{"id":151308,"date":"2010-08-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-02-18T15:33:06","modified_gmt":"2016-02-18T10:03:06","slug":"mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                 Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000443 dated 30.3.2009\n                   Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant        -       Shri Raj Balam Sharma\nRespondent           -   Supreme Court of India (SCI)\n                 Decision announced in hearing 12.8.2010\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>         By an application of 19.12.08 Shri Raj Balam Sharma, himself an<br \/>\nAdvocate, of Shakarpur, Delhi applied to the Competent Authority, Office of Chief<br \/>\nJustice, Supreme Court of India seeking information on seven points concerning<br \/>\ngeneral questions on the functioning of the Supreme Court and records<br \/>\nmaintained by it. He has received a point wise response from CPIO Shri Raj Pal<br \/>\nArora, Addl. Registrar dated 14.1.09. But whereas his own application, a copy of<br \/>\nwhich he has submitted with his appeal before us has only seven questions, the<br \/>\nresponse which is point wise addressed 25 questions.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Shri Sharma has then gone in appeal on 29.1.09, upon which Shri M. P.<br \/>\nBhadran has in a detailed order, after examining the answers to each of the<br \/>\nquestions put and the answers given by CPIO, come to the following conclusion:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;It is practically impossible to furnish the information sought by the<br \/>\n         appellant as per point 4 (iii) since no such data is kept in the Supreme<br \/>\n         Court in respect of 80,000 cases as mentioned therein. Similarly, the<br \/>\n         request of the appellant as per point 4 (iv) and connected points is not<br \/>\n         covered under section 2 (f) of the RTI Act. It is beyond the jurisdiction and<br \/>\n         duty of CPIO to give his opinion as sought by the appellant as per point 4\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         (v). Similarly, no information is available with the CPIO in respect of point<br \/>\n         4 (vii) and the points as referred to in the order of the CPIO. I find no error<br \/>\n         in the impugned order.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>         Shri Sharma has then moved a second appeal before us with the following<br \/>\nprayer:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;No response received in form-B, or C within thirty days of<br \/>\n         submission of Form-A response only of para-i) and ii) of the<br \/>\n         application and rest para-iii) to xx) left without reply.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            1<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        The appeal was heard on 14.7.10. The following are present:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Appellant<br \/>\n             Shri Raj Balam Sharma<br \/>\n       Respondents<br \/>\n             Shri Devadatt Kamat, Advocate for SCI<br \/>\n             Ms. Asha Ahuja, Br. Officer, SCI<\/p>\n<p>       Learned Counsel for Supreme Court of India Shri Devadatt Kamat<br \/>\npresented his vakalatnama, which has been placed on record. He presented a<br \/>\ncopy of the original application moved by Shri Raj Balam Sharma before<br \/>\nSupreme Court of India on 13.12.08. This carries only some questions which are<br \/>\nidentical with the copy of the application that appellant has submitted to this<br \/>\nCommission together with his second appeal. While examining the responses,<br \/>\ntherefore, we found that questions (iii), (iv) and (vii) are different to those in the<br \/>\napplication actually submitted to the Supreme Court, the only identical questions<br \/>\nwith identical answers being (i), (ii) &amp; (v).\n<\/p>\n<p>       In response Shri Raj Balam Sharma submitted that he had abbreviated his<br \/>\noriginal application for presentation before this Commission. Because of this,<br \/>\nhowever, the whole perspective of questions asked and answers given has been<br \/>\nrendered obscure making it impossible for this Commission to arrive at a<br \/>\nconsidered decision against each question asked. If appellant Shri Sharma were<br \/>\nsatisfied with the answers to certain questions he was free to say so in the<br \/>\nappeal that he moved before us highlighting only those questions regarding<br \/>\nwhich he was aggrieved with the answers. For this reason, the hearing was<br \/>\nadjourned to 10.8.2010 at 4.00 p.m. before which, and not later than a week from<br \/>\nthe date of receipt of this interim decision, Shri Raj Balam Sharma was directed<br \/>\nto send to us a revised statement with a copy to CPIO SCI, with regard to the<br \/>\noriginal application, a copy of which is in our possession now, after which the<br \/>\nmatter will be heard.