{"id":153296,"date":"2010-11-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-28T12:27:56","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T06:57:56","slug":"ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>we 18192\/2007\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH. COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 22% DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010;\nBEFORE   \nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTECE a.s.pAT1Lf:: 1.: V' \nW.P.No.18192\/200?\"fLR}. '_  V'  V'\nBETWEEN:   \n1. Sri Ramaiah,\nS\/o Halappa,\nAged about 72 years.\n2. Sri Hanumanthaiah.\n\nS\/0 Halappa, V\nSince dead by \n\n(3.) Siddarnma','~.rl I'\n\nW\/0, late Haf1Vu4n1elTltl1ai'ali, \nAged3._55'-Year\u00e9fll'-..,,Tll     \n\n[bl PLIttamina,\" _ _ 1\nW \/V 0 late J ay_aram,\nAged 60 years; y V\n\n. (c}VLak9h1mnya1*ayana,\n' _  S\/o_la11e Jayarama,\n\" ._ Aged 23\" years,\"\n\n _ {:1} Ciaandrae-llekara,\n\nS\/0 ~~Jatr:r Jayarama.\n\n   .. Aged 25 years.\n\n . l(e}llMaI:1galamn1a.\n\n'SW\/0 late Paramesha,\n\nM   --fAged 35 years,\n\n [I] Keshavamurthy.\nS\/0 late Pararnesha,\nAged 19 years,\n\n\n\n 3, viq'oai\";.h}i{\u00a2d.v; \n\n2\n{g} '1\".Rajar1.\nS\/0 late Hamzmamhaiah,\nAged 42 years.\n\n[h) Bhagyamma,\nW\/0 late Krishna.\nAged 33 years.\n\n(i) Narayana,   -\n\nW\/0 late Hamzmanthaiah,\nAged 35 years,\n\nAll are R\/at Garden Road,\nMaruthi Circle, Tumkur.  \n\n{By Sri T.A.!{arumbaiah. Adm)\n\nAND:\n\n1. State of Karna1'ial{a;:-.\n\nRevenue _I)epar1\ufb01ier1}.',VV\n\n1\\\/i.S.Bu:Z1ding\",iA D5r:B.F{.A.*n33e.dkar \nBarxgalmje, ;rep,b'y  A Seyc'1\"ejt:arjy.' -\n\n2. The Land \"I'i'i4l:)unal';--   S  V\nTurnkur Taliik, 'l'u.rriE.:ur*._Disirict,\n  \n\n'  s \/0 :Kaji\" Abdiil _\u00a5&lt;ah1m.,\nAged 67&quot;yea1js,f&#039;~&quot;&quot;\nNazarbad, Ch_ik&#039;pet,\n\nV &#039;I&#039;uIIi\u00a5:ur.V\\__i&#039; &#039;\n\n&quot; &quot; ~:\u00ab&#039;(;3y&quot;&#039;S;iyR.I{zun\u00ab1;ar. I-ICGP for R1 8: R2.\n S;fi..Ch&#039;anz(1an S.Rao. Adv. for R3}\n\nWP l8l92\/2007\n\n. . . RESPONDENTS\n\n. _ This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 &amp; 227 of the\n{3ei&#039;1stit&#039;u\u20acior1 of India. praying to quash Ar1nexure--D the order\n\nad daled 28.11.2006 passed by the R2 and allow the applications\n \ufb01led by the peiit&#039;.i0ne1*s.\n\n\n\nwp E8192\/2007\n3\n\nThis petition Coming on for preliminary hearingAB group\nthis day. the Court made the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>I. Learned Counsel for the petitioners and the-<\/p>\n<p>Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and a1soV_&#8221;&#8216;the:.l.lear11ed&#8221;l<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader submit by referring C1i&#8217;Arct_zjla.r,tf1&#8217;atV\u00a7:p_cl&#8217;:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>30012006usualbythesuuethwenhnauthata\u00a7theehh\ufb01V,<\/p>\n<p>made by the writ petitioners waslluinder the._pro:tl1sioiisl of the<br \/>\nKarnataka [Religious an\ufb02&#8221;  lnarns Abolition Act,<br \/>\n1955, it is the Deputy Comlrnissiovnerl, who is having<\/p>\n<p>the power and _i.urisC&#8221;_1ictio;n  lithe case and the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal Ejias_  entertain the matter. They<br \/>\nfurther invite_ the atter:Vtiofi&#8221;*o;f&#8221;:{he Court to the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>Circular; has been _is&#8221;s&#8217;1&#8242;,1edV&#8217; based on the decision rendered by<\/p>\n<p>7_this .CV&#8217;t:sttrt*t&#8221;i1~. salt: Kept: SRINGERI MAHA SAMSTHANAM vs<\/p>\n<p>s9i:ai*1t;;-  &#8212; ILR 1992 KAR 1827 and that of<\/p>\n<p>  M.B.RA;i&amp;AcxzA_Nj31\u00a7AN vs GO  8: 0125. ~&#8211; 11.11 2005 KAR<\/p>\n<p>1,  ;- 4.29-.29.