{"id":154243,"date":"2008-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008"},"modified":"2014-03-06T09:57:38","modified_gmt":"2014-03-06T04:27:38","slug":"sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ounr oa= KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AOF’-KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT cs KARNATAKA HIGH count<\/p>\n
3? TIE HEQH CQURT GP KA%\ufb01TAI{2\u00b0\u00a3 KI’ BEE<\/p>\n
mma ms 13$ 25% my {BF  ~ <\/p>\n
T}-IE’: HSETELE gum ;ms’fIC$ ‘v; <\/p>\n
REGU1;-\u00a353 s,\u00a7c9I*\u00a7.1.;\u00a7&:a??\u00a7\ufb01;._i\u00bb;.  1   L<\/p>\n
BENEEH:<\/p>\n
am WEEEH 3; G”1*?2\u00a5iG1\u00a3\u00a7?’E3?A. Aaiiiztm
\n\ufb01\u20ac3EBAB\ufb01.E”I’5\u00a7  1
\nma; \u00a7”:QV3’3}ER\\f\u00a3gIa*T.   .
\nKfQE’\u00a7.\u00a7\u00a7fC}\u00a737i’ ::.’1     <\/p>\n
mama\u00bb-1:   mm
\n{}EJL\u00a7\u00e9%1;R\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7.;.V_EIS”\u00a3’RI\u20aciT &     <\/p>\n
    mm
\nSE1 mama  T<\/p>\n
  ,  &’:\ufb01i\u00a7{;E4E~”\u00a5\u00a3CE;ASEEJ BY ms<\/p>\n
V   Wm mzmapm PALKI<\/p>\n
L g%gss:%E1m mm”? 53 mans, 0:39; Hwaewm
\n ma S  WW3, $%.\u00a5LB:a.RG:2 DIs’rRIc’r<\/p>\n
 u  2\u00a7*  \ufb01gvmamwa<\/p>\n
am SAEGAPPA PALKI
\n5:13:35 Ami’ 35 YEARS, me: BUSEIE$$
\nRm S  mm, GEILBARGA \u00a33IS’I’RI(:T<\/p>\n
3 maswazam
\n:~3; Q SMIGAPFA FALKI
\nawn \ufb01r 29 ‘mam, me; Bmmsss
\ngm     ~   mm, amamm Dimmer<\/p>\n
ci\u00e9\ufb01m\ufb02s\ufb01 the: suii; sf fig piafnti\ufb01. it was:
\nrse\ufb01af :3? \ufb01miara\ufb01arz. {If tit};-, nmzadamry <\/p>\n
wxwmzgi injumtimn agamt \ufb01gs   O”  *  ‘  <\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a3% fam 333. baisf   ‘:\n<\/p>\n
a\u00a7m-E;%x’2?; arm 13% <\/p>\n
x*e%e:f am we izsmt\ufb01m   property<\/p>\n
whlmh 123 a W31 72 feet 5 inschas<\/p>\n
am smgghgg.   hams bearing<\/p>\n
C     aamni Chowk,
\n$hampazu  ta me pzamm.\n<\/p>\n
was    the sale 65% -\u00bb
\nEsx\ufb01l  cieath of the: plaintifs
\n    ssh @al heir hamw tE<\/p>\n
 ‘yrmpezrigr whisk was the subject<\/p>\n
  ~\u00bb– E-x.P.1. \ufb02amequmztbr, the<\/p>\n
‘  is. the suit propesrty E alsv owned<\/p>\n
   in tha sa\ufb01 mm and the rmgumt mada<\/p>\n
 pgzmzig saga an daaf mm, ihe p1am’ ti\ufb01’ had to<\/p>\n
OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AOFKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
‘imam gm mas. cam rm ralitzf by \ufb01\ufb01ng the suit in<\/p>\n
q\ufb01m\ufb01ant <\/p>\n
3, The &s:=.:femiar2.m mntastw the said suit cf the:
\ng:%ain*a\u00a5\u00a7’ by ta\ufb01m up 3 mam \u00e9mt the suit <\/p>\n
mt ‘r\ufb01axzg \ufb01es: the glajxat\ufb01’ as” 3:513  <\/p>\n
mle ma dam mt mm:\n<\/p>\n
mag’ **\u00a7\u00a7::\u00a7$;. ‘  B3’? Tfae   O   ‘Vat  J<\/p>\n
asy pm::~.s: sf iime and  “flag <\/p>\n
Trmreming mg Q’\u00a7\u20ac”33\u00e9:.”~f,\u00a7”_ af   not arise.<\/p>\n
