{"id":151804,"date":"2010-10-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-11-13T22:25:29","modified_gmt":"2018-11-13T16:55:29","slug":"sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 18?\" DAY OF OCTOBER, \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VEN..U_GOPIi\\'LA\"  \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.31103;{20j1G~\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri N.J.Nataraj __  _  \nS\/o. Sri N.Jagannatham',~._41 years; _ I \nR\/a No.166\/C, 4\"' Main\"\"P;Oa.d}L  ;  \n7\"' Cross, Chamarajpet, T I ' ' '\nBangatore -- 560-018. \n      PETITIONER\n\nAND:\n\n1. Sri  N.J\"a.garIrIaf!;1:_arh,\u00ab   \nS\/o. Sri\ufb02 Vevnkata'Ea'n,V \"F; years.\n\n2. 'y,\u20acf$I'1*it;..N.3.S1mV_!=,;;'rV1'da V:Lakshmi,\nV-.IW'\/cf._;_SrIi A.N.Jag'a'uT'T'ratham, 66 years.\n\n% - 'T BOt'h4:_asr'e'*!\u00a7\/ay No.166\/C,\n\n._ \"-'4?\" man, 7f\"Cross, Chamarajpet,\n',_.Banga|O:j\u20acT* 560 018.\n\n Smt\".\":.D.J.VijayaEakshmi,\n\nA .-_W\/O.\" Sri D.R.3ejinath, 45 years,\n D\/o. Sri N.Jagannatham,\n\"RA\/a No.14---O3~144, 1\" Fioor,\nGosha Mahai,\nHyderabad - 500 012.\n\n\n\n4. Smt. P.R.Lavanya Mannar,\nW\/0. Sri P.S.Raja Mannar,\nE)\/o. Sri N.3agannatham, 45 years,\nR\/a No.58, Narayana Piliai St.\nShivaji Nagar,\nBangalore ~ 560 001.\n5. Smt. Rekha Harish,\n\nW\/o. Sri K.P.Harish,   ..\nD\/o. Sri N.}agannatham, 34 years,\nR\/a No.32\/2, 15' Floor, ' ' \n4\"' Main road, 4\"' Block,\nThyagarajanagar, _\nBangalore -- 560 028...__  _, V  'C 'C\n\n .i  ,  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By Sri A.Krishna_ E3hat,’,A.d:C\\{;–.,foifV  <\/p>\n
This writ pet-ition3–.is\u20acfiied “und’e’rvA.rticles 226 and 227
\nof the Const’i’tt1tion..of’In:d.i_a =p_ra.ying to quash the impugned
\norder dated1:2;;O8.2iZi1.Q*fpa_ssve’d by the City Civil Court,
\nMayo H-a~il,,._AB’a_ngai;9r_e -in i.Q.S;2t3.7131\/07 on the application
\nfiled by theC”‘-‘;1’*j’.’. res.po–ndent under Order 8 Ruie 1A read
\nwith Slecti’-on ~65′{.Z\u00a5i’).,,4tio,. (mam: Section 66 of the Evidence
\nAct, vide Arinexore  <\/p>\n
_This petition”:–comin\u00a7V on for preliminary hearing in ‘B’
\ng|’O,,Ilfi:3, this dayitthe Court made the following:<\/p>\n
QRDER<\/p>\n
 . “‘C..__\u00abXPeti”t_i.orier\/..plaintiff has instituted O.S.No.26711\/2007<\/p>\n
in the \u20ac;:ity”Civii Court, Bangalore, against the defendants<\/p>\n
44’.,:for’i___the”‘ relief of partition and separate possession of<\/p>\n
‘plaintiff’s half share in the suit scheduie property and to<\/p>\n
 “declare the settlement deed O4.G6.20\u00a7\\7\u00a7,(executecl by the<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
r4<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\ndefendants 1 & 2 in favour of defendants 3 to 5 as a sham
\n& void document and not binding on him and for<\/p>\n
consequential reliefs. Defendants 1 & 2 filed w”‘r’i.t;ten<\/p>\n
statement on 05.11.2007. They also made<\/p>\n
claim seeking partition of movables <\/p>\n
