{"id":151864,"date":"2008-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008"},"modified":"2016-04-30T19:39:45","modified_gmt":"2016-04-30T14:09:45","slug":"p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nOP.No. 2204 of 1998(K)\n\n\n\n1. P.JAYAPRAKASH\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :28\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                S. Siri Jagan, J.\n                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                          O.P. No. 2204 of 1998\n                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                  Dated this, the     28th October, 2008.\n\n                               J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
       The petitioner, while he was an unemployed engineer, availed<\/p>\n
of the facility offered by the Government for handing over a Common<\/p>\n
Facility Service Centre for Blacksmithy at Eramaloor pursuant to<\/p>\n
which by Ext. P1 Government Order, the Government agreed in<\/p>\n
principle to hand over the Common Facility Service Centre for<\/p>\n
Blacksmithy at Eramaloor to the petitioner. Pursuant thereto, Ext. P2<\/p>\n
Government Order was passed provisionally fixing the value of the<\/p>\n
land, building and machinery as well as furniture as Rs. 45,184.43.<\/p>\n
By Ext. P2, it was decided to hand over the land, building and<\/p>\n
machinery to the petitioner on the petitioner remitting an amount of<\/p>\n
Rs. 2500\/- as advance, leaving the balance to be paid later after<\/p>\n
finalising the value. Accordingly, the Centre was handed over to the<\/p>\n
petitioner. The petitioner would contend that as evidenced by Ext.<\/p>\n
P3, the petitioner had paid the entire amounts payable by the<\/p>\n
petitioner in respect of the Centre and therefore he became the<\/p>\n
absolute owner of the Centre. According to the petitioner, due to<\/p>\n
circumstances beyond his control, he had to temporarily suspend the<\/p>\n
functioning of the Centre for some years as he was out of station.<\/p>\n
After coming back, the petitioner is stated to have approached the<\/p>\n
Government for execution of appropriate documents for transfer of<\/p>\n
title and to give effective possession of the unit to the petitioner.    As<\/p>\n
there was no       response from the Government, the petitioner has<\/p>\n
approached this Court seeking the following relief:<\/p>\n
      “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,m order
\n      or direction commanding the respondents to effect the transfer in
\n      accordance with law and put the petitioner in effective possession
\n      of the land, buildings and   machinery in the common facilities
\n      service centre for blacksmithy, Erameloor, Cherthala.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      2. The contention raised by the petitioner is that on payment of<\/p>\n
O.P. No. 2204\/1998                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
the entire amounts due under the agreement executed for the<\/p>\n
purpose, the Government is duty bound to transfer the title over the<\/p>\n
unit to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
      3.   A counter affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent,<\/p>\n
wherein the respondents refuted the right of the petitioner for the<\/p>\n
relief prayed for. According to them, the unit has been handed over<\/p>\n
to the petitioner not absolutely to do whatever he pleases with the<\/p>\n
Centre, but it was handed over to the petitioner specifically for<\/p>\n
running it. Therefore, the petitioner can continue to be in possession<\/p>\n
and ownership of the same only if the petitioner continues to run it<\/p>\n
notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner has paid the amounts due<\/p>\n
under the agreement.        According to them, as admitted by the<\/p>\n
petitioner himself, for some years, the unit was closed down even<\/p>\n
violating the terms and conditions of the agreement. It is pointed out<\/p>\n
that in clause 10 of Ext. R2(a) governing the issue, if the petitioner<\/p>\n
commits breach of any of the provisions of the agreement, he is bound<\/p>\n
to surrender possession of the unit to the Government immediately on<\/p>\n
demand and the Government shall have power to deal with the said<\/p>\n
Unit in any manner they deem fit.         In case the petitioner fails to<\/p>\n
surrender the Unit when demanded, the petitioner would be<\/p>\n
considered as a trespasser liable to be proceeded against and evicted<\/p>\n
under the provisions of the Land Conservancy Act for the time being<\/p>\n
in force. It is therefore submitted on behalf of the respondents by the<\/p>\n
Government Pleader that when admittedly the petitioner has violated<\/p>\n
the terms and conditions of the agreement, he loses all his right under<\/p>\n
the agreement and as a result, he cannot validly demand that the<\/p>\n
Government is entitled to comply with their part of the agreement by<\/p>\n
transferring title in respect of the Unit to the petitioner.<\/p>\n
      4. I have considered the rival contentions in detail.<\/p>\n
O.P. No. 2204\/1998              -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
      5.   As is clear from Ext. P1, the transaction is not a mere<\/p>\n
conveyance of the property, building and machinery constituting the<\/p>\n
Common Facility Service Centre.      The transaction is governed by<\/p>\n
other Government Orders, namely, G.O.MS.817\/63\/ID dated 21-11-<\/p>\n
1963 as modified by G.O.MS.302\/67\/ID dated 31-8-1967 as is clear<\/p>\n
from Ext. P1 Government Order itself. The handing over is as per a<\/p>\n
scheme     formulated   by  the    Government     for   handing     over<\/p>\n
departmentally      run production centres, commercial Schemes,<\/p>\n
Common Facility service centres and Training Centres under the<\/p>\n
Rural Development Programmes to private parties. That being so, the<\/p>\n
intention behind such handing over is not merely to let persons like<\/p>\n
the petitioner have the unit absolutely to himself, but is specifically<\/p>\n
for the purpose of continuing to run it for the benefit of the society as<\/p>\n
a whole. Therefore, the petitioner continues to have the right to hold<\/p>\n
on to the same only if he continues to run the Common Facility<\/p>\n
Service Centre as envisaged by the scheme. Any other interpretation<\/p>\n
would defeat the very purpose of the scheme itself. The petitioner<\/p>\n
himself admits that he could not run the Centre for years together.<\/p>\n
Therefore, by the failure on the part of the petitioner in running the<\/p>\n
Common Facility Service Centre as envisaged by the Government, the<\/p>\n
petitioner has violated the terms and conditions of the agreement<\/p>\n
executed by him with the Government. As I have said, the intention<\/p>\n
behind this handing over is not merely for the petitioner to get title<\/p>\n
over the properties, building and machinery, but to enable the<\/p>\n
petitioner to run the Common Facility Service Centre for the<\/p>\n
betterment of the society as a whole. The petitioner has sadly failed<\/p>\n
to honour the terms and conditions of the privilege vested with him.<\/p>\n
It is even admitted before me that some parties have encroached into<\/p>\n
the property in question and the petitioner has lost control over the<\/p>\n
O.P. No. 2204\/1998                -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
property even.     In the above circumstances,       the very object of<\/p>\n
handing over the Common Facility Service Centre to the petitioner<\/p>\n
has been completely defeated.      The fact that the petitioner wants a<\/p>\n
direction to the respondents to put him in effective possession of the<\/p>\n
land itself shows that the petitioner has lost possession of the<\/p>\n
property. Under the agreement the petitioner is duty bound to keep<\/p>\n
the unit in proper maintenance, repair and working order, which also<\/p>\n
he has failed to do.     That being so, I am not satisfied that the<\/p>\n
petitioner is entitled to the relief prayed for in this original petition.<\/p>\n
Therefore, I decline to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction in favour<\/p>\n
of the petitioner. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                          S. Siri Jagan, Judge.\n<\/p>\n
Tds\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OP.No. 2204 of 1998(K) 1. P.JAYAPRAKASH … Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon’ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN Dated :28\/10\/2008 O R D E […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1105,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\",\"name\":\"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008"},"wordCount":1105,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008","name":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-30T14:09:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-jayaprakash-vs-state-of-kerala-on-28-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Jayaprakash vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}