  \ufb02ag    of tim\n\n \n\n;:a'\u00a7air:\u00a7:\u00a3' i\ufb01     329 the wall\nin qkieuvstiam    allcawetl\ntthc      fuaur iasuas am\n<\/pre>\n
my s::;:sr:\u00a7\u00a2\u00e9xr.::\u00a7.s%?1;:z*:g: ‘thg\u00e9 record, the ma: \u00abJudge
\nhag   in favtzmr af the plaimi\ufb01<\/p>\n
  aauii ef tine plazinti\ufb01’ was dwwed.<\/p>\n
 E\u00e9ie bei\ufb01g \ufb01mew and a. dzrex:t1o’ ‘ :1<\/p>\n
   &efe’:x1\u00ab&am ta remmias tho: vmtztilaters<\/p>\n
 %a*-fifzevvwaazmn walk the d\ufb01en\u00e9ants pm\ufb01erred<\/p>\n
 Mam the: iewzsaf appcsllatn (Inuit in<\/p>\n
 azz\ufb01 the Imrrzed Judge of trim lower<\/p>\n
 fsgggzusi\ufb01ata Sam. after app-mciza\ufb01xlg the. evi\ufb01ancae 0:1<\/p>\n
OUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURTR.OF:’.:KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNNAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
regard f\ufb01\ufb01llzi thaa the \u00e9n $ pmduced by the<\/p>\n
%t<\/p>\n
DURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
fly, gm me am – Ex.P.;i*.did not<\/p>\n
mm} \u00a3333: {km amt ymgaariy was mnrxw\u00e9 <\/p>\n
macxthtw mad as-;:s:>nd}\u00a7r, the:  <\/p>\n
mmtkzas aim aa mt. atep\u00a7’;:Air1t;::A4\u00a71*;;;e”‘s3;i\u00e9g@.’:u– a.a3,r._  <\/p>\n
tha: “aim 32:31:, WOW  er
\nf\ufb02r fiiaa mattarg the   as
\n\u00a2$r.m:ac::sr1 wa\ufb01 by-‘   A Thwafere, the
\nIwamr Rpwiigate  Cnurt misread
\ntha    imgartanoc to the
\n   a\ufb01 has c:::mm1med.’
\n35%:-max;  rciisf of \ufb01aclarat\u00e9arn and
\n   Cnurt aim: opined that wkn<\/p>\n
  m gm zmmre nf dmlaratian and<\/p>\n
%   k, –  it is immbent an rm part arm
\n  m have ermure\ufb02 t\ufb01wzt the ph1’r1tE\ufb01’ ph\ufb01<\/p>\n
‘ V  w\u00e9danm ta grave his aswnaarship over the suit;
\n  mud in am\ufb01nm mi” may evidemrae \ufb01zrthmming<\/p>\n
{mm tits phamti\ufb01a side: rm gamve the mrmarahip, it<\/p>\n
in\ufb01rm? mania? \ufb01le in rmpaesct nf {Em 311$! pmpmty ta 1%
\ngz\u00e9sin\u00e9\ufb01l 1%: 3:? far thae reamm, Elms iowar appe\ufb02ate
\nG\u00a2um\u00e9$mmmedtk\u00a7 af\ufb02mw\ufb011wm\ufb01w<\/p>\n
Jr<\/p>\n
fa<\/p>\n
OUR? OF KARNATAKA I”-KGH COUR’\u00a3”O_;F KARNATAKA HIGHCOURT OF KARSIATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
a\ufb01awizxg $321: ap\ufb01i grafenm by 1:11: dafmdang suit
\n9:? tha p  was   <\/p>\n
afarwa\u00e9i cimisimz at” the \u00e9aswar  <\/p>\n
 ma \u00a7  11173        <\/p>\n
 E\u00e9mwse hwl\ufb01
\nam eamfal\ufb01y’   ormh the C<:=u1'1:a\n<\/p>\n
   -Sri.\u00a7s3hok Patil, Iearzzue\u00e9
\n  ma: ma xnww Appenam
\nmfg 15::-e\u00e9m\ufb01 the decision es? the u-$5.1<\/p>\n
\ufb01gu\ufb01  ma oeaenaidereci all the isaum<\/p>\n
 ‘by;  i:’s.———-;’-srgg pmspax\ufb01wae\/havixg \ufb01ard in t&
\n‘   an me:-ya. Samndly, it was submitted<\/p>\n
  is evaidi ta kx\u00e9iamm that the suit property<\/p>\n
 *$I”3.\u00a7$}’\u00a2d skma 1mg 1% tht\ufb01 plainti\ufb01’ and eariiar<\/p>\n
