{"id":153649,"date":"2010-02-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-03-27T22:22:00","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T16:52:00","slug":"sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
I<\/p>\n
EN TH{‘\u20ac I*”EEGf”I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT %.3AN(}ALOI{\u00a3C
\ni”)e:1t’.t:*.cl: This the 15″‘ day (.>I”Fe1)1’1,:a1z’y 2010<\/p>\n
E53 ISFO R I353<\/p>\n
m {+2 1—-Iom.31.\u00a3; MR .1 u&3″:’1c::.<: V JAGANN 'T     .<\/p>\n
M.F.A. NO6356\/2.00E\u00bb'–\u00ab[-NIV=")  <\/p>\n
B I*Z'I'V\\\/ISEN :<\/p>\n
SR1 M. MA1.1,:+:s1\u00bb1A1A1–.1.\n<\/p>\n
S \/0 LA’I”\u00a33 MALLAIAH. ‘
\nR\/AT NO 42. snip: No.2,.-.\n<\/p>\n
BH0oPsAN1′)RA.;   _  ..\n<\/p>\n
1~~;<ANGA1.<)R;:-55o–09.4. r _ 2. 1.\n<\/p>\n
{By 51-: N v v:.JAy & SR1KSL2iT'{“{A.N\/xf\u00a7.A3{A’NA RAG.\n<\/p>\n
Am\/5.;       ” ‘<\/p>\n
1 S1x4f;”*KAw1A_f;A,3\\zI ” v
\nxv\/(}.._LAf1’\u00a3\u00a3 K K.!.;I\u00bb13_uswAMY.\n<\/p>\n
. A0131)” \/v\\_.13o.U”r 53 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
 5:91 r:..Qo1.>1NA*I’\u00a3\u00a51.\n<\/p>\n
_ 5\/Q \u00abI,\/Y-‘I.’f_3 K KUI-‘PE;’SWA_l\\\/EY.\n<\/p>\n
” . AjQV:31i3″A__13Qu’r 43 YEEIARS.\n<\/p>\n
‘ ‘F3.\n<\/p>\n
 sVI21′(3’31:Ris1-41  GIRII)I~h~’\\R.\n<\/p>\n
 53..\/o’:;m’E K KUPPUSWAMY.\n<\/p>\n
“:’?gC\u00a71.I%IIf) ABOUT 38 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
A ‘~ T.’ ” A L ” ” SR} (3 HAN 1.3 RASI—I EKAR.\n<\/p>\n
 S\/O LATE) K KUi~”PUSV\\7AI\\\/IY.\n<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
ALL ARE R\/AT NO.655.\n<\/p>\n
2″” STAG I5. RAJAJ INAGAR.\n<\/p>\n
E{.3AN(}1\\i,ORE~E”3{‘5O O 1 O.\n<\/p>\n
.. . E-‘\u20ac,E~3SPONI'”) }’:Z.N’I’S
\n[E:’3_\\\/ Sn” 8 G PRABHAKAR. Al.)V. FOR C\/ R.)<\/p>\n
 V  ~  \/’-\\PPEI..I..AN’I’<\/p>\n
THIS MFA 1511,}?-I-I) U\/ORDFZR 43 RULE Hr} OI’k (E,”E~?TC7.<\/p>\n
\/\\(;AINS’I”TH 1:: ORIJEER I’)A’I’EIT) :27.o’?.2o0s3 14>\/xssi+::.’j’:(>.\u00e9\u00a7;;’\u00ab(A-.’
