{"id":151840,"date":"2009-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-29T21:44:35","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T16:14:35","slug":"mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
1:\u00bb: ‘E”‘”\u00a7~{E’; \u00a7–;;9 \u00a7{fxE\u20ac’\u00a7’\u00a7;’3;”{‘AK.?*>..__
\n{T:ER\u20acT’:{f\u00a7’E’\u00a3’ BENCH, DEEARAWAB  Vf ~<\/p>\n
Ef\ufb01ati\u00e9d $15: $5 dag; sf Ja_:’1u_ar\u00a7;      <\/p>\n
‘\u00a7’\u00a7~\u00a3E; H{}N’BLE Z’s;’\u00a7’R.J’;.;FS’\u00e9’_1’I<3E.:AQ'-..$AG$\u00a7i\u00a7Ef\u00a5$ATI{\u00e9f%"-~  " <\/p>\n
CRiM}N_AL Pmwrriit\u00e9\u00e9 N0. 539 2* T Q2053  <\/p>\n
BETWEEN" :<\/p>\n
Ma\ufb02appa Ga:’;gappa”G:32i31, ‘
\nS\/0 C:aI1gaj\u00a7j)pa;.L\u20ac}aa}f., =i   A V
\nAge: 4′? j;;*e.:4I.s;~\u00a3>{:ci’ .%dV’a\u00a7:a?._e,.f,’ V
\nR\/9 Iv\u00a3aIa_i113d_d:, ;T)ha’:*\u00e9gwad..V– ‘<\/p>\n
V ….   ” ‘\u00ab:.,__ _ * V * ”  .\u00a7.Pat,1t1c>11e::’<\/p>\n
(    :__H\u00e9g<\u00a3s::, Advocata. }<\/p>\n
gigs
\n   State 'wiizrsmataka,<\/p>\n
,  .}3y.4V\u00e9.\u00a7yag'ri Police Station,
\n T.\n<\/p>\n
”  _\u20ac3\u00e9\u00a7z;;\u00a7:;adhargouda Shankargou\u00e9a Patil,<\/p>\n
 S f :3 Shankargouda Patil,
\n” _ Age: 48 years, R\/0 Tabeab Land,
\nH Hubli, District: Bharawad.\n<\/p>\n
. i Respondanis<\/p>\n
( By Sri P.E{.G01;1shi for M\/ S Jashi 8% Jeghi Assta,
\nAdvgcate far R-2 –~ absent. }<\/p>\n
Shirahatti, and at that time, a tenant was in eccupzition<\/p>\n
af ‘aha premisas and ha was arm Mupparma <\/p>\n
As the case was going in rasp\ufb01ct of evic\u20ac;i\u00a7;::”‘;}r0?;t::37ditigs\u00a7 V’ <\/p>\n
and i’oi1awi.t1g the Case coming 11\u00a2:  <\/p>\n
preferrad by the i;enant ~s_.’1s0 hefix\u00e9g c1i;.\ufb01\u00a7plai:}an1; fmmd that the person, W110 was in<\/p>\n
 oceupation 0f the: house was none other than the<\/p>\n
present patitioner. Alieging 31}. the abave facts, the<\/p>\n
}’<\/p>\n
! I<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
edmimstra\ufb01en of justice on the principle<\/p>\n
“quande {ex a\ufb01iquid aiieui conmdit, eorzeedere<\/p>\n
videtur et id sine qua res {pea esse nor;<\/p>\n
protest” (When the law gives 3 pers{);i._44″e._<\/p>\n
anything it gvee him that without. wehiehf’  ”<\/p>\n
emmet exist}. Whiie exercising L”\n<\/p>\n
under the sectiozl, the .eeuri;\n<\/p>\n
function as 3. court ef aisgpeslaxie ..\u00bbi)r\u00e9’eerev.ie;i0:’1.V <\/p>\n
inherent jurisdiction __ur1der_ ‘*-the _.:=\u00a7eet’.io?n  <\/p>\n
theugh Wide has to V:e;+;ereised._V_
\ncarefully aiix\u00e9 w\ufb01h cee;\u00a7:ie;;–  eiji};*v–..1ehEez:
\nsuch exercise ju.$ti\ufb01ed””–Ve[Vb\u00a7g*’e \u00a3116 \u00a363333
\nS}3\u20acCi\ufb01(38l}.}.S laid ::\u00a5;::1x,=:s}*_z3-…i1:V..3A;”;:1Le “\u00e9eeti\u00a3\u00a7je’V”itself. it<\/p>\n
  ex \u00e9iebvito  to de
\nfeggl’ _ aqgif  gueticse for me<\/p>\n
ad1i1i.:}ie:reTi.ioV:2. eff  fw”hiei’1 alone ceurts; exist.<\/p>\n
 ‘Ag1t:hei’i’:;; ‘ sf” the courli exists for<\/p>\n
 eir}:raheeme:e{“ef jus\ufb01ee ajild if any attempt is<\/p>\n
”   e;e%% abuse that authority Se as \u00a30<\/p>\n
 pfede-_eeVViI1justiee, the court. has power te<\/p>\n
 pzieveiif; abuse. It Weuid be an abuse ef<\/p>\n
preeees of the semi to allew any action<\/p>\n