  \ufb01g mg\ufb01mr an\u00e9 hm amends: ax\ufb01 tlamefam the Enwer<\/p>\n
\ufb01ypei\u00e9am Cam maid mt ham \ufb01xtmfmed with that
\n r\ufb01c\ufb02r\ufb01ed by-*’ the miai \ufb01aurt. En this mnneciion,
\nI\u00a7&3:”‘1’3.:’f\u00a5.\u00a7 Qimxmel teak rm thmugh rm judgmxmt of fin<\/p>\n
Emrwar \ufb01g\ufb01geilata Qmzrt in paixzt taut that the learned<\/p>\n
$\/<\/p>\n
‘-4<\/p>\n
Jaadga mi’ Ea away \ufb01spwilaiva Caurt was i::i–“+:1*r0r in<\/p>\n
igmrizzg fiw aural mti\ufb01ams pkczaad by <\/p>\n
am’; rm: $3′ m~;g Am\ufb01mr subm\ufb01:-\u00a7i{\u00a7\u00a3:;:.rri\u00a7;\u00a7<\/p>\n
the Zmver ageppeiiatsa Court  <\/p>\n
ga\ufb01ata fir?’ d\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 ancti has_r:.u_u;t
\npmmigm 3:? mam 41 am 31 3%’
\nthis reeastg\ufb02 ma, thn  eff
\nmm zmm\u00e9m tn \ufb01e  The<\/p>\n
icsawar \ufb01\ufb01m\ufb01ats   mm  that<\/p>\n
tha \u00e9ef      mm’ the wit
\npgawgy bf;   the said wall.\n<\/p>\n
    But an the 91% hand,<\/p>\n
*~;::r;’ery$:E\u00a7* mlcma main: of the ewldeancm<\/p>\n
 5327:.  wda by DW-}. and EH1-2.<\/p>\n
_ \ufb01’E?i’\u00a7?~’1f’ii’\u00a7%\u00a5  31.i?w5f;a5\ufb01\u00a7:\u00a7a1 qumtian sf law as mitxeme.-cl’ in<\/p>\n
  sf” appeei armies. for mxzg\ufb01ara\ufb01nn in<\/p>\n
$5 G2: the athm hand, the learned {Enamel<\/p>\n
DURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
 Kama? Ramw far the rwpandexata arguad<\/p>\n
that *:;’\u00a7’:ze: m\ufb02mkep wmmiitaad by the ‘trial Ccurt. has been<\/p>\n
3\/<\/p>\n
3.)<\/p>\n
IOURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COUR’Alb’..Ai”)F_:KARNATA!(A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
F\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01if\ufb01 3:3\u00a7? $:\u00a71\ufb01 Eawmf \ufb01gwliatc {hurt in as mzmh as: thus<\/p>\n
w\u00e9\u00e9e \u00e9\ufb02mment upnrz w\ufb02cb. the piaixlti\ufb01’ <\/p>\n
{3iP\u00a3’.’I” \u20ac513 gm: pramrgt is. EILF1, 1:113  <\/p>\n
wid’ stlscmzzrumam dam mt    <\/p>\n
Ea\ufb02arge\ufb02 32\u00a2 211% \u00a7\u00a3&iI’1t*%\ufb02”\u00a7’ Par
\n w in an  of   m.m
\nmimmg gm   me plamms
\nzmsfizeag,   yanmd any
\nra\ufb01\u00e9ai;    and mandatnry
\n has failed to pmve 11′:\n<\/p>\n
   \ufb01iga quvmtizzn of g,ranting miicf
\ncf   ma am also tim athm relief<\/p>\n
  smwzs arm Tm gran\ufb01ng tha afemaid mlicaf
\n .   when a\ufb01saizztely :21: evidence gs there to<\/p>\n
  mg ma: pmwzy Iwiangad to am plainturs
\nF ‘  Ax fax aa 2% sral emenm is concerned, the<\/p>\n
 O\u00e9ahmftasiag magi: wy the mm Ccumcl far the<\/p>\n
rmpaz3%er’z’m. is twt arai mr\u00e9zderzm zzanmnt take the a\ufb02ect
\n$1’ cmfmgts at” miss dad EXP}. and themfzre the laweer
\n\ufb01ymlkte \ufb01aurz has  dacli to Isak Eats the oral<\/p>\n
E:\n<\/p>\n
zouar or KARNATAKA H!GH coum’_.o.*=._:t<A12NAm<A HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH couxr or KARNATAKA HGH cozm<\/p>\n
