{"id":153508,"date":"2008-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-25T20:39:13","modified_gmt":"2016-08-25T15:09:13","slug":"m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court<\/div>\n
M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDated  :   24.03.2008\n\nCoram\n\nThe Honourable Mr.Justice S.RAJESWARAN\n\nC.R.P.(PD)No.2459 of  2007\nand\nM.P.No.1  of 2007\n\n\nM.Sathishkumar            \t\t\t           ...    Petitioner                                                           \n               \nVs.\n\n \n\n1.M.Ramasamy\n2.P.Kumar\n3.M.Mariappan\n4.Marappa Gounder\n5.Somu @ Ramasay\n6.R.Veeran                                                     ...    Respondents                                                             \n\n\t This petition has been filed  under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the fair and final order dated 08.11.2006 made in I.A.No.119 of 2006 in O.S.No.163 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Court-Fast Track Court No.II, Salem.  \n\n \t   \t For Petitioner        :  Mr.T.Murugamanikkam\n\t\n\t   \t For Respondents   :   Mr.P.Sathish for R2 to R5\n                                                Mr.K.Kannan for R6\n                                                R-1  - N.A.\n\n                                  \tO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
\tThis  Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner        to set aside the fair and final order dated 08.11.2006 made in I.A.No.119 of 2006 in O.S.No.163 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Court-Fast Track Court No.II, Salem.\n<\/p>\n
\t2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.163 of 2004 is the revision petitioner herein. He has filed a suit in O.S.No.163 of 2004   against the 6th respondent herein on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Salem for specific performance of the agreement for sale.  The 6th respondent herein has filed a written statement and he is contesting the said suit.  Pending suit, the respondents 1 to 5 herein filed an application in I.A.No.119 of 2006 praying to implead  them as defendants 2 to 6 in the original suit and permit them to contest the suit.  The said application was resisted by the petitioner\/plaintiff.  However, the trial Court by an order dated 08.11.2006 allowed the application and directed the parties to be impleaded as  defendants 2 to 6 in the suit.  Aggrieved by the same, the  civil revision  petition has been filed by the petitioner\/plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
\t3.  At the time of admission, notice was ordered on 23.08.2007 and interim stay was granted. The respondents  have been served and they have entered appearance through Counsel.\n<\/p>\n
\t4. It is a suit for Specific Performance   filed by the plaintiff against the 6th respondent. The written statement filed by the 6th respondent clearly reveals the fact of entering into the sale agreement and the readiness and willingness of the 6th respondent to execute the sale deed,  provided the plaintiff is ready to pay the balance sale consideration.\n<\/p>\n
\t5. While so, the respondents 1 to 5 herein claiming to be  the power of attorney of the 6th respondent\/defendant in the suit  filed an application  in I.A.No.119 of 2006 seeking to implead themselves as party defendants, 2 to 6. The said application was vehemently opposed by the petitioner\/plaintiff. However, the trial Court  allowed the application stating that  the respondents 1 to 5  are necessary parties for just and fair conclusion.\n<\/p>\n
\t6. The learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention to the  judgment reported in 2005(6) SCC 733 (Kasturi Vs.Iyyamperumal and others) wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has categorically held that a stranger or a third party to the contract cannot be added in a suit for Specific Performance of the contract of sale. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that  this being the settled decision, the order passed by the Court below impleading the respondents 1 to 5 herein, is legally unsustainable.\n<\/p>\n
\t7.  Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submit that the Court below has rightly allowed the application to implead the respondent 1 to 5 as parties defendants 1 to 5. Therefore it does not call for any interference under Article 227 of Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
\t8. I am unable to accept the submission put forth by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
\t9.  The suit was filed by the revision petitioner against the 6th respondent\/defendant for the main relief of directing the defendant to execute and register the sale deed for Rs.22,56,000\/-.  The suit claim is bared on a sale agreement entered in to between the plaintiff and the defendant.  If that being so, to decide the lis between the plaintiff and the defendant, respondents 1 to 5 who are not parties to the agreement are neither necessary parties not proper parties.  In such circumstances, the order of the trial Court holding that the respondents 1 to 5 are necessary parties is clearly vitiated and liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n
\t10.  As held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, reported in  2005(6) SCC 733 (Cited Supra) in a suit for specific performance  of a contract   for sale, the issue to be decided is the  enforceability of the contract entered in to between the  parties and  whether the plaintiff is ready and willing to perform his part of the contract.  Further this scope of the suit for Specific Performance of the contract of sale shall not be enlarged to a suit for title and possession.  If respondents 1 to 5 are impleaded in the suit, it would lead to a complicated litigation by which the trial and the decision of  serious questions which are totally  outside the scope of the suit would have to be gone into.  Therefore, the effective adjudication of controversies  involved in the suit  for Specific Performance  the presence of respondents 1 to 5 cannot be said to be necessary at all.  That apart the  revision petitioner who has filed the suit  for Specific Performance of the contract for sale is dominus litis and  he cannot be compelled to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless it is a compulsion of the Rule of law. There is no substance in the contention that Respondents 1 to 5 are necessary parties  to avoid multiplicity  of suit.  Therefore,  I am inclined to interfere  with the order of the trial Court dated 08.11.2006 and accordingly, the same is set aside.\n<\/p>\n
\t11 .  In the result, the civil revision petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.1 of 2007 is closed.\n<\/p>\n
 \t   \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   24.03.2008
\nrrg
\nIndex   : Yes\/No
\nInternet: Yes\/No
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t  S.RAJESWARAN,J.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t                rrg\t\t\t         <\/p>\n
1. The Additional District Judge,
\n    Fast Track Court No.II,
\n    Salem.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t      C.R.P.(PD)No.2459 of 2007<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t                               24.03.2008<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 24.03.2008 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice S.RAJESWARAN C.R.P.(PD)No.2459 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 M.Sathishkumar … Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Ramasamy 2.P.Kumar 3.M.Mariappan 4.Marappa Gounder 5.Somu @ Ramasay 6.R.Veeran … Respondents This petition has been filed under Article […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":879,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\",\"name\":\"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008"},"wordCount":879,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008","name":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-25T15:09:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sathishkumar-vs-m-ramasamy-on-24-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Sathishkumar vs M.Ramasamy on 24 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}