{"id":153633,"date":"2008-09-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-05-18T00:26:20","modified_gmt":"2018-05-17T18:56:20","slug":"mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Deepak Verma Gowda<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN TEE RIG?! CQURT 9? K.A.RHA’i”AKA AT <\/p>\n
DATED THIS THE 15% DAY 01-‘ smvrmmzga. 2g5\u00a2_3′.;* ” <\/p>\n
PRESEIIT<\/p>\n
ms Humans mm. Jusrxctf\ufb01i\u00e9i-:2-z?\u00a3ia,;i   <\/p>\n
Aw<\/p>\n
THE HOWBLE MR. Jvsfia\ufb01~B.SREE\u00a7iV;\u00a73E”:\u00a3\u00a7G%*”\u00e9A<\/p>\n
MXSCELLANEOUS FIRST A29\u00a7\u00e9LLNQ_.5124 cm’ 2694 {MV}<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:<\/p>\n
EviAF\\EGAL&,      \u00ab\n\nWfo RAMESH,\nAGED 35 YEARS;  . \n<\/pre>\n
Rzzxxr N0.s{)3\ufb01. 41:3′??? *\u20acR’fQs3′,_  ”
\nHOUSING B<::AR1:%g_<;oL:3N'::-.i;\u00bb "  <\/p>\n
HA8SAN.__.  _ <\/p>\n
{By Siiff. N .  V' Fi\ufb01iv.)<\/p>\n
 'THE E\\xi}XNAC}\u00a5{$EG .33'I"R.E__(_\u00a7_'i'QR,<\/p>\n
i\u00e9z.-s;.R':-:*.\u00ab:::\u00bb–.,;'L=<\/p>\n
%L%K.%mr)AD;k~%% <\/p>\n
SHALi$\u00a7THI?\u00a7V;%,{}21.f{; . V
\nBA.'i'sIGALOKE"_\ufb01-: 550 027'<\/p>\n
"(By \u00a73'm?,f\u00a7\u00abumanga1a A.SWamjg', Adv.)<\/p>\n
1-'vr"k*1Fc~k<\/p>\n
enhancament of compansation.\n<\/p>\n
… APPELLANT.\n<\/p>\n
.. ‘ RESPOSDENT.\n<\/p>\n
 AA +7\u00a7his;”‘Misce}1aneous First Appeal \ufb02ied ‘under Section 1:r:3(1; sf<\/p>\n
_  ff}f’1:’.i ‘\u00a3”i\u00e9\u20ac’\u00a5.’.f”\u00a72(Z!X’ Vehicies Act, against the Judgmezat and Award da\u00e9ged
\n pass\ufb01d in MVC N{:c.2135\/2001 on the {IE6 cf tbs W
\nA “”}1Hd}’\u00a7iiti0:1a.1 Small Causes Judge and MACYF, Bangalore {SCC.H–i2},
\n “p3;r’$:1}r a\ufb02owing the Ciaim Petition far compensation axxci seeking<\/p>\n
4. This appeal is far enhazlcememt u\ufb02dar Section 1733-{_1} of tha
\nMotor Vehicles Act, 1988, 0:1 variety \u00e9f grounds. Thizei  :10′:<\/p>\n
been disputed before us that appeiiant was f<\/p>\n
passenger ttave\ufb02ing $31 a bus belonging ‘i:\u00a3_>  p\u00a73;i\ufb01g’ <\/p>\n
benveen Ba\ufb01galore and Ha-333:1 and  t\ufb01\u00e9   J<\/p>\n
susizained bodiiy injuries.\n<\/p>\n
5. Lcarxmd counsel fz3f~zg;ppei1\u00e9\u00a5\u00a7i1tvL–:%3;e2V\u00a7\u00e9 ::a,itted ‘thaf tha Tribunai
\ncommittsd a grave \u20ac}”E’01” in  ‘ 3’9′   that the agapeliani<\/p>\n
haci contributed the  a<:cid&;3.i;. 'f'\u00bb:3 ilf\ufb01ss<\/p>\n
this poiifaf\u00e9 f_'1:.-2';iV'i(\u00a7*':;3 '~..\u00a7aj5:j:';1tj:t1i:::i*+;'oz1\u00e9:1sel far apgsaiiant has g\ufb02acad<\/p>\n
reliance on ;\u00a7.u”i1.’::3r:1*:?1f.\u20acziQ ETt’\u20acv_as’*–V_.<\/p>\n
an iden\ufb01cai cage: where a passeng\ufb01r ‘@733  E1t:r_.V}i3ft._j\u00e9’1’i’\u00a7\u00a73sr.;?7on; __ “V<\/p>\n
“w\u00a3:1dew~si11 of the bus, azezd wa.s_}:jit  an  491\/3311
\nthe bus crossed another bus
\nDivision Bench Cf Kerala Higxl}   V\ufb01xi\u00e9\u00e9r 0f the bus
\newes duty of care for the    travdling in this<\/p>\n
bus and he Sh(_}]}.=.5′{i_ ‘}:1av\u20ac[A fore_;$\u20ace:1A”‘i}.1:’_upo%:;sib\ufb01i1;y of passengers<\/p>\n
