{"id":15535,"date":"2009-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-27T01:31:54","modified_gmt":"2017-12-26T20:01:54","slug":"tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 32421 of 2009(W)\n\n\n1. TOWER VISION INDIA (P) LIMITED,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n4. ADV. SUKUMARA PILLAI,\n\n5. MR. ABRAHAM GEORGE @ JOY, PROPRIETOR,\n\n6. MR. BABY, (PROPRIETOR),\n\n7. MR. ALEX, (PROPRIETOR),\n\n8. MR. MAHESH, (MOTOR CYCLE MECHANIC),\n\n9. PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :01\/12\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n           KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n            -----------------------------------------\n      W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009, 33113 of 2009 and\n                        33114 of 2009\n            -----------------------------------------\n          Dated this the 1st day of December, 2009\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Kurian Joseph,J.\n<\/p>\n
           These writ petitions are filed at the instance of<\/p>\n
service providers\/infra-structure service providers, who have<\/p>\n
been issued licence by the Department of Telecommunications<\/p>\n
for the erection of mobile towers and for their operation. It is<\/p>\n
also seen that the local authority concerned had issued building<\/p>\n
permit for the construction of the tower. In some of the cases,<\/p>\n
it appears, after the issuance of the building permit, the local<\/p>\n
authority concerned itself had issued a stop memo. Some of<\/p>\n
the people at the locality entertained an apprehension with<\/p>\n
regard to the hazards to their health and they physically<\/p>\n
obstructed the petitioners from taking up the construction of the<\/p>\n
tower though the same was permitted by the local authority<\/p>\n
concerned and though they had the licence.         When the writ<\/p>\n
petitions came up before this court, it is seen that this court had<\/p>\n
issued a direction to the Police to render necessary police<\/p>\n
protection for the construction of the tower, in case there is no<\/p>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n
prohibitory order issued by any statutory authority or any court<\/p>\n
of law. It was also made clear that the commissioning of the<\/p>\n
tower will be done only after obtaining further orders from this<\/p>\n
court. The order regarding commissioning as above was issued<\/p>\n
in view of the reference order dated 24-3-2009 in W.P(C)<\/p>\n
No.6433\/2009 and connected cases, to the Larger Bench. The<\/p>\n
following are the two questions referred to the Larger Bench:-<\/p>\n
         1)     Whether the construction of a Mobile Base
\n                Station by itself will give raise to a dispute
\n                of civil nature, merely for the reason that a
\n                section of the public apprehends that it may
\n                cause some health hazards and whether a
\n                larger question of this nature as to whether
\n                such Mobile Base Station could cause any
\n                health hazard could be decided in a petition
\n                filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
\n                India.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         2)     If the petitioners have obtained licence in
\n                accordance with the relevant statute in force
\n                and when they start functioning of a Mobile
\n                Base Station, can anybody cause any
\n                physical obstruction to such work, without
\n                raising a dispute and seeking remedies
\n                available to them under law, and in case,
\n                any such physical obstruction is caused, is
\n                not the Police bound to act and whether in
\n                the   absence,    this   Court   could   issue
\n                necessary directions to the Police.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n
The Larger Bench is yet to consider the reference.<\/p>\n
      2. We find that none of the members of the public or for<\/p>\n
that matter any local authority has challenged either the licence<\/p>\n
granted     to   the   petitioners   by   the   Department      of<\/p>\n
Telecommunications or the permit granted to the applicants, as<\/p>\n
the case may be, before this court. Apparently such challenges<\/p>\n
could not have been taken up before this court in the ordinary<\/p>\n
course since any person aggrieved by an order passed by the<\/p>\n
local authority is to pursue his grievance before the Tribunal for<\/p>\n
Local Self Government Institutions.        Similarly any person<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the licence granted by the Department of<\/p>\n
Telecommunications is to pursue the matter before the TDSAT.<\/p>\n
If there is any other issue, the same is to be sorted out before<\/p>\n
the civil court.\n<\/p>\n
      3. Be that as it may, it is reported that pursuant to the<\/p>\n
interim orders granted by this court, the applicants have either<\/p>\n
completed the construction of the base tower or the same is in<\/p>\n
