{"id":153210,"date":"2011-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011"},"modified":"2015-06-21T05:50:29","modified_gmt":"2015-06-21T00:20:29","slug":"koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: C.K.Buch,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/9\/6909\t 2\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 969 of 2009\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n \n\nKOLI\nRAMUBEN WD\/O KARSHANBHAI & 2 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nTALPADA\nKOLI KHIMABHAI DAYABHAI BARAIYA - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nMRUGEN K PUROHIT for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5,1.2.6 - 3. \nNone\nfor Respondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 05\/02\/2009 \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
\t\tInvoking
\nthe writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner has preferred
\nthis petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
\nchallenging the judgment and order dated 29\/09\/2008 passed by the
\nlearned Senior Civil Judge, Jasdan passed below Exh.1 in Regular
\nCivil Execution Petition No.1 of 2005.\n<\/p>\n
2.\t\tIt
\nis submitted by learned Advocate for the petitioners-judgment
\ndebtors\/defendants that the parties are litigating since years and
\nthere is a clear confusion as to the description of the property.  At
\none place the land is described as Vid Land and the survey number of
\nthe land sold to the respondent-decree holder is of survey No.198 of
\nVillage Valod, Tal. Jasdan. In another suit, the land is referred to
\nas land bearing Survey No.199. In the execution proceedings, it has
\nbeen found that the land described in the document Exh.106 is part of
\nSurvey No.201 and the same is considered accordingly.  There is no
\ndispute that the present petitioner at relevant point of time was
\nowner and occupier of land of all the three survey Nos.198, 199 and\n<\/p>\n
201.<\/p>\n
3.\t\tIt
\nis the say of Mr.Purohit, learned Advocate for the petitioner that
\npetitioner was ready and is still ready to part with land bearing
\nSurvey No.198 described as ‘Vid Land’ in the document at Exh.106 and
\nthe land which is described stating the boundaries is not a Vid Land.
\n It is the say that the Executing Court was not legally entitled to
\nascertain the exact number of the land for which the decree is passed
\nand it was not within the domain of the Executing Court to ascertain
\nthe identity of the land and this exercise can be said to be an
\nexercise for the purpose of to go beyond the decree.\n<\/p>\n
4.\t\tI
\nhave considered the submission and the fact that in the judgment on
\nthe strength of which the decree is drawn says that the land bearing
\nSurvey No.198 admeasuring Acre 11-31 Guntha known as ‘Vid Land’ was
\nsold to the plaintiff as described in the plaint.  According to
\nMr.Purohit, if we go by Survey Number and description of the land as
\nVid Land then the boundaries shown of the land in the document does
\nnot tally and if we go by boundaries of the land described and
\nmentioned in the document then the same does not match with the other
\ndescription i.e. Survey Number and type of the land.  Whether this by
\nitself would make a decree unexecutable was a crucial question before
\nthe executing Court.  The Executing Court after referring the
\ndecision in case of  Bhavna
\nVaja Vs. Solanki Hanuji Khodaji Mansang, reported in 1972 2 SC 1371,
\nmore particularly, in paragraph No.9 of the judgment it is said that
\nwhere there is material technical contradiction in the description of
\nthe land sold to the plaintiff-decree holder, some exercise can be
\ndone by Executing Court, such is the ratio.\n<\/p>\n
5.\t\tWhile
\ndealing with the present petition, this Court is supposed to look to
\nthe certain undisputed facts which are as under:\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\tThe
\n\t\t\tland was sold to the plaintiff in the years 1979 and same was sold
\n\t\t\tby a registered document against consideration.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\t\t\tThe
\n\t\t\tdefendant was held entitled to have the land back which was sold
\n\t\t\tby paying Rs.5,000\/- to the plaintiff-decree holder.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\t\t\tThe
\n\t\t\tlearned trial Court has held in the its judgment that the
\n\t\t\tdefendant has failed to prove that Rs.5,000\/- was ever returned to
\n\t\t\thim and therefore he was not under the privilege to have land back
\n\t\t\tsold under the registered sale-deed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\t\t\tThe
\n\t\t\tplaintiff is entitled to have enjoyment of land purchase and he