avidsme: w\u00e9m \u00e9sc*:'a%ntaty ev\ufb01enaa akms
\n'ms \u00a7mw aha  }\ufb01p of tha suit  the
\n\u00a7\u00a7a:i.t'1$\ufb01Z.Et -wag am summed Ehat <\/p>\n
Semi has prapearly  x<\/p>\n
\ufb01wmrm\u00e9aw   " ext"\n<\/p>\n
mmlu\ufb01mm and has    af \nma} \ufb01amrt.    laslm marit\nm\u00e9    imoxued in tlim\n far no-midaratiun by\n'@5122   , in is suhmittneci\n<\/pre>\n
tli\u00e9\u00e9   aaf Iowa” Amllate Cceurt has<\/p>\n
gmgg\u00e9.    wrmxch mm a}} the asauas<\/p>\n
_f\u00a79~f:a–.mz:=xi W Quurt ansi mesh:-e 110 am: is
\n  \u00e9n. this ward. Ga mm aubmaiom, the
\n  :V Z:{:$’i1r3.5\ufb01\u00a7. far we rmpanden:-.5 PI-ayed fur<\/p>\n
 af tbs aweal.\n<\/p>\n
 Hav%@ thaw \ufb02rd both skim, the only point
\nfag” mr\ufb01iiiazatimn \ufb01g whetimsr arxgs substantial queatiom<\/p>\n
9? law grim fur mns\ufb01\ufb01rawn in this appeal.<\/p>\n
3\/<\/p>\n
6|<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
S\u00bb E\u00a2f\u00a2re, I prma\ufb01 ta amwer thin said qu\ufb01tiona,<\/p>\n
it 23$ mm\ufb01aaaw tn lnaep Emvieraw the  laid<\/p>\n
dam: @352 the Agar; Caurt in rand <\/p>\n
a\u00e9zhmmmiimi qumtzimn at’ law   <\/p>\n
Cimm: em; *ma;erfcz’\u00a2 in, $w\u00a2\ufb01ss:1A:’a%1n  Lia
\nv\u00e9:-yam am pzmzsible. In”‘\u00a7:1’g=\u00a3*2w5:eV’\u00a3’.-_iV_’ VIVJS.<\/p>\n
Saar: Ema Eaji\ufb01   ha regani in
\nO    the domain cf the
\n “””    the gxuurxds on
\n mg m ax-zma at, by the am
\nV”‘:*t.:f:.\u00a7;1..*t*fi: 51? {he \ufb01rs; appellate court. It
\n  is. tf”.1\u00a7:{fkm:1ms*ar aype\ufb01ate mun shceuld not<\/p>\n
”    W’i!::\u00a3’1%$m acxaeyted by the:<\/p>\n
IOURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURfl7O\u00a7? KARNATAKA HEGH COURT O\u00a5 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT O\u00a5 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HM’.-‘vi-I COUR1<\/p>\n
 $5-a::ur%*, 5m raped: at”  q but everx
\n‘ it ms rmcma the wimcsm accepted
\n  tk 3’35} wurt, the same is no graund for
\n; \u00e9zrltariezrerxce 23;; 5mm Appeal when 5: is
\nfmszizi that the appe\ufb01ate cxzzurt baa
\naatia\ufb01acmzy magmas for minim 50.. In 5 case
\nwiw 5mm 3  set 1:? cirmzmstances tum
\n\ufb01\ufb01  xcsf fact am geaa\ufb01la. am drawn by
\ntlm lrawar awliats emit: w\ufb01l mt e :iz’11;\u00a2rt’e:mv:1<\/p>\n
by ‘Elm High Cmirt \u00a7x1 \ufb01awr\ufb01 Ail.<\/p>\n
}\/<\/p>\n
\\c<\/p>\n
E5. Ta be ‘aubatan\ufb01ai’ a qum\ufb01nn <\/p>\n
must he zlebaiabie, ma garevicusly
\nlaw \ufb01g” gm hn\ufb02 at a
\nmamt haw a material     ” ” <\/p>\n
\naftkme case, if    \n\ufb02ue  mf um   ii \n\n  -.  Tc:     V\n\n<\/pre>\n
22:: mg   12\u00a2 rg\u00e9aa .a,_AAf\u00a2:\u00a73\u00a7r1daticn
\nfar it %air;1   the question
\n\ufb01malzi e\u00bb.mr51’*g\u00a77 \ufb01nditw
\n:2?  aytjisycem :39 am} it must
\n  of Law for<\/p>\n
a jaist and   1};-\u00e9tuzi\ufb01n\u00e9g