\nNO} IN O.S.NO.26092\/2008 ON ‘1’:—–Iii? 1″‘U_~—–3:
\nADDIHONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGFZ. _.Fi3A_NQ!x:\u00a3;ORJ$ <\/p>\n
DISMISSING IA NO.1 I\u00ab*11_.z\u00ab:r) LJ\/()I2’_I’>&:-‘a  R’J.I,I’.\u00a7 .\u00a7_& ‘2 <\/p>\n
cpc FOR ‘1: 1.\n<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL COMING “”0;\u00a7”*;~’Qr’2 Am(‘1’1[s s:0 m THIS
\nDAY. ‘ms: COURT Dra:m;r5R1L;;3″”1’1–:.:s: I?O{,I,OWiN’G<\/p>\n
This  by it,}”‘:”e. pi.::_iI’11’i’ff–befbre the c()u1’1.’<\/p>\n
befow ,:a1gg.rjie\u00a7.rc:d”1:3: “fhe. \u00a7p()1’1de1’1–1–s4defenda1’1t’.s sec-:k1’r1g \\~’acat.%()i’1 of<\/p>\n
 ih\u00e9 =r3_r*”c.\u00a7_e?:’z’ . c;fT_Vsratusvquc) g:’ar1ted eariier. ‘I’he trial<\/p>\n
(*.,'(;r.;ft’_ h2_1.(.i”\u00a7*iis}’11issy”‘L.1.i’1e resp01’1denIs\u00abciefc:n(.ia1’1t$ and c\\.-‘<–rn the<\/p>\n
'=_"c:_zfde"1"_\u00ab()f stat1,1s–quo VVE:1S vacated. It is this order that<\/p>\n
  called in q1.1c:*,st'z'c'31'1 in this appeal.<\/p>\n
2. 1.,earnc~.(I c:(‘)m1sei for t.%’1e=. zxpgselfa-II11<\/p>\n
sa1I:)I}1i1’:tcci that: the trial} (*<_)u1'1 c'J11;\u00a7}'1i' not" to have<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
that the very c01'1d1.1c1 of the E?1pp(TUE1l'1i is such that it<\/p>\n
discmitlcs the appcllmil fbr emy relief 211 ihc l12,1ii'~'1_cyi5.5_<_i(';w1'"V<\/p>\n
i1'1c court: more so ihc 1'c1i<=?f of 1('I11p()1'al"y_'iilj\u00a3l'i"i'(TviIi'-I}Iii ~<\/p>\n
which relief is granted by the c_r;;u.:ft'i1ajx}'i11'g"'i*\u00a3:g2ii"d_'_Ai;o V<\/p>\n
1:110 l'a.c1's of thc case and ('(')1i1(11f\u00a7('l "i,hc";)_\u00e9ir1.ics <\/p>\n
being a disc1*ctionary ()rdc1<,_i'hc said._0rdcrv=.'(r\u00e91._\ufb01i'ic3t"be:
\ninte.1*fcrcd by this ()Q.L1l't, Lin-1–cs.sv–.it"~is sI*1(5Vm. 1':iia.t' the
\nView i'.e1kci'1 is iotially p\u00e9riwfcrsc 51;' c,e_1pifi'\u00e9iit)z\u00a3s.<\/p>\n
4. Fpiritiiici” ;sLibf1’1.issi(“)ii~.._rI1’acic{ is ihat the<\/p>\n
e1ppe?li’:%i\ufb01’i ‘l1c;ijci1i”hashgi”:’cg2ii*ti”for the co11r1,s and it is
\nvicar ilsiohi the’xfiaiiy’~cp5nd1;ict_ of the appellant. in as<\/p>\n
much_ asf”i:hc EIVRC”vpc1″i’ti()ii filed by 1’.1’1c rcspondcm:s<\/p>\n
 \\.’\\1″c'”‘l-..’.’3′:’i.\u00a5}’-~,lE1.”Ji)Ll]” (_)’i””i’i”1’c rcsp(i>ndci’1ts and the order of<\/p>\n
