{"id":152316,"date":"2011-11-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011"},"modified":"2018-06-28T23:33:30","modified_gmt":"2018-06-28T18:03:30","slug":"mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                             Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796\n                                                             Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002049\/15510\n                                                                     Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002049\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\nAppellant                            :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Rao,\n                                             C\/o Devanand Rao,\n                                             Bheekam Ahmat Village,\n                                             P.O. Bheekam Ahmat,\n                                             Gazipur district-UP-233229.\n\nRespondent                           :       Mr. Sripathi M. K.\n                                             PIO &amp; AGM\n                                             Syndicate Bank\n                                             Personnel Department,\n                                             Industrial Relations Division,\n                                             Head Office:Manipal-576104.\n\nRTI application filed on             :       01-12-2010\nPIO replied on                       :       17-03-2011\nFirst Appeal filed on                :       21-04-2011\nFirst Appellate Authority order of   :       --- --- ---.\nSecond Appeal received on            :       21-07-2011\n\nInformation Sought:\nThe appellant want the photocopies of all the documents related to bank's Bisrk Branch, If the files are\nnot available then what are the reasons of non availability? How the branch's important document come\noutside? Why the transfer of all the employees not happened in the Bisrk's Branch related to Rs. 10.00\nlacs and Rs. 60,000\/-? Why the matter of Circular No. 078-2008 BC-Vig-04\/FIC Dated:18-03-2008 not\ngiven to the CBI\/CID? Is the copy of FMR-1 and FIR send to Vigilance Department, If not then why?\nWhy is the cheque book was bought from Vaidpura when the stock had the full requirement of cheque\nbooks? Why Sh. P.K. Sharma was not given the registry of the cheque book 158101-159100, bought from\nVaidpura? Why the customer Sh. Ravindra Singh had been issued the cheque book no. 185101-158110\ninstead of 9431-9440 by Sh. P.K. Sharma? Please do the observation of evidence No. A-8. Why Sh. P.K.\nSharma issued Cheque book no. 158241-158250 instead of 158251-158260 to Sh. Begraj Yadav? Why the\ninformation officer Sh. Babu Verma, did not sent cheque book of date 23-10-2008 to disciplinary officer\ninstead of Sh. Manishankar Prasad? Why the issued cheque book creation was not authorized? Why the\nofficer Sh. P.K. Sharma &amp; Sh. S.P.S. Sisodia, issued the cheque book to the customers as they are not\nauthorized to do so? Why the mistake done by Mr. P.K. Sharma &amp; Sisodia are imposed to Sh. Manindra\nPrasad? Why Sh. Suresh Chander did not stock created the system in respect of cheque book no 108241-\n108540? In which evidence that the Information Officer Sh. R.K. Garg proved that the cheque book no.\n158241-158250 were stole by Sh. Manindra Prasad as it is clear from A-8 that cheque book no 158241-\n158250 were issued by Sh. P.K. Sharma to Thana Ram Mavi. What is the base under which Probing\nofficer Sh. R.K. Garg proves that the fake signature of Sh. P.K Sharma was done by Manindra Prasad?\nWhy has all cheques\/withdrawals vouchers dated 01\/11\/2008 not been sent to the writing expert for\ncertification? Why has the leave application being sent to the expert and why the expert had sent his report\nto the Bisrak Department? The statement given by Sh. Shanti Swaroop must be observed. Under which\nevidence\/document did Probe Officer Sh. R.K. Garg proved that A\/c No. 9508's sample signature was\n                                                                                                Page 1 of 3\n sent by Manindra Prasad? Why Sh. Babu Ram intimidate the branch's employees to change their\nstatement? Why the probing officer Sh. Ram Babu Verma not sent the required information to bank? It is\nproved on given statement of the employees and the customers that Sh. Suresh Chander deposited the\ncheques to his O.D.C A\/c, but Sh. Ram Babu Verma did not probe the O.D.C A\/c of Sh. Suresh Chander,\ngive the statement of Sh. Suresh Chandra's O.D.C A\/c. Sh. Suresh Chander and Sh. Shanti Swaroop, took\nRs. 5000\/- as commission from the customers on checking their A\/c and offer insurance policy. Why Sh.