{"id":153027,"date":"2009-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-02T19:24:10","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T13:54:10","slug":"vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 519 of 2009()\n\n\n1. VANAJA.V., W\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. JOSNA, D\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR,\n3. JISHA, D\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K.P.SREENIVASAN, S\/O.GOPALAN NAIR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.V.ASOKAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :02\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n               Dated this the 2nd    day of November,     2009\n\n                              J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
                              ———————-\n<\/p>\n
\n      The Second Appeal arises from the judgment and decree of<\/p>\n
learned Sub Judge, Quilandy in A.S. No.32 of              2006   confirming<\/p>\n
judgment and decree of learned Munsiff, Quilandy in O.S. No.210 of<\/p>\n
2004.      Respondent\/plaintiff      claimed        that Karunakaran   Nair,<\/p>\n
predecessor in interest of appellants borrowed Rs.50,000\/- from him<\/p>\n
on 15.6.2003 and issued Ext.A1, cheque dated 15.5.2004 for the sum<\/p>\n
of Rs.60,000\/- which took in the principal amount together with<\/p>\n
interest  agreed to be paid thereon. Since Karunakaran Nair died<\/p>\n
before the date of maturity, respondent could not present the cheque<\/p>\n
for encashment.    After the death of Karunakaran Nair, respondent<\/p>\n
issued notice to the appellants demanding payment of the amount.<\/p>\n
Appellants denied the transaction and execution of cheque and hence<\/p>\n
the suit. Respondent gave evidence as P.W.1 and examined P.Ws.2<\/p>\n
and 3 in proof of the alleged transaction and execution of Ext.A1.<\/p>\n
Appellant No.3 was examined as D.W1 and gave contra evidence.<\/p>\n
Exhibits B1 to B5 and X1 to X3(b) are produced in support of the<\/p>\n
contention of appellants. Learned Munsiff found that Karunakaran Nair<\/p>\n
had borrowed money from the respondent and issued the cheque.<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
First appellate court confirmed the same. As the decree now stands,<\/p>\n
respondent is allowed to realise the amount from the        assets of<\/p>\n
Karunakaran Nair in the hands of appellants. Appellants are aggrieved<\/p>\n
and have come up in Second Appeal urging the following by way of<\/p>\n
substantial questions of law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   (i)   Whether a suit can be maintained<\/p>\n
            by a drawee of the cheque against the legal<\/p>\n
            representatives of the drawer of the cheque<\/p>\n
            without a plea that the legal representatives<\/p>\n
            had inherited the estate of the drawer to bear<\/p>\n
            the responsibility and obligation to discharge<\/p>\n
            the original debt owed by the drawer of the<\/p>\n
            cheque?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   (ii)  Whether the courts below are<\/p>\n
            justified in drawing a presumption under<\/p>\n
            Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act<\/p>\n
            upon Ext.A1 (concededly a post dated cheque)<\/p>\n
            which was      presented for encashment long<\/p>\n
            after the death of the drawer of the cheque<\/p>\n
            even without proof regarding the signature of<\/p>\n
            the drawer as contained in the cheque?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   (iii) Whether the courts below are<\/p>\n
            justified in drawing a presumption in favour of<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                   -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
            the drawee of the cheque in spite of the<\/p>\n
            contrary evidence adduced by the appellants<\/p>\n
            with regard to the very basis of the cheque in<\/p>\n
            question? Is not the presumption contemplated<\/p>\n
            under     Section    118     of the  Negotiable<\/p>\n
            Instruments Act a rebuttable one?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   (iv)   Whether a cheque     issued by a<\/p>\n
            person can be presented for encashment long<\/p>\n
            after the death of the drawer of the cheque and<\/p>\n
            file a suit for the said amount against the legal<\/p>\n
            representatives? Is not such a claim bad and<\/p>\n
            hit by Section 64 of the Negotiable Instruments<\/p>\n
            Act?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   (v)    Are not the conclusions in the<\/p>\n
            judgments of the courts below vitiated by<\/p>\n
            reason of their perverse appreciation of the<\/p>\n
            evidence on record?\n<\/p>\n
It is contended by       learned counsel that courts below have not<\/p>\n
adverted to the above questions while granting decree in favour of<\/p>\n
respondent.\n<\/p>\n
      2.    Substantial questions of law urged in the Second Appeal<\/p>\n
concerned the question regarding validity of the negotiable instrument<\/p>\n
and its presentation after the death of the drawer of the instrument. I<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                  -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
