appellate court dated 19.11.1994 are set aside and<\/p>\n
    petitioner Sujan Singh S\/o Sher Singh is acquitted of the charges<\/p>\n
    under Section 279 and 304-A IPC. The petitioner is on bail. His<\/p>\n
    bail bonds are hereby discharged.\n<\/p>\n
                                          [KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI],J.\n<\/p>\n
Pramod<\/p>\n
                                 Page 6 of 6<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 388\/1994 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Sujan Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 388\/1994 Date of Order : 15.03.2011 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nSujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1285,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011"},"wordCount":1285,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011","name":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T21:33:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sujan-singh-vs-state-on-15-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sujan Singh vs State on 15 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}