\nShanti Swaroop said that he lend the money from his relative as he lent the money from the customer\nnamed Sh. Karuna Nithi Sharma, of amount Rs.1 lac? How Mr. Shanti Swaroop had discounted a cheque\nof Rs. 2500\/- from Malivara Branch as the A\/c is closed? Why Sh. Shanti Swaroop give payment to\ncheque No. 158249 as he know that the signature of Mr. P.K. Sharma was fake? Why Sh. Shanti Swaroop\npay the cheques which was signatured by Sh. P.K. Sharma? Sh. P.K.Sharma issued a fake car loan of Rs.\n300,000\/- to Sh. Om Prakash. On opposition to this by Manindra Prasad, he made a D.D and give it to Sh.\nBillu Singh without submitting the amount in the A\/c. Why did any action not being taken against him?\nIt is cleared from the documents that the signature of Sh. P.K. Sharma was different in different\ndocuments, why it is so? Appellant is describing a situation that how it is possible that one person is\navailable on two different places? Why Sh. R.K.Garg not collect evidence when Sh. Manindra Prasad was\nissuing them? Why Sh. R.K. Garg and Sh H.N. Vishweshvar not provided the certified copies invited by\nSh. Maniendra Prasad?Why the Probe officer Sh. R.K. Garg publically issued the report? What action was\ntaken by your department on the case of A\/c No.8771.220.4915 whose holder is not alive? Why Sh. P.K.\nSharma passed cheque no. 832475 besides the cheque is considered as out of range? Why Sh. P.K Sharma\nuses the password of Sh. Manindra Prasad in between the leave of Sh Manindra Prasad? Why Sh. P.K.\nSharma not passed cheque\/withdrawl. Why he used the password of Sh Manindra Prasad? Why S. N.\nVisheweshvar dismissed Sh. Manindra Prasad as it is clear from the documents that Sh. Manindra Prasad\nis not included in this fraud. Why Sh. Ram Babu Verma took second statement of the employees by\nthreatening them?\n\nThe PIO Reply:\nWe have examined your Application in detail and observe that you have sought information under 42\nitems which are directly related to the Disciplinary Action taken by the Bank against Sri. Manindra\nPrasad,then Asst. Manager of our Bisrak Branch.\nIn this connection, we observe that Sri Manindra Prasad has challenged the Bank's action against him\nbefore the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad. As such, the information sought by you is subject matter of a\nlitigation and hence, the matter being sub-judice, we are exempted from providing the same, by virtue of\nthe provisions of Section 8(1) (h) of the Act.\nThe above apart, we observe that the information is relating to third part\/parties and no public interest is\ndiscernible. Hence, we are also exempted from supplying the information U\/s 8(1) (j) of the Act.\n\nGrounds for the First Appeal:\nUnsatisfactory reply was given to the appellant by the PIO.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n      \"No FAA order mentioned\/received from\/by the Appellant.\"\n\nGround of the Second Appeal:\nUnsatisfactory information had been provided by the PIO.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Absent;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. Sripathi M. K., PIO &amp; AGM on video conference from NIC-Udupi Studio;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       Some of the Appellant&#8217;s queries seek information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act and<br \/>\nsome do not. The PIO has claimed exemption under Section 8(1)(h) &amp; (j) without justifying how these<br \/>\nexemptions would apply.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The PIO is directed to provide the information point-wise based on the records to the<br \/>\nAppellant before 10 December 2011. If any of the information is not available this should<br \/>\nbe stated.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.<br \/>\nNotice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                     08 November 2011<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number. (BK))<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002049\/15510 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002049 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Rao, C\/o Devanand Rao, Bheekam Ahmat Village, P.O. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":176,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011"},"wordCount":176,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011","name":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-28T18:03:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sanjay-kumar-rao-vs-syndicate-bank-on-8-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Sanjay Kumar Rao vs Syndicate Bank on 8 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152316\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}