{"id":151606,"date":"2010-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-05T11:37:39","modified_gmt":"2016-06-05T06:07:39","slug":"jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                        FA No.160 of 2006\n                      JAGDISH CHANDRA ROY .\n                              Versus\n                     MOST.URMILA DEVI &amp; ORS .\n                            -----------\n                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>16.   08.09.2010.          Heard the learned counsel, Mr. Sushanto Kumar Das,<\/p>\n<p>                    appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Abu Haider, the<\/p>\n<p>                    learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent on<\/p>\n<p>                    I.A. No.1484 of 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>                           (2) This I.A. No.1484 of 2010 has been filed by the<\/p>\n<p>                    appellants under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil<\/p>\n<p>                    Procedure praying therein to restrain the respondents Nos.1 and<\/p>\n<p>                    2 from making construction over the suit plot No.1653 during the<\/p>\n<p>                    pendency of this Appeal.       Counter affidavit and supplementary<\/p>\n<p>                    affidavit and rejoinder have been filed on behalf of the parties.<\/p>\n<p>                           (3) The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that<\/p>\n<p>                    the appellants have been allotted one acre of plot No.1653 in the<\/p>\n<p>                    back side whereas the respondents have been allotted the portion<\/p>\n<p>                    of land which is just by the side of the road. The respondents are<\/p>\n<p>                    making shop rooms and they have taken lakhs of rupees from<\/p>\n<p>                    different   persons   for   inducting   them   as   tenant.   If    the<\/p>\n<p>                    respondents are not restrained by injunction then the appellant<\/p>\n<p>                    shall suffer serious loss and irreparable injury.<\/p>\n<p>                           (4) On the other hand, the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>                    respondent submitted that the appellant have got no prima facie<\/p>\n<p>                    case nor the balance of connivance is in their favour. The learned<\/p>\n<p>                    counsel further submitted that still 126 feet land of plot No.1653<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>which is just adjacent to road which was allotted in the share of<\/p>\n<p>respondent is lying vacant. If the appeal will be allowed and any<\/p>\n<p>portion of this plot is again allotted to the appellant then they<\/p>\n<p>may be very well adjusted in that 126 feet long land by the side<\/p>\n<p>of the road.\n<\/p>\n<p>       (5) It appears that the plaintiff-respondent&#8217;s suit for<\/p>\n<p>partition was decreed.   Thereafter, pleader Commissioner was<\/p>\n<p>appointed and on the basis of Pleader Commissioner&#8217;s report,<\/p>\n<p>final decree was prepared.     This First Appeal has been filed<\/p>\n<p>against the final decree.     After final decree, the plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>respondents filed Execution case and obtained delivery of<\/p>\n<p>possession of the properties according to final decree.        The<\/p>\n<p>concerned plot No.1653 measures 2.14 acres and out of that<\/p>\n<p>area, the appellants have been allotted one acre.    The plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>respondents have been allotted 76 decimals and they have<\/p>\n<p>obtained delivery of possession and now, therefore, the plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>respondents are the rightful owner of the property of which<\/p>\n<p>delivery of possession has been given. According to the plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>respondent still 126 feet land is lying vacant and no construction<\/p>\n<p>is being made. If the final decree is set aside and any portion of<\/p>\n<p>land out of the land of which possession has been given to the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff is allotted to the appellant then they may be given the<\/p>\n<p>unconstructed portion of plot No.1653.\n<\/p>\n<p>       (6) In view of the above facts and circumstances of the<\/p>\n<p>case that the plaintiff-respondents have obtained delivery of<\/p>\n<p>possession through the process of the Court and are enjoying the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            said land by constructing shop premises in a portion of the said<\/p>\n<p>            land, in my opinion, the appellants have got no prima facie case.<\/p>\n<p>            In the counter affidavit, it has specifically been stated that<\/p>\n<p>            substantial construction had already been completed. At the time<\/p>\n<p>            of hearing, the leaned counsel for the respondent submitted that<\/p>\n<p>            roof have been concreted.         It appears that the injunction<\/p>\n<p>            application has been filed in February, 2010.       7 months have<\/p>\n<p>            passed and, therefore, it cannot be denied that substantial part of<\/p>\n<p>            the construction have been made.        I, therefore, find that the<\/p>\n<p>            balance of connivance is not in favour of the appellant rather if<\/p>\n<p>            injunction is granted, the plaintiff-respondents shall suffer serious<\/p>\n<p>            loss and the amount invested will be blocked. I, therefore, find<\/p>\n<p>            that the appellant shall also not suffer any loss what to speak of<\/p>\n<p>            serious loss and irreparable injury.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   (7) I, therefore, find no merit in this Injunction Application<\/p>\n<p>            and accordingly this Injunction Application is rejected.<\/p>\n<pre>Sanjeev\/-                               (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.160 of 2006 JAGDISH CHANDRA ROY . Versus MOST.URMILA DEVI &amp; ORS . &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; ORDER 16. 08.09.2010. Heard the learned counsel, Mr. Sushanto Kumar Das, appearing on behalf of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":650,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010"},"wordCount":650,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010","name":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-05T06:07:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagdish-chandra-roy-vs-most-urmila-devi-amp-ors-on-8-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jagdish Chandra Roy vs Most.Urmila Devi &amp;Amp; Ors on 8 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}