resting t}f:.3ir~ iI::5v::1:1  E;’Jii1{‘lQ\u00a5{E;’Si}1 and sheuld have ieft
\nsuf\ufb01cient Sp211(:f:   313: there was no iikeiihood cf the<\/p>\n
passsngarsz’  being <\/p>\n
 V6\u00bb A “‘\u00bbV:’e: if1avt”:. aIsc3  into consideration the Divimon Bench<\/p>\n
6:.”\u00a7:i\u00e9i1f _{\u00a7f=   wherein question of contributcry negiigence,<\/p>\n
‘   Was’ Aiqj\ufb01ked.  the cue from Haisbuxy Laws of England,<\/p>\n
 . \u00ab.._jLsa0king E9 me ratic decici\ufb01ndi ef the aforesaid cases, we are 9f the<\/p>\n
  that the Tribunai committed an \ufb01ff\ufb01r in coming $19 the<\/p>\n
 …_’ \u00e9’o3;iV’c}*Iusio11 that appe\ufb02ant wouid be hai\ufb01 liable to the extent of 125\u00b0\/o<\/p>\n
 W ifbr centributaxy negiigmrace in the said accident. The said fandizzg<\/p>\n
recorded by the Tribunal cannct be sustained in law. It is<\/p>\n
‘V’\u20ac><\/p>\n
not \ufb01nd any rationals: behind itha reasoning mcer\u00a7g%\u00a7”‘\u00bbby ‘she<\/p>\n
Tribunal as to why the same has been Confine\u00e9. \ufb01shen<\/p>\n
the evidenct: was available to \u00a31133: establish <\/p>\n
disabihlty far the whale hwy was toizhfg\u00e9bi\u00e9xts\ufb01xt  <\/p>\n
any piausihle and valid reasens jibe 4\u20ac:UAi:Ci\u00a3?.I1C6 $.56   h:-ais
\nbae\ufb01 brushtzd asida. Thus the   31$”)
\ncannet be sustarinseii in   i\u00a53″$\u00e9\u00a3 aside. We
\naccardingly hold that   disab\ufb01ity \u00a30 {ha<\/p>\n
W110\u00a7\u20ac bo\ufb01y would  <\/p>\n
8. f1’1*i;;:\u00a51\u00a79{‘t.’1{\u00a75.acci\u00a7iiV\u00e9:3.i;’\u00bbf;\u00a7ie ap \u00a7\u00e931 ant was C31″ij–r’3I1g {>31 b11S\u00a7I}\u20ac$S
\nof selling :fIaI\ufb01}3\ufb02r\u00a7.f:L{‘Oij1.a”p}%S3’1\u00e9”:?i1I”L near Bhanu Theaire at Hassan.<\/p>\n
This is  frefn_E$,:_.P-Z\ufb02’ a Seance issuad :0 her by the Town<\/p>\n
_ fxliunicgfraliigr of Haasaxa. It has also come on mcer\ufb01 that eversince<\/p>\n
 $3116. c\ufb01et\ufb01x?-\u00a7’fh  acci\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t, the saiei business ha{}; {(3 ha Ehliit dow\ufb02<\/p>\n
 \u00a3ix$:*::_x\u00a7?'<+t;;\u00e9 .iid0f<)ae (3136 \u00a311 th\ufb01 famiiy 9f the agpsiiant, who cm\ufb02d<\/p>\n
haw: \ufb01i\u00e9ntiniz\ufb01ki 5:0 C\ufb01ffjg' the same. Thus accerciing ":0 us \ufb02ue<\/p>\n
 'a\u00a7p\u20ac}1E1I1'?, '\u00a7\u00a32'asvca:I}rir;g an the sai\u00e9 business, which uitimateiy had<\/p>\n
  t\u00a7:)_9 $\u00e9 'c:..\u00a70sec1 ciown on aocaunt of nature of in_}?m*ies sustainad by<\/p>\n
 ._.}_1ef;-b"f'.A11us adverse \ufb01nding resettled \u00a311 this regard 3150 stancis
\n 'hftzzjby quashed *3)<\/p>\n
9. Witiaout deducting 253% of the ammmt, tcsta\u00e9 ammmt af
\nRs.1,11,3(}\u20ac)\/~ has been awaxtlad to the appe\ufb01ant 11n\u00e9er ‘<:':.i\ufb02er\u20ac1:t<\/p>\n
heads as mentionad hereinbt\ufb02owz<\/p>\n
3} Pain and Su\ufb01s\ufb01ng V' V   _<\/p>\n
13) Loss of amenitiss    . \u00ab_  ~\u00ab ,1?\u00e9} ”  _ 5,9-{$4100 Y ‘<\/p>\n
0) Medical expeases   ~  <\/p>\n
ii] Loss of zaarming        L.\n<\/p>\n
6} Loss of future income’ I    –“\u00a793s..’7;44{:rV,8OG–OOV<\/p>\n