properties. Issues were framedfandifsa.vit’2_was–<\/p>\n
trial. 4″‘ defendant\/4″‘ respondent-.Afi’ied I.A’..”u.nde’r <\/p>\n
VIII Rule 1A (1) & (3) read w4:.tVh1\u00bbSectidnV_ 151′.-= o”fv_cE5c and 0′<\/p>\n
Sections 65 (a) to (c)  o’f”‘i\u00a7_{nd.en’vce.\u00abAct, to receive the
\nlisted documents therein vAA.fpx_”_’.pe marked as<\/p>\n
defendants’  ifhe: Vsopr\u00e9osed the prayer in<\/p>\n
the said   -statement of objections on<\/p>\n
04.08.2010.” _ Up.o’n.’ conasiideration, the trial court has<\/p>\n
 aliov\ufb01iefd the sa’id….appiication by its order dated 12.08.2010.<\/p>\n
.0110; wrIt.pp.et-i.ti_on filed on 25.09.2010 is directed against<\/p>\n
 agasaia <\/p>\n
if H ”   one 205.110.2010.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ – Respondents have filed statement of objections<\/p>\n
\/4,\/”\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
3. Heard the Eearned counsei on both sides and
\nperused the writ petition papers. The documents sought
\nto be produced aiong with the aforesaid appiication aresthe<\/p>\n
foilowing:\n<\/p>\n
1. Notice u\/ Order 12 Rules 4   K
\n05.06.2008 got issued:-“th1’o1;1gl’i Aafve.c;aie..i’..fd1=’
\nDefendants 3 to 5 by  toftiie learned Adifo.cate:
\nfor plaintiff, Sri R.P.Sornashei<ha\ufb01ahfto:  <\/p>\n
facts stated in the Noticefwith copy 'ofjfpostafl receipt
\nand Acknowledgement'*ca.rd:'"~..\\'  ,. .. <\/p>\n
2. Notice u\/Ordve’r..f:i2A l07_{u12,-jg  22.01.2009
\ngot issued through.Adirooate=.fo’1;~:f._I:2efendants 3 to 5<\/p>\n
by RPM) ‘to the  for plaintiff, Sri<\/p>\n
 ..  tofproduce before this Hon’ble
\n Cou1″t  stated in the Notice with copy<\/p>\n
of \u00e9posvtafi’  Acknowledgement card;\n<\/p>\n
 Notice uu’;fOrdVerfi2 Rule 8 CPC dated 07.04.2009
\n ‘issued by”{3efendants 1 81 2 by RP to the learned
\n‘Ad\u00abVocate for plaintiff, Sn’ R.P.So1nashekhariah to
\n*  before this Hon’b1e Court the documents<\/p>\n
4′ .  in the Notice with copy of postal receipt;<\/p>\n
0 .4.0’\u00abSaIe deed dated 08.03.1982 by Narayana
\nJagannatharn in favour of Narayana Rarnaiah
\nregistered as No.999\/82-83 at Pages 252-253 in
\nVo1.No.1163 at the Office of Sub–registrar, Kadri<\/p>\n
Taluk for Rs.3000 i
\n\/’<\/p>\n
5. Sale deed dated 08.03.1982 by Narayana<\/p>\n
Jagannatham in favour of Narayana Ratrtaigah<\/p>\n
registered as No.1000\/82-83 at Pages  Lie
\nVoI.No.1164 at the Office of Sub–registrarQ <\/p>\n
Taluk for Rs.8000<\/p>\n
4. Petitioner does not Zadispustge <\/p>\n
notices as at Si.Nos.1 to 3.\u00bbsu.pra. V7′!’_he petit’i’doVVne_r:Vhalving <\/p>\n
had the custody of said noticeisydicouid hav.ei_’prodfuced the
\nsame in case there we-refa’nyi_ v.ari1a”n.._c’eiA”i’n the xerox copies
\nthat were produced A.a\u00a70df.’9  “the’:Vi–‘i.Vapp|ication. The<\/p>\n
petitioner  copies of the<\/p>\n
sale deteds date_d Vo’t3′;o3;:.V%;ia2 }\u00bbd’tg=;\u00e9si’ieii-ted at SE.Nos.-4 8L 5. The
\ncontention of’ that, the certified copies<\/p>\n
