{"id":15484,"date":"2010-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-15T08:23:20","modified_gmt":"2019-01-15T02:53:20","slug":"amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.A\/2257\/2009\t 5\/ 8\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nAPPEAL No. 2257 of 2009\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nAMRUTBHAI\nASHABHAI SHRIMALI - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nPARSHOTTAMBHAI\nAMBALAL PATEL &amp; 1 - Opponent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nUA TRIVEDI for\nAppellant(s) : 1, \nNone for Opponent(s) : 1, \nMR AJ DESAI, LD.\nADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Opponent(s) :\n2, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 28\/01\/2010\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tappellant has preferred this Appeal under Section 378 of the Code of<br \/>\n\tCriminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal<br \/>\n\tdated 30th March 2007 passed by the learned 6th<br \/>\n\tAdditional Senior Judicial Magistrate, Gandhinagar, in Criminal Case<br \/>\n\tNo. 08 of 2006, whereby the learned Magistrate has acquitted the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused of the charges levelled against him.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tshort facts of the prosecution case is that the complainant and the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused<br \/>\n\twere residing in one sector and knows each other. It is also the<br \/>\n\tcase of the complainant that the respondent-accused<br \/>\n\ttold the complainant that he wants to sale his plot No.128\/1 in<br \/>\n\tSector -4A, Gandhinagar in a sum of Rs.1,50,000\/- (Rupees One Lac<br \/>\n\tFifty Thousand Only).  The complainant thereafter purchased the said<br \/>\n\tplot after paying consideration of Rs.1,50,000\/- (Rupees One Lac<br \/>\n\tFifty Thousand Only).  It is also the case of the complainant that<br \/>\n\tin the presence of Notary Agreement was also entered into between<br \/>\n\tthe original complainant and<br \/>\n\tthe original accused. Thereafter the complainant came to know that<br \/>\n\tthe plot in question was also sold to other person. Against this,<br \/>\n\tthe complainant also gave an advertisement in the newspaper and<br \/>\n\tcancelled the Agreement. On being asked to the respondent-accused,<br \/>\n\the informed the complainant that he is giving three cheques in lieu<br \/>\n\tof Rs.1,50,000\/-, which is received by the respondent-accused<br \/>\n\tfrom the complainant as a consideration of plot in question. The<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused<br \/>\n\thad given three cheques to the complainant.  When on 21st<br \/>\n\tNovember 2002 the complainant deposited all the three cheques in<br \/>\n\tGandhinagar, two cheques were returned dishonoured with endorsement<br \/>\n\t insufficient balance .  It is also the case of the prosecution<br \/>\n\tthat because of this, the complainant  issued notice to the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused<br \/>\n\ton 05th December 2005 to return the cheque amount within<br \/>\n\t15 days.  The respondent-accused<br \/>\n\thas not given proper reply to the notice issued by the complainant.<br \/>\n\tTherefore, the complainant had filed the complaint under Section 138<br \/>\n\tof the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent-accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter<br \/>\n\tthe trial was conducted before the learned Magistrate. To prove the<br \/>\n\tcase of the prosecution, prosecution has produced oral as well as<br \/>\n\tdocumentary evidence. After considering the oral as well as<br \/>\n\tdocumentary evidence, the learned Magistrate has acquitted the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused from the charges alleged against him by the<br \/>\n\tjudgment and order dated 30th March 2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>Being<br \/>\n\taggrieved and dissatisfied with the said judgment and order dated<br \/>\n\t30th March 2007 passed by the learned Magistrate in<br \/>\n\tCriminal Case No. 08 of 2006, the appellant has preferred the above<br \/>\n\tmentioned Criminal Appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>I<br \/>\n\thave heard Mr. Mukesh Dave, learned counsel for the appellant. I<br \/>\n\thave also gone through the papers and the judgment and order passed<br \/>\n\tby the Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Just<br \/>\n\tto prove the case of the prosecution, prosecution has produced oral<br \/>\n\tas well as documentary evidence. Heard Mr. Mukesh Dave,  learned<br \/>\n\tcounsel for the appellant.  