{"id":154164,"date":"2010-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-03-18T12:59:39","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T07:29:39","slug":"s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATE!) THIS THE 21ST DAY 0:\u00bb SEPTEMBER, 2.910\nBEFORE \" 'T\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIV1_\u00a7E5ViI*'.\"  \n\nMiscellaneous First Appeal No: 8.01 1:\" K V'\n\nBETWEEN\n\nS Mahesha,\n\nS \/ O M Surendra Rao\n\nAged about 29 Years  A *  ' \nR\/at. No.138, Sharadha Ni1ay.j_a,v \"  '  \nGollahalli Village, Anjanapura';     9\nBangalore \u00bb 530 062,.\"   '\n\n' Appellant\n(By   go 4: ii\n1 . Ste\"  \"   4' V.\n. * S\/O. Vgrasarnurthy\n\n.   aboAu*;.  Years\nP~a\"rt\ufb01e1f, Srinivas Transport\n\nA\" A  A._tV'No\u00ab._6'4a4, 80 Feet Road\n\n  Gifr1'f1agarv~'II Stage\n Bangalore -- 560027.\n\n 2. ' fhe Divisional Manager,\n\n'I\"h.e Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,\n\nAA  Division Office,\n\n At D. 0. VI, No.232\/19\nPavithra South Avenue,\n9\"' Main Road, SK' Block,\nJayanagar,\n\n\n\nBangalore - 560 O1 1.\n Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri. K. Suresh, Adv. for R2.\n<\/p>\n<p>R1 &#8211; Served)<\/p>\n<p>This MFA is filed U \/ S 1&#8242;?3[li) of MV  .. Ci<br \/>\njudgment and award dated: 6f.&#8217;3.&#8217;2008&#8242;..passed._ in&#8217;~\u00a7Vl\\\/&#8217;=\u00bb&#8217;_3<\/p>\n<p>No. 2743\/2007 on the file of&#8217;\u00bb.._the&#8221;X}VIl\u00a7 Ad&#8217;dl\u00a7&#8221;VJndge,<\/p>\n<p>Court of Small Causes, Member;E\\\/iact~-4,i&#8217;Vl\u00a7Zletropo.litan;_<br \/>\nBangalore, [SCCH.No.4},&#8217; partly &#8220;~allo.win_g (&#8216;them elaimj<\/p>\n<p>petition for compensation ar:..d&#8221;*seeking_ enhancement of<br \/>\ncompensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>This appeal ConiirighonVpifor&#8217;aAdn&#8217;iission, this day,<br \/>\nthe Court, delivered the&#8217;_folioinrjpng;&#8217;~.,v 1 ._ <\/p>\n<p>This  claimant for enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>Cornpen&#8211;s&#8217;ation&#8221;avb&#8221;a1 the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p> A  i,.A&#8217;-Heard. x&#8217;The&#8221;appeal is admitted and with the<\/p>\n<p>  ofrv1:e&#8217;arned Counsel appearing for the parties, it<\/p>\n<p>  for final disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>~ it  For the sake of convenience parties are referred to<\/p>\n<p> as they are referred to in the clairn petition before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Brief facts of the case are:\n<\/p>\n<p>That on 16\/17-SW07 midnight, when the <\/p>\n<p>was riding a motor cycle bearing registrationji\\i&#8217;o;if&#8217;:Z\u00a7&#8211;V5\u00a7il-~.<\/p>\n<p>K8522 on Bangalore&#8211;1\\\/iangalore  -.<\/p>\n<p>Adichunch anagiri Hospital, Bel.1_vur,&#8217;- .. the   4 l &#8216;of, <\/p>\n<p>bearing registration No.~&#8217;ivi{_Aw16&#8217;4?5E~8  _i&#8221;ron1_:&#8221;e.<\/p>\n<p>opposite direction in a rash__an.d negligent manner and<\/p>\n<p>dashed against his&#8221;&#8221;niotor ;c;;\u00a21ep;;i  a result, the<\/p>\n<p>claimant  filed a claim<br \/>\npetition         it Eangaiore, seeking<br \/>\ncompensation   The Tribunal by<br \/>\nimpuigned:  award has awarded<\/p>\n<p>compensation \/&#8211; with interest at 6% p.a.<\/p>\n<p>  by the..Hq1i1.antum of compensation awarded by<\/p>\n<p>_  the claimant is in appeal seeking<\/p>\n<p>lenlhancerrierit of compensation.<\/p>\n<p>at As there is no dispute regarding occurrence of<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02accident, negligence and liability of the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ioffending vehicle, the only point that remains for my<\/p>\n<p>consideration in the appeal is:<\/p>\n<p>Whether the quantum of<br \/>\ncompensation awarded by the Tribunal is.