{"id":151547,"date":"2009-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-22T18:01:33","modified_gmt":"2019-02-22T12:31:33","slug":"mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coma? 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 10\"*aAy 0? JUNE, 2009 V\nBEFORE:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTECE A.S: pACHHA9\ufb01RE {T\n\nCRIMENAL REVISION PETITION &o.i\u00a262 Q\u00a7 2\u00a793'fu'*J\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nH.C.Sabakath Hussain,v'\n\nSKO. Hussain Beary,\n\nAged about 44 years, .  \n\nR\/at Coastal Rock apartment;\n\nJaya Mahal, :'*, < L \u00a7 j mV* \\2 *\n\nBangalore. _[V 5", ,'.'; __A. "";\u00b0 PETITIONER\/S\n\n{By M\/3. C.R3g\u00a7\u00a2;;a\u00a7gam\u00a7fafAss\u00a7\u00a2\u00e9}, Adv3.}\n\nAND:\n\nThe State df,Karn\u00e9t\u00e9ka} f\nBy Range Forest Gfficer,\n\n.*K9PPar\u00a2a . *.W ;\n* Rey, by State Public Prosecutor,\n'High*Ceu;t Building,\n\nBapgg15;g+\u00a760*Q0;. N RESPONDENTJS\n\n{By'Sfi._B\u00a7 B\u00e9lakrishna, HCGP.}\n\n-iwiwk\n\n ; =T$is Crl.R.P. is filed ufSection 482 Cr.P.C. by\n\nV - {he Advocate for the petitioner praying to quash the\n"a;\u00a7\u00a7ggned Order dt. 22.4.2806 passed by th@ 9.0.,\n\nA "FTC--I, Chikmagalur, in Crl.R.P. No.5?\/O5.\n\nThis Crl.R.?. Gaming on for Final Hearing thi\ufb01\n\nday, the canrt made the Eoiiawing:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner has challenged the Juegmg\ufb01\ufb01faed<\/p>\n
Orders passed by the lower appe;iete’@*CQurt}ub*<\/p>\n
Chikmagalur, allowigg’ the Crli\u00a7\u00a7P;t Ne;57f2$GS” and
\ndirecting to reetore C.C. No.54\u20ac(20\u00a73 :5 the r::\u00e9\u00bb\u00a7f,
\nthe JMFC directing to di3eese,ef rheVceeexee merits <\/p>\n
and in accordance with law,~”.r”\n<\/p>\n
2. ?he facts re}e%an\u00a7 fe\u00a3m\ufb01hee\u00a7\ufb01rpose of the
\nrevision are as eeder\ufb01 g v7 VA r’\u00abw_<\/p>\n
I will\u00bbbe.referriee~\ufb01\ufb01e earries as per their
\nrank before xihe_ TrisiV Court for the purpose of<\/p>\n
convenience)<\/p>\n
fee *\u00a7etitieeer sis a Deputy Conservator of<\/p>\n
Akforest eed gee arrayed as accused Ne.4 before the<\/p>\n
Trial Ce\u00a7rEwfer”\u20ache charge of the offence punishabie<\/p>\n
V’VunderWSeetie\ufb01 87 of the Karnatake Forest Act r\/w.<\/p>\n
“e3rE\ufb01:esL84;~\u00a75\u00e9, 165 and ?1~A of the Karnataka Ferest<\/p>\n
\u00b0%ei\u00e9e,s5 En application came to be filed by the<\/p>\n
x “pet\u00a7tiener {accused \u00a30.43 ene aiee accused Nes.\u00a7 to<\/p>\n
 “~.\u00a7’ under Section 245\u00a32) rfw. Sectien 19? Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
praying to discharge them with the averment that<\/p>\n
94<\/span><\/p>\n
there are no sufficient grounds to proceed against<\/p>\n
them for the above said offences.\n<\/p>\n
It is on 95.03.2002 at about 5.00 _a,h{}n the<\/p>\n
forest authorities had an information’Hebouth the h.<\/p>\n
unlawful possession of sandaiwoo\ufb02”pieoes,ahd_in the<\/p>\n
circumstances, theyt along \ufb01ithoi the’ –a::es\u00a7;\u00a7g,<\/p>\n
witnesses and other officiaiepprooeededVin7the’\ufb01eeph<\/p>\n
bearing reg. No.KA Gl\ufb01\ufb01 3369 ehd when they qeme near
\nThirthahalli, near Ae\u00e9teb,\u00a7htSih\u00a7 home, they saw a
\nvehicle and they\u00ab%k$?P$di\ufb01\ufb02dhm\u00e9dhhih\u00e9i\u00e9earch, and on
\nobservation of ehe\ufb01icioghiooh\ufb01hot of the inmates of
\nthe sale \u00a7\u00e9\ufb01:\u00a2ig,ih\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 Noeii to 3 who were found
\non inteftogatioe [v5i$Q< hot offer satisfactozy<\/p>\n
explanation "and _th\u00e9y itoid about the sandalwood<\/p>\n
xtieceeiahagingt beeh "Stored """ near the \ufb01ursing Home.<\/p>\n
Thev eaid\u00a2 s\ufb01hdalwood pieces were seized and on<\/p>\n
