{"id":153615,"date":"1999-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-07-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999"},"modified":"2017-04-09T15:39:51","modified_gmt":"2017-04-09T10:09:51","slug":"municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","title":{"rendered":"Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: 1999 IVAD Delhi 642, 80 (1999) DLT 313, 1999 (82) FLR 1022<\/div>\n
Author: M Mudgal<\/div>\n
Bench: M Mudgal<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
Mukul Mudgal, J.<\/p>\n
1. This writ petition is filed against the order passed by the Presiding  Officer of Industrial Tribunal who declined the prayer in the application  filed by the petitioner seeking the copy of the evidence recorded in cross-examination of the workman in the industrial disputes pending before the  respondent No. 1. The petitioner herein is the Municipal Employees Union  representing the employees of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the  respondent No. 1 is the Industrial Tribunal through its Presiding Officer  and the respondent No. 2 is the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The  order under challenge in the writ petition reads as under:-\n<\/p>\n
 “These are two Misc. Applications moved by the authorised representative of the workman with a request that the copies of the   evidence being recorded by the Tribunal be given to him. In   support of this fact he has placed reliance on Delhi High Court   Rules. On being desired to help the Tribunal about there being   any provision of law or rules under I.D. Act he has candidly   conceded of there being no such to the same but has submitted   that for the convenience of the parties an order to the same be   passed. It is true that in issuing the copies of the evidence   being recorded it may proved to be convenient to both the parties   as well as to can be unhealthy practice of making the inspection   by unauthorised manner, but in view of there being no provision   to the same no order, as is being desired, can be passed. An   incidental questions in case such order is issued pertaining to   the maintenance of the accounts and stationary to be required and   the responsibility to account far the amount on being realised   for the same and thereafter as to which account of land the   amounts so relied is to be deposited. For such purposes the   amendment in the rules of the Industrial Disputes Act is required   for which the tribunal is not competent to do so. Thus keeping in   mind the above facts no order to issue a copy of the statement   being recorded simultaneously can be ordered by the tribunal as   is desired. Both the applications though pertaining to different   I.D. reference are disposed off accordingly.”\n<\/p>\n
2. It is necessary in this respect to consider the provisions which would  apply in the present case. The relevant provision is Rule 26 of The Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957, which reads as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
 “Fees for copies of awards or other documents of Labour Court,   Tribunal or National Tribunal- (1) Fees for making a copy of an   award or an order of a Labour Court. Tribunal or National Tribunal or any document filed in any proceedings before a Labour   Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal be charged at the rate of   Rs. 1 per page.\n<\/p>\n
 (2) For certifying a copy of any such award or order or document,   a fee of Rs. 1 shall be payable.\n<\/p>\n
 (3) Copying and certifying fees shall be payable in cash in   advance.\n<\/p>\n
 (4) Where a party applies for immediate delivery of a copy of any   such award or order or document, an additional fee equal to one-half of the fee leviable under this rule shall be payable.\n<\/p>\n
3. The petitioner has sought the implementation of the above rule by  seeking the copy of the evidence recorded in cross-examination. The learned  counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is not possible to have an  effective disposal of the matter before the Industrial Tribunal unless and  until a copy of the deposition is available. It is indisputable that a  sine-qua-non for effective functioning of the judicial system is the availability to the parties of any proceedings before the court concerned and in  particular the evidence led before the trial court i.e. the Industrial  Tribunal in this instance. Even the principal of natural justice would  require that parties have a convenient access to the copies of the record  of the case. It has been argued on behalf of the respondent that the term  “document” contained in the above rule cannot cover the deposition of a  witness. In my view this is a highly technical view and does not advance  the purpose behind the rule. Once the deposition of a witness is reduced in  writing the said written deposition, in my view, does constitute a “document falling within the meaning of Rule 26 set out above and accordingly a  copy of the deposition aught to be made available to any applicant subject  to the fulfillment of the attendant conditions.\n<\/p>\n
4. If the view propounded by the Tribunal is upheld it will only lead to  a situation where the only alternative would be to resolve to a length time  consuming and laborious inspection of the record which is not conducive to  the proper functioning of the Industrial Tribunals.\n<\/p>\n
5. Accordingly the writ petition is allowed. The order dated 7th October,  1996 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Respondent No. 3, is set aside.  Respondent No. 1 is directed to dispose of the application dated 23.9.96 in  accordance with Rule 26 of the Industrial Dispute (Central) Rules, 1957 and  if the application is in order copy of the deposition be made available on  payment of requisite charges to the applicant within four weeks of the  receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. This procedure shown henceforth govern all similar applications before the Industrial Tribunals and  Labour Courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 Equivalent citations: 1999 IVAD Delhi 642, 80 (1999) DLT 313, 1999 (82) FLR 1022 Author: M Mudgal Bench: M Mudgal ORDER Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. This writ petition is filed against the order passed by the Presiding Officer of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMunicipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Municipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\"},\"wordCount\":922,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\",\"name\":\"Municipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Municipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Municipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999","datePublished":"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999"},"wordCount":922,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999","name":"Municipal Employees' Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-09T10:09:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-employees-union-vs-the-presiding-officer-another-on-2-july-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Municipal Employees’ Union vs The Presiding Officer & Another on 2 July, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153615"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153615\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}