{"id":152141,"date":"2011-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011"},"modified":"2018-02-15T04:25:39","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T22:55:39","slug":"mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                     Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                          File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM\n                  Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                     :                                    3\u00a0June\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                    :                                    3\u00a0June\u00a02011\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0              :   Shri\u00a0Dilip\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Roy\n                                        Flat\u00a0No.\u00a0C\u00ad605,\u00a0Sukh\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Apartments,\n                                        Plot\u00a0No.\u00a012,\u00a0Sector\u00a09,\u00a0Dwarka,\n                                        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0075.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0      :   CPIO,\u00a0Rajya\u00a0Sabha\u00a0Secretariat,\n                                        Parliament\u00a0House\u00a0Annexe,\n                                        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0001.\n\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n<pre>        (i)     Shri\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Director\u00a0&amp;\u00a0CPIO,\n        (ii)    Shri\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Bhushan,\u00a0Jt.\u00a0Director\n\n\n\nChief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner              :       Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.      In\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0turn\u00a0up\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Respondents,\u00a0however,\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0and\u00a0made\u00a0their\u00a0submissions.<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0certain\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0creation\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>temporary \u00a0 posts \u00a0 for \u00a0 providing \u00a0 secretarial \u00a0 assistance \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 committee\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>constituted\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Judges\u00a0(Inquiry)\u00a0Act.\u00a0He\u00a0had\u00a0also\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM<br \/>\n for\u00a0permission\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0provided\u00a0some\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>information \u00a0 but \u00a0 did \u00a0 not \u00a0 specifically \u00a0 advise \u00a0 him \u00a0 about \u00a0 the \u00a0 date \u00a0 or \u00a0 time \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>inspection. \u00a0 Not \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 provided \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>preferred\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0appeal,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>pointed \u00a0 out \u00a0 the \u00a0 shortcomings \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 response \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Authority, \u00a0 probably \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 person \u00a0 as \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 offered \u00a0 some \u00a0 further\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>clarifications\u00a0but\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0disclose\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0nor\u00a0gave\u00a0any\u00a0direction\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>about\u00a0 the\u00a0 inspection\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 records.\u00a0 Now,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 has,\u00a0 in\u00a0 his\u00a0 second\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appeal,\u00a0wanted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0punished\u00a0in\u00a0terms\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a020\u00a0(1)\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0Act\u00a0for\u00a0providing\u00a0incomplete\u00a0information.\u00a0He\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>also\u00a0prayed\u00a0that\u00a0disciplinary\u00a0proceedings\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0instituted\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>for\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0reasons.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      After\u00a0carefully\u00a0considering\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case,\u00a0we\u00a0are\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0view\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>was\u00a0not\u00a0adequate\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0extent\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0support\u00a0his\u00a0contentions\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>relevant\u00a0documents.\u00a0If\u00a0temporary\u00a0posts\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0created\u00a0for\u00a0any\u00a0particular\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>purpose,\u00a0there\u00a0must\u00a0be\u00a0some\u00a0order\u00a0or\u00a0decision\u00a0approved\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>authority\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0A\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0given.\u00a0Similarly,\u00a0if\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>direction \u00a0 or \u00a0 order \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 competent \u00a0 authority \u00a0 exists \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 the \u00a0 eligibility\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>criteria\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0posts,\u00a0those\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0also.<\/p>\n<p>5.      We\u00a0are\u00a0surprised\u00a0that\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0appear\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>to\u00a0be\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0person\u00a0unless\u00a0of\u00a0course\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0soon\u00a0after\u00a0disclosing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>information,\u00a0was\u00a0designated\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0authorities\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0As\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>rightly\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0fair\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0person\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>hear\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0against\u00a0his\u00a0own\u00a0order.\u00a0We\u00a0hope\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority\u00a0would\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM<br \/>\n be\u00a0careful\u00a0in\u00a0future\u00a0and\u00a0avoid\u00a0such\u00a0situations.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      Now,\u00a0since,\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0beginning,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0interested\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0records\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0queries,\u00a0we\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0invite\u00a0him\u00a0on\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>and\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records.\u00a0After\u00a0such\u00a0inspection,\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant\u00a0would\u00a0choose\u00a0to\u00a0get\u00a0the\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0some\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CPIO\u00a0shall\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0charge.\u00a0However,\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>not\u00a0 interested\u00a0 in \u00a0 inspecting\u00a0 the\u00a0 records\u00a0 any\u00a0 longer,\u00a0 even\u00a0 then\u00a0 the\u00a0 CPIO\u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>directed \u00a0 to \u00a0 send \u00a0 the \u00a0 photocopies\u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant\u00a0 records\u00a0 to \u00a0 him\u00a0 within \u00a0 this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>period.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      We\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0intend\u00a0to\u00a0impose\u00a0any\u00a0penalty\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0or\u00a0recommend\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>disciplinary\u00a0 proceedings \u00a0 against \u00a0 him \u00a0 as \u00a0 we \u00a0 are \u00a0 not \u00a0 convinced \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>intentionally\u00a0suppressed\u00a0some\u00a0vital\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<p>8.      The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0off\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>9.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                    (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                    Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                               (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM<br \/>\n                           Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000896\u00adSM Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 3\u00a0June\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 3\u00a0June\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0Dilip\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Roy Flat\u00a0No.\u00a0C\u00ad605,\u00a0Sukh\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Apartments, Plot\u00a0No.\u00a012,\u00a0Sector\u00a09,\u00a0Dwarka, New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0075. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0Rajya\u00a0Sabha\u00a0Secretariat, Parliament\u00a0House\u00a0Annexe, New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0001. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Director\u00a0&amp;\u00a0CPIO, (ii) Shri\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Bhushan,\u00a0Jt.\u00a0Director Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra 2. In\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0turn\u00a0up\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\u00a0The\u00a0 Respondents,\u00a0however,\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0and\u00a0made\u00a0their\u00a0submissions. 3. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0certain\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0creation\u00a0of\u00a0 temporary \u00a0 posts \u00a0 for \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":595,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011"},"wordCount":595,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011","name":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-14T22:55:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dilip-kumar-roy-vs-lok-sabha-secretariat-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 3 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}