{"id":152272,"date":"2002-05-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-05-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002"},"modified":"2016-03-09T06:03:30","modified_gmt":"2016-03-09T00:33:30","slug":"smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","title":{"rendered":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S Sinha<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Sinha, A Sikri<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> S.B. Sinha, C.J.  <\/p>\n<p> 1. Whether an &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  working in the College of<br \/>\nArts is entitled to the same scale of pay paid to the<br \/>\n&#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  working in the Polytechnics is the<br \/>\nquestion involved in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. The applicant was employed as &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217; in the<br \/>\nCollege of Arts. The Human Resource Development of the<br \/>\nGovernment of India created various posts from time to time<br \/>\nin terms whereof posts of &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  had been<br \/>\nupgraded to the post of &#8216;Librarian&#8217; and placed in higher scale<br \/>\nof pay. The petitioner prayed that he be placed in the scale<br \/>\nof pay of Rs. 1,400\/- &#8212; Rs. 2,600\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. It is not in dispute that the Fourth Central Pay Commission<br \/>\n(in short, &#8216;IV CPC&#8217;) did not consider the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. The learned Tribunal by reason of the impugned judgment<br \/>\ndeclined to grant any relief to the petitioner only on the<br \/>\nground that the fixation of pay-scale of &#8216;Assistant Librarians&#8217;<br \/>\nwould depend upon the size of library of the College of Arts<br \/>\nor in the Polytechnic.\n<\/p>\n<p> The IV CPC in para 11.63 stated as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;11.63 There are difficulties in reclassifying<br \/>\nthe posts of librarians and<br \/>\nspecifying their qualifications and recruitment<br \/>\nlevels. The pay scales, qualifications and<br \/>\nrecruitment levels of responsibility will really<br \/>\ndepend on several factors, mainly on the size of<br \/>\nthe library, its character and importance. To<br \/>\ndraw up suitable proposals in this regard a<br \/>\ncommittee may be constituted to undertake<br \/>\nthis work. Pending such a review by the<br \/>\nCommittee, we recommend that librarians and<br \/>\nlibrary staff may be given the revised scales of<br \/>\npay proposed in Chapter 8.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. Mr. Venkataramani, the learned senior counsel appearing<br \/>\non behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the relevant<br \/>\ndocuments, although were directed to be produced, had not<br \/>\nbeen produced before the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the said<br \/>\nfindings are wrong that the Report of the Committee had not<br \/>\nbeen produced.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. The learned Tribunal in its impugned judgment held that<br \/>\nthe petitioner would be entitled to the scale of pay, as<br \/>\nrecommended by the Committee, which was constituted<br \/>\npursuant to the direction of the IV CPC.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. From the Order Sheets dated 16.10.2000 and 30.10.2000<br \/>\npassed by the learned Tribunal and as contained in<br \/>\nAnnexure &#8216;P-16&#8217; and &#8216;P-17&#8217;, it does not appear that the<br \/>\nrecommendations of the Committee constituted by the IV<br \/>\nCPC were produced before the learned Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. The applicant inter alia contended in the said original<br \/>\napplication by filing two Miscellaneous Applications that<br \/>\npursuant to the recommendations of the Committee, the<br \/>\nscales of pay had been revised as regard counterparts of the<br \/>\napplicants working in similar organisations.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. Recommendations as regards pay-scale of &#8216;Librarians&#8217; are as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p>Existing designation (as given by Review Committee<\/p>\n<p>Pity scale (as suggested By Review Committee) (Rs.)<\/p>\n<p>Revised designation<\/p>\n<p>Pay Scale<\/p>\n<p>Qualification<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Library Semi-Professional Grade I<\/p>\n<p>1320-2040<\/p>\n<p>By promotion<\/p>\n<p>Library and Information<\/p>\n<p>1400-2600<\/p>\n<p>Library &amp; Information Assistant<\/p>\n<p>1600-2660<\/p>\n<p>50% by DR of Graduates<\/p>\n<p>Assistant<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>With B.Lib. 50% by promotion<\/p>\n<p>Senior Library and Information Assistant<\/p>\n<p>1640-2900<\/p>\n<p>Senior Library and Information Assistant<\/p>\n<p>1640-2900<\/p>\n<p>By Promotion<\/p>\n<p>Asstt. Library &amp; Information Officer<\/p>\n<p>2000-3500<\/p>\n<p>Asstt. Lib &amp; Information Officer<\/p>\n<p>2000-3500<\/p>\n<p>50% by DR of PG + B.Lib or B.A. with M. Lib. 50% by<br \/>\npromotion<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Lib. &amp; Information Officer Grade II<\/p>\n<p>2200-4000<\/p>\n<p>2200-4000<\/p>\n<p>Library &amp;Information. Officer<\/p>\n<p>3000-4500<\/p>\n<p>Lib. &amp; Information Officer Grade I<\/p>\n<p>3000-4500<\/p>\n<p>Promotion<\/p>\n<p>Senior Library &amp; Information Officer<\/p>\n<p>3700-5000<\/p>\n<p>Library &amp; Information Officer<\/p>\n<p>3700-5000<\/p>\n<p>Promotion<\/p>\n<p>Principal Lib. And information Officer\/Director<\/p>\n<p>4500-5700<\/p>\n<p>Principal Library &amp; Information Officer<\/p>\n<p>4500-5700<\/p>\n<p>Promotion<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>5900-6700<\/p>\n<p>Director<\/p>\n<p>5900-6700<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>7300-7600<\/p>\n<p>Director-General<\/p>\n<p>7300-7600<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p> 11. It is not dispute that the principles of &#8216;equal pay for equal work&#8217; in terms of Article 39(d) read with Article 14 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India (in short, &#8216;the Constitution&#8217;) would be<br \/>\nattracted provided the concerned employees are similarly<br \/>\nsituated.