{"id":151720,"date":"1999-03-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-02-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999"},"modified":"2015-12-22T05:30:23","modified_gmt":"2015-12-22T00:00:23","slug":"corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","title":{"rendered":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: 1999 IIAD Delhi 295<\/div>\n
Author: K Ramamoorthy<\/div>\n
Bench: K Ramamoorthy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
K. Ramamoorthy, J.<\/p>\n
1.
\n     The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-\n<\/p>\n
     “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may      kindly be pleased to:-\n<\/p>\n
  i) Issue appropriate writ\/directions\/orders in favour of the   petitioner and against the respondents for quashing the impugned   decision of the respondents whereby the petitioner was denied his   disability pension which was duly recommended by the Medical   Board at the time of invaliding out the petitioner from the   service on 08.9.1995.\n<\/p>\n
  ii) To direct the respondents so as to reconsider their recommendations with regard to admissibility of Medical Pension to the   petitioner considering the invaliding disease on account of which   the petitioner suffered disability was attributable to the service and also was aggravated by the service keeping in view the   nature of duties of the petitioner.”\n<\/p>\n
 2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition can be  noticed in the following terms:\n<\/p>\n
   On the 11th of October, 1984, the petitioner was enrolled in the  Indian Air Force as an airman. He was medically found fit. His character  had been assessed as an exemplary and his proficiency in professional trade  had been assessed to be exceptional. In 1992, he had some ailment referring  to sleeplessness. He was given treatment and he was again serving. On the  25th of February, 1994, he was posted at Air Force Station Yelhanka. On the  8th of September, 1995, he was medically boarded out of service. On the 2nd  of July, 1996, the Air Force Record Office sent the papers to the authority  concerned for payment of disability pension. By order dated 28.10.1996, the  CCDA (Pension), Allahabad decided that the petitioner was not entitled to  disability pension as he was not suffering from any ailment which could be  attributed to military service, nor did it existed before or during military service. It had also been noted that the ailment was no aggravated by  military service. The Medical Board gave its report on the 8th of July,  1995. In column No.3D, it is stated “constitutional disease not connected  with service”.\n<\/p>\n
 3. The Medical Board has not given any reasons and it has been pointed  out time and again by this Court and by the Supreme Court that there must  be reasoning on record to come to the conclusion that the ailment was not  attributable to military service. The disability had been fixed at 60%. It  is not disputed that the petitioner’s record of service had been very  exemplary and exceptional, as I noticed above.\n<\/p>\n
 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents  had not considered the matter in its proper perspective and the ailment  suffered by the petitioner was certainly attributable to the military  service, for the petitioner had been working without any complaint whatsoever for eight years or more.\n<\/p>\n
 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner  sent an appeal to the appellate authority, the Ministry of defense, on the  17th of January, 1997 and the Ministry had not cared to disposed of the  appeal, and therefore, the petitioner was forced to file this writ petition  on the 25th of July, 1998.\n<\/p>\n
 6. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the ailment  suffered by the petitioner was not attributable to the military service.  The Medical Board had expressed its opinion:-\n<\/p>\n
  “This 27 Yrs old Cpl, having 10 Yrs of service, is an old case of   unspecified psychosis. The onset was in 1992, _______(not legible) sleeplessness, restlessness, and ______________(not   legible)_________ ETCs and drugs. This yr he had an _________   psychotic breakdown for which he had to be hospitalised.\n<\/p>\n
  In spite of treatment, he has residual psychotic creatures like   effective blunting, apathy, social withdrawal and loss of insight. He has also run away from the ward. Keeping the foregoing   in mind, it is not felt that he is not fit for further military   duties.\n<\/p>\n
  Recommended invalidment in Med _at EEE(pay).”\n<\/p>\n
 7. The Medical Board is expected, in law, to give its opinion so that  Court may appreciate the reasoning given by the Medical Board. The word  ‘constitutional’ is general in nature and it cannot be said that because  the Board has used word ‘constituional’ that is final on the point. The  Medical Board had not stated with reference to the condition of the petitioner when he had been serving the Air Force for 11 years and that the  ailment was not due to military service. The CCDA, Allahabad had projected  the issue in a very cavalier fashion.\n<\/p>\n
 8. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that judgment of the  Supreme Court in “Union of India & Others Vs. Shri Baljit Singh” (Civil  Appeal No.13272 of 1996 decided on 11.10.1996) would cover this case and  the learned counsel relied upon the following observation made by the  Supreme Court:-\n<\/p>\n
   “This is made amply clear from clauses (a) to (d) of paragraph 7   which contemplates that in respect of a disease the Rules enumerated thereunder require to be observed. Cl.(c) provides that if a   disease is accepted as having arisen in service, it must also be   established that the conditions of military service determined or   contributed the onset of the disease and that the conditions were   due to the circumstances of duty in military service. Unless   these conditions are satisfied, it cannot be said that the sustenance of injury per se is on account of military service. In view   of the report of the Medical Board of doctors it is not due to   military service, the conclusion may not ave been satisfactorily   reached that the injury though sustained while in service, it was   not on account of military service. In each case, when a disability pension is sought for and made a claim, it must be affirmatively established, as a fact, as to whether the injury sustained   was due to military service or was aggravated which contributed   to invalidation for the military service. Accordingly,we are of   the view that the High Court was not totally correct in reaching   that conclusion. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, we do not think that it is an appropriate   case for interference.”\n<\/p>\n
 9. The Supreme Court has ruled that in each case it must be established  whether the ailment was due to military service. That has not been done in  this case. Therefore, the order passed by the CCDA (Pension), Allahabad  cannot be sustained.\n<\/p>\n
 10. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the appeal  filed by the petitioner has not been disposed of and the petitioner can  approach this Court only after the appeal is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
 11. I am unable to agree with the contention. The existence of an alternative remedy or availing of an alternative remedy would only be taken into  consideration by this Court while exercising its discretion. In a matter  like this the Ministry of defense cannot take its own time. On the facts  and circumstance of this case, the fact that the appeal is pending before  the Ministry of defense cannot be put against the petitioner. The writ  petition stands allowed.\n<\/p>\n
 12. The respondents are directed to pay the disability pension to the  petitioner in accordance with the rules on or before the 31st of May, 1999.\n<\/p>\n
13.  There shall be no order as to costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 Equivalent citations: 1999 IIAD Delhi 295 Author: K Ramamoorthy Bench: K Ramamoorthy ORDER K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCorporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\"},\"wordCount\":1224,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\",\"name\":\"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999","datePublished":"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999"},"wordCount":1224,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999","name":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-02-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T00:00:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/corporal-satbir-singh-ex-vs-union-of-india-ors-on-1-march-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Corporal Satbir Singh (Ex.) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 1 March, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}