hi~Vo furtheii ihtor\ufb01ogation, accused Nos.1 to 3 gave a<\/p>\n
yglunter\ufb01tgetatemeht that on the instructions of<\/p>\n
\u00aboh\u00e9eo\ufb01\ufb01ee he.\u00e9, they had come to purchase the<\/p>\n
hx_ San\ufb02ei\ufb01oed gieoes and as they found it not worthy,<\/p>\n
vtefected the offer" to purchase and waere retaining<\/p>\n
nhaok. They also stated that it wag accused Nos.5 to<\/p>\n
? who had collected sandaiwoo\u00e9 pieces at that place.<\/p>\n
So far 33 accusad $03.5 ts '? are ceacerned, they
\nwere l@ft~out during the investigation. A. charge<\/p>\n
sheet was laidT only' against accused \u00a7os.1 t\ufb01 4a<\/p>\n
During the proceedings before the Mag\ufb01$tra\u00a7%;m\ufb01\ufb01*u<\/p>\n
appiicaticn un\ufb01er Section E\u00e9\ufb01gg)   Cft\ufb01gC;. ;tb<\/p>\n
discharge them came to be filedi\ufb01<\/p>\n
On a\u00a7preciation of th\u00e9,$at@rial cg re\u00e9\ufb01f&; the'<\/p>\n
Trial Caurt allowed the application a\ufb01d-\u00a7isbharged
\naccused Nos.1 to 4. "\ufb01\ufb01qrievgd\u00e9bgj\ufb01he said Order,
\nthe State preferxed revisio\ufb01 to \ufb01hg 3\u00e9ssions Court<\/p>\n
in Crl.R.P. Nd@S%\/2\u00a7G\u00a7.\u20ac,\u00e9ft\u00e9p h$\u00a7iing the learned<\/p>\n
counsei for Eh\u00a7_p\u00e9\ufb01ti\u00e93; the fast ?xack Court set<\/p>\n
aside th\u00e9.'Gr8e: \u00a7f ";\ufb01e\u00a2*ieazned Magistrate and<\/p>\n
dixected to \ufb01roceed wi\ufb01\ufb01 the matter against all the<\/p>\n
a\/ac\u00a2u$\u00a7\u00a7za\ufb01\ufb01 di3pd\u00e9e cf the matter. Aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
\u00a7aid =Q:d\u00e9rgV[ accused No.4 i.e., the Qeputy<\/p>\n
V Ccnservator-\u00a7f:Ferest has preferred the revision.<\/p>\n
V*. 3. ",f'have hear\u00e9 the ieaxned Ceu\ufb01sel far the<\/p>\n
"\u00a7\u00e9ti:ioher aad alss the learne\ufb01 Government Pleader.<\/p>\n
' 4. The point that arises for my eonsideration<\/p>\n
Whether the Qrder of the Fast<\/p>\n
Erack Court, aiiowing the rgvision and<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
directing to proceed against the
\npetitioner herein i.e., accused No.\u00e9,egi;
\nbefore the Triai Court is iiiegai and .@'f,u<\/p>\n
perverse?\n<\/p>\n
5. It is the contentien ef the leat\ufb01ed eeuneel<\/p>\n
for the petitioner that there ieKne materiel at all *<\/p>\n
against the petitiener teiitcl\ufb01 Vthetifteere are
\nsufficient grounds te *proeeeeiea\u00a7ein$t \ufb01imi for the
\noffence alleged. In  he submits
\nthat the Ordep*e\ufb01 the Ap\ufb01ellate Co\ufb01if is illegal and
\nperverse. ‘ 1 iii’ it  ‘ V<\/p>\n
Per: \u00a2o\ufb01tfa,_ the “learned Gevernment Pieader
\nsuppoxted”the_impe\u00a7\ufb01e\u00a7*efder of the lower Agpeiiate<\/p>\n
Court._i<\/p>\n
A’v6f _ u$heV scrutiny of the doeuments and the<\/p>\n
ch\u00e9:g\u00e9_.sh\u00e9et_5i\u00e9id by the State reveai only’ two<\/p>\n
Vcircum3tae\u00e9ee’as against the petitioner. The name<\/p>\n
~-T at the petitioner eccerding to the prosecutien was<\/p>\n
iieveale\ufb01e only’ \ufb02exing’ the interrogation of accused<\/p>\n
i”NQe,\u00a7 to 3, who stated in their voluntary statements<\/p>\n
i”\u00bbthat it is accused No.\u00a7, who gave instructions te<\/p>\n
them to g0 and perchaee the sandaiweed. The ether<\/p>\n
Circumetances is that an the date of tee incident,<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
accused No.4 i.e., the petitionex herein was to go<\/p>\n
to Davangere, but he did not do 30. Insteadfihe<\/p>\n
went to Kappa, whexein the incident teak pieeeg”i5eg<\/p>\n
far as the 1″ accused is cencerned, it is releventj<\/p>\n
to note that accused Nos.\u00a7 to 3″in-theiri\ufb01oleeterfv<\/p>\n
statement have stated before t\ufb01e \ufb01eiic\u00e9 that tee?”<\/p>\n
went to t\ufb01e spot on instr\ufb01etipn A5f_ aeeeeee””NoC4.