He has taken me through the evidence of<br \/>\n\tprosecution witnesses. He has vehemently argued that the learned<br \/>\n\tJudge has not properly considered the  oral as well as documentary<br \/>\n\tevidence produced on record. He has read oral as well as documentary<br \/>\n\tevidence and vehemently argued that the complainant-present<br \/>\n\tappellant has prima-facie case and it is a good case for admission.<br \/>\n\tMr. A.J. Desai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service<br \/>\n\tof notice on behalf of the State. He, therefore, contended that the<br \/>\n\tjudgment and order passed by the learned Magistrate is without<br \/>\n\tappreciating the facts and evidence on record.\n<\/p>\n<p>I<br \/>\n\thave gone through the judgment of the Trial Court. I have also<br \/>\n\tperused the reasons assigned by the learned Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>At<br \/>\n\tthe outset it is required to be noted that the principles which<br \/>\n\twould govern and regulate the hearing of appeal by this Court<br \/>\n\tagainst an order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court have been<br \/>\n\tvery succinctly explained by the Apex Court in a catena of<br \/>\n\tdecisions. In the case of<br \/>\n\tM.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State of Kerala &amp; Anr, reported<br \/>\n\tin (2006)6 SCC, 39,<br \/>\n\tthe Apex Court has narrated about the powers of the High Court in<br \/>\n\tappeal against the order of acquittal. In para 54 of the decision,<br \/>\n\tthe Apex Court has observed as under:\n<\/p>\n<p> 54.<br \/>\n\tIn any event, the High Court entertained an appeal treating to be an<br \/>\n\tappeal against acquittal, it was in fact exercising the revisional<br \/>\n\tjurisdiction. Even while exercising an appellate power against a<br \/>\n\tjudgment of acquittal, the High Court should have borne in mind the<br \/>\n\twell-settled principles of law that where two  view are possible,<br \/>\n\tthe appellate  court should not interfere with the finding of<br \/>\n\tacquittal recorded by the court below.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thus,<br \/>\n\tit is a settled principle that while exercising appellate power,<br \/>\n\teven if two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the<br \/>\n\tevidence on record, the appellate court should not disturb the<br \/>\n\tfinding of acquittal recorded by the Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Even<br \/>\n\tin a recent decision of the Apex Court in the case of State<br \/>\n\tof Goa Vs. Sanjay Thakran &amp; Anr. Reported in (2007)3 SCC 75,<br \/>\n\tthe Court has reiterated the powers of the High Court in such cases.<br \/>\n\tIn para 16 of the said decision the Court has observed as under:\n<\/p>\n<p> 16.<br \/>\nFrom the aforesaid decisions, it is apparent \tthat while<br \/>\nexercising the powers in appeal against the order of acquittal, the<br \/>\nCourt of \tappeal would not ordinarily interfere with the order of<br \/>\nacquittal unless the approach of the lower Court is vitiated by some<br \/>\nmanifest illegality and the conclusion arrived at would not be<br \/>\narrived at by any reasonable person and, therefore, the decision is<br \/>\nto be characterized as perverse. Merely because two views are<br \/>\npossible, the Court of appeal would not take the view which would<br \/>\nupset the judgment delivered by the Court below. However, the<br \/>\nappellate court has a power to review the evidence if it is of the<br \/>\nview that the conclusion arrived at by the Court below is perverse<br \/>\nand the Court has committed a manifest error of law and ignored the<br \/>\nmaterial on record. A duty is cast upon the appellate court, in such<br \/>\ncircumstances, to re-appreciate the evidence to arrive to a just<br \/>\ndecision on the basis of material placed on record to find out<br \/>\nwhether any of the accused is connected with the commission of the<br \/>\ncrime he is charged with.\n<\/p>\n<p>Similar<br \/>\n\tprinciple has been laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of State<br \/>\n\tof Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Veer Singh &amp; Ors, reported in 2007 AIR<br \/>\n\tSCW 5553 and<br \/>\n\tin Girja<br \/>\n\tPrasad (Dead) by LRs Vs. state of MP, reported in 2007 AIR SCW 5589.<br \/>\n\tThus, the powers which this Court may exercise against an order of<br \/>\n\tacquittal are well settled.\n<\/p>\n<p>It<br \/>\n\tis also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the<br \/>\n\tappellate court is not required to re-write the judgment or to give<br \/>\n\tfresh reasoning, when the reasons assigned by the Court below are<br \/>\n\tfound to be just and proper. Such principle is laid down by the Apex<br \/>\n\tCourt in the case of State<br \/>\n\tof Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy, reported in AIR 1981 SC 1417.