  it’-:’VJi_1’C’f,–.i(:v)V\u00a3”._VVi{S,_1\u00a7:\u00a71SSf3d and t4hcrc21i’i:c1-‘t.hc appellant’. did<\/p>\n
iJO__iZV\\?E1(f\u20aci!’:\u20acf’-nifht? premises cit-rspiic being given time till<\/p>\n
 S1.7.”O8’3~ and did not cv’c1″1 comply with me other<\/p>\n
 _AAc1iyr_c:C;t:.i(:)11s givcii with regard to filirig of affidavii and<\/p>\n
v___z\u00a7.p21i’i_. from that the appellant” hcrcin filed 21 suit for<\/p>\n
specific pcrforma1’1(:c in rcspc.c.i. of the vciy sanic ‘A’<\/p>\n
sc11cd1.1lc pmpc1*1’y which is the s1.1b_jcct mattcr of 11%;?<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
p1’esei1t suit and ilidi. suit ().S.No.3846\/O4 was<\/p>\n
dismissed 21nd thc agi’ecrI11e1’11. of sale upon which”~1_h\u00a3><\/p>\n
said suit” was filed was held to be a fE.I1′)l’i(‘.E:1HI:’L’:ffiT()\ufb01t’iV<\/p>\n
RFA filed algaiiist’ the said decisioii in [.hC.-__SL.1:i:i’~. Viv:-1si:–.”i<\/p>\n
also dismissed in R.F.A.No. I  Evteii;’i.}iE\u00ab.I_<1\\~*ic\u00a7w <\/p>\n
petition filed was also dismissed "by {:hiSj'A\u20ac?(}\u00a7_iiI't":"if'Ii V<\/p>\n
R.P.N0.252\/O6.\n<\/p>\n
5. FL\u00a3l’fh(3I’ sLzb~::gjssi'()ii i.h\u00e9ii. .1″<\/p>\n
i’e\\gI-jcaiidce\u00e9m ]’}Cl’t’.iI]  d’A_’Q..\u00bb\u00bb_Sf..No.lO32\/O4<\/p>\n
gig:-1.ii1s’t””t’hs’Tprcrs\u20ac;:1’i1 “‘ai}j’pelia’i”ii:””in 1’espe(‘: of the very<\/p>\n
same  ..’$I1’i(‘_’.}’1E,’Ch:,|..\u00bbl”t’.V pvijciprgiity and {he trial coiirt has<\/p>\n
passeci aui”~.r)I*’d\u20ac*1f}ui”‘–\u20ac,ci’i’i”p<)1'211'y iI'ljU1'1('1i(}1'] a\u00a7_"{\u00a31i11st'. the<\/p>\n
 pi-96.:s'e1:ji'{.Az'1ppella1i'\ufb01""i'iithe said suit and the said order<\/p>\n
  s'{;.:?1;i"' the City Civil<\/p>\n
Cm.1r\u00a3 at. Mayo Hall amd i\u00a7’lETl'{‘\u00e9i\ufb01.E’I’ the appevlleliit<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
f \u00a7<\/p>\n
wii’1’1(irew the suit O.S.:\\T0.5733\/O2 after obtaiiiiiig an<\/p>\n
order of st”‘aI.us–qLio in the subseque1’H V-‘suit<\/p>\n
O.S.i_\\io.26092\/O8 and all these show the <\/p>\n
the appellam arid i’1.11’i;her ex-‘en in the “”~eXej\u00a2iaI:’i(>rsi <\/p>\n
pi’c’>ceedihgs in Ex. N.14l  by <\/p>\n
respondem herein the app_c-:11a11t7.l’iie:d an\u00bb2i.;);jiitf*21i.ii)h.’4~4i\u00bb9.\/_2f)i0~.. ‘vvi(_’1;ii*–i1 was also<\/p>\n
her.’ E111  .i.h’e’ ‘appeii21r1I has filed<\/p>\n
dismissed and’