 which would meal: in irljustiee and prevent<\/p>\n
premotjen of juetice. In exercise 01″ the
\npewere court would be justified to quash any
\nproceeding if it fmde that<\/p>\n
initiatien\/c:e11tir2ue.I’;m of it amounts to<\/p>\n
abuse of the process ef court at queehing of
\nthese proceedings weuid otherwise serve A’<\/p>\n
ends efjustice.”\n<\/p>\n
‘7’. Keeping in View the afore;s”\u00e9i\u00a2i\u00ab .}:>o’sitie1f};’-3;: View, <\/p>\n
have perused the materia}. piaceE\u00a3._a:i*:\u20ace1z (I \u00a73\u00bbi\u00a7:\u00a7e th,at <\/p>\n
eomyiaint, it has been state::’:{V””‘:\u00a211e.t “thez111eged “Vitiei’eienta”‘<\/p>\n
was witnessed by 0ne~..R.S.’E3\u00e9ji1L.:’j4 ‘iV”‘I’:e’ sa{d”\u00a3:e1:ip1aint is
\ndated 26.6.2002 and’  the private
\neempiaint    of the Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
on 11.7  eexiipleiilent has referred
\nto the    when the irieident
\noecureedg ” A’ the ehergeweheet witnesses’<\/p>\n
statements” reveeis  name of the Witnesses, whose<\/p>\n
 ” 3t’e\u00a7er\u00a31’eni8A.ehave Been recorded, were present sszhexu the<\/p>\n
   took place and neither Raju net<\/p>\n
P2tnd13;”a::.:\u00a7’a have been men\ufb01ened either in the<\/p>\n
   .ee;neIaii3t \ufb02ied hefere the peliee er in the later eempiaint<\/p>\n
‘ ‘~_f’1’L::<IA befere the court as the pereene whe were present.<\/p>\n
 "  'ivhen the aileged i\ufb01eident {wk place. The investigating ~<\/p>\n
agency has failed 1:0 record the statement 0f the eniy<\/p>\n
E?\n<\/p>\n
63\/'{3~WiYLI1\u20acSS viz, E-iiremath, wha was pI’\u20acS\u20acfi’\u00a3 accei\ufb01jdixag<\/p>\n
ta the complainaxlt.\n<\/p>\n
8. The next: aspect is that thr:….i:}ciC}\u00bb\u20ac::’if ‘_’;:i1″r:g\u20acd ifg)”<\/p>\n
have taken place an 245.2002, :’2a.Z1″1. j;%ears’~ . L’<\/p>\n
later on 26.8.2004 3211:}…  ‘t:3{}’x’i:.5t_aAV’1L:\u20acII1\u20ac?I1f; of
\nRaju reveais that he   just a year back
\nand, t11eiwefQ;~<;;i*;e   the aliegeci
\nincident    tiy\u00e9w\ufb01ase with the next<\/p>\n
witne$$%'Fa1"\u00a7\u20ac?;11r\u00e9:%:~; gag" ~ _ <\/p>\n
9. Y\u00e9t. L4\u00e9.n0{.hei””‘ a3_\u00a7ji\u20ac=r;{‘  that, though the incident<\/p>\n
tog}; place Vacs\ufb01riiing to the csmpiainant on 24.6.2802,<\/p>\n
.A the pa\ufb01\u00a7:ha”1a_a1na came ta be regarded two yeaI’s Later on<\/p>\n
j…  2’i}?}~*_’1,_  V V <\/p>\n
 103 ”  immed judgc of the trial} court did not refer in<\/p>\n
 311’. fhese ixlfiportant aspects of the mattsr whiie daciding<\/p>\n
V%  2 ___\u00a7;9 take CO C\u20ac. ‘\u00a7’aking C C\u20ac is in regpect 9f<\/p>\n
the o\ufb01ence and the trig} 00131’: ought: to have consi\u00e9ered<\/p>\n
ail the niaterial piaced before it before arriving at the<\/p>\n
‘L<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
H)<\/p>\n
cenchmitm as to the axistsnoe of sufficient matzerial to
\ntake cognizance. A piain reading of the cGmp1ai\u00a7:1:___it3eEf<\/p>\n
gives an indication that the dmpute is of a CiX3’iI’;?i\u00e92tii}f\u20act<\/p>\n
and the leameqd cmmsei fer the p-etitio:a:f:::’*  1:330 <\/p>\n
pmc_1.u:::eci at, A:1:1e:~mre-K the p1;ii:1’i.–tha\ufb01 isi  bjf.5′.tE*’;<.~f; V'<\/p>\n
very R\u00bb? in O.S.No. 237\/2032 '\u00a3h\u00a7p.:;\u00a7&::::ene;\u00a7'\ufb02 7i<\/p>\n