\n<\/p>\n<p> 12. Furthermore, it appears that the learned Tribunal proceeded<br \/>\non the basis that the case for grant of the said scale of pay<br \/>\nwas not recommended by the IV CPC. However, in para 4(ii)<br \/>\nof their counter affidavit, it was stated as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;4(ii) In reply to this para it is submitted that<br \/>\nthe applicant is a Graduate with Diploma in<br \/>\nLibrary Science. The post of Asstt. Librarian in<br \/>\nCollege of Arts was not dealt with by IIIrd Pay<br \/>\nCommission or by IVth Pay Commission and<br \/>\nhence, the applicant cannot claim the scale of<br \/>\nRs. 1400-2600 on the basis of recommendation<br \/>\nbecause replacement scale of Rs. 1200-2050<br \/>\nhas already been given as per recommendation<br \/>\nof the IIIrd Pay Commission.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 13. In that view of the matter, the learned Tribunal must be<br \/>\nheld to be wrong inasmuch as it proceeded on a wrong<br \/>\npremise, particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner in<br \/>\nhis reply to the preliminary objections categorically stated<br \/>\nthat the qualifications of &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  of the<br \/>\nPolytechnics as also the qualification of &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;<br \/>\nin the College of Arts are similar.\n<\/p>\n<p> 14. It has further been stated that the petitioner had been<br \/>\nworking in the Library of Post-Graduate College, which has<br \/>\ninternational recognisition and is affiliated to the University of<br \/>\nDelhi. The said Library consists of thousands of rare books,<br \/>\nwhich are not only costly, but also technical in nature.\n<\/p>\n<p> 15. According to the petitioner, her duties and functions are<br \/>\nmuch arduous than the &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  of a<br \/>\nPolytechnic. Keeping in view the fact that the Report of the<br \/>\nCommittee had not been produced before the learned<br \/>\nTribunal and furthermore as admittedly the case of the<br \/>\npetitioner had not been considered either by the Third<br \/>\nCentral Pay Commission or the IV CPC, we are of the<br \/>\nopinion that the Tribunal committed a manifest error in<br \/>\ndismissing the said original application.\n<\/p>\n<p> It may be that it could not have decided the matter itself,<br \/>\nbut, it ought to have drawn an adverse inference against the<br \/>\nrespondents herein for non-production of the Report of the<br \/>\nCommittee, which was constituted in terms of the directions<br \/>\nof the IV CPC. The Report of the Committee was very<br \/>\nrelevant. The respondents being a model employer could<br \/>\nnot have withheld the same.\n<\/p>\n<p> 16. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the<br \/>\nimpugned judgment of the Tribunal cannot be sustained,<br \/>\nwhich is set aside accordingly. This writ petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 17. The respondents are thereby directed to make the necessary<br \/>\njob of evaluation of the &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  in College of<br \/>\nArts vis-a-vis &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217;  in the Polytechnic and<br \/>\ntake an appropriate decision. Such decision must be taken<br \/>\nat an early date and not later than three months from the<br \/>\ndate of the communication of this order.\n<\/p>\n<p> Keeping in view the fact that the respondent had not<br \/>\nproduced the relevant records before the Tribunal, we are of<br \/>\nthe opinion that the petitioner herein is also entitled to<br \/>\ncosts, which is quantified at Rs. 5,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p> This writ petition is accordingly allowed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 Author: S Sinha Bench: S Sinha, A Sikri JUDGMENT S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Whether an &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217; working in the College of Arts is entitled to the same scale of pay paid to the &#8216;Assistant Librarian&#8217; working in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002\",\"datePublished\":\"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\"},\"wordCount\":1163,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\",\"name\":\"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002","datePublished":"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002"},"wordCount":1163,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002","name":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2002-05-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-09T00:33:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sudha-bedi-vs-union-of-india-uoi-and-ors-on-18-may-2002#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt. Sudha Bedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 18 May, 2002"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152272\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}