\nThis itself is not a gixcumetencei w\ufb01ich_Qeeld be
\ncensidered as a faetiiofeegie&eyeiy  under the
\nprovisions of Seetien 2?”ef tee ie\u00e9ie\ufb01i\ufb01eidence Act.<\/p>\n
The infQrmatip\ufb01_ gi\ufb01en. by _a ,petSo\ufb01i$and consequent<\/p>\n
recovery “of *a\ufb01y \ufb01eteiiel weald be the evidence
\nagainst tBat_pe:se\ufb01 wee gege the infermatien. Se,<\/p>\n
at the most;\u20acthe’tecC\u00a7er\u00a7 of the sandalwoed at the<\/p>\n
vinetaece _5\u00a7V accused. Nos.\u00a7 to 3 would be a<\/p>\n
eizcemstance against the said accused under Section<\/p>\n
2? of the E\ufb01die\ufb01 Evidence Act and it can never be a<\/p>\n
circum\u00e9tanee against accused No.4. In that View of<\/p>\n
iittheimattef; the mere fact that accused N0.3 stated<\/p>\n
eefefe’~the Felice in his etatement that en the<\/p>\n
uinet\ufb01uetion of eccuee\ufb01 $0.4, they gone to the place,<\/p>\n
“can not be ceneideredt as a Circumstance against<\/p>\n
accused \u00a7o.4 i.e., the petitioner herein. \u00e9\ufb01\ufb01:<\/p>\n
?. Et is necessary to note that the petitioner
\nherein is the Deputy Conservator of Fo:aatt an\u00e9
\nhaving his office at Bangaiore and hisimaathotitfto
\nextends to whole of the state. tin the”Citoa\ufb01atanca;”
\nif he had a pmogramme to go to i\ufb01\ufb01ahgat\u00e9oaa\ufb01ifot
\nsome reason if he had changao his proqra\ufb01aa ano\u00a7tadE;
\ngone to Koppa, in my opiaio\ufb01’ thia’.\ufb01a\u00e9h \ufb01of doubt
\nitself is not sufficio\ufb01t \u00a7t\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01:g\u00a7ah0lW,\u00a3\u00a7\u00e9t there
\nare material circumsta\ufb01oaat:agag\ufb01a\ufb01i\ufb01him for the
\naccusation ma\u00a7efQLApatt\u20acttomataaae two Circumstances
\nstatad by tho gtosooatig\ufb01k t\ufb01\u00e9fa is no material at
\nall ag3inStjW!tHB< toetitioaei and these two
\ncircumstancesVvai\u00e9\ufb02\ufb01iaauttioient in my opinion to<\/p>\n
proceed against toe y\u00e9titioner. in that View of the<\/p>\n
_matter\u00a7 the Gfdet of the learned Presiding Officar<\/p>\n
trot tho Saat Track Court is iilegai and deserves to<\/p>\n
b\u00e9" Sat "a\u00a3ide;*" Hence, I answer the point in<\/p>\n
ViVaffirmati#\u00e9~ahd proceed to pass the foliowing:<\/p>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
E"=;V_\ufb01 The petition is allowed. The Qrder of the<\/p>\n
Vi"~_\u00a7re5idiag Gfficar, Fast ?rack Court, Chikmagaiur, in<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P. No.5?\/2005, directing to proceed against<\/p>\n
the petitioner\/accused N0.\u00a7 in the case is set<\/p>\n
94-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure IN THE HIGH coma? 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10″*aAy 0? JUNE, 2009 V BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTECE A.S: pACHHA9\ufb01RE {T CRIMENAL REVISION PETITION &o.i\u00a262 Q\u00a7 2\u00a793’fu’*J BETWEEN: H.C.Sabakath Hussain,v’ SKO. Hussain Beary, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1201,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009"},"wordCount":1201,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009","name":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-22T12:31:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-h-c-sabakath-hussain-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr H C Sabakath Hussain vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}