11. Under the above circu119iS\u20ac;a:z1(f,\u00a7s,  T_E’\u20ac’:a1″1\u00e9ed jmdge
\n3f the trial court 0i1giE;\u00a3_At\u00a7:; }:;a\u00a77\u00e9’V-_’a\u00a7\u00a7p3L;ed his mind E0<\/p>\n
ascertain as E0 .Wh\u20ac\u20ac11f:’.1″$h\u00a73I’\ufb01*i:)i.f1_Sf$\u00a7’_\u00a7I)jt:iiifJ:\ufb01 facie nlateria\ufb01<\/p>\n
to  *:;’fx~cVV-aiiistant Case, in the \ufb01ght
\nGf \u00a3he:”‘aftit}_\u20acSai(i  investigafziora papsrs, {ha<\/p>\n
trial $0121?-4.,c0’u\u00a3d-.\u00a7n{2t iz\u00e9va {align C\u20ac}g’I:’iiZaI}C\u20ac. in \u00a7,}$1<'f:<\/p>\n
   Qf :f{"l\u00a3 d\u00e9if\u00e9cts–\u00abpointad cut by the fieamad <;:mms<=:1<\/p>\n
  fa? "$316-.3:_)E:t.iLt\u00e9%3fz;\u00a7:r which have been refermd to by him, it<\/p>\n
\u00a33 ,.$ i $0  that the {via} Weuld 'en\u00e9 in favour sf the<\/p>\n
 prasacgjigiozz 13$, the camplainant. As such, I \ufb01nd that<\/p>\n
L\u00a73i;iS"'A_'is 3 fit case ta exercise inherent powers {G quash<\/p>\n
VA   fc;\u00a3"1& pmceeciings as continuance of the $9.316 would net.<\/p>\n
be in the intarest Bf serving the ends of justice. i am<\/p>\n
also conscious of the \ufb01arklaid down by the Apex Ceurt in<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
the aforementisned case that the izahsrent pow:-‘:1’ 31″-1Q\u00b0e1Ed<\/p>\n
nut be exesrcise\ufb01 to stifle 3 iegitimate prs<%{::1f:\u00a7;p 1*1,\u00a7V"' -:"t:'3i';*;_,<\/p>\n
in the install: sage, in tha Eight {if 'the seris\ufb01g (.%j\u20ac,~fs\u20ac:}i::\u00a53  ' <\/p>\n
the investigation, it cannot be  'th9. t7%;_h\u20ac':' <\/p>\n
is iikeiy ti} succeed in estabiishi1\u00a7gA {he \u00a3:as f\u00a7_; <\/p>\n
petiiinner.\n<\/p>\n
12. For the foregoif\u00a7’g {‘t:\u00e9\u00a7sQi:1\u00a3j;,   is ailawe\u00e9<\/p>\n
and the     court taking<\/p>\n
cgni2,a;1ce”‘a’\u00a7.”\u00a7_1 V  pursuant thereto
\nin C.{}.’Nt3; the Eeamad C.J.M.,
\nDha1’aV\u00a7v,ad,4’ * _% :\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
<i\u00a51<<:%\/%- L <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009 Author: V.Jagannathan 1:\u00bb: ‘E”‘”\u00a7~{E’; \u00a7–;;9 \u00a7{fxE\u20ac’\u00a7’\u00a7;’3;”{‘AK.?*>..__ {T:ER\u20acT’:{f\u00a7’E’\u00a3’ BENCH, DEEARAWAB Vf ~ Ef\ufb01ati\u00e9d $15: $5 dag; sf Ja_:’1u_ar\u00a7; ‘\u00a7’\u00a7~\u00a3E; H{}N’BLE Z’s;’\u00a7’R.J’;.;FS’\u00e9’_1’I<3E.:AQ'-..$AG$\u00a7i\u00a7Ef\u00a5$ATI{\u00e9f%"-~ " CRiM}N_AL Pmwrriit\u00e9\u00e9 N0. 539 2* T Q2053 BETWEEN" : Ma\ufb02appa Ga:’;gappa”G:32i31, ‘ S\/0 C:aI1gaj\u00a7j)pa;.L\u20ac}aa}f., =i A V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1181,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009"},"wordCount":1181,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009","name":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri ... on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T16:14:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallappa-gangappa-gaali-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-vidyagiri-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mallappa Gangappa Gaali vs State Of Karnataka By Vidyagiri … on 6 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151840\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}