could _havei’b\u00bbee’ii .ot=.taAi’:_ied”iand produced.<\/p>\n
   indisputedly, after the impugned order was<\/p>\n
1″pa’s.sed}” d’e.tertda”.nts having obtained the certified copy of<\/p>\n
the”‘saEe’:deeds, have produced the same before the trial<\/p>\n
 The said documents have been marked on<\/p>\n
f  2i.\u00a7i’;oi9.2o1o as Ex.D-58 to Ex.E)-63. This writ petition filed<\/p>\n
 “on 25.09.2010 without disclosing the event that has taken<\/p>\n
\/'”\n<\/p>\n
-J<\/p>\n
place on 24.09.2010 i.e., marking of five documents, is<\/p>\n
untenable.\n<\/p>\n
6. The trial court having consideredg,….t,lje,’:’claim’.<\/p>\n
made in the application and the objectionshof”‘t.he.jp~i.aintiifi,<\/p>\n
noticing the fact that the docurvnentsr pr*odLi’cedi’–Egirei\u00e9joti<\/p>\n
available on the record, has perm’itte’d the,.\u00bb’p’_rod’uct’ioii,,of’–..<\/p>\n
xerox copies to be used a’s~,secondaryVeizidence. The<\/p>\n
impugned order, in the..gfaci:ds'”ano ci’rcumsta”nces of the
\ncase, does not suffer from  prc\u00bbc,edurai_’..impropriety or<\/p>\n
irrationality. .The_,ts—iaiizcourt5hasi:’n’o’t.. committed any illegal<\/p>\n
act in ,al’ioVwingf.the:\u00a5app:l:ica’tion “f_i|Ve”d\ufb02 by the defendants.
\nI:x1V\\u\/ievvl  writ petition is devoid of<\/p>\n
merit and sh’al_l stand “dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
  re.sponVde’i”‘its 1 8: 2 are senior citizens. The suit<\/p>\n
_V__is_T_font-..rel’i’ef_:”pf partition and separate possession.<\/p>\n
Def_endan.ts’ 1;i.’8a 2 have also made a counter-claim. In view<\/p>\n
‘*.,of th”e,V__A’i~provisions under the Karnataka (Case Flow<\/p>\n
,,g\/j\/(.,\u00a7”\u00bb4,.a,rlf\u00a7i1gement in Sub-Ordinate Couvij Rules, 2005, keeping<\/p>\n
\/”..\n<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nin view the nature of relief prayed in the suit and the fact
\nthat defendants 1 & 2 are senior citizens, the trial court is<\/p>\n
directed to complete the trial and dispose of the  as<\/p>\n
early as practicable and at any event, within a..~pe4rAiodc-of};<\/p>\n
months from the date a copy of this order  Tits _ <\/p>\n
record.\n<\/p>\n
Ksj\/ —<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18?” DAY OF OCTOBER, BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VEN..U_GOPIi\\’LA” WRIT PETITION NO.31103;{20j1G~ BETWEEN: Sri N.J.Nataraj __ _ S\/o. Sri N.Jagannatham’,~._41 years; _ I R\/a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":954,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010"},"wordCount":954,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010","name":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-13T16:55:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-j-nataraj-vs-sri-n-jagannatham-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri N J Nataraj vs Sri N Jagannatham on 18 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151804\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}