\n\t\t\twas never denied this right of years.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
5.1\t\tThe
\ncrucial question before the Court by the present petition is that
\nwhether the Executing Court has committed any error in ascertaining
\nthe fact that exactly which parcel of land was sold to the
\ndecree-holder.\n<\/p>\n
5.2\t\tIt
\nis averred in the plaint that the decree holder has spent a huge
\namount in the land such as, wall was erected and pipeline was laid
\ndown. The parties were litigating since the year 1989 and the Court
\ntherefore, observed that with a view to avoid complexity and the
\ncontradiction emerging from the record qua the identity of the land,
\nif it is possible to resolve then that exercise should be and can be
\ndone otherwise the litigation would remain fruitless even after
\nseveral years.  Undisputedly, the sale-deed has been executed by the
\njudgment debtor (defendant) and he is the person who has described
\nthe land by stating, in detail, the boundaries of the land sold and
\nthe Government Officer, an independent person, was asked to visit the
\narea after the executing Court can effectively executing the decree
\nof the land falling within the boundaries described.  Whether the act
\nof executing Court ignoring the Survey Numbers mentioned in the
\ndecree or the description of the land as Vid Land is a failure of
\nexercising jurisdiction or not needs consideration when the Court is
\nasked to interfere with the finding recorded by the Executing Court
\nin extraordinary jurisdiction vested with the Court.\n<\/p>\n
5.3\t\tIf
\nthe say of Mr.Purohit is accepted then the resultant effect would be
\nthat a person who sold a land after taking consideration by a
\nregistered sale-deed shall not be required to part an inch of land to
\nthe petitioner. Defendant had never accepted in past during
\nlitigation including the suit decided, that he is ready to handover
\nthe possession of the land admeasuring Acre 11-31 Guntha of survey
\nNo.198.  It appears that no evidence was available before the
\nExecuting court that Survey No.198 is admeasuring Acre 11-31 Guntha
\nor more having similar description.  The said land is more than that
\nand a big parcel of land.  Undisputedly, the land of Survey No.199 is
\nless than 11 Acre.  In this fact situation, if the Executing Court
\nhas recorded that the finding described in the document Exh.106 is
\npart of survey No.201 would not make the order passed beyond
\njurisdiction and such an order cannot be said to be an order passed
\nby the Executing Court going beyond the decree. The Executing Court
\nhas simply said that the land described wise boundary in document
\nExh.106 in the registered sale-deed requires to be handed over to the
\nplaintiff by the judgment debtor-defendant.\n<\/p>\n
6.
\nIt deserves to be noted that what was the situation of Survey No.201
\non relevant date in the year 1989 or in past is not emerging from the
\nrecord and therefore it would not be appropriate for this Court to
\njump to a conclusion that it was never a Vid Land.  Ultimately, a
\nlitigation at least should come to an end with all by reasonable good
\nand appropriate finding.  The learned Executing Court has recorded
\nthat finding and no interference is required to be made.  The Court
\nhastens to adhere while dismissing this petition that the petitioner
\nhas never challenged the decree on merit raising the dispute that
\ncould have been decided evaluating the facts in detail in reference
\nto the finding recorded by way of judgment on the strength of which
\nthe decree is drawn.\n<\/p>\n
7.\t\tIn
\nview of the above, the petition fails and is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n
(C.K.BUCH,
\nJ.)<\/p>\n
sompura<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 Author: C.K.Buch,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/9\/6909 2\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 969 of 2009 ========================================================= KOLI RAMUBEN WD\/O KARSHANBHAI & 2 – Petitioner(s) Versus TALPADA KOLI KHIMABHAI DAYABHAI BARAIYA – Respondent(s) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKoli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1206,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011"},"wordCount":1206,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011","name":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-21T00:20:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/koli-vs-talpada-on-24-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Koli vs Talpada on 24 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}