\nthe p?:&:sei*it. VS”\u00a71V\u00a7’;~.__iVI”.. wi:1_ir:.ir1 he  been unsuccessful
\nin geI.i’ii’i.g an “‘–r.:>1″‘(1i.ei’.\u00ab rift: ‘il]_j{.il’i(.’i’Ii’0Il 2-incl hence the<\/p>\n
ap.p_e}i2u:1Ie }1EV1″Su_(‘.()l)1C up before this em,ii’\u00a3. in this<\/p>\n
. 21p,D(*::\u00bb1_lA. i_A–sA’s.u(3h. the conciuet. of the appellant speaks<\/p>\n
H t:i;ii*1″‘;\u00a71i1i*ci1<'c:* is<\/p>\n
called for by this <t;r1e(i .Qr’\u00bbr.i’\u00e9:1._<\/p>\n
In i’~3i,1ppOl”1′ the aiiacwe cont.c1″it_ions, 1″c:iia1i1(>\u00a3.–3Vi9″p!\u00e9i’c%\u00a2{.1-‘.__._ .<\/p>\n
by the learneti (TOLIIISEI for t’h(fml”E?Sp(Jl.ifiC~1iii’.’SV’.E)i’I’_a <\/p>\n
decision 1’epc)rt:’c\u00e9d in 1988(1) <\/p>\n
NOC 96 (KANT) 39, AIR ‘l:9i;3Q s.”(:~. 1156;:’%i*ii{Ri…1.,9V92%<\/p>\n
KAR 554, 1983(2) Kgu.  979.249,
\nAIR 1977 RAJAs’1’HAt\u00a7i7 MYSORE 74.\n<\/p>\n
1965(1) KLJ  :”‘VIV”l”1V(>”:i1’1 U’1\u20ac? writ
\nPet-M0″    ::”\u00a7’*1″$V\u20acV7*v’Mi9I’0L1ght: to the<\/p>\n
a t.t.(:-1’1 if j_(:)11 cf V'[V1’V’Euiv’L_~”*f,7iI)’i.!ft”.~  i ‘ <\/p>\n
  i In the’iiig11t::”9,i;4ti’1e (_:o11E,e1’1t.i0ns put i01″ward<\/p>\n
by 4t;h’e –.].. (:(.)urt:
\n b-\u20ac7l<)'w*' calls for i11t'eri'e1*c'1'acrc~'?
\n As far as gram of temporary iI]jt.iI'}(',1,i()I"1 is<\/p>\n
Ci()1'1Ct?I'I']G?C}. it is relc-\u00e9vant tio 1*c:"!'e1' at this Vflil'1(f'Il,ll'\u20ac to 21<\/p>\n
CiCCiSi()l'1 0ft.l1is Court. 1'ep():'t:c:c:i in 1965(1) KL} 1370.<\/p>\n
in the (".2199 of La.icxshn'zir"ic1rasz'iiz1ic1t'{:1I"i. t'\u00a7z. othears Vs.<\/p>\n
;9\/ff'.\n<\/p>\n
ii}<\/p>\n
to which he seeks iI’1_jE.1I1(‘1.i\\r'(‘ i’eiz’c-‘*f pi’e<.'1i.ic1es
\nhim i"m111 obtaining such 1'e1i('*i'. Ii'1V;'L.11'i1('?1.ion"V
\nwill not be gr2':ii'1ted in aid of' .21 p0ssessi'(i'I'i~.f"*4. <\/p>\n
sec:L.ired by st.i'e1t.e;_$erii or trick.\n<\/p>\n
8. As far as ii’1i.c’*ri’i’->i’c2i’1cfe &1\u00a7;:\u00e9Iil:1S\u00abI_ tii1e.__:(>’i~.g.lw-*:j_i9″iii <\/p>\n
the iriai Court gl”E1I11′.iI’1g v(}_1′ I’\u20acf%.iSi’i1g injtii1(\u20actiit)i*i”: is<\/p>\n
(_’.(}I’1(_’.\u20aci’I1t’,d. ii: is also per\u20acii’i\u00bb:::ji:iii Io 1*cr.\u00a3ci’i’i’:(_3 i’:l_i’10111(‘.1′
\ndecisioil oi’ this CO{i__1;Y~,. i~ep’oi~ieci \u00bb,ii:if~–i.968{ii 1VI.ys.L.J.<\/p>\n
552. in the case of Raij’ganifn{1 V’\/”S, E”{..ifVi\u00abs:hr1appa, and<\/p>\n