f) Conveyance 8:L!I’:E.:i..v1f1(}1″1’1’iS”1i;3;”‘i_}:.’C*\ufb01]:?l” t \u00ab–‘  4,G(}O\u00bbG0
\n533.1, 1 },,3U(}~O\u20ac}<\/p>\n
In Zvabsazxc\u00e9v  -‘and valid evidence ied by the<\/p>\n
appeliant t\u00e9 ‘:~:1;;o:vv11\u20ac*r  \ufb01mn selling panipuri, “I’:*i1:>tmal<\/p>\n
_ Vhas  uzas$es\u00a7c{iV_ i\u00a3’1e \ufb01zcome of ‘(ha appellant at Rs.2,f}{}0,1\u00ab per<\/p>\n
V.  A\u00e9\u00e9.  this aspect of the ;m.atts:-:1′ is concemed, it calls for<\/p>\n
11\u00a2’ .i:it::rfe1*e%i1:;_e.f ~\u00a74\u00a3owcver, the other ameunts awarded to her<\/p>\n
 _under””\u00abdiiTr;’re1;.\u00a7::””1ieads desarve to be erzhanced. After having gone<\/p>\n
-. _. . *.\ufb02irr)1:;gh Lmcopd and ‘the evidtnce available on record, WE are 9%’<\/p>\n
 1E.1i::aVi>g)it.};io:1 that the appellant (1_\u20acS(3I’V\u20acS is be awar\u00e9ed. \u20ac315 fa\ufb01awixzg<\/p>\n
%  ‘.’\u00a7l1_\u00a7\u00a71{)j1iJ3tS urrzcier the diifsmnt heads:<\/p>\n
a) Pain and Su\ufb01\ufb01ring — Rs. ‘?{}\u00a78OG~OS\n<\/p>\n
13) Less of amenities ~ Rs. 2i’:;,GGO–{)0<\/p>\n
‘T6<\/p>\n
C) Medical exgenses ~ Rs. 2S–;Q4B(}–00
\n(:1) L033 of aarning — Rs. _ v.$;\u20ac) {}iI3e~9O\n<\/p>\n
e) Logs af future incame — Ra;..~1.,<\/p>\n
2000 x 30 x 12 x 1’7  =  ”\n<\/p>\n
1) Ccnveyance and nourishment _.  V  <\/p>\n
g) For Ihtum medicai experxsgas an\u00e9. &_ <\/p>\n
0P6I’aiion    <\/p>\n
. ..–_\u00bb…..—..-. …………………………._..<\/p>\n
10. Thus impugned awagfd is LAAp1\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01.r9;:<1t  entitled to<\/p>\n
receive: in 311 from respond\u00e9iai\ufb01a.t\u00a7:ai–.\u00e9\u00a7.m\u00e9\u00a7:\u00e9j:a: 'Of _Rs.2,9(},40{} ,1 -.<\/p>\n
11. The d\ufb01fereglti\u00e9l ‘_am0fi_1n\u00a7;b  interest at the rats: of<\/p>\n
6% per    till its realiswzion. T336
\namount     <\/p>\n
12. Agapeaix thigs  \u00e9HCI \\;E;\u20acd to the extent made above, with<\/p>\n
 tE1I\u00a7c;ugi1o1i;:._ cmsaxg, fee is Rs.2,000\/ ~ if certi\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Iudqe<\/p>\n
Sd\/-iv
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n
  AGV.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 Author: Deepak Verma Gowda IN TEE RIG?! CQURT 9? K.A.RHA’i”AKA AT DATED THIS THE 15% DAY 01-‘ smvrmmzga. 2g5\u00a2_3′.;* ” PRESEIIT ms Humans mm. Jusrxctf\ufb01i\u00e9i-:2-z?\u00a3ia,;i Aw THE HOWBLE MR. Jvsfia\ufb01~B.SREE\u00a7iV;\u00a73E”:\u00a3\u00a7G%*”\u00e9A MXSCELLANEOUS FIRST A29\u00a7\u00e9LLNQ_.5124 cm’ 2694 {MV} BETWEEN: EviAF\\EGAL&, \u00ab Wfo RAMESH, AGED […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1058,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008"},"wordCount":1058,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008","name":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-17T18:56:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangala-vs-the-managing-director-ksrtc-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mangala vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 15 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}