{"id":151646,"date":"2005-12-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-12-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005"},"modified":"2015-02-26T19:50:09","modified_gmt":"2015-02-26T14:20:09","slug":"rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","title":{"rendered":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 2006 (1) AWC 361<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: A Lala, S Shanker<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Amitava Lala and Shiv Shanker, JJ.<\/p>\n<p>1. Prayer has been made for the purpose of commanding the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their residential house situated in village Purey Dayal, Pargana Barasathi, District Jaunpur. Further prayer has also been made for commanding respondents not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioners as provided under the law. We have come to know the facts and circumstances of the case. One of the brothers of the petitioners namely Prem Prakash Singh @ Munna Bajrangi is the accused in a heinous crime case. According to the petitioners, the police is regularly visiting the place of the petitioners and harassing them and their mother. They are threatening to attach the property in spite of decree of the civil suit passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, in original suit No. 1014 of 2002 whereunder the petitioners&#8217; properties are separated from the accused by a decree of partition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioners contended that under the garb of proclamation under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the police personnel are threatening to seize the property, which legitimately belongs to the petitioners. They have no connection with Prem Prakash Singh alias Munna Bajrangi. In any event, the property of the petitioners is adjacent to the property of Prem Prakash Singh alias Munna Bajrangi and admittedly not physically divided.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Learned Government Advocate has contended before this Court that no attachment order is passed as yet. Therefore, the writ petition is based only on apprehension.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Upon hearing the parties, we have not yet been able to understand the cause  of action of the writ petition. We are not concerned with future cause of action, if any. If the property is attached, in that case, the appropriate remedy is available to get release of the property from appropriate authority on the basis of decree of the civil court. Therefore, it is not a fit case for interference. It appears to us that the petitioners only want to have assurance from the Court about no disturbance from the police. It has alleged that the police is not discharging its duty properly. According to us the petitioners have avenue to make appropriate representation before the concerned authority or to proceed before Human Rights Commission for the remedy. This Court cannot interfere with such type of vague allegations.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Factual aspect of the case of <a href=\"\/doc\/619152\/\">Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors.<\/a>   is not applicable herein.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. No order is passed as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. However, if the petitioners appear before the appropriate authority or before the Human Rights Commission for the purpose of redressal of their grievance, if any, such authority or the Commission may consider the case sympathetically.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005 Equivalent citations: 2006 (1) AWC 361 Bench: A Lala, S Shanker JUDGMENT Amitava Lala and Shiv Shanker, JJ. 1. Prayer has been made for the purpose of commanding the respondents not to interfere with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005\",\"datePublished\":\"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\"},\"wordCount\":509,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\",\"name\":\"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005","datePublished":"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005"},"wordCount":509,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005","name":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ... on 19 December, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-12-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-26T14:20:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-singh-and-rakesh-singh-both-vs-state-of-u-p-through-secretary-on-19-december-2005#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajesh Singh And Rakesh Singh Both &#8230; vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary &#8230; on 19 December, 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}