the relcivziiifob\ufb01 :ifvs;ii’i(ii’is”inside 2i1?\u00e9”i—h”e following:<\/p>\n
 {NI oi’ i~.i;iii1}’3()i*2iry irijunc1’i0I1
\nf\u20ac%S14i:5\u00ab.()li i:h’e.”‘:sQi.ir1j\u00e9i”.\u00a72:ei’cise 0fd1’sci’et:.ioi1 by
\nt’ihe VC.\u00a7%m.i’1:.V’ ._  exercist: of CiisCi’et:ic)1’i<\/p>\n
__\u00a7 biii311()t. V’b\u20aci ligli:’.:]y i1’1\u00a3’e1*fe1’e(1 with by the
\n C(a”L’irt,. unless it. is shown that<\/p>\n
“i\u00a7X(i’ii’_CiS\u20ac of clisc1’et:.ion is 1,1l1I’\u20acE1S()I18.b]\u20ac<\/p>\n
‘ ‘(‘)l’ ‘(7, ic:l:pI7i::(?iC)lIS. ‘I’i1at a differc->1’1i View was<\/p>\n
‘ ptjssible on the {Butts and CiI”(?Ll1’1’1S1.’c1.I1(}\u20acS of<\/p>\n
“V .  tl’V1’e.c’c.ise. by itself will not be szifficieiii. to<\/p>\n
_,5ii’it’.erfci’e with the 01*ciei’.\n<\/p>\n
9. Keeping the \u00e9:1f()]”(“3′.S’c1id priricriples in view, if<\/p>\n
we \u20aciXE’1f}’}il’I(‘ the orcieif oi” the 1″i’i2;1i Court. it is iiotziced<\/p>\n
tile’-it the 2-ippeilaiit lmrciii IRES iiiectri fi;3;l’it:irigg the<\/p>\n
Ex<\/p>\n
9;\n<\/p>\n
$3<\/p>\n
seinie ‘A’ S(‘.l’1Cdl1l\u20ac property and order o1″i1’1ju1’iC1io1’1 <\/p>\n
also gxaiiteci in favoui’ of first respoiidem herein.<\/p>\n
to show that the siibjeet matter of the suit p1_f\u00a3>_g\u00a7’::1’iy.4’i.s<\/p>\n
also the subject maiiiier of suit filed by thetiespofideof <\/p>\n
No.1. Apart. from this. the 2-ippellaij1t1’\u00ab_l1:2ivi.1\ufb01g;.ubeeii_ <\/p>\n
Linsuecessllll in c%hal1er1ging_i..lie oifclei’ pa$\u00bb5\u00e9.ed”by f’he dvismissecl and so also the review<\/p>\n
.pe.tii.ioni,1.ha’t.is ended in dismissal. The appellant<\/p>\n
  in O.S.l\\lo’57’33\/2002 ag_\u00a7ai1’ist the<\/p>\n
ver}2xs’aar1ie “A’ schedule property and being not<\/p>\n
 sLie\/<\/p>\n
‘st<\/p>\n
[fa<\/p>\n
I.here21i”i’.e1″w21rcis. the appeliaiit witliciraws c-:2u’li<=;*1' .~_sL1ii_<\/p>\n
O.S.N0.5733\/2002. Apart fl'()l"I1 this. the e1ppeVl.}:v;ui1I "<\/p>\n
ever} pi."<3\\=-'\u20acIi{'t'.d the execution of the order c)bt:4i':1\u00e9:'L*i–'~..<\/p>\n
the first: l'\u20acSp()l'1d\u20ac1'1I in HRC N0.705\/ 2001  H<\/p>\n
applicatioii for 21pp0i1'1tmer1t \u00a2)ff\u00b0e1vC'<,mmis.siQiiie:p\u00e9md <\/p>\n
the said request, was I'\u20acj(3(?ti}':'.C1 bythe_ExecL1_i:iArig Co'1.'.1Ar'i, V<\/p>\n