\nimfaree the High  is’…V_.$*i3;ru1’1::-\u00bb:’\u00a7-Qtgzinm\ufb01on
\nixnmlm in the mag:  iggo\u00e9a triizha root
\narms mam. \u00a7\u00a7\ufb01ir\ufb01;1_;V”c1f;er\u00e9f\u00a7:=a,…\ufb01cv33e:1d on the
\nmm mm mm whatber
\n3 c53.13sti@nVA \u00a5:%\u00a3{‘    cane am
\n   the par\ufb01unt
\n Belg the ma \ufb01or<\/p>\n
 ii     ‘nalaw ‘between the
\n{,”tf:’\ufb011iga’\u00a3:isn 15′: (in justice at all<\/p>\n
mm ur mmnmm mun COURT QFKARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0: KARNATAKA HIGH counr or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA new cougr<\/p>\n
“:3-;LaVgmi:  g;g3%::5apea11m nmmizy sf mrniding
\n in the lit’: mf say Es.\n<\/p>\n
Ex<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
DUE? OFKAHQATAKA HG!-1 COURT,\u20ac3F_; KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OFKARNNAKA HIGH COURT OF KARN4I1\\l(A HIGH COURTCF KARNATAKA HIGH COURI’<\/p>\n
E2<\/p>\n
9.. zzwym thz: ahczve prmcipxw in  haw
\ncar\u00e9z\ufb01gs  the ju\ufb01\ufb01nt cf Q\ufb01uzm<\/p>\n
‘mloxxa The plaixati\ufb01’ whet \u00a33 ma
\nazzit in qizwtriun     <\/p>\n
may %a c\ufb01wlared as 1:11? a1a\u00a7’ \u00a3.a:\u00a7\u00a7~af
\nwmh hayyaas me he
\npraa\ufb01ue\ufb02\ufb01 by \ufb02zxc piaanziei   am me
\nawait pmway is mm; 3313 deed under<\/p>\n
wmzg    g\ufb01ichaaw the pa-mtg
\n  as b.L:;e been held
\n C\u00e9uri dam  indicate that ms
\n owned by the plamtifs mnthm.<\/p>\n
 um’  has {am to prmre 5:-am Exm that
\nA ‘A  in qasmtimn is met. awnad by his rzxothw
\n .  ax \ufb01nm her wander, the ma: mcmr
\n  amsa\u00e9awea \ufb01 as 33:: whsthes: the wall \u00a311 qumian
\n AA  wmswa\ufb01 aa a m:z%n wan, so that tha p1zinti\ufb02’<\/p>\n
 slam aasassmmcxt to @111: War it. In owes’ tn<\/p>\n
asta\ufb01i\u00e9\ufb01h Ehis facmr m e1.ri:ier1ce \u00a33 plank by the
\n and Em \ufb01\ufb01htly omwred by the laws: Appcllata
\nCant: \ufb01mt 1.113 vezzairar 9%” \ufb02ags mnsther has not ban<\/p>\n
3:\n<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
axanmmzi as skew mat simtae time:  suit<\/p>\n
wall %& qavmt\u00e9nn Wm be?@ enjoyed <\/p>\n
, Le. (kw: ..-7 .,      ;\n<\/p>\n
hzma\ufb01 aw that $53 aasmn\u00a3= ‘bar  _t1:.\u00a2v “a.a:d.,__<\/p>\n
 Ix<\/p>\n
mu, mm 3-uni: Tm the   <\/p>\n
vvmtclszg r::\u00bbf tlm pmmzws mmzimr dnm.1’r1qj; Iizeforev’  I
\nSear: ms agaimm\ufb01aba the Shim sf  01%
\nthin gmund aim) 3. View
\n\ufb01ouri s:.. t be   aaid
\nthan: than Imvsx    properly
\ntrnamtzzrmzw \ufb01w _ E\u00a7:.P}.. Mere
\nera} 3&3: \u00bb:.:\u00bba\u00a7   7am not help tm
\ngases cs? 22%    erwne-.1-ship aver
\ntI*1,e_g~g:;:;;’t   the M15 deed imelf ‘n<\/p>\n
 221%: anfammlni. cf’ aral evidence<\/p>\n
    Emma by the male am<\/p>\n
V A   tithe sank dwd dams not revml that
\n    Ivaa 21$ pre\ufb01x}? purcha\ufb01 by the
\nI   under \ufb01rm aais clean} \ufb01n quvmmrn.’<\/p>\n
BURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH COURT VICARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
‘E3. in V5.99? sf ‘\u00a3113 abmte raas::n.i1Jg,Ia:zn ::f the<\/p>\n
$2355? tikm\u00e9i tifm lewsmr \ufb01pwilatc Cmzrt has pmparly
\n  iha aevi\ufb01aw am rm:-:31 and more an, the<\/p>\n
3\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘I<\/p>\n
DURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT\u00bbO’F’VKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
ak\ufb01waa\ufb01azm 8% ma Iewer A\u00a7pB1}B.’$z\u00a3% Czmrt  trial<\/p>\n
Camm gug\ufb01 tn have y\ufb01illy <\/p>\n
ham’ an mm: Ea the nature: <31' mnef  <\/p>\n
p\u00e9aingz\u00e9i\ufb01g agamm ta ha the    <\/p>\n
amt;\n<\/p>\n
magma in Elm    Om\nmm\ufb01 W    mm mm!\n , s\u00a71.V   , I sin that see any\n\n<\/pre>\n
arm:   the Euwm Apyaellatae Court aw<\/p>\n
 .. ‘Vthe Exawer \ufb01pmkte Ceurt has mt<\/p>\n
O   xwaimxa spakcza. it; by the wimmses, that<\/p>\n
L O  a gumld ta mm w\ufb01h 1:113 judwt of<\/p>\n
A  1 \ufb02izzrlawaf Appenm cam an\ufb01 mix is salear from the<\/p>\n
”  gbsmas\ufb01m cz;\u00a7 \u20ac115 am iimxrt: En the a\u00a3::m~\u00bbmm1tim1ed<\/p>\n
mm, serkzw\ufb01m is: has Ema hazeld that when the Agpellatc
\nCauri. Em  3a’\u00ae\u00a3a;::’mr\u00a7r xmacrzs and where a case
\ng’mrais.\u00a2tetwr::ix1fsra%Ea:abec3rawt1andt}w<\/p>\n
\ufb01ypei\ufb01ata \ufb02auzrt \u00e9rawa ax: ?\ufb017m*ez’1c:a nther than the one<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008 Author: V.Jagannathan ounr oa= KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AOF’-KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT cs KARNATAKA HIGH count 3? TIE HEQH CQURT GP KA%\ufb01TAI{2\u00b0\u00a3 KI’ BEE mma ms 13$ 25% my {BF […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Suresh S\\\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\\\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2126,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Suresh S\\\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\\\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Suresh S\\\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\\\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008"},"wordCount":2126,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008","name":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki ... on 28 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-06T04:27:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresh-so-nagappa-arikeri-vs-sri-sangappa-so-siddappa-palki-on-28-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Suresh S\/O Nagappa Arikeri vs Sri Sangappa S\/O Siddappa Palki … on 28 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154243"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154243\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}