{"id":153895,"date":"2009-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009"},"modified":"2018-07-27T02:19:28","modified_gmt":"2018-07-26T20:49:28","slug":"mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
IN THE HEGH COURT 0? aganawgga %? BANGALGRE\nDATED TEES THE 19\" SAY OF JuME,'2ae9\nBE?QR\u00a3:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTECE \u00a7.s. pACaHA\u00a73R3 WQ \n\nCREMINAL REVISIQN PE?ITI\u00aeN No.88\u00a7 GE 2008\n\nggwwaaw:\n\nSridhara S.V.Shetty,\nS\/0. Vittai Shetty,\n\nAged about 42 years,\nS\ufb01iva Sanidhi,\n\nKaiai Guttu House,\n\n'Kandttu,\n\nPost: Kukshekar, '~_ V ' >    ,\nMangalorem5?5 Q05. :V\"\"-f' W {_ '.a ; PETITIONEEXS\n\n{\ufb02y Sgi. KfSh&$hika\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7_Prasad, Adv.}\n\n&NB:\n\nSundar\"PGajarif\" \n\n\"U\ufb023fQ} Q\u00a7j\ufb01 Peojaii\ufb01wv\n\nV VAgad'abOut\"\ufb018 years,\n\n't2S\u00a7\u00a7ii N;$as,'%ea\u00a3 \u00a7a@e: Mill,\nA?\u00a23t:'\u00a5bdahgai\u00a7,\n\nHcsahettuf$:;iagep\nMoodbidrii3?4 22?. M RESPGNEE\ufb01TfS\n\nK:-2  .{8y 32:; Sa\ufb01ath Kumar Shetty, Adv.}\n\nai:\u00b0\u00a7a'~k\n\n__ \", '\"This \u00a2r1.R,\u00a7u is filed ufSeCtion 39? agd 4&1\n_ \"Cr;P.C. by the Advecata is: the gatitianer praying\n '=twT 39$ aside the Judgmeat of convictian amd the\n7.\u00a7rder af sentence \ufb01i. i8.1.2OS6 pas\ufb01ed by the Civil\n\nJudga \u00a7Jr. 8%.} & JMFC., Meodibidri, in C.C.\n\u00a7o.129fQ4 and tha same was confirmed by the 3\ndt. 3.\u00a7.2QG8 an t\ufb01e file 3f the 9.6., ETC~I, B.K.,\nMangalore, in Crl.R\u00a2 \ufb01G\u00a233f2QQ\u00a7.\n\n\n\nThis Crl.R.?. Gaming an for Admissien this \u00e9ay,\nthe court made the fsllowing:\n\nORQER\n\nThough the matter is posted for admis$i5n;\"Qith \n\nthe censent cf the counsel, it iS_taE\u00e9\ufb01 g\ufb01 f5r fi\ufb02ai'\n\ndisposal.\n\n2. The petiticn\u00e9r  hag' vcha;Ee\ufb01ged' his\n\nconvictian and semtence_ \ufb01a:= the \"offenbe undar\nSection 138 cf the .N\u00e9gdtiab:@ \"instruments Act\n\n[hereinafter referred tQ>a5_?t$\u00e9 Abf; for short} on\n\na tziai he\ufb02\ufb01 by the JM?C[;\"Md\u00a7\u00e9bidri,-and Confirmed\nin Crimia\u00e9lvV\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7e\ufb01l N\u00a7}\u00a73\/2806 by tha Fast Track\n\nCourt, M\u00e9hgaicr\u00e9,\n\n*\u00a73,\u00b0 The faQ\u00a7\u00a7_relevant fer the purpose sf this\n\n 1_rev\u00e9S:mn\\aK\u20ac as under:\n\nW,I ail: be raferring the parties a3 per their\n\n. rank\" b\u00e9fay\u00e9 the Trial Caurt for the \"purpose of\n\n\"_ce\ufb01$eni\u00e9Bce.\n\n'K'\"\"Th& \u00a7etiti0ner herein 35 the accus@& and the\n'~:%spondent hereia is the Camplainaat befare the\nTriai Caurt. The complainant submitted his\n\nrug\n\ncempiai\ufb01t ma\ufb01a: Saction 2&8 Cr...Cw is: taking\n\n\n\nacticn under Section 138 of the Act alleging that in\ndischazga 95 the money due ta him the accusgd ha\ufb01\n\nissued a cheque \u00e9ated 3\u00a7.G6.2Q@2 dxawn an Sy\ufb01\ufb01ibate\n\nBank far Rs.3,9Q,GQS--G8 in favour of the cQm\u00a7L\u00e9i\ufb01\u00a7n\ufb01 \n\nand he received the said cheque infga\ufb01d fagth and\u00a7\n\npresente\ufb01 the same for coi1e\u00e9tic\u00e9*thrcu\u00a7h'th\u00a7,5Eate\n\nBank cf My\ufb01ore andT the _Same was .di3ho\ufb01m\u00a7:ad and'\n\nretur\ufb01ed with an endarsemeg\ufb01 CE \"insufficient fund\"\non 06.68.2832. Emm\u00e9diatalyyvih\u00e9.