<br \/>\njust and proper or does it cail fo1&#8221;,_<br \/>\nenhancement?   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>6. After hearing the learned Counseiu <\/p>\n<p>and perusing the award of theii<\/p>\n<p>View that the Compensation awardedby <\/p>\n<p>not just and proper, it is on&#8217;t1::e1owerVs&#8217;id&#8217;eanddtherefore<br \/>\nit is deserved to be     H V\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The ciajihant   it t the following<br \/>\ninjuries: V W t I<br \/>\n1}<br \/>\n A<br \/>\n&#8216;3) Iiiracturey  end of right radius<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; 4534s}_:FractuAre&#8217; of-metacarpal or right hand.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;7&#8242;.__y.Inju_ri\u20acs.t..;&#8221;sustained by him are evident from the<\/p>\n<p>woundv&#8211;._&#8217;:\u00a2er&#8217;tificate &#8212; Ex.P.7, discharge summary -~<\/p>\n<p>.c,&#8217;V:\u00a3e3;;.;P_.8,Vv&#8221;&#8216;Case sheet ~ Ex.P.10, admission record ~~\u00ab&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217;   and supported by oral evidence of the claimant<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;and doctor examined as P.Ws.1 and 2 respectiveiy.<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01r<\/p>\n<p>Claimant was treated as inpatient for 15 days at Sanjay<\/p>\n<p>Gandhi Hospital, Bangalore.\n<\/p>\n<p>P.W.2 ~\u00ab~ an Orthopaedic Surgeon <\/p>\n<p>Gandhi Hospital, Bangalore, has stated   _ <\/p>\n<p>that, he examined the c1aiii_1ant.4,AAfon&#8211;,,g <\/p>\n<p>assessment of disability and-.__found.riiovements of lifightl&#8217;,<\/p>\n<p>knee is restricted by 40 degree  has<br \/>\ndifficulty in sitting, powerldoixthe right<br \/>\ncodricepts muscles  in lifting<br \/>\nheavy  of 37% to<\/p>\n<p>right     limb and 28% to<br \/>\nthe wholeglboduynf -~  it   h <\/p>\n<p>8.  =\u00a3_onsid~eriiig thevnature of injuries, Rs.30,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>  by__the ribunal towards pain and suffering is<\/p>\n<p> , and it is deserved to be enhanced by<\/p>\n<p>another -R5&#8217;s,15,000\/&#8211; and I award Rs.45,000\/&#8211; under<\/p>\n<p>  iithis head.\n<\/p>\n<p>  Claimant has produced medical bills for<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 17,542\/\u00bb and the Tribunal has awarded Rs.20,000\/w<\/p>\n<p>\u00a352:\n<\/p>\n<p>towards medical and incidental expenses. Thereby, it<br \/>\nhas awarded Rs.2,458\/&#8211; towards incidental expenses.<\/p>\n<p>Claimant was treated as inpatient for <\/p>\n<p>Considering the same, it is on the \u00a7lov:Ie1f&#8221;-side&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>Therefore, a sum of Rs.25,0QU&#8217;\/&#8221;&#8211;&#8220;i\u00abs <\/p>\n<p>medical and incidental expenses.&#8217;.__ <\/p>\n<p>10. Claimant claims to &#8221; per<br \/>\nmonth, by Working&#8217;aalilla.irlead:VC&#8217;hC&#8217;ooit{&#8216; -But the same is<br \/>\nnot establishedby  In the<br \/>\nabsence   assessing his<br \/>\n and considering the<br \/>\nperiod &#8216;of  &#8220;three months, has awarded<br \/>\nRs.9,O0Vt);!..-gt   of income during laid up<\/p>\n<p> The san:1_e..is just and proper and there is no<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; sscope-for;enhancement under this head.<\/p>\n<p>ll. Coiisidering the disability stated by the doctor<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;A and  amount of discomfort and unhappiness which<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02the: claimant has to undergo for the rest of his life,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;lRs.15,000\/~awarded by the Tribunal. towards loss of<\/p>\n<p>amenities is just and proper and there is r1o&#8217;scope for<\/p>\n<p>enhancement under this head.