\n<\/p>\n<p>  , _pIn&#8221;A_v&#8217;iew of the submission made by the learned Counsel<\/p>\n<p> ..__for the parties and in the light&#8221;. of the Circular dated 30.01.2006<\/p>\n<p> placed before this Court. which is issued pursuant to the law<\/p>\n<p>laid down by the Apex Court. I tun of the ttonsiderecl View that.<\/p>\n<p>wp 18192\/2007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8216;i&#8217;n&#8217;bunal. This is so, because in the judgment of the Apex Court<\/p>\n<p>in the case Of M.B.RAMACHANDRAN VS GOWRAMMA &amp;  &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>{LR 2005 KAR 2929. at paragraph 9 while interfering<\/p>\n<p>order passed by this Court in the case of SHRI KUDQ  <\/p>\n<p>MAHA SAMSTHANAM vs STATE or KAaNAm1m}_}~ 1_i;R-&#8216;:;9s2\u00bb  A<\/p>\n<p>1827. it is made clear that the dec1ara1\u00a3,i0n_A_&#8217;n&#8217;rade&#8221;l;;y  <\/p>\n<p>declaring the provisions of the\u00bbAr12endrr1&#8217;ent  as &#8221; A<\/p>\n<p>invalid shall only be confined tt)_&#8230;l:V1%l\u20ac.&#8217;\u20ac&#8217;\u00a7&lt;ff[,q\u20ac11t&#039;\\&#039;j&#039;\\[t\/i1lIl\u00a2\u00a3ld\u20acd the<br \/>\nMysore [Religious and   Act, 1955.\n<\/p>\n<p>This apparently means t.ha;t&#8221;tiie:&#8217;poWers on the Land<br \/>\nTribunal by   tilde.  out as per<\/p>\n<p>Amendrnent Act, V l\u00a7T@..AhiaVi1ag&#8221;&#8216;beer1 upheld, the jurisdiction as<\/p>\n<p>was vested &#8220;&#8216;:yith.V  Cornmissioner prior to the<\/p>\n<p>_Vamend&#8221;n_1enteA has beenlrestored and therefore, the Land Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;?_could_not .il11av_eA&#8221;exercised the power and it was the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Colfnni-issioizeir.&#8221;whowas competent to decide the claim.<\/p>\n<p>In Vicz\ufb01f oi&#8217;; the above, 1 do not find any need for further<\/p>\n<p>~ ~ &#8216;A J,&#8221;C18,ufifieation&#8221;i.n the order dated 22.11.2010.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-3<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil we 18192\/2007 1 IN THE HIGH. COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22% DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010; BEFORE THE HONBLE MRJUSTECE a.s.pAT1Lf:: 1.: V&#8217; W.P.No.18192\/200?&#8221;fLR}. &#8216;_ V&#8217; V&#8217; BETWEEN: 1. Sri Ramaiah, S\/o Halappa, Aged about 72 years. 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":408,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010"},"wordCount":408,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010","name":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-28T06:57:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153296"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153296\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}