{"id":153473,"date":"2011-01-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011"},"modified":"2015-09-05T19:30:05","modified_gmt":"2015-09-05T14:00:05","slug":"mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                             File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876\n                  Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                      :                             17\u00a0January\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                     :                             17\u00a0January\u00a02011\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0               :   Shri\u00a0A\u00a0Khalid\n                                         Markazu\u00a0Ssaquafathi\u00a0Ssunniyya\u00a0\n                                         Kanyapuram,\u00a0Wimberly\u00a0Gunj,\n                                         South\u00a0Andaman.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0       :   CPIO,\u00a0O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner,\n                                         Port\u00a0Blair,\n                                         A&amp;N\u00a0Isaland.\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Mohammad,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0was\u00a0present.<\/pre>\n<p>Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner               :         Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra<\/p>\n<p>                                   Decision\u00a0Notice<\/p>\n<p>                                   Appeal\u00a0allowed<\/p>\n<p>Elements\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        Section\u00a020\u00a0(1)\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0CPIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0information\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0show\u00a0<br \/>\ncause\u00a0notice.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      We\u00a0heard\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0through\u00a0video\u00a0conferencing.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Port\u00a0Blair\u00a0studio\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876<br \/>\n entry\u00a0and\u00a0sketch\u00a0map\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0Sri\u00a0C\u00a0Hassanair\u00a0in\u00a0support\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0claim\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>holding\u00a0the\u00a0title\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0land\u00a0bearing\u00a0survey\u00a0number\u00a0169\/P.\u00a0Belatedly,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>forwarded\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Tehsildar,\u00a0Ferrargunj.\u00a0The\u00a0first\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appeal\u00a0preferred\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0seem\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.\u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the \u00a0 second\u00a0 appeal,\u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 has\u00a0 prayed\u00a0 for\u00a0 directions\u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO\u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>provide\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0compensate\u00a0him\u00a0towards\u00a0the\u00a0costs\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>and\u00a0other\u00a0incidentals.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      After \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 submissions \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 and \u00a0 carefully\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>considering\u00a0 the \u00a0 facts\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 case,\u00a0 we\u00a0 are\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 opinion\u00a0 that\u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>should \u00a0 be \u00a0 shown \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 records \u00a0 in \u00a0 this \u00a0 regard \u00a0 for \u00a0 his \u00a0 inspection.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, \u00a0 we \u00a0 direct \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 to \u00a0 invite \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 on \u00a0 any \u00a0 mutually\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>convenient\u00a0date\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>show \u00a0 him \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 records \u00a0 in \u00a0 this \u00a0 regard \u00a0 for \u00a0 his \u00a0 inspection. \u00a0 After\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>inspection,\u00a0if\u00a0he\u00a0chooses\u00a0to\u00a0get\u00a0the\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0some\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CPIO\u00a0shall\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0filed\u00a0on\u00a021\u00a0July\u00a02009\u00a0while\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a07\u00a0October\u00a02009,\u00a0obviously,\u00a0nearly\u00a0one\u00a0and\u00a0half\u00a0months\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>beyond\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period\u00a0of\u00a030\u00a0days.\u00a0If\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0have\u00a0any\u00a0valid\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>explanation\u00a0for\u00a0this\u00a0delay,\u00a0he\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0liable\u00a0for\u00a0imposition\u00a0of\u00a0penalty\u00a0in\u00a0terms\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Section\u00a0 20(1)\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 Right\u00a0 to\u00a0 Information\u00a0 (RTI)\u00a0 Act.\u00a0 Before\u00a0 deciding\u00a0 on\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>penalty,\u00a0we\u00a0would\u00a0like\u00a0to\u00a0hear\u00a0the\u00a0explanation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0concerned.\u00a0We,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>therefore, \u00a0 direct \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 to \u00a0 forward \u00a0 a \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 this \u00a0 order \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>officer(s)\u00a0concerned\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appear \u00a0 before \u00a0 us \u00a0 through \u00a0 video \u00a0 conferencing \u00a0(NIC, \u00a0 VC \u00a0 Studio, \u00a0 R.No.11, \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Ground \u00a0 Floor, \u00a0 Old \u00a0 Pradesh \u00a0 Building, \u00a0 Port \u00a0 Blair \u00a0 &#8211; \u00a0 744 \u00a0 101. \u00a0 Contact \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Officer\u00adMr. \u00a0 Narasimha \u00a0 Rao \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 Contact \u00a0 No. \u00a0 03192\u00ad232733)\u00a0 on \u00a0 7 \u00a0 March \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>2011\u00a0at\u00a011.00\u00a0a.m.\u00a0and\u00a0explain\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0delay.\u00a0If\u00a0they\u00a0fail\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0<br \/>\nCIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876<br \/>\n or\u00a0offer\u00a0any\u00a0satisfactory\u00a0explanation\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0matter,\u00a0we\u00a0will\u00a0proceed\u00a0to\u00a0impose\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>penalty\u00a0without\u00a0giving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0opportunity\u00a0of\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>6.      The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                              (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                        (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 17\u00a0January\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 17\u00a0January\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0A\u00a0Khalid Markazu\u00a0Ssaquafathi\u00a0Ssunniyya\u00a0 Kanyapuram,\u00a0Wimberly\u00a0Gunj, South\u00a0Andaman. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Commissioner, Port\u00a0Blair, A&amp;N\u00a0Isaland. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Mohammad,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0was\u00a0present. Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra Decision\u00a0Notice Appeal\u00a0allowed Elements\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision: Section\u00a020\u00a0(1)\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0CPIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0information\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0show\u00a0 cause\u00a0notice.\u00a0\u00a0 2. We\u00a0heard\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0through\u00a0video\u00a0conferencing.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0 present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Port\u00a0Blair\u00a0studio\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC. 3. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0 CIC\/SM\/A\/2010\/000876 entry\u00a0and\u00a0sketch\u00a0map\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0Sri\u00a0C\u00a0Hassanair\u00a0in\u00a0support\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0claim\u00a0for\u00a0 holding\u00a0the\u00a0title\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0land\u00a0bearing\u00a0survey\u00a0number\u00a0169\/P.\u00a0Belatedly,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0 forwarded\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Tehsildar,\u00a0Ferrargunj.\u00a0The\u00a0first\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":499,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011"},"wordCount":499,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011","name":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T14:00:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-khalid-vs-ut-of-andaman-and-nicobar-on-17-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.A Khalid vs Ut Of Andaman And Nicobar on 17 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}