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. Claimant aged about 28 years. Multiplier<\/p>\n<p>applicable to his age group is &#8217;17&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>assessed at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; per month. Consiideringidddthe <\/p>\n<p>disability stated by the dootorsitod the_ i\u00abirn.bsd,:_&#8221;disahilityr<\/p>\n<p>caused to the whole body v4C.o&#8217;rn._es errf\ufb02urld it<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, future loss of&#8221;-Iineome&#8217;  out to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,53,000\/&#8211; {Rs.3:,0.0Qi.:&#8217;;25]..1.00  &#8220;12 X17].<br \/>\nConsidering that the  the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>at Rs.l,61.280}{.s&#8217;pis  is worked out<\/p>\n<p>here, it does notVj&#8217;req\u00bbuire__ enhancement.<\/p>\n<p>13. awarded Rs.5,000\/~ towards<\/p>\n<p>  fuo_t&#8217;1\u00a7u*e__r11eVdicai&#8221;&#8216;cxp_er1ses. The same is just and proper<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; send.  rrot&#8217;require enhancement.<\/p>\n<p>iii:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>14. Thus the claimant is entitled for the following<\/p>\n<p>compensation:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) Pain and suffering Rs. 1&#8242;\n<\/p>\n<p>2) Medical and incidental  &#8221; L&#8221; T&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p>Expenses    1 A V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>3) Towards loss of income<\/p>\n<p>during laid up perioidi&#8221;  A  <\/p>\n<p>4) Towards loss of a1ne=nitie=sg..iv Rs.&#8221;  1&#8217;5&#8242;,OVG&#8211;0\/&#8217;=73, f<\/p>\n<p>5} Future loss of income.__  Rs;..1,&#8217;61i2&#8217;8_U~\/}&#8221;~._<br \/>\n6} Future medica\ufb01iexpensesi   v.5_V,0Q0\/4 <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;1?isi2,6(9.28G\/-<\/p>\n<p>\nAccordingly   part and the<br \/>\nJudgment     modified to the<br \/>\nextent  Ciaimant is entitled for<br \/>\na   i&#8217;..iV{Vs&#8217;.V\ufb01,6O,28O\/- as against<br \/>\n the Tribunai with interest at<\/p>\n<p>6%&#8217; pa.   enhanced compensation of Rs.20,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>  claim petition till the date of<\/p>\n<p> ._ res1isati.on{:&#8217;V<\/p>\n<p>* !&#8217;i:7he Insurance Co. is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>it uenhanced compensation amount with interest within<\/p>\n<p> two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>judgment and the same is ordered to be released in<\/p>\n<p>favour of the claimant.\n<\/p>\n<p>No order as to costs.  .  ,   <\/p>\n<p>mgn*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATE!) THIS THE 21ST DAY 0:\u00bb SEPTEMBER, 2.910 BEFORE &#8221; &#8216;T THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIV1_\u00a7E5ViI*&#8217;.&#8221; Miscellaneous First Appeal No: 8.01 1:&#8221; K V&#8217; BETWEEN S Mahesha, S \/ O M Surendra [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":941,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\",\"name\":\"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010"},"wordCount":941,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010","name":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-18T07:29:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-mahesha-vs-sri-raghunath-on-21-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S Mahesha vs Sri Raghunath on 21 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}