\u00e9amplainant issued\n\nK'; -73\n\na lawyexs notice da:e\u00a7%.13.Q8\u00a720u4 fEo the accused\n\ndemanding th\u00e9 \u00a7hegu\u00e9'a\ufb01d\ufb01n\u00a7,_\u00a7\u00e9s@ite the service of\nnotiae, \"\"\" \"a$ jth\u00e9W;3ccused '\ufb01:d\" not comply with t\ufb01a\n\ndemand} the \u00a2s$\u00a71\u00e9i\ufb01aQ\u20ac'a\u00a7\u00a7reached the Trial Court\n\nand f;le\ufb02V5\"cQm@;ajnE in these facts.\n\n. VIn_pursua\ufb01c@m@\u00a7 the summons issued, the accuse\ufb01\n\n.V2appear9\ufb01*b@fb:e tha Trial Csurt and after recor\u00e9ing\n\nthe\"\u00a7lea, the complainant was examine\ufb01 as P.W.1 and\n\nthe udoium\u00e9\ufb01ts Exs.Pl is 6 were admittad in the\n\n',gvidenm\u00e9. The s\ufb01atemami sf the accugad was recaz\ufb01ed\n\n'=_\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7Qf Sectian 313 Cr.?.C. \ufb01e has taken the defence\n\n'~$f tatal denial and has act ie\ufb01 any \u00e9efenc\n\n.1\n\nevi\ufb01emae.\n\n\n\nand confirmed by the lowe: Appeilate_\u00ab\n\nCourt ara iiiegal and gerverse?\n\n6. It is the contention of the lea:ned,dQua$\u00e9ly\n\nfor the petitione: that thg\"mc0mpiai\u00a7a\ufb01t  \ufb01asg hot'\n\nmeatianed the particuiars of \ufb01he.\ufb01ran\u00e9aCtio\ufb01\"in his\n\ncomplaint and that he h\ufb013\u00a2@eni\u00e9d_th\u00e9xsiqhat@re gm\n\nEx.P5. Further he s\u00a7bmit\u00a7m\u00a3hatH\u00a7he Cempl\ufb01inant has\nmisused the blank  \u00a7heq\ufb01$i \u00a7\ufb015 :%fter fiiiing t\ufb01e\nblanka has pre5e@ted\"t\u00a7\u00e9 s\u00e9mg \ufb01g \ufb01\u00a7\u00a7 \u00e9ank. Hence he\nsubmits \ufb01ha\u00e9' %\ufb01\u00a7 .%vid%nc\u00a7Vi@fu E\u00a7@ cQmplainant is\ninsuff;\u00a7\u00a7$m\u00a7f E? 'C@\ufb01\u00a7\u00a3C\ufb01  &\ufb01\u00a7  p@titioner and the\n\u00a3udgm\u00a7nts:\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7 Q;\u00a7\u00e9r\u00a7 \u00e9f the bourts below are iliagal\nand pe\ufb01\u00a7?\ufb015\u20ac-' \u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7n\u00a7\ufb01i?@ly, he submits that he has\n\nalready paid half bf the amount and requests far 6\n\n ~mo\ufb01thsy\u20acime ta m\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 payment sf tha remaining amou\ufb01t.\n\n\"_H@T 'alsQMf\"3ubmits :0 reduce the gentence of\n\nimgrisonmaahi\n\nE33 contra, the learned ceanaai for the\n\n \ufb01:@3p\u00a7ndent $u@\u00a70rted t\ufb01a Jadgmemis and Qfd\u00e9f\ufb01 ef the\n\nWU C\u00e9urts belaw.\n\n?. SQ far as the perusai cf the euideaca of\n\n\u00a7.W.1 is concgrne\ufb01, ii i3 nec\u00a73sary' to mate tha:\n\nt\ufb01ere was a partnership buginasg beiween th\u00e9\n\n\n\nEx.?6--\u00a7eed of retirement and disseiutien ef the\n\nparteezship reveais issuance ef cheque fer\nR.3,90,G8G--QO and after receipt of the n0tiee%Ex.F3,\n\nthe petitioner did not care to :eply --\ufb01heL said\n\nnetice. Rpart frem this, he \u00e9id moi ,en\u20acef= the_\n\nwitness box and from these eircumsianceeg it ceui\ufb01j\n\nbe inferred that the aeeesee\ufb02hee\"\ufb01oen\u00e9u\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01eetg\ufb01\u00e9ee\nzeal facts befere the Ce\ufb01\u00a7e\u00a2 \u00a3\u00a7:$GU%e]Be\"eeee free\nSection 138 of the \ufb01at \u00a7\ufb01e;e*\u00a7s e'\u00a7\ufb01es;$ptien and\nthe fact that the ehe\ufb01ue was is$\u00a7\u00a7a,:o; discharge of\n\nthe debt or liebili;v and=t\ufb01et a netiee was iseued\n\nfez whieh}\u00bbf\ufb01hefe' was\" no _fepE\u00a7' having' been eroved\nsatiefecteriiy 2 item _ tee evieence sf P.W.1.\n\nThe\u00a7efere;g avVp:eeump:ion arieee under' law and' no\n\n\"e rebd\ufb01tei evide&Ce-eaVe been led by the accused \ufb01e\n\n'disbeiieve {he alieqatiens made by the'e0mpiaiee\u00a7t.