{"id":154506,"date":"2008-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-11T18:49:51","modified_gmt":"2017-08-11T13:19:51","slug":"smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n
Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A Shrivastava<\/div>\n
Bench: A Shrivastava<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
A.K. Shrivastava, J.<\/p>\n
1. The plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by the trial Court and  the appeal which he filed has also been dismissed by the first appellate  Court by the impugned judgment and decree, has filed this second appeal  assailing the judgment and decree of two Courts below and praying to  decree the suit.\n<\/p>\n
2. In brief, the case of plaintiff\/appellant as borne out from his plaint  is that State of Madhya Pradesh is his tenant and the suit  accommodation was taken to run Veterinary Hospital in the suit  premises. Earlier the rate of rent was Rs.500\/-per month,  however, later on, the rate of rent was enhanced to Rs.550\/-per  month.\n<\/p>\n
3. The husband of the plaintiff has retired from Government  service and is sitting idle. Plaintiff’s son Surendra Singh having age  of 32 years has already completed his studies and is unemployed.  The suit accommodation is required bona fidely by plaintiff and her  son Surendra Singh to start the business of grain in which her  husband would also assist and she has no reasonably suitable nonresidential accommodation of her own in the township of Niwari,  District Tikamgarh and hence the suit has been filed after giving  and serving notice on the respondents, since the same was not  vacated by the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
4. The plaint averments have been denied by the defendants  by filing written statement. In the written statement it has been  pleaded that earlier to the filing of the present suit, the plaintiff  filed a suit alleging her bona fide need for residential purposes  which was decreed by the trial Court but in appeal, filed by the  State, the same was allowed and the suit was dismissed by learned  1st Additional District Judge, Tikamgarh in Civil Appeal No. 62A\/2000 on 24\/7\/2002. Thus, according to the defendants, the  earlier judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 62-A\/2000 will operate  res judicata in the present suit and the same is not maintainable.\n<\/p>\n
5. Learned trial Court framed preliminary issues in respect to  the maintainability of suit on the ground of res judicata and after  hearing the parties, dismissed the suit holding that the judgment  dated 24\/7\/2002 passed in Civil Appeal No. 62-A\/2000 by learned  1st Additional District Judge, Tikamgarh, would operate as res  judicata in the present suit and, therefore, the same is not  maintainable. Eventually, learned trial Court dismissed the suit on  the ground of bar of res judicata. The appeal filed by the plaintiff  has also been dismissed by the learned first appellate Court.\n<\/p>\n
6. In this manner the present second appeal has been filed by  the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
7. On 13\/2\/2008 this Court admitted this second appeal on the  following substantial question of law:\n<\/p>\n
 Whether the decision of earlier civil  suit No. 69-A\/2000 dismissed in civil  appeal No. 62-A\/2000 would operate  as res judicata in the present suit  which is based on the ground as  envisaged under Section 12(1)(f) of  the M.P.Accommodation Control Act ?\n<\/p>\n
8. The contention of Shri Umesh Trivedi, Learned Counsel for  the appellant, is that the earlier suit was filed for residential  purposes by the plaintiff showing her bona fide need and the same  was dismissed by learned first appellate Court holding that the suit  accommodation is not a residential one but is a non-residential  accommodation and the Veterinary hospital of the defendants is  running in the suit accommodation, therefore, since the  accommodation is let for non-residential purposes, the same  cannot be got vacated for non-residential purposes and, hence, the  appellate Court dismissed the suit of plaintiff on that ground. The  contention of Learned Counsel is that present suit has been filed by  plaintiff on the ground of bona fide need for herself and her major  son to start the business of grain and, therefore, the present suit  cannot be dismissed on the principle of res judicata. In support of  his contention, Learned Counsel has placed reliance on Single Bench  decision of this Court Sohanlal v. Sheikh Barkatukddin 1981(2) MPWN Note 223.\n<\/p>\n
9. On the other hand, Ms.Nidhi Verma, Learned Counsel for the  respondents\/State, argued in support of the impugned judgment  passed by learned two Courts below and by inviting my attention to  the findings of learned first appellate Court in para-11 has  submitted that the present suit is barred by principle of res judicata  and learned two Courts below did not commit any error in  dismissing the suit as such. On these premised submissions, it has  been submitted by Learned Counsel for the State that this appeal be  dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
10. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, I am of the  view that this appeal deserves to be allowed and the case is  required to be sent back to the trial Court to try the suit on merit.\n<\/p>\n
REGARDING SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW:\n<\/p>\n
11. On going through the judgment passed by learned 1st  Additional District Judge, Tikamgarh in Civil Appeal No. 62-A\/2000  decided on 24\/7\/2002, this Court finds that the appeal filed by the  State\/defendants was allowed holding that the suit accommodation  was given for non-residential purposes on tenancy basis and the  same cannot be got vacated showing the bona fide need for  residential purposes. Admittedly, the present suit which is a  subsequent suit has been filed by the plaintiff is for non-residential  purposes on the ground of bona fide need to start the business by  the plaintiff and her son Surendra Singh. Thus, the matter of the  present suit is not directly and substantially in issue which was  directly and substantially in issue in the former suit between the  parties. In the earlier suit the matter in issue was whether  plaintiff’s need is bona fide to reside in the suit premises, and the  matter in issue in the present suit which is subsequent, is  altogether different and is whether the plaintiff’s need is bona fide  to start the business. According to the parties the suit  accommodation is non-residential, therefore, the same can be got  vacated only for non-residential purpose. Thus, the matter in issue  of both the suit is not at all identical and, therefore, application and  bar of res judicata does not arise and the present suit is not barred  by the principle of res judicata.\n<\/p>\n
12. In the case of Sohanlal (supra) it has been held that  strictly speaking the principle of res judicata as contended in  Section 11 of CPC is not applicable for eviction suits in all cases on  the same ground. A fresh suit for eviction on the same ground can  lie if the circumstances are changed. The circumstances, in the  two cases may not be identical and, therefore, the rejection of the  plaintiff’s earlier suit for eviction on the ground of his bona fide  need would not necessarily operate as res judicata. In the case of  Jethanand v. Mahendra Kumar 1981MPRCJ Note 39, it has  been held that if basis of landlord’s claim in later suit different from  that in earlier suit, the decision of earlier suit would not operate as  res judicata. Long back the law was settled by P.V.Dixit, J (as His  Lordship then was) in the case of Harakchand v. Karodimal 1957 JLJ 809 that the finding in the previous suit for ejectment of  a tenant from a house, on the question of landlord’s genuine  necessity for the house existing at the time of institution of that  suit cannot operate as res judicata in the subsequent suit where  the basis is the landlord’s genuine necessity as existing on the date  of the later suit. The ratio decidendi also applicable in the present  case.\n<\/p>\n
13. Substantial question of law is, thus, answered in negative.\n<\/p>\n
14. Resultantly, this appeal succeeds and is hereby allowed.  The judgment and decree of two Courts below holding the present  suit to be barred by res judicata is hereby set aside. The case is  sent back to the trial Court to decide the suit on merit. The  respondents shall bear the cost of appellant throughout including  the costs of this appeal. Counsel fee Rs.2,000\/-, if pre-certified.\n<\/p>\n
15. The parties are hereby directed to appear before the trial  Court on 7th April, 2008. Registry is hereby directed to send the  record post-haste so as to reach the trial Court before 7th April,  2008.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008 Author: A Shrivastava Bench: A Shrivastava ORDER A.K. Shrivastava, J. 1. The plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by the trial Court and the appeal which he filed has also been dismissed by the first […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\\\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1389,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\\\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\\\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008","datePublished":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008"},"wordCount":1389,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008","name":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam ... vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya ... on 14 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-11T13:19:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mithilesh-kumari-wo-padam-vs-pashu-chkikitsa-sahayak-shalya-on-14-february-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt. Mithilesh Kumari W\/O Padam … vs Pashu Chkikitsa Sahayak Shalya … on 14 February, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154506\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}