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thus,<br \/>\n\tin case the appellate court agrees with the reasons and the opinion<br \/>\n\tgiven by the lower court, then the discussion of evidence is not<br \/>\n\tnecessary.\n<\/p>\n<p>I<br \/>\n\thave gone through<br \/>\n\tthe judgment and order passed by the Trial Court. I have also<br \/>\n\tperused the oral as well as documentary evidence led before the<br \/>\n\tTrial Court and also considered the submissions made by learned<br \/>\n\tadvocate for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tTrial Court has, after appreciating the oral as well as documentary<br \/>\n\tevidence, found that the complainant has failed to prove beyond<br \/>\n\treasonable doubt that cheques were issued in connection with legal<br \/>\n\tdebt.  It is the duty of the prosecution to prove the main<br \/>\n\tingredient of section 138 that there was a legal debt.  The<br \/>\n\tprosecution has failed to prove that the cheques, which were<br \/>\n\treturned dishonoured, were issued from which accounts. In the<br \/>\n\tpresent case, it is on record that there was a breach of the<br \/>\n\tcontract entered into between the original complainant and the<br \/>\n\taccused. The allegations levelled against the respondent-accused<br \/>\n\tis of civil in nature.  It is also observed by the learned<br \/>\n\tMagistrate that the prosecution has failed to satisfy the main<br \/>\n\tingredient of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The<br \/>\n\tTrial Court has observed that there are serious lacuna in the oral<br \/>\n\tas well as documentary evidence of prosecution. Nothing is produced<br \/>\n\ton record of this appeal to rebut the concrete findings of the Trial<br \/>\n\tCourt.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thus,<br \/>\n\tthe appellant could not bring home the charges against the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused in the present appeal. The prosecution has<br \/>\n\tmiserably failed to prove the case against the respondent-accused.<br \/>\n\tThus, from the evidence itself it is established that the<br \/>\n\tprosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned<br \/>\n\tcounsel for the appellant is not in a position to show any evidence<br \/>\n\tto take a contrary view in the matter or that the approach of the<br \/>\n\tTrial Court is vitiated by some manifest illegality or that the<br \/>\n\tdecision is perverse or that the Trial Court has ignored the<br \/>\n\tmaterial evidence on record.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\n\tabove view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that the<br \/>\n\tTrial Court was completely justified in acquitting the<br \/>\n\trespondent-accused of the charges levelled against him. I find that<br \/>\n\tthe findings recorded by the Trial Court are absolutely just and<br \/>\n\tproper and in recording the said findings, no illegality or<br \/>\n\tinfirmity has been committed by it.\n<\/p>\n<p>I<br \/>\n\tam, therefore, in complete agreement with the findings, ultimate<br \/>\n\tconclusion and the resultant order of acquittal recorded by the<br \/>\n\tcourt below and hence find no reasons to interfere with the same.<br \/>\n\tHence the appeal is hereby dismissed. Record<br \/>\n\tand Proceedings to be sent back to the Trial Court, forthwith.  Bail<br \/>\n\tbonds, if any, shall stands cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Z.\n<\/p>\n<p>K. Saiyed, J)<\/p>\n<p>Anup<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010 Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.A\/2257\/2009 5\/ 8 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2257 of 2009 ========================================================= AMRUTBHAI ASHABHAI SHRIMALI &#8211; Appellant(s) Versus PARSHOTTAMBHAI AMBALAL PATEL &amp; 1 &#8211; Opponent(s) ========================================================= [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1629,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010"},"wordCount":1629,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010","name":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial ... on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-15T02:53:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrutbhai-vs-additional-senior-judicial-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amrutbhai vs Additional Senior Judicial &#8230; on 28 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15484"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15484\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}