and ()l1(',t'.' eig,{ai1'1 the 21ppei1?\u00a3ui'iI'i.1i10w\u00a5s;._'t"hi,r\u00e91 C;j)1,11*1 in
\nW.P.N0.449\/2010 xvhieh vxi\u00e9i\u00e9; giisg r\u00a7e3:;c:t;e\u00bbd.\n<\/p>\n
10. Thus. on ti”lv_(‘4:'(1116:i1{iI’1(1f’;.\ufb01i\ufb01’:Ei\u00a7Dpf311&’tflT gc)e:.~:;<\/p>\n
on tiliiig”‘:.’i1\u00a7\u20ac7:ce1S\u00e91: ‘r;as3r1″”c;.1f\u00e9’-()i’13′”t)1’* the other Court in one
\nor tEi\u00e9”r)ti1ef $’t3rI:iZ”{31’i\u00a3.._,\u20acii=-,,t.h..e same tirne, has no regard<\/p>\n
for  c)1’&1~e:’V’p2;$–sc\u00e9A(i_ by the HRC Court and ciofss not<\/p>\n
 \u20acV.f3IC’1 p:)n’1i.p1y with””‘i.he directions 1.0 vacate the suit<\/p>\n
“m<e1n:'sas ~\\%\u00a72hi"c:h. was the sub'e(:i_. m21t..tie1' of the HRC<\/p>\n
}jr_g)(:eeVdi;1i'gs'arid does not c:\\.-*e.:1 pay rent and does 1101<\/p>\n
 evL%:1"fi_lE3 the z:1ffid'c1vii'. within the time 'limii: prescribed<\/p>\n
  'wfhjiiea the HRC order was passeci. All tliese Show thaf<\/p>\n
___\u00a71ppe1lar1t.  litter disregard for the orders of the<\/p>\n
Court and wliethei" such a persoii can be gr;:1r1i:eci an<\/p>\n
()l'dE.'1' of i1-'1jur1c%i.i01'1 is the p()ii-ii" '[0 be (',(,}i'lSid\u20ac:'l'\u20ac('i arici<\/p>\n
i\u00bb<\/p>\n
la\u00bb<\/p>\n
in 21 de(?isi(m wliich I laave 1'el'errec,i in the bC'{_\u00a7ll'i1'}iI'1g of<\/p>\n
this 0rd\u20acr. this C()uri' has l'1E'.ld that 21 persQ1'1Vl"wl1~(_)<\/p>\n
C1()t'.S rmt. C.()me to the Court with (Tl("?E:ll'l l1.;\u00a71_1"1'<"'l;'s-iv."}1—-3:ic}'.._ '<\/p>\n
who himself is guilty of i1llS(2()I'1d'L.l()l. in .r'\u00e9Sp\u00a3i(':t' '()fvt1l1\u20ac=.V <\/p>\n
matter in controversy. does I1()E.7_<:*.ni\u00e9ji"i1l\u00a3;?d 'f~Z;)I'A":~'t_E"1:Ju16\u00a7ll\u00a7?Vlivl_A<\/p>\n
at the hands ofi.l1e Court." _'I'l1zc_- wrong c':;')ri;.di.1{i1waif tfhc:<\/p>\n
plaimiff in the pai"t:i(;u1ar f1f1_.'c1l.V:l:.(3If 'ogf {.1-ari3-a(;t.iQii with<\/p>\n
respect to which he  '-ii_1'1_\u00a7f-\u00a32}r1(fi:ix2ci\u00a7"elief prec:lL1des
\nhim from c')bt:ai1'i\u00e91_1g sstlbli';i.;’i_j1in;ti’Vi()11 will not be<\/p>\n
granted i1j_:.=’a”i<71__ i,5..lI.'_a 'pQ_:3siV\u20acvssiciii'-5Vsepaired by straiiegem<\/p>\n
_ll. "hi" ._{1;he'=_ 'i"f1st:a.r11 case. the above<\/p>\n
  c)b$\u20acr\\r:,\u00a21\u00a7:.ic;vs’1s are-V’a;’r’i”1’Vl ‘ a. 3 )licta.b1c=r and tiller trial Court.