\n\nI\ufb01 ie in tie context cf these circumstances that the\n\neeufts*Abeiow' en aeereeiatien ef the materiai on\n\n'V,reee\u00a7d\"have arrived at the eeneiesien to eenviei the\n\npeiitieeee fer the offence under Sectiee 138 of the\n\n8. ?he eceee of the xevisien is iimitee and\n\nthis Ceurt eaeeet re~appreeiate the evidence uniess\n\n\n\nL.\u00a2,L\n\n*%e petitiener establishes tbat there is caypicieus\nappreciation 3f the evi\u00e9ence. in the circum$tance3,\n\nE am 3% the opinion that the \u00a7&\u20acitiQ\ufb01\u20acE has \ufb01bt m\ufb01\ufb02e\n\namt any such graunds to warrag; \ufb01h@J1\ufb02\ufb01e\u00a5f\u00e9\u00a7\u20ac\ufb01CQ_i\ufb01\u00bb\"\n\nthe coaviation erder. So f3E\ufb02\"83: the. $enEenc\u20ac; is\nconcarne\ufb01, it is relevant to nbt\u00e9 that L 0;\n\n \n\nRs.3,\u00a7G,\u00a708w\ufb01Q wag \ufb02ue.\npay' compensation cf xRsfE,GQ}Q@Q9QO a\ufb01d a fine cf\n\nR5.5,\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7~GG and imp@s\u00e9d_s\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01enae=@f im\u00a7risonment Q;\n\n \n\n5 msnths a\u00a7  p%oQe%&i\ufb01@\u00a7 a\u00a7\u00a7E3\ufb02: the nature of\nquasi ci\u20ac\u00a7\u00a3Z\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9e\ufb01i\ufb01g\ufb01plifw\ufb01hink it wculd ha just\nand gfd\ufb01er \ufb01ts \u00a5\u00a7nn\ufb01\ufb01L\"th\u00e9 \"S\u00e9\ufb01temce of imprisanmeni\nord@r$\ufb01 by i\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01gr%$$\u00a7\u00a7i\u00e9w. in tha circumstances,\n\nI an$we: the gei\ufb01t Qaftly in affizmativa and partiy\n\nin \ufb01eg\u00e9tive a\ufb01d_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2cee\ufb01 to paaa the feliawing:\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
\u20ach@’\u00a7\u00e9titi0n is allowed in part, confirming \ufb01he<\/p>\n
 L,cc\u00a7viCiion cf the patitisner far the offance under<\/p>\n
‘\ufb01ec\ufb01ion 138 Of the Act. The sentensa cf impriscnmgnt<\/p>\n
-af \u00e9 msnths Ofd\u00a7IE\u00a7 by the ?riai Smart is set agide<\/p>\n
an\u00e9T the \u00a7ati:i@nez’ is ordered to gay’ comgensaiien
\nand E339 ardezed by t%e Ccurts bglow. If any amount<\/p>\n
has baen gaid during the pen\u00e9enc” of t\ufb01e<\/p>\n
prcseedinga, the same shail be deducte\ufb01. fr\ufb01m the<\/p>\n
amaunt af campansatien. The petitioner ia granted $<\/p>\n
{five} months time from the date sf ihis Dfd\u00e9f to<\/p>\n
p&y the compensatian and fine amount, ii d\u00e9f\ufb01ul\ufb01 \ufb01e <\/p>\n
\ufb01hakl undergo simple impfiso\ufb01me\u00a7tZ_fof six}<\/p>\n
months. Tha bail bonds a:$_canceiied; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure IN THE HEGH COURT 0? aganawgga %? BANGALGRE DATED TEES THE 19″ SAY OF JuME,’2ae9 BE?QR\u00a3: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTECE \u00a7.s. pACaHA\u00a73R3 WQ CREMINAL REVISIQN PE?ITI\u00aeN No.88\u00a7 GE 2008 ggwwaaw: Sridhara S.V.Shetty, S\/0. Vittai Shetty, Aged about […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":154,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009"},"wordCount":154,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009","name":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-26T20:49:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sridhara-s-v-shetty-vs-mr-sundar-poojari-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Sridhara S V Shetty vs Mr Sundar Poojari on 18 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}