have gone through the copy of the plaint which learned counsel for<\/p>\n
appellants produced before me for perusal and I find that the suit is<\/p>\n
based on the original cause of action, i.e. Karunakaran Nair borrowing<\/p>\n
Rs.50,000\/- from the respondent       on 15.6.2003.  Though it is also<\/p>\n
stated that the date on which the amount payable (15.5.2004) also<\/p>\n
gave respondent a cause of action for suing for recovery of the amount<\/p>\n
basically and principally suit is based on the original cause of action.<\/p>\n
Therefore much of the substantial questions of law urged in the<\/p>\n
Second Appeal do not arise for decision.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    It is not the case of respondent that he had presented the<\/p>\n
cheque for encashment at any point of time. Instead he pleaded that<\/p>\n
he did not present the cheque for encashment since Karunakaran Nair<\/p>\n
died before the due date i.e., 15.5.2004. He has given evidence as<\/p>\n
P.W1 regarding the transaction and execution of Ext.A1, cheque by<\/p>\n
Karunakaran Nair. P.Ws.1 and 2 also supported him. P.W.2 of course,<\/p>\n
is a relative of respondent. But he is also a neighbour of respondent<\/p>\n
and Karunakaran Nair.      Exhibit B4 series are produced to show that<\/p>\n
cheque book containing Ext.A1 was not issued to Karunakaran Nair<\/p>\n
during 2003 when according to the respondent alleged transaction<\/p>\n
took place. But the mere fact that Ext.A1, cheque comes from the<\/p>\n
cheque book containing Ext.B4 series is of the previous year does not<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                   -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
by itself mean that there was no such transaction as pleaded by the<\/p>\n
respondent.        Exhibits X1 to X3(b) are produced to show that<\/p>\n
Karunakaran Nair who was admittedly working at Goa during the<\/p>\n
relevant time had attended his office on 14.6.2003 and 16.6.3003 and<\/p>\n
therefore there was no possibility of        his being at Quilandy on<\/p>\n
15.6.2003 to borrow the amount from the respondent.             It is seen<\/p>\n
from the judgment of the trial court that appellants had produced the<\/p>\n
time table of train timings from Calicut to Medgaon. Learned Munsiff<\/p>\n
observed that the running time was only 11 hours and hence there<\/p>\n
was no difficulty for Karunakaran Nair even if he had been attending<\/p>\n
office on 14.6.2003 and 16.6.2003 to come to Quilandy on 15.6.2003<\/p>\n
and return to the place of his employment and attend duty               on<\/p>\n
16.3.2003.     Trial court has   referred to the oral and documentary<\/p>\n
evidence and found in favour of the transaction and execution of<\/p>\n
Ext.A1 by Karunakaran Nair. First appellate court has confirmed that<\/p>\n
finding. I do not find any perversity in the finding of the courts below<\/p>\n
and as such no question of law is involved.<\/p>\n
       4.    It is lastly argued by learned counsel that appellants could<\/p>\n
not have been made personally liable for the debt of Karunakaran Nair.<\/p>\n
It is seen from the operative portion of the judgment of learned Munsiff<\/p>\n
that it is made clear that liability of appellants shall be limited to the<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
extent of property of Karunakaran Nair inherited by them. That would<\/p>\n
take care of the apprehension of appellants as against the personal<\/p>\n
liability apprehended by them.      I do not find any question of law,<\/p>\n
much less any substantial question of law involved in the Second<\/p>\n
Appeal requiring its admission.\n<\/p>\n
       Resultantly, Second Appeal is dismissed in limine.<\/p>\n
                                            THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
vsv<\/p>\n
R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                         -: 7 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                 THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n<\/p>\n
                                ===================
\n                                   R.S.A. NO.519 of 2009
\n                                ===================<\/p>\n
                                    J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n
                                 2ND NOVEMBER, 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 519 of 2009() 1. VANAJA.V., W\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR, … Petitioner 2. JOSNA, D\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR, 3. JISHA, D\/O.LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR, Vs 1. K.P.SREENIVASAN, S\/O.GOPALAN NAIR, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.V.V.ASOKAN For Respondent : No Appearance The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1145,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009"},"wordCount":1145,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009","name":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T13:54:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vanaja-v-vs-k-p-sreenivasan-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vanaja.V. vs K.P.Sreenivasan on 2 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153027\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}