\n. .  I E<\/p>\n
  t’_l1<_2i*c.f\u00a7)'r"\u00a3;:; \u00bbv'ii;%c1$f=f_;ust:ified in de(.:1ini1"1g to grant an order<\/p>\n
OfU\/1_i1lI'1.C?t,iO.E"lKU1 favour of the appellant. At" the same<\/p>\n
 l'IiETi1(i,zEi}]\u00e9: llfi\u00e9ll Court. has E.-akei'1 great pain to ctonsider<\/p>\n
"  of the d()Cumem;s pmciucred by t'l1c'r parties and<\/p>\n
.. Ml,'-ZEIS giveii its opinion as to why the c:l0cL1n1em.s plactecl<\/p>\n
by tl'1<;~.m 1:1.l't:'. not 1"e1cv-'a2'at for the pL,11"p()-gee of<\/p>\n
(1c')I1si(ie1"in;;\u00a7 the applicrz1i_i(')n l.A.:\\:'0.2. 'l'here'f<)re._ I<\/p>\n
.2\u00bb<\/p>\n
\u00ab.4<\/p>\n
3 .'-\n<\/p>\n
holci i”}’1z1i the disc1’c~1’ion cxc’1″(‘isc(i by (“F10 trial Com’!
\ndoes r10i C()l1’1\u20ac’ wit.11i1′: the (7aic*g_;_;'()1’~\\-‘ of di9i5(.’1’t’1i01′}<\/p>\n
exemiseci ce.1p1’i(::i0us1y or 1.11’11*E~as01’1e1biy, 1101’ _.._1,he<\/p>\n
(‘.Ol1(‘.1L1Si()l1 nvaclled by {he trial} Court. can be ‘a_\u00e9rn_i’e;i’._<\/p>\n
as [;)t’I’\\=’C1″SC’. The oiher dc(‘isi()11s 1’cfe1*1*ec1–,<\/p>\n
by “t 1i'<;:.  : "\n<\/p>\n
learned Counsel for the appe1iarz’t””(,:a111T1(i1. (\u00a7.r)rf1e _10 ‘his <\/p>\n
1’escue pa_rticuie11’Iy in the fa(‘.(‘ ()Vfv\\”(“\u00a5_’y. c;’fn.pV(jVra1’y<\/p>\n
i1’1junct:i0n in fav(>L11*V(5f7j.h(> a]5p@I.l”211’ii’ \u00bb.\\{e1’y di\ufb01’ict.1it.<\/p>\n
VvV’Wi111. \u00a7,11t3\u00ab’:?a?\u00a3b<J'i\u00ab~'e3a"'-<)b:s\u00e9\u20aci'V2itions. the appeal is<\/p>\n
dis111i\u00a7st*\u00a3'i.;\n<\/p>\n
  sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
3UDGE<\/p>\n
‘:ib\\’}1v.\/;V’i”1V:’  –<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 Author: V.Jagannathan I EN TH{‘\u20ac I*”EEGf”I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT %.3AN(}ALOI{\u00a3C i”)e:1t’.t:*.cl: This the 15″‘ day (.>I”Fe1)1’1,:a1z’y 2010 E53 ISFO R I353 m {+2 1—-Iom.31.\u00a3; MR .1 u&3″:’1c::.<: V JAGANN 'T . M.F.A. NO6356\/2.00E\u00bb'–\u00ab[-NIV=") B I*Z'I'V\\\/ISEN : SR1 M. MA1.1,:+:s1\u00bb1A1A1–.1. S \/0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2644,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010"},"wordCount":2644,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010","name":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T16:52:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-malleshaiah-vs-smt-kamalamma-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri M Malleshaiah vs Smt Kamalamma on 15 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}