the process of construction\/completion.     In that view of the<\/p>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                                4<\/span><\/p>\n
matter since the issue referred to the Larger Bench has nothing<\/p>\n
to do with the construction of the base station, we do not think<\/p>\n
that there is any point in keeping these writ petitions before this<\/p>\n
court. The construction is undertaken only on a licence issued<\/p>\n
by the Department of Telecommunications and a permit issued<\/p>\n
by the local authority concerned.         If the local authority<\/p>\n
concerned has issued a stop memo for any valid reason and in<\/p>\n
case the same is in force, it is for the service provider\/infra-<\/p>\n
structure service provider to pursue the matter in appropriate<\/p>\n
proceedings before the Tribunal for Local Self Government<\/p>\n
Institutions.  Similarly, if any of the respondents or for that<\/p>\n
matter any person is aggrieved by the permit granted by the<\/p>\n
local authority for the construction of the base station or by the<\/p>\n
licence issued to the service provider\/infra-structure service<\/p>\n
provider, it is for that person to pursue the matter before the<\/p>\n
TDSAT. If there is still any other dispute, it is for the party<\/p>\n
concerned to approach the civil court. Unless interdicted by any<\/p>\n
such forum or a competent authority, petitioners are free to act<\/p>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n
according to the licence\/permit granted to them.<\/p>\n
       Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of making it<\/p>\n
clear that in the event of any person\/party approaching the<\/p>\n
Tribunal or TDSAT. referred to above or the civil court, such<\/p>\n
forums shall consider the issues taken up before them ignoring<\/p>\n
the factual position that pursuant to the interim order granted by<\/p>\n
this court for police protection, the construction of the mobile<\/p>\n
tower has been either constructed or started construction. We<\/p>\n
make it clear that the construction thus made will be subject to<\/p>\n
the orders, if any, passed by the forums as referred to above.<\/p>\n
Still further it is made clear that the petitioners cannot claim any<\/p>\n
equity on the only ground of the construction.         We make it<\/p>\n
further clear that if any such forum is approached by any of the<\/p>\n
parties, that forum is free to consider the matter on all available<\/p>\n
grounds and that the construction had been made as permitted<\/p>\n
by the High Court shall not be taken as an objection for dealing<\/p>\n
with those aspects. However, it is made clear that in case there<\/p>\n
is no interdiction from any competent forum, and in case the<\/p>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                               6<\/span><\/p>\n
construction is made in accordance with the permit\/licence from<\/p>\n
the local authority\/ competent authority, there cannot be any<\/p>\n
physical obstruction in doing a lawful activity. In the unlikely<\/p>\n
event of any obstruction in such circumstances, the police shall<\/p>\n
render necessary assistance.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                               (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                               (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)
\nssn<\/p>\n
W.P(C)Nos.32421 of 2009,
\n33113 of 2009 and 33114 of 2009<\/p>\n
                               7<\/span><\/p>\n
                                  KURIAN JOSEPH &
\n                                 C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n<\/p>\n
                                —————————\n<\/p>\n
                                W.P(C)Nos.24020, 28688,
\n                                28689, 28690, 28691,
\n                             28946, 28982, 28987,
\n                       28988, 29118, 29222
\n                                 and 30057 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                                —————————-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                       JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
                                   28th October, 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 32421 of 2009(W) 1. TOWER VISION INDIA (P) LIMITED, … Petitioner Vs 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM … Respondent 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 3. THE SUB […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nTower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1098,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009"},"wordCount":1098,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009","name":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-26T20:01:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tower-vision-india-p-limited-vs-the-superintendent-of-police-on-1-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tower Vision India (P) Limited vs The Superintendent Of Police on 1 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15535"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15535\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}