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        Accordingly the matter was heard once more on 10.8.2010. The following<br \/>\nare present<br \/>\n      Appellant<br \/>\n      Shri Raj Balam Sharma<\/p>\n<p>      Respondents<br \/>\n      Shri Devadatt Kamat, Advocate for SCI<br \/>\n      Ms. Smita Vats Sharma Addl. Registrar, CPIO, SCI<br \/>\n      Ms. Asha Ahuja, Br. Officer, SCI<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant Shri Raj Balam Sharma, Advocate submitted a revised list of<br \/>\nquestions which he stated was the same as was part of his original RTI<br \/>\napplication. This, however, was contested by Learned Counsel for respondents<br \/>\nwho submitted that there was still a discrepancy although minor, specifically with<br \/>\nregard to the listing of question nos. 18 &amp; 19.          The application was then<br \/>\nexamined question wise.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Learned Counsel for respondent Shri Devdutt Kamat submitted that the<br \/>\nentire information sought by appellant Shri Raj Balam Sharma with regard to<br \/>\nquestion nos. 1 &amp; 2 are available on the website and appellant Shri Raj Balam<br \/>\nSharma was welcome to access this. It was clarified with regard to question no. 6<br \/>\nthat information regarding voluntary declaration of the property by the Judges is<br \/>\nalso available on the website, but that all such disclosures are voluntary. Insofar<br \/>\nas Supreme Court of India is concerned the Registry of the Supreme Court of<br \/>\nIndia is not in a position to answer this question with regard to Judges of the High<br \/>\nCourts.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Information with regard to question nos. 6, 14 &amp; 15 was, besides, not held<br \/>\nby the Registry but with specific reference to the question at serial no. 14<br \/>\nLearned Counsel for respondent clarified that there was no authority authorized<br \/>\nto hear complaints against judges so long as the Judge holds office. He can,<br \/>\nhowever, be impeached by Parliament and Parliament alone. Learned Counsel<br \/>\nfor respondents also submitted that the details of the same fall within the ambit of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          3<\/span><br \/>\n in-house procedure in the Office of Chief Justice of Supreme Court of India.<br \/>\nDisclosure of this matter is at present sub-judice with a stay issued in SLP filed<br \/>\nbefore the apex court by the Registry of the Supreme Court of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>       From our discussion as described above we find that all the information in<br \/>\nthe form of information as defined in section 2 (f) held by the Supreme Court of<br \/>\nIndia has indeed been provided to appellant Shri Raj Balam Sharma, save such<br \/>\ninformation the disclosure of which is at present under stay. Further clarifications<br \/>\nhave also been provided in the hearing. Under the circumstances there is no<br \/>\nfurther action warranted in this regard. Those questions in which opinions have<br \/>\nbeen elicited such as question no. 5 cannot be provided by CPIO but will require<br \/>\na legal opinion giving the required clarification. Moreover there is no prescribed<br \/>\nform as per the Act-with reference to Forms B and C referred to by appellant-<br \/>\nthrough which information is required to be provided. Therefore, after elucidation<br \/>\nprovided to appellant by learned counsel for respondent in the hearing, this<br \/>\nappeal is now dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n12.8.2010<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n12.8.2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000443 dated 30.3.2009 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Shri Raj Balam Sharma Respondent &#8211; Supreme Court of India (SCI) Decision announced in hearing 12.8.2010 Facts : By an application [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1127,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010"},"wordCount":1127,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010","name":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T10:03:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-raj-balam-sharma-advocate-vs-supreme-court-of-india-on-12-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Raj Balam Sharma Advocate vs Supreme Court Of India on 12 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}